MYP Physics · unit 12
Electromagnetic spectrum
Connect the ideas, make your working visible, and test the result. Use the hints when you need a starting point; open the full solution after your attempt.
Extra challenging questions
A selection from this pathway. Open a topic below for its complete practice and challenge set.
Same light energy, different photon counts
Optional enrichment: this challenge may extend beyond the usual syllabus depth and assumes confidence with algebra and graph interpretation. A source emits monochromatic pulses of equal energy 6.626×10⁻⁶ J at two frequencies: 5.0×10¹⁴ Hz and 1.0×10¹⁵ Hz. Use h = 6.626×10⁻³⁴ J s and c = 3.0×10⁸ m s⁻¹. The graph provides photon energy as a function of frequency. Supplied model: Use photon energy E = hf, wavelength λ = c/f and photon count N = Epulse/Ephoton. Supplied data (Frequency / 10¹⁴ Hz; Photon energy / 10⁻¹⁹ J): (0, 0), (5, 3.313), (10, 6.626). (a) Calculate each wavelength, photon energy and photon count. Identify the approximate spectral region of each pulse. [3 marks] (b) Explain why interference supports a wave model while photon-counting detection needs a particle-like model. Evaluate the claim that all electromagnetic radiation has identical biological effects. [3 marks]
Photon-energy model
Supplied question data. Read the labelled axes and use the observations to test the physical model.
Vertical axis (y): Photon energy / 10⁻¹⁹ J
Horizontal axis (x): Frequency / 10¹⁴ Hz
Read the exact data as a table
| Frequency / 10¹⁴ Hz | Photon energy / 10⁻¹⁹ J |
|---|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 3.313 |
| 10 | 6.626 |
These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. Lines join the supplied values; they are not a fitted model.
Show a hint
Begin with part (a): Calculate each wavelength, photon energy and photon count. Identify the approximate spectral region of each pulse.
Reveal the worked solution
- Use λ = c/f: the lower frequency has wavelength 6.0×10⁻⁷ m and the higher 3.0×10⁻⁷ m.
- Ephoton = hf gives 3.313×10⁻¹⁹ and 6.626×10⁻¹⁹ J. Dividing equal total pulse energy by these values gives 2.0×10¹³ and 1.0×10¹³ photons.
- 600 nm is visible light and 300 nm is ultraviolet. Both propagate at c in vacuum; the higher-frequency pulse contains fewer photons for the same total energy.
- Spatial interference patterns follow phase and superposition, which a simple stream of classical particles does not explain.
- Localized detector events with frequency-dependent energy are described by photons. These are complementary descriptions of quantum light rather than literal tiny balls riding classical waves.
- Absorption, penetration, dose and photon energy depend on wavelength and material. Ultraviolet can cause photochemical damage; exposure assessment cannot be inferred from vacuum speed alone.
Answer (a) 600 nm, 3.313×10⁻¹⁹ J, 2.0×10¹³ photons; 300 nm, 6.626×10⁻¹⁹ J, 1.0×10¹³ photons. (b) Different models describe different observations; common vacuum speed does not imply identical interaction or hazard.
Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.
A prism separates colours but preserves frequencies
Optional enrichment: this challenge may extend beyond the usual syllabus depth and assumes confidence with algebra and graph interpretation. White light enters glass from air at 30° to the normal. The material's measured refractive indices at several vacuum wavelengths are supplied. Air has index 1.00 and c = 3.0×10⁸ m s⁻¹. Treat the colours independently and use Snell's law. Supplied data (Vacuum wavelength / nm; Refractive index): (400, 1.54), (550, 1.52), (700, 1.5). (a) Compare the refracted angles, glass speeds and glass wavelengths for 400 nm and 700 nm light. [3 marks] (b) Explain why recombining the spectrum can produce white light and distinguish this from mixing coloured paints. [3 marks]
Glass dispersion
Supplied question data. Read the labelled axes and use the observations to test the physical model.
Vertical axis (y): Refractive index
Horizontal axis (x): Vacuum wavelength / nm
Read the exact data as a table
| Vacuum wavelength / nm | Refractive index |
|---|---|
| 400 | 1.54 |
| 550 | 1.52 |
| 700 | 1.5 |
These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. No fitted trend is drawn.
Show a hint
Begin with part (a): Compare the refracted angles, glass speeds and glass wavelengths for 400 nm and 700 nm light.
Reveal the worked solution
- Snell's law gives sin r = sin30°/n. The blue/violet value is asin(0.5/1.54)≈18.9° and the red value is asin(0.5/1.50)≈19.5°.
- Speeds are c/n, about 1.95×10⁸ and 2.0×10⁸ m s⁻¹. Higher index gives greater bending toward the normal on entry.
- Frequency is unchanged at entry, so λglass = λvacuum/n, giving about 260 and 467 nm. Dispersion separates directions because n depends on wavelength.
- A second appropriately oriented prism or lens arrangement can recombine the separated spectral components into the original white-light mixture.
- The first prism separates pre-existing frequencies; it does not manufacture colours or convert red photons into blue ones.
- Coloured pigments absorb and scatter different bands, so pigment mixing is subtractive and does not follow the same colour rules as adding light beams.
