University Advanced Quantum Mechanics · topic UAQM-06.09
Thomas precession derived from non-commuting boosts
Connect the ideas, make your working visible, and test the result. Use the hints when you need a starting point; open the full solution after your attempt.
Further practice
Work through a fresh case before tackling the extension.
Thomas precession derived from non-commuting boosts: predict a finite change
Thomas precession is the turning of a spin that feels no torque, measured in the rest frames reached from the lab by pure boosts. It exists because two non-collinear boosts compose to a boost and a rotation, and it runs at ω_T = (γ²/(γ + 1))(a × v)/c². Use the supplied topic model Y_out = 1/sqrt(1-b^2), where Y_out is LORENTZ FACTOR γ (dimensionless). The output symbol Y_out is distinct from all input symbols. ^ denotes a power; π = 3.141592653589793; sqrt(x) means √x. b is Speed β = v/c, dimensionless. Keep phi (Orbit angle travelled φ) = 270 ° fixed. For this exercise use only 0.140313 ≤ b ≤ 0.809688 on this continuous branch. A grid of test settings is an input restriction for this exercise, not by itself a claim of physical quantisation. This calculation retains the topic model's stated assumptions; it does not extend them to a different physical setup. Calculate Y_out at b = 0.287575 and 0.381288. Find the signed output change ΔY_out and the average sensitivity ΔY_out/Δb across this interval. State whether the response increases or decreases; distinguish this interval average from a derivative at one point.
LORENTZ FACTOR γ against b
Predictions from the supplied Thomas precession derived from non-commuting boosts model, with all other inputs fixed as stated in the question. 5 calibration points support a trend comparison; they are not measured data or a straight-line law.
Vertical axis (y): LORENTZ FACTOR γ
Horizontal axis (x): b: Speed β = v/c
Axes show the supplied calibration interval; the origin may lie outside the plot.
Read the exact data as a table
| b: Speed β = v/c | LORENTZ FACTOR γ |
|---|---|
| 0.1403125 | 1.0099915758818119 |
| 0.30765625 | 1.0509748297308472 |
| 0.47500000000000003 | 1.1363819794542722 |
| 0.64234375 | 1.3047732957603952 |
| 0.8096875000000001 | 1.7039802216382824 |
These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. No fitted trend is drawn.
Show a hint
Substitute each value of b separately while keeping every other input fixed, then subtract in the same order.
Reveal the worked solution
- At b = 0.287575, substitute into Y_out = 1/sqrt(1-b^2): Y₀ = 1.0441.
- At b = 0.381288, the same fixed-parameter model gives Y₁ = 1.08172.
- Signed change: ΔY_out = Y₁ − Y₀ = 0.0376117; the input change is Δb = 0.0937125.
- Average sensitivity is ΔY_out/Δb = 0.401352 1 per unit input. Its positive sign means that this response increases over the specified interval.
- This is a secant slope between two settings. It equals a point derivative only for a locally linear relation or in a justified small-interval limit.
Answer Y₀ = 1.0441, Y₁ = 1.08172; ΔY_out = 0.0376117; average sensitivity = 0.401352 1 per unit input.
Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.
Extra challenging questions
Work through the linked stages and explain what each result means.
Thomas precession derived from non-commuting boosts: infer an input with uncertainty
Thomas precession is the turning of a spin that feels no torque, measured in the rest frames reached from the lab by pure boosts. It exists because two non-collinear boosts compose to a boost and a rotation, and it runs at ω_T = (γ²/(γ + 1))(a × v)/c². Use the supplied topic model Y_out = 1/sqrt(1-b^2), where Y_out is LORENTZ FACTOR γ (dimensionless). The output symbol Y_out is distinct from all input symbols. ^ denotes a power; π = 3.141592653589793; sqrt(x) means √x. b is Speed β = v/c, dimensionless. Keep phi (Orbit angle travelled φ) = 270 ° fixed. For this exercise use only 0.140313 ≤ b ≤ 0.809688 on this continuous branch. A grid of test settings is an input restriction for this exercise, not by itself a claim of physical quantisation. This calculation retains the topic model's stated assumptions; it does not extend them to a different physical setup. A reading gives Y_out = 1.1960801, with a bounded reading uncertainty ±0.027913. Treat the model and all fixed inputs as exact for this exercise; the bound is not a standard deviation. First estimate the unknown b by straight-line interpolation between the two endpoint predictions. Then solve the actual model on the stated branch to an absolute input tolerance of 0.0000669375, using a numerical bracket if required. Find the full input interval consistent with the bounded reading uncertainty and compare it with a symmetric input-error assumption. Do not assume that the supplied calibration points prove monotonicity outside this branch.
LORENTZ FACTOR γ against b
Predictions from the supplied Thomas precession derived from non-commuting boosts model, with all other inputs fixed as stated in the question. 5 calibration points support a trend comparison; they are not measured data or a straight-line law.
Vertical axis (y): LORENTZ FACTOR γ
Horizontal axis (x): b: Speed β = v/c
Axes show the supplied calibration interval; the origin may lie outside the plot.
Read the exact data as a table
| b: Speed β = v/c | LORENTZ FACTOR γ |
|---|---|
| 0.1403125 | 1.0099915758818119 |
| 0.30765625 | 1.0509748297308472 |
| 0.47500000000000003 | 1.1363819794542722 |
| 0.64234375 | 1.3047732957603952 |
| 0.8096875000000001 | 1.7039802216382824 |
These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. No fitted trend is drawn.
Show a hint
The model's endpoint predictions bracket the reading. Solve Y_out(b) = Y_measured and then solve again at Y_measured − u and Y_measured + u; a nonlinear inverse can give unequal input deviations.
Reveal the worked solution
- Endpoint predictions are Y_out(0.140313) = 1.00999 and Y_out(0.809688) = 1.70398. The target lies between them. On the selected branch the response is strictly increasing.
- Endpoint interpolation gives b_line = 0.140313 + (1.19608 − 1.00999)(0.809688 − 0.140313)/(1.70398 − 1.00999) = 0.319801. This estimates the inverse of the endpoint chord, rather than assuming that chord is the physical model.
- Use the actual equation, not the chord, and bracket its root. Evaluating the midpoint and retaining the sign-changing half-interval gives b = 0.548631; substituting back gives Y_out = 1.1960801.
- The interpolation error in the input is |b_line − b| = 0.22883. This is larger than the requested numerical tolerance.
- Invert both limits Y_out = 1.1681671 and 1.2239931. Sort the roots even if the response decreases: 0.516906 ≤ b ≤ 0.57664.
- The lower and upper input deviations are 0.0317249 and 0.0280091. They differ because the inverse response is nonlinear; a symmetric error bar would only be a local approximation. This interval includes reading uncertainty only, not model error or uncertainty in fixed inputs.
Answer b ≈ 0.548631; compatible interval [0.516906, 0.57664]. Endpoint interpolation gives 0.319801.
Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.