Skip to main content

Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson

Thomas precession derived from non-commuting boosts

Quantum Mechanics II halved its spin-orbit energy on Thomas's word, and topic 6.07 pulled the half out of the Foldy-Wouthuysen algebra. Here it is earned again from kinematics alone, and we see why the −1 in g − 1 belongs to the trajectory rather than to the electron, the fact storage-ring g − 2 experiments rest on.

UAQM-06.09 · Lesson 9 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Thomas precession derived from non-commuting boostsLeft: a torque-free spin carried counterclockwise round a circle at β = 0.60; solid arrow its rest-frame spin, faint arrow the velocity, dashed line the spin's starting direction. After φ = 270° the spin has turned 67.5° clockwise. Right: Thomas angle per lap, exact 2π(γ − 1) solid, low-speed πβ² dashed: 90.0° against 64.8°.φ = 270°: spin turned 67.5° clockwiseThomas angle per lapexact 90.0°, πβ² 64.8°360°dashed: πβ²β = v/c, 0 to 0.9solid: spin, faint: velocity, dashed: start
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

Boosts in different directions do not commute, so a torque-free spin still turns.

The key idea

Thomas precession is the turning of a spin that feels no torque, measured in the rest frames reached from the lab by pure boosts. It exists because two non-collinear boosts compose to a boost and a rotation, and it runs at ωT = (γ²/(γ + 1))(a × v)/c².

Example. A proton with 250 MeV of kinetic energy circling in a cyclotron has γ = 1.2664, so on every lap kinematics alone turns its spin back by 2π(γ − 1) = 1.67 rad, or 95.9°, before any magnetic torque is counted.

The complete physical model and assumptions

An accelerated particle has no single rest frame but a family of them, one per instant, and the natural member at time t is the one reached from the lab by the pure boost L(v(t)); the spin is defined there. A spin with no torque on it, though, keeps its direction relative to a different family: the axes the particle carries from one instant to the next by pure boosts alone. The two families would agree if L(v + a dt)L(v)⁻¹ were a pure boost, and it is not. Unit 5's [Kₓ, Ky] = −iJz makes the composition of non-collinear boosts a boost times a rotation, through |a × v| dt/(2c²) at low speed and (γ²/(γ + 1))|a × v| dt/c² exactly. Measured against the lab-aligned rest frames the spin therefore precesses at ωT = (γ²/(γ + 1))(a × v)/c², backwards, 2π(γ − 1) per circular lap. A precession is an energy, S⋅ωT, and in a central electric field that energy is −(1/(2m²c²))(1/r)(dV/dr) S⋅L, minus one half of the g = 2 rest-frame magnetic energy. That is the coefficient g − 1: g belongs to the particle's moment, −1 to its path. The argument needs a classical trajectory with a definite a and v and works to first order in the coupling. The operator statement is topic 6.07's Foldy-Wouthuysen result, the Darwin term has no precession picture at all, and the covariant all-speed law is the Bargmann-Michel-Telegdi equation, named here rather than derived.

1Two families of rest frames

Units are SI throughout, with Unit 5's metric signature (+, −, −, −). A particle on a curved path has lab velocity v(t) and acceleration a = dv/dt. Call its rest frame at time t, R(t), the frame reached from the lab by the pure boost L(v(t)): its axes are as nearly parallel to the lab's as relativity allows, and the rest-frame spin s lives there. Now ask what a spin with no torque on it does. Between t and t + dt the particle only ever experiences a small boost, by the velocity change it sees in R(t), with nothing to turn it, so s keeps its components on a second family of axes built step by step from pure boosts out of the particle's own frame (Fermi-Walker transport). The families coincide only if L(v + dv)L(v)⁻¹ is itself a pure boost. For dv parallel to v it is, because collinear rapidities add. For any part of dv perpendicular to v, Unit 5's [Kₓ, Ky] = −iJz says it cannot be.