Answer (a) 400 nm: r≈18.9°, v≈1.95×10⁸ m s⁻¹, λglass≈260 nm; 700 nm: r≈19.5°, v=2.0×10⁸ m s⁻¹, λglass≈467 nm. (b) Light addition combines spectral components; paints remove selected components through absorption.
Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.
Finding a hidden polariser axis
Optional enrichment: this challenge may extend beyond the usual syllabus depth and assumes confidence with algebra and graph interpretation. Unpolarised light of intensity 80 W m⁻² passes through an ideal first polariser and then an ideal analyser. The analyser data are supplied for angles relative to the first axis. Use I = I0 cos²θ for linearly polarised light at an analyser. Supplied data (Relative angle / °; Transmitted intensity / W m⁻²): (0, 40), (30, 30), (45, 20), (60, 10), (90, 0). (a) Explain the first intensity reduction and predict the intensity when a third polariser at 45° is inserted between crossed first and last polarisers. [3 marks] (b) Explain what the extinction supports about light and give one limitation when using this model to reduce glare. [3 marks]
Analyser transmission
Supplied question data. Read the labelled axes and use the observations to test the physical model.
Vertical axis (y): Transmitted intensity / W m⁻²
Horizontal axis (x): Relative angle / °
Read the exact data as a table
| Relative angle / ° | Transmitted intensity / W m⁻² |
|---|---|
| 0 | 40 |
| 30 | 30 |
| 45 | 20 |
| 60 | 10 |
| 90 | 0 |
These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. Lines join the supplied values; they are not a fitted model.
Show a hint
Begin with part (a): Explain the first intensity reduction and predict the intensity when a third polariser at 45° is inserted between crossed first and last polarisers.
Reveal the worked solution
- An ideal polariser transmits half the average intensity of unpolarised light, giving 80/2 = 40 W m⁻².
- The middle axis at 45° transmits 40cos²45° = 20 W m⁻² and defines a new output polarisation direction.
- The last axis is another 45° from the middle, so it transmits 20cos²45° = 10 W m⁻². Without the middle element, the crossed pair transmits zero in the ideal model.
- A transverse oscillation has a selectable direction perpendicular to propagation. A simple longitudinal wave has no equivalent independent transverse axis to filter.
- The evidence supports the transverse nature of light, not every microscopic detail of a classical-wave picture.
- Reflected glare may be only partially polarised, and real filters leak light and absorb other components. Measured minima therefore need not be exactly zero.
Answer (a) First output = 40 W m⁻²; with the middle polariser, final output = 10 W m⁻². (b) Polarisation supports transverse electric-field oscillations; real glare and real filters need not reach complete extinction.
Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.
A sharper X-ray image with a dose trade-off
Optional enrichment: this challenge may extend beyond the usual syllabus depth and assumes confidence with algebra and graph interpretation. An X-ray beam passes through a uniform absorber. Measured transmitted intensity fractions are supplied. Assume exponential attenuation I/I0 = exp(−μx), ignore scatter, and use h = 6.63×10⁻³⁴ J s, c = 3.0×10⁸ m s⁻¹ and electron charge e = 1.60×10⁻¹⁹ C. The tube voltage is 60 kV. Supplied model: For the shortest X-ray wavelength use eV = hc/λmin. Supplied data (Thickness / cm; I/I₀): (0, 1), (1, 0.5), (2, 0.25), (3, 0.125). (a) Determine attenuation coefficient, transmission through 4 cm and the shortest possible tube-emission wavelength. [3 marks] (b) Explain the image contrast and evaluate raising beam intensity to improve a weak image. [3 marks]
Measured X-ray attenuation
Supplied question data. Read the labelled axes and use the observations to test the physical model.
Vertical axis (y): I/I₀
Horizontal axis (x): Thickness / cm
Read the exact data as a table
| Thickness / cm | I/I₀ |
|---|---|
| 0 | 1 |
| 1 | 0.5 |
| 2 | 0.25 |
| 3 | 0.125 |
These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. Lines join the supplied values; they are not a fitted model.
Show a hint
Begin with part (a): Determine attenuation coefficient, transmission through 4 cm and the shortest possible tube-emission wavelength.
Reveal the worked solution
- The half-value thickness is 0.01 m, so μ = ln2/0.01 ≈69.3 m⁻¹. Four such thicknesses transmit (1/2)⁴ = 1/16.
- The greatest photon energy is the full electron energy eV = (1.60×10⁻¹⁹)(60000) = 9.60×10⁻¹⁵ J.
- Using E = hc/λ gives λmin = hc/(eV) ≈2.07×10⁻¹¹ m. Most emitted photons need not have this maximum energy.
- Different tissue thicknesses and attenuation coefficients give different transmitted intensities at the detector, creating contrast.
- If detected photons are independently counted, relative random counting uncertainty scales approximately as 1/√N; increasing N can improve statistical image quality.
- X-rays are ionising, so increased photon fluence can increase patient dose. The exposure should be justified by the diagnostic task, with collimation, shielding and detector efficiency considered; ultrasound may answer some questions without ionising radiation.
Answer (a) μ≈69.3 m⁻¹; transmission at 4 cm = 1/16 = 6.25%; λmin≈2.07×10⁻¹¹ m. (b) Different attenuation gives contrast; more incident photons can reduce relative counting noise but also increases exposure.
Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.