Skip to main content
Course and syllabus guidance

Cambridge International AS & A Level · 20 · structured

Design, predict and evaluate an induction test

An induction experiment with controlled comparisons · Original GioPhysics question with a detailed, mark-by-mark answer guide.

Demand
demanding
Marks
12
Topics
1
Answer
Complete
structured12 marks

Plan an experiment demonstrating that changing flux induces an e.m.f., testing its direction and how its magnitude depends on speed. Include apparatus, a stationary control, controlled variables, speed and voltage readings, repeats and uncertainty. Predict what happens when a north pole approaches, stops and withdraws. Explain how turn number could be tested without confusing e.m.f. with resistance-dependent current.

  1. (a)

    Describe a workable apparatus and the stationary/approach/withdrawal direction test.

    4 marks
  2. (b)

    Plan controlled speed measurements and uncertainty-aware analysis.

    5 marks
  3. (c)

    Explain the turns comparison and one safety/measurement refinement.

    3 marks
Ready to self-mark?Reveal the detailed answer guide
Answer overviewFixed coil/magnet guide with labelled voltage-logger leads and measured speed; stationary zero control; opposite approach/withdrawal polarities with near coil face N then S; repeated controlled speed comparisons and uncertainty bars; same-geometry turns and high-input-resistance voltage measurement.
01

(a)

4 marks

Describe a workable apparatus and the stationary/approach/withdrawal direction test.

How to approach it

Identify what the question is testing, organise the response into distinct mark-earning points, and make every conclusion traceable to a physical principle or to the evidence supplied.

  1. 1

    Connected fixed coil and axial magnet, labelled polarity, stationary zero, N approach gives near-face N and withdrawal near-face S.

02

(b)

5 marks

Plan controlled speed measurements and uncertainty-aware analysis.

How to approach it

Identify what the question is testing, organise the response into distinct mark-earning points, and make every conclusion traceable to a physical principle or to the evidence supplied.

  1. 1

    Measured speed, resolved voltage, fixed geometry/electrics, repeats, uncertainty treatment and graph/conclusion.

03

(c)

3 marks

Explain the turns comparison and one safety/measurement refinement.

How to approach it

Identify what the question is testing, organise the response into distinct mark-earning points, and make every conclusion traceable to a physical principle or to the evidence supplied.

  1. 1

    Same geometry and motion; high-input-resistance voltage measurement to avoid resistance confounding; relevant safe or resolving setup.

Complete marking guidance

Use these worked steps alongside the part-by-part answers. They explain the method and mark allocation; they do not add extra marks.

  1. Describe an assembled fixed coil, axial magnet guide, voltage logger/centre-zero meter and speed-measurement method.
  2. Record a stationary baseline; approach, stop and withdraw with fixed lead connections. No change gives zero sustained e.m.f.
  3. For north approach the near coil face is north, opposing the increase; for withdrawal it is south, opposing the decrease. The polarities reverse.
  4. Vary measured speed while keeping magnet, path, alignment, coil, endpoints and electrical connections fixed.
  5. Record resolved peak e.m.f. traces, repeat each setting and include speed uncertainty, voltage resolution, sample timing and scatter.
  6. Compare mean peaks with uncertainty bars over several speeds; discuss whether the difference and any proportionality are supported.
  7. For turns, keep coil geometry and flux change equivalent, and measure voltage with input resistance much greater than coil resistance.
  8. State a relevant safety precaution and limitation, such as secured magnets and short-pulse sampling.

Private on this device

Your self-assessment

Compare your work with the guide. This is your own rating, not an awarded exam mark.