Skip to main content
Course and syllabus guidance

University Physics I · topic UPI-EXT-WS.11

Shock waves and Mach number

Connect the ideas, make your working visible, and test the result. Use the hints when you need a starting point; open the full solution after your attempt.

Further practice

Work through a fresh case before tackling the extension.

Further practice · 01

Shock Waves & Mach Number: predict a finite change

The Mach number M = v_s/v is a source's speed divided by the wave speed in the medium it moves through. For M > 1 the wavefronts overlap into a cone trailing the source, with half-angle μ satisfying sin μ = 1/M. Use the supplied topic model Y_out = 10000*sqrt(max((vs/v)^2-1,0))/vs, where Y_out is BOOM LAG, h = 10.0 km (s). The output symbol Y_out is distinct from all input symbols. ^ denotes a power; π = 3.141592653589793; sqrt(x) means √x; max(a,b) selects the larger value. vs is Source speed v(s), measured in m s⁻¹. Keep v (Sound speed v) = 343 m s⁻¹ fixed. For this exercise use only 428 m s⁻¹ ≤ vs ≤ 932 m s⁻¹ on this continuous branch. A grid of test settings is an input restriction for this exercise, not by itself a claim of physical quantisation. This calculation retains the topic model's stated assumptions; it does not extend them to a different physical setup. Calculate Y_out at vs = 538.88 m s⁻¹ and 609.44 m s⁻¹. Find the signed output change ΔY_out and the average sensitivity ΔY_out/Δvs across this interval. State whether the response increases or decreases; distinguish this interval average from a derivative at one point.

Explore the question data

BOOM LAG, h = 10.0 km against vs

Predictions from the supplied Shock Waves & Mach Number model, with all other inputs fixed as stated in the question. 5 calibration points support a trend comparison; they are not measured data or a straight-line law.

Vertical axis (y): BOOM LAG, h = 10.0 km / s

BOOM LAG, h = 10.0 km against vsPredictions from the supplied Shock Waves & Mach Number model, with all other inputs fixed as stated in the question. 5 calibration points support a trend comparison; they are not measured data or a straight-line law. Horizontal axis: vs: Source speed v(s) / m s⁻¹. Vertical axis: BOOM LAG, h = 10.0 km / s. Exact values are available in the data table below.17.0519.6622.2724.8827.5407.8543.9680816.1952.2xy

Horizontal axis (x): vs: Source speed v(s) / m s⁻¹

Axes show the supplied calibration interval; the origin may lie outside the plot.

Reading 1vs: Source speed v(s) / m s⁻¹: 428BOOM LAG, h = 10.0 km / s: 17.44
Read the exact data as a table
BOOM LAG, h = 10.0 km against vs — supplied values
vs: Source speed v(s) / m s⁻¹BOOM LAG, h = 10.0 km / s
42817.438083898773147
55422.89462657921519
68025.173855474536712
80626.38282811348916
93227.10832647642774

These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. No fitted trend is drawn.

Show a hint

Substitute each value of vs separately while keeping every other input fixed, then subtract in the same order.

Reveal the worked solution
  1. At vs = 538.88 m s⁻¹, substitute into Y_out = 10000*sqrt(max((vs/v)^2-1,0))/vs: Y₀ = 22.4861 s.
  2. At vs = 609.44 m s⁻¹, the same fixed-parameter model gives Y₁ = 24.0987 s.
  3. Signed change: ΔY_out = Y₁ − Y₀ = 1.61262 s; the input change is Δvs = 70.56 m s⁻¹.
  4. Average sensitivity is ΔY_out/Δvs = 0.0228546 s per m s⁻¹. Its positive sign means that this response increases over the specified interval.
  5. This is a secant slope between two settings. It equals a point derivative only for a locally linear relation or in a justified small-interval limit.

Answer Y₀ = 22.4861 s, Y₁ = 24.0987 s; ΔY_out = 1.61262 s; average sensitivity = 0.0228546 s per m s⁻¹.

Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.

Extra challenging questions

Work through the linked stages and explain what each result means.

