IGCSE · course IGCSE
Cambridge IGCSE Physics
Connect the ideas, make your working visible, and test the result. Use the hints when you need a starting point; open the full solution after your attempt.
Extra challenging questions
A selection from this pathway. Open a topic below for its complete practice and challenge set.
A convincing graph with a hidden timing error
Optional enrichment: this challenge may extend beyond the usual syllabus depth and assumes confidence with algebra and graph interpretation. A trolley travels at constant speed. A single observer measures elapsed time after each distance from the start line. The stopwatch resolves 0.01 s, the distance uncertainty is ±0.01 m, and repeat readings scatter by ±0.03 s. The time–distance data are supplied below. The observer starts the watch after the trolley passes the start line. Supplied data (Distance / m; Recorded time / s): (0.2, 0.15), (0.4, 0.35), (0.6, 0.55), (0.8, 0.75), (1, 0.95). (a) Find speed from the graph gradient and the timing offset. Explain why distance divided by each recorded time gives inconsistent speeds. [3 marks] (b) Design a fair test of the claim that added mass changes speed, and distinguish precision from accuracy in this evidence. [3 marks]
Elapsed time against distance
Supplied question data. Read the labelled axes and use the observations to test the physical model.
Vertical axis (y): Recorded time / s
Horizontal axis (x): Distance / m
Read the exact data as a table
| Distance / m | Recorded time / s |
|---|---|
| 0.2 | 0.15 |
| 0.4 | 0.35 |
| 0.6 | 0.55 |
| 0.8 | 0.75 |
| 1 | 0.95 |
These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. No fitted trend is drawn.
Show a hint
Begin with part (a): Find speed from the graph gradient and the timing offset. Explain why distance divided by each recorded time gives inconsistent speeds.
Reveal the worked solution
- The gradient is (0.95−0.15)/(1.0−0.2) = 1.0 s m⁻¹, so speed is its reciprocal, 1.0 m s⁻¹.
- The line is t = x/(1.0 m s⁻¹) − 0.05 s. Its nonzero intercept reveals the common timing offset.
- Dividing x by t assumes a zero intercept; that assumption fails most strongly over short distances.
- Choose added trolley mass as the independent variable and interval speed as the dependent variable; keep slope, release position, wheel condition and gate spacing fixed.
- Use several masses and repeat each condition, recording SI units. Two light gates remove a human start delay; guard the run-out area.
- The 0.01 s display resolution is finer than the ±0.03 s repeat scatter. Repeats improve precision of a mean but cannot remove the systematic 0.05 s timing error.
Answer (a) Speed = 1.0 m s⁻¹; recorded time is 0.05 s too small. (b) Change mass alone; measure speed over a fixed interval with light gates, repeats, and controlled release.
Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.
A gas law that fails on a Celsius axis
Optional enrichment: this challenge may extend beyond the usual syllabus depth and assumes confidence with algebra and graph interpretation. A fixed amount of dilute gas is sealed in a rigid container. After equilibrium at each bath temperature, its absolute pressure is measured as supplied below. Assume ideal-gas behaviour and no leakage. The gas occupies 2.0×10⁻³ m³; take R = 8.31 J mol⁻¹ K⁻¹. Supplied data (Temperature / °C; Absolute pressure / kPa): (0, 100), (27.3, 110), (54.6, 120), (81.9, 130). (a) Extrapolate the pressure–temperature line to zero pressure and estimate the amount of gas at 0°C. [3 marks] (b) Predict pressure at 136.5°C and explain the microscopic mechanism. What if the container is allowed to expand at constant pressure instead? [3 marks]
Gas thermometer calibration
Supplied question data. Read the labelled axes and use the observations to test the physical model.
Vertical axis (y): Absolute pressure / kPa
Horizontal axis (x): Temperature / °C
Read the exact data as a table
| Temperature / °C | Absolute pressure / kPa |
|---|---|
| 0 | 100 |
| 27.3 | 110 |
| 54.6 | 120 |
| 81.9 | 130 |
These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. No fitted trend is drawn.