2The commutator gives the rotation at low speed

At low speed the rapidity is v/c and L(v) = exp(−i v⋅K/c). Compose with the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff series, eX eY = exp(X + Y + ½[X, Y] + …), taking X = −i(v + a dt)⋅K/c and Y = +i v⋅K/c. The first-order part, X + Y = −i(a dt)⋅K/c, is a boost by the velocity change. The second-order part is ½[X, Y] = (dt/(2c²)) aᵢvⱼ[Kᵢ, Kⱼ] = (dt/(2c²)) aᵢvⱼ(−iεᵢⱼₖJₖ) = −i(dt/(2c²))(a × v)⋅J, a rotation generator. So stepping from R(t) to R(t + dt) is a boost plus a turn through dθ = (dt/(2c²))(a × v), which carries the spin's components to s + dθ × s. Relative to the lab-aligned rest frames a torque-free spin therefore precesses at ωT ≈ (1/(2c²)) a × v, derived. Dimensions: (m s⁻²)(m s⁻¹)/(m² s⁻²) = s⁻¹. What this drops, [X, [X, Y]] and beyond, is smaller by a further v²/c².

3The exact rate from the 4 × 4 matrices

The commutator fixes the low-speed coefficient; the exact one comes from multiplying the finite matrices. L(v) has time-space entries −γvᵢ/c and spatial block δᵢⱼ + ((γ − 1)/v²)vᵢvⱼ, and L(v)⁻¹ = L(−v). In the spatial block of L(v + dv)L(−v), every term built from one velocity alone is symmetric in i and j, so only the cross terms, one factor from each velocity, can rotate anything. Antisymmetrised and kept to first order in dv they give −((γ − 1)/v²)(dvᵢvⱼ − vᵢdvⱼ), which sends s to s + ((γ − 1)/v²)(dv × v) × s. Since γ² − 1 = γ²v²/c², (γ − 1)/v² = γ²/((γ + 1)c²), and so ωT = (γ²/(γ + 1))(a × v)/c², derived. Its transverse time-space entries, −γ dv⊥/c, give the boost: the transverse velocity γ dv⊥ that R(t) sees. Checks: γ²/(γ + 1) → ½ as v → 0, recovering the commutator; a ∥ v gives zero; at γ = 5/3 the coefficient is 25/24, already about twice its low-speed value.

4A circular orbit: γ − 1 per radian, backwards

On a circle a ⊥ v and |a × v| = v²ω, and a × v points opposite to the orbital angular velocity ω. So ωT = −(γ²β²/(γ + 1))ω = −(γ − 1)ω: the spin turns backwards through 2π(γ − 1) per lap, derived. At β = 0.6, γ = 1.25 and each lap costs 90°; at β = 0.866, γ = 2 and the spin turns once backwards per lap while the velocity turns once forwards. At low speed 2π(γ − 1) → πβ², and that shortcut is already 13% low for a 50 keV electron with γ = 1.098. In hydrogen's Bohr ground orbit v = αc and ħω = α²mc² = 27.2 eV, so the spin falls behind by only πα² = 1.67 × 10⁻⁴ rad per orbit. Yet ħωT = α⁴mc²/2 = 0.72 meV, the size of the fine structure and half the magnetic precession energy α⁴mc² it competes with, which the next step turns into an energy shift.

5Precession is energy: where the −1 comes from

Any extra precession ω × S of a spin is generated by an energy ω⋅S, since (i/ħ)[ω⋅S, S] = ω × S. The lab-aligned rest axes turn at −ωT against the torque-free ones, so the energy written in them gains UT = S⋅ωT. For a central force ma = −(1/r)(dV/dr) r, so a × v = −(1/(m²r))(dV/dr) L and, at low speed, UT = −(1/(2m²c²))(1/r)(dV/dr) S⋅L, derived. The moment μ = g(q/2m)S in the rest-frame field B′ = −v × E/c², quoted from Quantum Mechanics II, adds UB = −μ⋅B′ = (g/(2m²c²))(1/r)(dV/dr) S⋅L, using qE = −(1/r)(dV/dr) r. The sum has coefficient g − 1, topic 6.07's result reached without the Dirac equation. Hydrogen's 2P splitting is then (g − 1)α⁴mc²/32: the magnetic term alone gives 21.9 GHz, the Thomas term brings it to 10.95 GHz, and the anomalous moment raises g − 1 to 1 + 2aₑ = 1.0023, giving 10.97 GHz against the measured 10.969 GHz.

