Skip to main content
Course and syllabus guidance

University Physics I · topic UPI-EXT-WS.08

Sound intensity and decibels

Connect the ideas, make your working visible, and test the result. Use the hints when you need a starting point; open the full solution after your attempt.

Further practice

Work through a fresh case before tackling the extension.

Further practice · 01

Sound Intensity & Decibels: predict a finite change

Sound intensity is the average acoustic power crossing unit area, in W m⁻². The sound-intensity level is its logarithm against a fixed reference: β = 10 log₁₀(I/I₀) with I₀ = 1.00 × 10⁻¹² W m⁻², reported in decibels. Use the supplied topic model Y_out = sqrt(412*n*pw/(4*pi*d^2)), where Y_out is RMS PRESSURE (Pa). The output symbol Y_out is distinct from all input symbols. ^ denotes a power; π = 3.141592653589793; sqrt(x) means √x. d is Meter distance r, measured in m. Keep n (Incoherent sources n) = 4; pw (Power per source P) = 0.2 W fixed. For this exercise use only 11.5187 m ≤ d ≤ 89.4812 m on this continuous branch. A grid of test settings is an input restriction for this exercise, not by itself a claim of physical quantisation. This calculation retains the topic model's stated assumptions; it does not extend them to a different physical setup. Calculate Y_out at d = 28.6705 m and 39.5852 m. Find the signed output change ΔY_out and the average sensitivity ΔY_out/Δd across this interval. State whether the response increases or decreases; distinguish this interval average from a derivative at one point.

Explore the question data

RMS PRESSURE against d

Predictions from the supplied Sound Intensity & Decibels model, with all other inputs fixed as stated in the question. 5 calibration points support a trend comparison; they are not measured data or a straight-line law.

Vertical axis (y): RMS PRESSURE / Pa

RMS PRESSURE against dPredictions from the supplied Sound Intensity & Decibels model, with all other inputs fixed as stated in the question. 5 calibration points support a trend comparison; they are not measured data or a straight-line law. Horizontal axis: d: Meter distance r / m. Vertical axis: RMS PRESSURE / Pa. Exact values are available in the data table below.0.041740.14630.25090.35550.46018.429.4550.571.5592.6xy

Horizontal axis (x): d: Meter distance r / m

Axes show the supplied calibration interval; the origin may lie outside the plot.

Reading 1d: Meter distance r / m: 11.52RMS PRESSURE / Pa: 0.4446
Read the exact data as a table
RMS PRESSURE against d — supplied values
d: Meter distance r / mRMS PRESSURE / Pa
11.5187499999999990.44461418765647776
31.0093750.1651564945784316
50.499999999999990.10141385493204066
69.9906250.07317265239548944
89.481249999999990.05723433315994192

These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. No fitted trend is drawn.

Show a hint

Substitute each value of d separately while keeping every other input fixed, then subtract in the same order.

Reveal the worked solution
  1. At d = 28.6705 m, substitute into Y_out = sqrt(412*n*pw/(4*pi*d^2)): Y₀ = 0.17863 Pa.
  2. At d = 39.5852 m, the same fixed-parameter model gives Y₁ = 0.129376 Pa.
  3. Signed change: ΔY_out = Y₁ − Y₀ = -0.0492531 Pa; the input change is Δd = 10.9147 m.
  4. Average sensitivity is ΔY_out/Δd = -0.00451253 Pa per m. Its negative sign means that this response decreases over the specified interval.
  5. This is a secant slope between two settings. It equals a point derivative only for a locally linear relation or in a justified small-interval limit.

Answer Y₀ = 0.17863 Pa, Y₁ = 0.129376 Pa; ΔY_out = -0.0492531 Pa; average sensitivity = -0.00451253 Pa per m.

Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.

Extra challenging questions

Work through the linked stages and explain what each result means.