Show a hint
Begin with part (a): Extrapolate the pressure–temperature line to zero pressure and estimate the amount of gas at 0°C.
Reveal the worked solution
- The slope is 10/27.3 kPa °C⁻¹. Extrapolating 100 kPa down to zero requires a decrease of 273°C.
- Use absolute temperature T = 273 K and SI pressure 100000 Pa in pV = nRT.
- n = 100000(0.002)/(8.31×273) ≈0.0882 mol. The mathematical intercept motivates an absolute scale; a real gas condenses before this extrapolation reaches zero.
- 136.5°C corresponds to 409.5 K, 1.5 times 273 K, so fixed-volume pressure rises by the same factor to 150 kPa.
- Higher absolute temperature means greater mean molecular kinetic energy; more vigorous momentum transfer to the walls raises pressure at fixed volume.
- At fixed pressure and fixed particle number, V/T is constant, so the volume increases by 1.5. Dividing by Celsius temperatures would give an invalid proportionality.
Answer (a) Zero-pressure intercept ≈−273°C; amount ≈0.0882 mol. (b) Rigid-container pressure = 150 kPa; at constant pressure the volume would rise to 3.0×10⁻³ m³.
Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.
Reconstructing a travelling wave and an overlapping pulse
Optional enrichment: this challenge may extend beyond the usual syllabus depth and assumes confidence with algebra and graph interpretation. At one instant a transverse wave has the supplied displacement–position profile. Adjacent points are joined smoothly as a sinusoid. A fixed sensor observes five complete cycles in 2.0 s. Later an upward 3.0 cm pulse and a downward 2.0 cm pulse overlap at the sensor in a linear medium. Supplied data (Position / m; Displacement / cm): (0, 0), (0.025, 0.5853), (0.05, 1.1481), (0.075, 1.6667), (0.1, 2.1213), (0.125, 2.4944), (0.15, 2.7716), (0.175, 2.9424), (0.2, 3), (0.225, 2.9424), (0.25, 2.7716), (0.275, 2.4944), (0.3, 2.1213), (0.325, 1.6667), (0.35, 1.1481), (0.375, 0.5853), (0.4, 0), (0.425, -0.5853), (0.45, -1.1481), (0.475, -1.6667), (0.5, -2.1213), (0.525, -2.4944), (0.55, -2.7716), (0.575, -2.9424), (0.6, -3), (0.625, -2.9424), (0.65, -2.7716), (0.675, -2.4944), (0.7, -2.1213), (0.725, -1.6667), (0.75, -1.1481), (0.775, -0.5853), (0.8, 0). (a) Find amplitude, wavelength, period, frequency and propagation speed. Explain why the snapshot does not determine the direction of travel. [3 marks] (b) Find the displacement during pulse overlap and explain what happens to the pulses and their transported energy afterward. [3 marks]
Wave snapshot
Supplied question data. Read the labelled axes and use the observations to test the physical model.
Vertical axis (y): Displacement / cm
Horizontal axis (x): Position / m
Read the exact data as a table
| Position / m | Displacement / cm |
|---|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| 0.025 | 0.5853 |
| 0.05 | 1.1481 |
| 0.075 | 1.6667 |
| 0.1 | 2.1213 |
| 0.125 | 2.4944 |
| 0.15 | 2.7716 |
| 0.175 | 2.9424 |
| 0.2 | 3 |
| 0.225 | 2.9424 |
| 0.25 | 2.7716 |
| 0.275 | 2.4944 |
| 0.3 | 2.1213 |
| 0.325 | 1.6667 |
| 0.35 | 1.1481 |
| 0.375 | 0.5853 |
| 0.4 | 0 |
| 0.425 | -0.5853 |
| 0.45 | -1.1481 |
| 0.475 | -1.6667 |
| 0.5 | -2.1213 |
| 0.525 | -2.4944 |
| 0.55 | -2.7716 |
| 0.575 | -2.9424 |
| 0.6 | -3 |
| 0.625 | -2.9424 |
| 0.65 | -2.7716 |
| 0.675 | -2.4944 |
| 0.7 | -2.1213 |
| 0.725 | -1.6667 |
| 0.75 | -1.1481 |
| 0.775 | -0.5853 |
| 0.8 | 0 |
These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. Lines join the supplied values; they are not a fitted model.