Extra challenging · 01

Shock Waves & Mach Number: infer an input with uncertainty

The Mach number M = v_s/v is a source's speed divided by the wave speed in the medium it moves through. For M > 1 the wavefronts overlap into a cone trailing the source, with half-angle μ satisfying sin μ = 1/M. Use the supplied topic model Y_out = 10000*sqrt(max((vs/v)^2-1,0))/vs, where Y_out is BOOM LAG, h = 10.0 km (s). The output symbol Y_out is distinct from all input symbols. ^ denotes a power; π = 3.141592653589793; sqrt(x) means √x; max(a,b) selects the larger value. vs is Source speed v(s), measured in m s⁻¹. Keep v (Sound speed v) = 343 m s⁻¹ fixed. For this exercise use only 428 m s⁻¹ ≤ vs ≤ 932 m s⁻¹ on this continuous branch. A grid of test settings is an input restriction for this exercise, not by itself a claim of physical quantisation. This calculation retains the topic model's stated assumptions; it does not extend them to a different physical setup. A reading gives Y_out = 25.78952 s, with a bounded reading uncertainty ±0.19782 s. Treat the model and all fixed inputs as exact for this exercise; the bound is not a standard deviation. First estimate the unknown vs by straight-line interpolation between the two endpoint predictions. Then solve the actual model on the stated branch to an absolute input tolerance of 0.0504 m s⁻¹, using a numerical bracket if required. Find the full input interval consistent with the bounded reading uncertainty and compare it with a symmetric input-error assumption. Do not assume that the supplied calibration points prove monotonicity outside this branch.

Explore the question data

BOOM LAG, h = 10.0 km against vs

Predictions from the supplied Shock Waves & Mach Number model, with all other inputs fixed as stated in the question. 5 calibration points support a trend comparison; they are not measured data or a straight-line law.

Vertical axis (y): BOOM LAG, h = 10.0 km / s

BOOM LAG, h = 10.0 km against vsPredictions from the supplied Shock Waves & Mach Number model, with all other inputs fixed as stated in the question. 5 calibration points support a trend comparison; they are not measured data or a straight-line law. Horizontal axis: vs: Source speed v(s) / m s⁻¹. Vertical axis: BOOM LAG, h = 10.0 km / s. Exact values are available in the data table below.17.0519.6622.2724.8827.5407.8543.9680816.1952.2xy

Horizontal axis (x): vs: Source speed v(s) / m s⁻¹

Axes show the supplied calibration interval; the origin may lie outside the plot.

Reading 1vs: Source speed v(s) / m s⁻¹: 428BOOM LAG, h = 10.0 km / s: 17.44
Read the exact data as a table
BOOM LAG, h = 10.0 km against vs — supplied values
vs: Source speed v(s) / m s⁻¹BOOM LAG, h = 10.0 km / s
42817.438083898773147
55422.89462657921519
68025.173855474536712
80626.38282811348916
93227.10832647642774

These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. No fitted trend is drawn.

Show a hint

The model's endpoint predictions bracket the reading. Solve Y_out(vs) = Y_measured and then solve again at Y_measured − u and Y_measured + u; a nonlinear inverse can give unequal input deviations.

Reveal the worked solution
  1. Endpoint predictions are Y_out(428) = 17.4381 s and Y_out(932) = 27.1083 s. The target lies between them. On the selected branch the response is strictly increasing.
  2. Endpoint interpolation gives vs_line = 428 + (25.7895 − 17.4381)(932 − 428)/(27.1083 − 17.4381) = 863.266 m s⁻¹. This estimates the inverse of the endpoint chord, rather than assuming that chord is the physical model.
  3. Use the actual equation, not the chord, and bracket its root. Evaluating the midpoint and retaining the sign-changing half-interval gives vs = 735.44 m s⁻¹; substituting back gives Y_out = 25.78952 s.
  4. The interpolation error in the input is |vs_line − vs| = 127.826 m s⁻¹. This is larger than the requested numerical tolerance.
  5. Invert both limits Y_out = 25.5917 s and 25.98734 s. Sort the roots even if the response decreases: 716.021 m s⁻¹ ≤ vs ≤ 756.699 m s⁻¹.
  6. The lower and upper input deviations are 19.4185 m s⁻¹ and 21.2587 m s⁻¹. They differ because the inverse response is nonlinear; a symmetric error bar would only be a local approximation. This interval includes reading uncertainty only, not model error or uncertainty in fixed inputs.

Answer vs ≈ 735.44 m s⁻¹; compatible interval [716.021, 756.699] m s⁻¹. Endpoint interpolation gives 863.266 m s⁻¹.

Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.