MYP Physics · Unit 09
Waves
Wave quantities, transverse and longitudinal models, speed, reflection, refraction, diffraction, superposition, and interference.
- 21
- questions
- 19
- total marks
- 5
- mapped topics
Link wave speed, frequency, and wavelength
A water wave travels at 0.60 m s⁻¹ and has frequency 4.0 Hz. What is its wavelength?
- A
0.15 m
- B
0.24 m
- C
1.5 m
- D
2.4 m
- a
Select and show Select the correct wavelength and show the calculation.
3Ready to self-mark?Reveal the detailed answer
Mark-by-mark answer
Correct choiceA
Selects option A: the water-wave wavelength is 0.15 m.
Uses wavelength = wave speed ÷ frequency.
Calculates 0.60 ÷ 4.0 = 0.15 m.
Build deeper understandingReveal the teacher insight
Deeper learning cue
Ask students to estimate whether four waves per second, each 0.15 m long, plausibly pass a point at 0.60 m each second.
Does ripple speed stay constant?
A ripple tank has constant water depth. A student changes the source frequency and measures wavelength.
| Frequency / Hz | Wavelength / cm |
|---|---|
| 5.0 | 4.8 |
| 6.0 | 4.0 |
| 8.0 | 3.0 |
| 10.0 | 2.4 |
| 12.0 | 2.1 |
- a
Calculate Calculate the wave speed for the first four rows.
3Ready to self-mark?Reveal the detailed answer
Mark-by-mark answer
Uses v = fλ and converts centimetres to metres.
Obtains 0.24 m s⁻¹ for the 5.0 Hz and 6.0 Hz rows.
Obtains 0.24 m s⁻¹ for the 8.0 Hz and 10.0 Hz rows.
- b
Evaluate Evaluate the 12.0 Hz result against the constant-speed model.
3Ready to self-mark?Reveal the detailed answer
Mark-by-mark answer
Calculates the 12.0 Hz speed as 12.0 × 0.021 = 0.252 m s⁻¹.
Compares it with 0.24 m s⁻¹ and identifies a difference of 0.012 m s⁻¹ or 5%.
Concludes that it is a possible anomalous or uncertain point, but one point alone does not establish a real speed change.
- c
Improve Propose one improvement that reduces wavelength-measurement uncertainty.
2Ready to self-mark?Reveal the detailed answer
Mark-by-mark answer
Proposes measuring across several complete wavelengths, using a strobe image, or repeating independent readings.
Explains that a longer measured distance or repeated mean reduces the percentage uncertainty in one wavelength.
Build deeper understandingReveal the teacher insight
Deeper learning cue
The final value is deliberately close enough to require uncertainty-aware language rather than automatic rejection.
Plan a two-source interference test
Two coherent ripple sources create alternating regions of large and small amplitude. A student claims that increasing the source separation makes the nodal regions closer together at a fixed distance from the sources.
- a
Formulate State the variables needed to test the claim and one suitable dependent measurement.
3Ready to self-mark?Reveal the detailed answer
Mark-by-mark answer
Identifies source separation as the independent variable.
Identifies nodal spacing at a fixed observation line, or number of nodal lines across a fixed width, as the dependent variable.
Controls source frequency, water depth, source phase, amplitude, and observation distance.
- b
Design Describe a method that would produce evidence strong enough to test the claim.
3Ready to self-mark?Reveal the detailed answer
Mark-by-mark answer
Uses at least five measured source separations and records a frozen or stroboscopic pattern for each.
Measures across several nodal spacings and divides by the number of intervals, with repeats.
Plots mean nodal spacing against source separation and uses uncertainty or spread when judging the trend.
- c
Evaluate Explain why judging nodal positions by eye is a limitation and propose a linked improvement.
2Ready to self-mark?Reveal the detailed answer
Mark-by-mark answer
Explains that low-amplitude regions have finite width or fluctuate, making the chosen centre subjective.
Proposes video/image analysis, a fixed grid, or an amplitude probe with a stated threshold to define positions consistently.
Build deeper understandingReveal the teacher insight
Deeper learning cue
Students need not derive an interference formula; the assessment target is designing observable evidence for a directional claim.
More focused practice
Seven quick mastery questions
Open one task at a time, reveal the worked reasoning, then mark it mastered or save it to revisit.
Criterion A
Festival wave speed
4 marks · routineOpen question →Criterion A
From frequency to period
3 marks · routineOpen question →Criterion D
Pulse meets a fixed end
5 marks · demandingOpen question →Criterion C
Refraction in shallow water
6 marks · demandingOpen question →Criterion A
Two pulses share the rope
4 marks · routineOpen question →Criterion C
Read a wave snapshot
5 marks · routineOpen question →Criterion B
Ripple-tank wavelength inquiry
8 marks · discriminatingOpen question →Criterion B
A harbour entrance model
8 marks · demandingOpen question →Criterion B
Same entrance, different waves
8 marks · demandingOpen question →Criterion B
Separating two coherent sources
8 marks · demandingOpen question →Criterion B
Waves behind a model breakwater
8 marks · demandingOpen question →Criterion B
Waves cross a shallow shelf
8 marks · demandingOpen question →Criterion B
Turning waves at a depth boundary
8 marks · demandingOpen question →Criterion B
Changing the timing of linked sources
8 marks · demandingOpen question →Criterion B
How large is a reinforced wave?
8 marks · demandingOpen question →Criterion B
Steering a reflected ripple
8 marks · demandingOpen question →Criterion B
Does a wave fan get wider?
8 marks · demandingOpen question →Criterion A
Predict waves entering two harbour gaps
10 marks · discriminatingOpen question →Reference subsectionMapped lessons for this unit
Wave quantities and representations
Build and read wave diagrams using amplitude, wavelength, frequency, period, and speed.
Open lesson →Superposition and interference
Use overlapping pulses first, then explain when reinforcement and cancellation occur.
Open lesson →Stationary waves, nodes, and antinodes
Identify pattern features from evidence and explain the boundary conditions that produce them.
Open lesson →Diffraction and grating evidence
Connect aperture or grating structure to a measurable pattern; formal derivations remain optional.
Open lesson →Two-source interference investigation
Criterion B focus: predict a pattern, identify measurable quantities, and evaluate alignment uncertainty.
Open lesson →