Skip to main content
Course and syllabus guidance

University Physics I · topic UPI-06.01

Work by a constant force

Connect the ideas, make your working visible, and test the result. Use the hints when you need a starting point; open the full solution after your attempt.

Further practice

Work through a fresh case before tackling the extension.

Further practice · 01

Work by a Constant Force: predict a finite change

The work done by a constant force is the dot product of the force with the displacement of the point where it acts, W = F⋅Δr: a signed scalar, measured in joules, that counts only the part of the force along the motion. Use the supplied topic model Y_out = -5*mu*(15*g-pull*sind(th)), where Y_out is WORK BY FRICTION W_f (J). The output symbol Y_out is distinct from all input symbols. ^ denotes a power; π = 3.141592653589793; sind/cosd/tand use degrees; g = 9.81 m s⁻². th is Rope angle θ above the motion, measured in °. Keep pull (Rope pull F) = 40 N; mu (Kinetic friction coefficient μₖ) = 0.2 fixed. For this exercise use only 94.725 ° ≤ th ≤ 160.875 ° on this continuous branch. A grid of test settings is an input restriction for this exercise, not by itself a claim of physical quantisation. This calculation retains the topic model's stated assumptions; it does not extend them to a different physical setup. Calculate Y_out at th = 109.278 ° and 118.539 °. Find the signed output change ΔY_out and the average sensitivity ΔY_out/Δth across this interval. State whether the response increases or decreases; distinguish this interval average from a derivative at one point.

Explore the question data

WORK BY FRICTION W_f against th

Predictions from the supplied Work by a Constant Force model, with all other inputs fixed as stated in the question. 5 calibration points support a trend comparison; they are not measured data or a straight-line law.

Vertical axis (y): WORK BY FRICTION W_f / J

WORK BY FRICTION W_f against thPredictions from the supplied Work by a Constant Force model, with all other inputs fixed as stated in the question. 5 calibration points support a trend comparison; they are not measured data or a straight-line law. Horizontal axis: th: Rope angle θ above the motion / °. Vertical axis: WORK BY FRICTION W_f / J. Exact values are available in the data table below.-135.1-127.9-120.7-113.4-106.292.08109.9127.8145.7163.5xy

Horizontal axis (x): th: Rope angle θ above the motion / °

Axes show the supplied calibration interval; the origin may lie outside the plot.

Reading 1th: Rope angle θ above the motion / °: 94.72WORK BY FRICTION W_f / J: -107.3
Read the exact data as a table
WORK BY FRICTION W_f against th — supplied values
th: Rope angle θ above the motion / °WORK BY FRICTION W_f / J
94.725-107.28593841890674
111.26249999999999-109.87284898441996
127.8-115.54379950497238
144.3375-123.82961684066598
160.875-134.04479281753225

These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. No fitted trend is drawn.

Show a hint

Substitute each value of th separately while keeping every other input fixed, then subtract in the same order.

Reveal the worked solution
  1. At th = 109.278 °, substitute into Y_out = -5*mu*(15*g-pull*sind(th)): Y₀ = -109.393 J.
  2. At th = 118.539 °, the same fixed-parameter model gives Y₁ = -112.01 J.
  3. Signed change: ΔY_out = Y₁ − Y₀ = -2.61743 J; the input change is Δth = 9.261 °.
  4. Average sensitivity is ΔY_out/Δth = -0.282629 J per °. Its negative sign means that this response decreases over the specified interval.
  5. This is a secant slope between two settings. It equals a point derivative only for a locally linear relation or in a justified small-interval limit.

Answer Y₀ = -109.393 J, Y₁ = -112.01 J; ΔY_out = -2.61743 J; average sensitivity = -0.282629 J per °.

Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.

Extra challenging questions

Work through the linked stages and explain what each result means.