6Any spinning body, any speed: the BMT equation

ωT knows only a and v, so the −1 is the same for every spinning body, while g belongs to the particle. A gyroscope pushed round a track keeps only the Thomas term, and so does the kinematic part of a nucleon's spin-orbit energy, whatever else the strong force adds. Topic 6.07's Lorentz-scalar potential makes no rest-frame magnetic field and gives exactly the Thomas term, hence its opposite sign. A neutron crossing a nucleus's electric field has a moment but no acceleration, so it keeps the whole magnetic term and no Thomas term. In a storage ring with B ⊥ v and no E, the time-dilated rest-frame Larmor rate (g/2)qB/m and the backward (γ − 1)ωc leave the spin outrunning the momentum by a qB/m at any γ, derived in the Hard example. The covariant law for all speeds in slowly varying fields is the Bargmann-Michel-Telegdi equation of 1959, named and quoted: an electric field adds a term in a − 1/(γ² − 1), which vanishes at the magic γ = √(1 + 1/a) = 29.3, the 3.094 GeV/c of the muon g − 2 rings.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Neighbouring rest frames at low speed

L(v + a dt) L(v)⁻¹ ≈ exp[−i(a dt/c)⋅K − i(dt/(2c²))(a × v)⋅J]

The rotation is ½[X, Y] of the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff series, made by [Kₓ, Ky] = −iJz: two boosts leave a turn that no single boost contains.

K, J: Unit 5's dimensionless 4 × 4 boost and rotation generators; v in m s⁻¹, a in m s⁻², dt in s. Derived here.

Thomas precession rate, exact

ωT = (γ²/(γ + 1)) (a × v)/c²

A torque-free spin obeys ds/dt = ωT × s in the lab-aligned rest frames. Only a ⊥ v counts, so a linear accelerator gives no Thomas precession.

a, v: lab acceleration (m s⁻²) and velocity (m s⁻¹); ωT in rad s⁻¹ of lab time; γ²/(γ + 1) → ½ as v → 0. Derived here.

Uniform circular motion

ωT = −(γ − 1) ω

β = 0.6 loses 90° per lap and γ = 2 a full turn. At low speed the lap angle is πβ², 1.67 × 10⁻⁴ rad in hydrogen's Bohr ground orbit.

ω the orbital angular velocity (rad s⁻¹); from |a × v| = v²ω and γ²β²/(γ + 1) = γ − 1. Backwards, 2π(γ − 1) per lap. Derived here.

Precession as energy

UT = S⋅ωT

The lab-aligned rest axes turn at −ωT against the torque-free ones, and a Hamiltonian written on axes turning at Ω gains −Ω⋅S.

S the spin (J s), ωT in rad s⁻¹, UT in J. Argued here: an energy ω⋅S generates the precession dS/dt = ω × S.

Thomas energy in a central field

UT = −(1/(2m²c²)) (1/r)(dV/dr) S⋅L

For an electrostatic V it is exactly −½ of the g = 2 rest-frame magnetic energy, whatever the shape of V(r), because both are built from the same a and v.

V(r) the potential energy (J), m in kg, L = r × mv in J s; from ma = −(1/r)(dV/dr) r at low speed. Derived here.

Spin-orbit coefficient g − 1

Uₛₒ = ((g − 1)/(2m²c²)) (1/r)(dV/dr) S⋅L

Hydrogen's 2P splitting is (g − 1)α⁴mc²/32 = 10.95 GHz at g = 2 and 10.97 GHz with aₑ, against a measured 10.969 GHz. Dropping the −1 gives 21.9 GHz.

g from −μ⋅B′ with B′ = −v × E/c², quoted from QM-II; −1 from Thomas. For the electron g − 1 = 1 + 2aₑ, not 1 + aₑ.
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

0.60
0.05 to 0.9; steps of 0.05.
270 °
0 to 720 °; steps of 15.