Extra challenging · 01

Sound Intensity & Decibels: infer an input with uncertainty

Sound intensity is the average acoustic power crossing unit area, in W m⁻². The sound-intensity level is its logarithm against a fixed reference: β = 10 log₁₀(I/I₀) with I₀ = 1.00 × 10⁻¹² W m⁻², reported in decibels. Use the supplied topic model Y_out = sqrt(412*n*pw/(4*pi*d^2)), where Y_out is RMS PRESSURE (Pa). The output symbol Y_out is distinct from all input symbols. ^ denotes a power; π = 3.141592653589793; sqrt(x) means √x. d is Meter distance r, measured in m. Keep n (Incoherent sources n) = 4; pw (Power per source P) = 0.2 W fixed. For this exercise use only 11.5187 m ≤ d ≤ 89.4812 m on this continuous branch. A grid of test settings is an input restriction for this exercise, not by itself a claim of physical quantisation. This calculation retains the topic model's stated assumptions; it does not extend them to a different physical setup. A reading gives Y_out = 0.086691897 Pa, with a bounded reading uncertainty ±0.0044186 Pa. Treat the model and all fixed inputs as exact for this exercise; the bound is not a standard deviation. First estimate the unknown d by straight-line interpolation between the two endpoint predictions. Then solve the actual model on the stated branch to an absolute input tolerance of 0.00779625 m, using a numerical bracket if required. Find the full input interval consistent with the bounded reading uncertainty and compare it with a symmetric input-error assumption. Do not assume that the supplied calibration points prove monotonicity outside this branch.

Explore the question data

RMS PRESSURE against d

Predictions from the supplied Sound Intensity & Decibels model, with all other inputs fixed as stated in the question. 5 calibration points support a trend comparison; they are not measured data or a straight-line law.

Vertical axis (y): RMS PRESSURE / Pa

RMS PRESSURE against dPredictions from the supplied Sound Intensity & Decibels model, with all other inputs fixed as stated in the question. 5 calibration points support a trend comparison; they are not measured data or a straight-line law. Horizontal axis: d: Meter distance r / m. Vertical axis: RMS PRESSURE / Pa. Exact values are available in the data table below.0.041740.14630.25090.35550.46018.429.4550.571.5592.6xy

Horizontal axis (x): d: Meter distance r / m

Axes show the supplied calibration interval; the origin may lie outside the plot.

Reading 1d: Meter distance r / m: 11.52RMS PRESSURE / Pa: 0.4446
Read the exact data as a table
RMS PRESSURE against d — supplied values
d: Meter distance r / mRMS PRESSURE / Pa
11.5187499999999990.44461418765647776
31.0093750.1651564945784316
50.499999999999990.10141385493204066
69.9906250.07317265239548944
89.481249999999990.05723433315994192

These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. No fitted trend is drawn.

Show a hint

The model's endpoint predictions bracket the reading. Solve Y_out(d) = Y_measured and then solve again at Y_measured − u and Y_measured + u; a nonlinear inverse can give unequal input deviations.

Reveal the worked solution
  1. Endpoint predictions are Y_out(11.5187) = 0.444614 Pa and Y_out(89.4812) = 0.0572343 Pa. The target lies between them. On the selected branch the response is strictly decreasing.
  2. Endpoint interpolation gives d_line = 11.5187 + (0.0866919 − 0.444614)(89.4812 − 11.5187)/(0.0572343 − 0.444614) = 83.5527 m. This estimates the inverse of the endpoint chord, rather than assuming that chord is the physical model.
  3. Use the actual equation, not the chord, and bracket its root. Evaluating the midpoint and retaining the sign-changing half-interval gives d = 59.0759 m; substituting back gives Y_out = 0.086691897 Pa.
  4. The interpolation error in the input is |d_line − d| = 24.4769 m. This is larger than the requested numerical tolerance.
  5. Invert both limits Y_out = 0.082273297 Pa and 0.091110497 Pa. Sort the roots even if the response decreases: 56.2109 m ≤ d ≤ 62.2486 m.
  6. The lower and upper input deviations are 2.86501 m and 3.17275 m. They differ because the inverse response is nonlinear; a symmetric error bar would only be a local approximation. This interval includes reading uncertainty only, not model error or uncertainty in fixed inputs.

Answer d ≈ 59.0759 m; compatible interval [56.2109, 62.2486] m. Endpoint interpolation gives 83.5527 m.

Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.