Extra challenging · 01

Work by a Constant Force: infer an input with uncertainty

The work done by a constant force is the dot product of the force with the displacement of the point where it acts, W = F⋅Δr: a signed scalar, measured in joules, that counts only the part of the force along the motion. Use the supplied topic model Y_out = -5*mu*(15*g-pull*sind(th)), where Y_out is WORK BY FRICTION W_f (J). The output symbol Y_out is distinct from all input symbols. ^ denotes a power; π = 3.141592653589793; sind/cosd/tand use degrees; g = 9.81 m s⁻². th is Rope angle θ above the motion, measured in °. Keep pull (Rope pull F) = 40 N; mu (Kinetic friction coefficient μₖ) = 0.2 fixed. For this exercise use only 94.725 ° ≤ th ≤ 160.875 ° on this continuous branch. A grid of test settings is an input restriction for this exercise, not by itself a claim of physical quantisation. This calculation retains the topic model's stated assumptions; it does not extend them to a different physical setup. A reading gives Y_out = -118.90352 J, with a bounded reading uncertainty ±1.7426 J. Treat the model and all fixed inputs as exact for this exercise; the bound is not a standard deviation. First estimate the unknown th by straight-line interpolation between the two endpoint predictions. Then solve the actual model on the stated branch to an absolute input tolerance of 0.006615 °, using a numerical bracket if required. Find the full input interval consistent with the bounded reading uncertainty and compare it with a symmetric input-error assumption. Do not assume that the supplied calibration points prove monotonicity outside this branch.

Explore the question data

WORK BY FRICTION W_f against th

Predictions from the supplied Work by a Constant Force model, with all other inputs fixed as stated in the question. 5 calibration points support a trend comparison; they are not measured data or a straight-line law.

Vertical axis (y): WORK BY FRICTION W_f / J

WORK BY FRICTION W_f against thPredictions from the supplied Work by a Constant Force model, with all other inputs fixed as stated in the question. 5 calibration points support a trend comparison; they are not measured data or a straight-line law. Horizontal axis: th: Rope angle θ above the motion / °. Vertical axis: WORK BY FRICTION W_f / J. Exact values are available in the data table below.-135.1-127.9-120.7-113.4-106.292.08109.9127.8145.7163.5xy

Horizontal axis (x): th: Rope angle θ above the motion / °

Axes show the supplied calibration interval; the origin may lie outside the plot.

Reading 1th: Rope angle θ above the motion / °: 94.72WORK BY FRICTION W_f / J: -107.3
Read the exact data as a table
WORK BY FRICTION W_f against th — supplied values
th: Rope angle θ above the motion / °WORK BY FRICTION W_f / J
94.725-107.28593841890674
111.26249999999999-109.87284898441996
127.8-115.54379950497238
144.3375-123.82961684066598
160.875-134.04479281753225

These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. No fitted trend is drawn.

Show a hint

The model's endpoint predictions bracket the reading. Solve Y_out(th) = Y_measured and then solve again at Y_measured − u and Y_measured + u; a nonlinear inverse can give unequal input deviations.

Reveal the worked solution
  1. Endpoint predictions are Y_out(94.725) = -107.286 J and Y_out(160.875) = -134.045 J. The target lies between them. On the selected branch the response is strictly decreasing.
  2. Endpoint interpolation gives th_line = 94.725 + (-118.904 − -107.286)(160.875 − 94.725)/(-134.045 − -107.286) = 123.445 °. This estimates the inverse of the endpoint chord, rather than assuming that chord is the physical model.
  3. Use the actual equation, not the chord, and bracket its root. Evaluating the midpoint and retaining the sign-changing half-interval gives th = 135.077 °; substituting back gives Y_out = -118.90352 J.
  4. The interpolation error in the input is |th_line − th| = 11.6319 °. This is larger than the requested numerical tolerance.
  5. Invert both limits Y_out = -120.64612 J and -117.16092 J. Sort the roots even if the response decreases: 131.433 ° ≤ th ≤ 138.502 °.
  6. The lower and upper input deviations are 3.64324 ° and 3.42526 °. They differ because the inverse response is nonlinear; a symmetric error bar would only be a local approximation. This interval includes reading uncertainty only, not model error or uncertainty in fixed inputs.

Answer th ≈ 135.077 °; compatible interval [131.433, 138.502] °. Endpoint interpolation gives 123.445 °.

Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.