Try this. Keep β = 0.60 and drag φ to 360°: one lap leaves the spin 90° behind, pointing outward, though nothing twisted it. Then push β to 0.90 and watch the solid curve leave the dashed one; past β = 0.866, where γ = 2, the spin loses more than a full turn per lap.

Live results

LORENTZ FACTOR γ
1.250
|ωT| / ω = γ − 1
0.2500
THOMAS ANGLE PER LAP
90.0 °
LOW-SPEED πβ² PER LAP
64.8 °

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Advanced Quantum Mechanics modelLeft: a torque-free spin carried counterclockwise round a circle at β = 0.60; solid arrow its rest-frame spin, faint arrow the velocity, dashed line the spin's starting direction. After φ = 270° the spin has turned 67.5° clockwise. Right: Thomas angle per lap, exact 2π(γ − 1) solid, low-speed πβ² dashed: 90.0° against 64.8°.φ = 270°: spin turned 67.5° clockwiseThomas angle per lapexact 90.0°, πβ² 64.8°360°dashed: πβ²β = v/c, 0 to 0.9solid: spin, faint: velocity, dashed: start
Left: a torque-free spin carried counterclockwise round a circle at β = 0.60; solid arrow its rest-frame spin, faint arrow the velocity, dashed line the spin's starting direction. After φ = 270° the spin has turned 67.5° clockwise. Right: Thomas angle per lap, exact 2π(γ − 1) solid, low-speed πβ² dashed: 90.0° against 64.8°.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Speed β = v/c: 0.60; Orbit angle travelled φ: 270 °

Baseline 0.60; choose 0.05 to 0.9, in steps of 0.05.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The tempting reading is that the Thomas half belongs to the electron, as though relativity halved its magnetic coupling inside an atom, so that every spin-orbit energy should simply be multiplied by ½. Then an anomalous moment g = 2(1 + aₑ) would scale hydrogen's 2P splitting by g/2 = 1 + aₑ, and a neutron crossing a nucleus's electric field would feel half of −μ⋅B′. Both are wrong for one reason: ωT is built from a × v alone. It subtracts a fixed 1 from g, not a fraction of g, so the splitting scales as g − 1 = 1 + 2aₑ, the 0.23% rise the measured 10.969 GHz requires; 1 + aₑ leaves the prediction about 13 MHz short. And a neutron, which an electric field does not accelerate, has no Thomas term at all: it feels the whole rest-frame magnetic energy, which is Schwinger's spin-orbit interaction. The half describes a g = 2 particle's path through an electric field, not the particle.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

An electron with kinetic energy 50.0 keV circles counterclockwise, seen from above, in a uniform 20.0 mT magnetic field. Find the Thomas precession rate and the angle, with its sense, through which the Thomas precession alone turns its rest-frame spin on each lap, and say how far off the low-speed formula would be.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

Build hydrogen's 2p fine structure from the two precessions. Using Quantum Mechanics II's ⟨1/r³⟩ = 1/(24a₀³) for 2p, find the rest-frame magnetic energy and the Thomas energy of 2P(3/2) and 2P(1/2) at g = 2, the splitting with and without the Thomas term, and the effect of the anomalous moment aₑ = 1.160 × 10⁻³. Compare with the measured 10.969 GHz.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

A storage ring holds positive muons at p = 3.094 GeV/c in a uniform 1.45 T field perpendicular to the orbit, with no electric field on the orbit. Build the lab-frame spin precession from the time-dilated rest-frame Larmor precession plus the exact Thomas precession, find how fast the spin turns relative to the momentum, and evaluate it with the quoted aμ = 1.16592 × 10⁻³. What would the ring see if the Thomas term were left out?

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

Take a spinning body with no magnetic moment, steered at constant speed 0.80c (γ = 5/3) round a circular path, counterclockwise seen from above, by a force that exerts no torque in its rest frame. After one lap, how has its rest-frame spin turned relative to the lab axes?
7

Review & continue

Thomas precession is the turning of a spin that feels no torque, measured in the rest frames reached from the lab by pure boosts. It exists because two non-collinear boosts compose to a boost and a rotation, and it runs at ωT = (γ²/(γ + 1))(a × v)/c².

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.