University Advanced Quantum Mechanics · topic UAQM-02.08
Mott's formulas for identical charged particles
Connect the ideas, make your working visible, and test the result. Use the hints when you need a starting point; open the full solution after your attempt.
Further practice
Work through a fresh case before tackling the extension.
Mott's formulas for identical charged particles: predict a finite change
Mott's formula is the centre-of-mass cross-section for pure Coulomb scattering of two identical particles: Rutherford's term for the scattered particle, Rutherford's term for the recoil, and an exchange term whose size is set by the spin and whose phase is η ln tan²(θ/2). Use the supplied topic model Y_out = 180/eta, where Y_out is FRINGE PERIOD AT 90°, π/η (°). The output symbol Y_out is distinct from all input symbols. ^ denotes a power; π = 3.141592653589793. eta is Sommerfeld parameter η, dimensionless. Keep spin (Spin s of each particle) = 0; dth (Resolution δθ, rms, centre of mass) = 2 ° fixed. For this exercise use only 2.57187 ≤ eta ≤ 17.9281 on this continuous branch. A grid of test settings is an input restriction for this exercise, not by itself a claim of physical quantisation. This calculation retains the topic model's stated assumptions; it does not extend them to a different physical setup. Calculate Y_out at eta = 5.95025 and 8.10012. Find the signed output change ΔY_out and the average sensitivity ΔY_out/Δeta across this interval. State whether the response increases or decreases; distinguish this interval average from a derivative at one point.
FRINGE PERIOD AT 90°, π/η against eta
Predictions from the supplied Mott's formulas for identical charged particles model, with all other inputs fixed as stated in the question. 5 calibration points support a trend comparison; they are not measured data or a straight-line law.
Vertical axis (y): FRINGE PERIOD AT 90°, π/η / °
Horizontal axis (x): eta: Sommerfeld parameter η
Axes show the supplied calibration interval; the origin may lie outside the plot.
Read the exact data as a table
| eta: Sommerfeld parameter η | FRINGE PERIOD AT 90°, π/η / ° |
|---|---|
| 2.571875 | 69.98784933171325 |
| 6.410937499999999 | 28.0770168169632 |
| 10.249999999999998 | 17.5609756097561 |
| 14.089062499999999 | 12.775867805256738 |
| 17.928124999999998 | 10.040090639707165 |
These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. No fitted trend is drawn.
Show a hint
Substitute each value of eta separately while keeping every other input fixed, then subtract in the same order.
Reveal the worked solution
- At eta = 5.95025, substitute into Y_out = 180/eta: Y₀ = 30.2508 °.
- At eta = 8.10012, the same fixed-parameter model gives Y₁ = 22.2219 °.
- Signed change: ΔY_out = Y₁ − Y₀ = -8.02895 °; the input change is Δeta = 2.14987.
- Average sensitivity is ΔY_out/Δeta = -3.73461 ° per unit input. Its negative sign means that this response decreases over the specified interval.
- This is a secant slope between two settings. It equals a point derivative only for a locally linear relation or in a justified small-interval limit.
Answer Y₀ = 30.2508 °, Y₁ = 22.2219 °; ΔY_out = -8.02895 °; average sensitivity = -3.73461 ° per unit input.
Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.
Extra challenging questions
Work through the linked stages and explain what each result means.
Mott's formulas for identical charged particles: infer an input with uncertainty
Mott's formula is the centre-of-mass cross-section for pure Coulomb scattering of two identical particles: Rutherford's term for the scattered particle, Rutherford's term for the recoil, and an exchange term whose size is set by the spin and whose phase is η ln tan²(θ/2). Use the supplied topic model Y_out = 180/eta, where Y_out is FRINGE PERIOD AT 90°, π/η (°). The output symbol Y_out is distinct from all input symbols. ^ denotes a power; π = 3.141592653589793. eta is Sommerfeld parameter η, dimensionless. Keep spin (Spin s of each particle) = 0; dth (Resolution δθ, rms, centre of mass) = 2 ° fixed. For this exercise use only 2.57187 ≤ eta ≤ 17.9281 on this continuous branch. A grid of test settings is an input restriction for this exercise, not by itself a claim of physical quantisation. This calculation retains the topic model's stated assumptions; it does not extend them to a different physical setup. A reading gives Y_out = 15.076403 °, with a bounded reading uncertainty ±0.75545 °. Treat the model and all fixed inputs as exact for this exercise; the bound is not a standard deviation. First estimate the unknown eta by straight-line interpolation between the two endpoint predictions. Then solve the actual model on the stated branch to an absolute input tolerance of 0.00153562, using a numerical bracket if required. Find the full input interval consistent with the bounded reading uncertainty and compare it with a symmetric input-error assumption. Do not assume that the supplied calibration points prove monotonicity outside this branch.
FRINGE PERIOD AT 90°, π/η against eta
Predictions from the supplied Mott's formulas for identical charged particles model, with all other inputs fixed as stated in the question. 5 calibration points support a trend comparison; they are not measured data or a straight-line law.
Vertical axis (y): FRINGE PERIOD AT 90°, π/η / °
Horizontal axis (x): eta: Sommerfeld parameter η
Axes show the supplied calibration interval; the origin may lie outside the plot.
Read the exact data as a table
| eta: Sommerfeld parameter η | FRINGE PERIOD AT 90°, π/η / ° |
|---|---|
| 2.571875 | 69.98784933171325 |
| 6.410937499999999 | 28.0770168169632 |
| 10.249999999999998 | 17.5609756097561 |
| 14.089062499999999 | 12.775867805256738 |
| 17.928124999999998 | 10.040090639707165 |
These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. No fitted trend is drawn.
Show a hint
The model's endpoint predictions bracket the reading. Solve Y_out(eta) = Y_measured and then solve again at Y_measured − u and Y_measured + u; a nonlinear inverse can give unequal input deviations.
Reveal the worked solution
- Endpoint predictions are Y_out(2.57187) = 69.9878 ° and Y_out(17.9281) = 10.0401 °. The target lies between them. On the selected branch the response is strictly decreasing.
- Endpoint interpolation gives eta_line = 2.57187 + (15.0764 − 69.9878)(17.9281 − 2.57187)/(10.0401 − 69.9878) = 16.638. This estimates the inverse of the endpoint chord, rather than assuming that chord is the physical model.
- Use the actual equation, not the chord, and bracket its root. Evaluating the midpoint and retaining the sign-changing half-interval gives eta = 11.9392; substituting back gives Y_out = 15.076403 °.
- The interpolation error in the input is |eta_line − eta| = 4.69883. This is larger than the requested numerical tolerance.
- Invert both limits Y_out = 14.320953 ° and 15.831853 °. Sort the roots even if the response decreases: 11.3695 ≤ eta ≤ 12.569.
- The lower and upper input deviations are 0.569703 and 0.629809. They differ because the inverse response is nonlinear; a symmetric error bar would only be a local approximation. This interval includes reading uncertainty only, not model error or uncertainty in fixed inputs.
Answer eta ≈ 11.9392; compatible interval [11.3695, 12.569]. Endpoint interpolation gives 16.638.
Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.