Skip to main content

MYP Physics · Unit 16

Space physics

Solar-system scale, stars, galaxies, redshift, expansion, evidence-led models, and impacts of space technology.

21
questions
17
total marks
5
mapped topics
01
Criterion AYears 1–2multiple choicerecall

Read a model without mistaking it for space

3 marks

A student says, ‘A star in the top-left of a Hertzsprung–Russell diagram must be physically above and left of another star in space.’ Which response is best?

  1. A

    Correct, because every scientific diagram is a map

  2. B

    Correct, but only for stars in our galaxy

  3. C

    Incorrect; the axes show stellar properties, not positions in space

  4. D

    Incorrect; all stars are the same distance from Earth

  1. a

    Select and explain Select the best response and name two properties represented on an H–R diagram.

    3
    Ready to self-mark?Reveal the detailed answer3 marks

    Mark-by-mark answer

    Correct choiceC

    1. Selects option C: the H–R diagram axes represent stellar properties rather than positions in space.

    2. Names luminosity or absolute brightness as one represented property.

    3. Names surface temperature, colour, or spectral class as the other represented property.

Build deeper understandingReveal the teacher insight

Deeper learning cue

Pair this with a solar-system scale model and ask what each representation preserves, distorts, and leaves out.

02
Criterion CYears 2–4data analysisroutine

Distance from stellar parallax

6 marks

For nearby stars, distance in parsecs can be estimated using d = 1 ÷ p, where p is the parallax angle in arcseconds.

Measured stellar parallax
StarParallax p / arcsecUncertainty / arcsec
K0.50±0.01
L0.20±0.01
M0.05±0.01
  1. a

    Calculate Calculate the distance to stars K and L.

    2
    Ready to self-mark?Reveal the detailed answer2 marks

    Mark-by-mark answer

    1. Calculates dK = 1 ÷ 0.50 = 2.0 pc.

    2. Calculates dL = 1 ÷ 0.20 = 5.0 pc.

  2. b

    Analyse Identify which distance is least reliable and justify your choice from the table.

    2
    Ready to self-mark?Reveal the detailed answer2 marks

    Mark-by-mark answer

    1. Identifies star M as having the least reliable calculated distance.

    2. Explains that ±0.01 arcsec is the largest percentage uncertainty for M: 0.01 ÷ 0.05 = 20%.

  3. c

    Explain Explain why parallax becomes difficult to use for very distant stars.

    2
    Ready to self-mark?Reveal the detailed answer2 marks

    Mark-by-mark answer

    1. States that parallax angle becomes smaller as distance increases.

    2. Explains that the angle approaches the instrument's resolution or becomes comparable with measurement uncertainty.

Build deeper understandingReveal the teacher insight

Deeper learning cue

Have students compare absolute and percentage uncertainty; the same angular uncertainty has a very different effect at small parallax.

03
Criterion DYears 4–5extended responsediscriminating

From galaxy spectra to an expanding-universe model

8 marks

Spectral lines from most distant galaxies are observed at longer wavelengths than the same atomic lines measured in a laboratory. More distant galaxies generally show a larger shift. A media post claims this single observation ‘proves every detail of the Big Bang.’

  1. a

    Distinguish Distinguish the observation from the inference made from it.

    2
    Ready to self-mark?Reveal the detailed answer2 marks

    Mark-by-mark answer

    1. Identifies shifted spectral-line wavelengths and the distance trend as observations.

    2. Identifies recession or expansion of space as an interpretation or inference from those observations.

  2. b

    Explain Explain how the distance–redshift pattern supports an expanding-universe model.

    3
    Ready to self-mark?Reveal the detailed answer3 marks

    Mark-by-mark answer

    1. Links longer observed wavelength to redshift.

    2. Links greater redshift, in this context, to greater recession rate.

    3. Explains that the general increase with distance matches the prediction that large-scale separations grow over time.

  3. c

    Evaluate Evaluate the wording of the media claim and propose a more scientifically responsible conclusion.

    3
    Ready to self-mark?Reveal the detailed answer3 marks

    Mark-by-mark answer

    1. Rejects ‘proves every detail’ because one evidence line does not uniquely establish all parts or parameters of a model.

    2. Recognises the need for independent evidence, uncertainty, calibration, and consideration of alternative explanations or model limits.

    3. Proposes wording such as ‘provides strong evidence for cosmic expansion and is consistent with a hot early-universe model when combined with other evidence.’

Build deeper understandingReveal the teacher insight

Deeper learning cue

Keep observation, calculation, inference, and model confidence in separate columns to prevent scientific caution being mistaken for indecision.

More focused practice

Seven quick mastery questions

Open one task at a time, reveal the worked reasoning, then mark it mastered or save it to revisit.

10

Criterion C

A nearby galaxy departs from a trend

8 marks · demandingOpen question →
12

Criterion C

One spectral line shifts unusually far

8 marks · demandingOpen question →
15

Criterion C

Equal shifts at different distances

8 marks · demandingOpen question →
17

Criterion C

A second internally consistent survey

8 marks · demandingOpen question →
18

Criterion D

Select an Earth-observation orbit responsibly

16 marks · discriminatingOpen question →
Reference subsectionMapped lessons for this unit
MYP-16.01

Solar-system scale and structure

Compare scale models and explain why every model distorts at least one important relationship.

Open lesson →
MYP-16.02

Cosmic distance measurement

Compare parallax and standard-candle reasoning while keeping measurement range and uncertainty visible.

Open lesson →
MYP-16.03

Hertzsprung–Russell evidence

Criterion C focus: identify patterns in stellar data without treating the diagram as a map of space.

Open lesson →
MYP-16.04

Stellar life cycles

Connect stellar mass to an evidence-based sequence while recognising the vast time scales.

Open lesson →
MYP-16.05

Redshift and an expanding universe

Distinguish observation, inference, and model limitation when communicating cosmological evidence.

Open lesson →