Skip to main content

MYP Physics · 11 · data analysis

Refraction through a transparent block

Light and optics · Original GioPhysics question with a detailed, mark-by-mark answer guide.

Demand
routine
Marks
6
Topics
1
Answer
Complete
data analysis6 marks

A student directs light from air into the same transparent block and measures each angle from the normal.

Angles measured at the air–block boundary
Angle of incidence / °Angle of refraction / °
107
2013
3019
4025
5030
  1. a

    Describe Describe the pattern in the data.

    2 marks
  2. b

    Calculate For the 30° reading, calculate sin(i) ÷ sin(r). Use sin(30°) = 0.500 and sin(19°) = 0.326.

    2 marks
  3. c

    Evaluate Suggest two changes that would make the conclusion more reliable.

    2 marks
Ready to self-mark?Reveal the detailed answer guide
Answer overviewKey answer: States that the angle of refraction increases as the angle of incidence increases. States that the refracted angle remains smaller than the incident angle, so the ray bends towards the normal. Substitutes 0.500 ÷ 0.326.
01

a

2 marks

Describe Describe the pattern in the data.

How to approach it

Read the data before explaining it. Quote the relevant values or trend, show the comparison or calculation, and then connect that numerical evidence to the physical conclusion—including uncertainty or anomalies when they matter.

  1. 1

    States that the angle of refraction increases as the angle of incidence increases.

  2. 2

    States that the refracted angle remains smaller than the incident angle, so the ray bends towards the normal.

02

b

2 marks

Calculate For the 30° reading, calculate sin(i) ÷ sin(r). Use sin(30°) = 0.500 and sin(19°) = 0.326.

How to approach it

Read the data before explaining it. Quote the relevant values or trend, show the comparison or calculation, and then connect that numerical evidence to the physical conclusion—including uncertainty or anomalies when they matter.

  1. 1

    Substitutes 0.500 ÷ 0.326.

  2. 2

    Obtains 1.53, to three significant figures or a consistent precision.

03

c

2 marks

Evaluate Suggest two changes that would make the conclusion more reliable.

How to approach it

Read the data before explaining it. Quote the relevant values or trend, show the comparison or calculation, and then connect that numerical evidence to the physical conclusion—including uncertainty or anomalies when they matter.

  1. 1

    Suggests repeating each measurement and calculating a mean, or taking more angle pairs across the range.

  2. 2

    Suggests a second valid improvement such as using a narrower ray, avoiding parallax, or drawing a more precise normal.

Private on this device

Did your answer earn the marks?

Compare the reasoning point by point, then choose what happens next.