Show a hint
Begin with part (a): Find amplitude, wavelength, period, frequency and propagation speed. Explain why the snapshot does not determine the direction of travel.
Reveal the worked solution
- One complete spatial cycle spans 0.80 m, and maximum displacement from equilibrium is 3.0 cm.
- Frequency is cycles/time = 5/2.0 = 2.5 Hz; T = 1/f = 0.40 s; propagation speed is fλ = 2.0 m s⁻¹.
- A single spatial profile can move either left or right. A later snapshot or local displacement–time information is needed to establish direction.
- Superposition adds signed displacements: +3.0+(−2.0) = +1.0 cm upward.
- Partial cancellation describes displacement at that location and instant. It does not mean the waves permanently destroy each other.
- The pulses continue in the ideal linear model. Energy is redistributed between kinetic and elastic forms; displacement alone is insufficient to determine all local energy during overlap.
Answer (a) A = 3.0 cm; λ = 0.80 m; T = 0.40 s; f = 2.5 Hz; v = 2.0 m s⁻¹. (b) Resultant displacement is +1.0 cm; in the ideal linear medium both pulses continue through each other.
Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.
Mapping an electromagnet without mistaking a field line for a path
Optional enrichment: this challenge may extend beyond the usual syllabus depth and assumes confidence with algebra and graph interpretation. A long solenoid is tested at its centre. Current and magnetic flux-density measurements are supplied. A compass at the right-hand end points away from the coil when current is positive. For a long air-core solenoid use B = μ₀nI, with μ₀ = 4π×10⁻⁷ T m A⁻¹. Ignore Earth's field after background subtraction. Supplied data (Current / A; Flux density / mT): (-2, -2), (-1, -1), (0, 0), (1, 1), (2, 2). (a) Identify the right-end pole for positive current, estimate turns per metre, and predict the field after reversing a 1.5 A current. [3 marks] (b) Design a fair comparison of air and iron cores and explain a limitation of field-line maps. [3 marks]
Solenoid field after background subtraction
Supplied question data. Read the labelled axes and use the observations to test the physical model.
Vertical axis (y): Flux density / mT
Horizontal axis (x): Current / A
Read the exact data as a table
| Current / A | Flux density / mT |
|---|---|
| -2 | -2 |
| -1 | -1 |
| 0 | 0 |
| 1 | 1 |
| 2 | 2 |
These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. No fitted trend is drawn.
Show a hint
Begin with part (a): Identify the right-end pole for positive current, estimate turns per metre, and predict the field after reversing a 1.5 A current.
Reveal the worked solution
- Outside a magnet, a compass's north-seeking end follows the field direction from north to south. Pointing away from the right end identifies that end as north.
- The measured gradient is 1.0×10⁻³ T A⁻¹ = μ₀n, so n = 0.001/(4π×10⁻⁷)≈796 m⁻¹.
- Reversing current reverses field direction. At −1.5 A the linear calibration predicts −1.5 mT; its magnitude is unchanged.
- Control current rather than supply voltage, because resistance and heating may change. Keep probe orientation and centre position fixed, repeat measurements and subtract the ambient field.
- Measure a current-up and current-down sequence to detect hysteresis or remanence in the iron core; the air-core proportional model need not describe a saturating core.
- Field lines represent local directions and relative density. They are not physical wires or trajectories that isolated magnetic poles follow; a complete magnetic field map forms loops.
Answer (a) Right end is north; n≈796 turns m⁻¹; reversed field is −1.5 mT. (b) Vary core material at fixed coil geometry and current; measure signed field at fixed locations and check for residual magnetism.
Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.