Skip to main content
University Physics III

University Physics III · Quantum Physics · 9.09

Potential barriers and quantum tunnelling

Exponential decay of psi inside a barrier and transmission near the exponential of minus 2 κ L, with kappa set by the square root of mass times the barrier height above the particle energy, so transmission falls exponentially in width but only with that square root in mass and height; alpha decay and scanning tunnelling microscopy; the estimate drops the prefactor and assumes a thick, one-dimensional, static barrier.

Course-map guide · not a complete lesson or simulation

Scope & orientation

What this subsection covers

Exponential decay of psi inside a barrier and transmission near the exponential of minus 2 κ L, with kappa set by the square root of mass times the barrier height above the particle energy, so transmission falls exponentially in width but only with that square root in mass and height; alpha dec…

A strong response uses stopping-potential versus frequency graphs and states where the model stops being reliable.

Reasoning checklist

Evidence, assumptions and limits

01

Assumptions to state

State the system, observable, approximation, and conditions held fixed before using a model.

02

Evidence to collect

Does stopping potential vary linearly with frequency, and what value of h and work function does the fit support?

Read the complete note

Does stopping potential vary linearly with frequency, and what value of h and work function does the fit support? Useful evidence includes stopping-potential data at several source frequencies, a linear fit with slope h/e and intercept minus φ/e, residuals, propagated uncertainty, and a stated range of validity.

03

Limits to state

This GioPhysics course map is an adaptable learning sequence, not academic credit, accreditation, or a universal university syllabus.

Read the complete note

This GioPhysics course map is an adaptable learning sequence, not academic credit, accreditation, or a universal university syllabus. Third-semester content is the least standardised of the introductory sequence: departments place oscillations, waves, optics, and thermal physics differently, and the modern-physics units here are a bounded survey rather than a complete course in relativity, quantum mechanics, atomic, nuclear, or particle physics. Follow your institution's published scope, notation, laboratory programme, and assessment rules. A result should be checked against units, signs, limiting cases, and the conditions under which its model was derived.

Diagram & examples

Work the claim before choosing an equation

Interactive concept map

Follow the model from claim to evidence.

01 · Physical claimPotential barriers and quantum tunnelling

Exponential decay of psi inside a barrier and transmission near the exponential of minus 2 κ L.

Read the complete note

Exponential decay of psi inside a barrier and transmission near the exponential of minus 2 κ L, with kappa set by the square root of mass times the barrier height above the particle energy, so transmission falls exponentially in width but only with that square root in mass and height; alpha decay and scanning tunnelling microscopy; the estimate drops the prefactor and assumes a thick, one-dimensional, static barrier.

02 · RepresentationThe subsection's claim

Model, evidence, and boundary

03 · TestPrediction before measurement

What is the strongest test of a claim about Potential barriers and quantum tunnelling?

04 · Evidence & boundaryDecide, then qualify

Does stopping potential vary linearly with frequency, and what value of h and work function does the fit support?

Read the complete note

Does stopping potential vary linearly with frequency, and what value of h and work function does the fit support? Useful evidence includes stopping-potential data at several source frequencies, a linear fit with slope h/e and intercept minus φ/e, residuals, propagated uncertainty, and a stated range of validity.

Interactive diagram for Potential barriers and quantum tunnelling: follow the physical claim through its representation, proposed test, evidence, and model boundary.

modelModel, evidence, and boundary turns the stated idea into a representation that can make a prediction.

Example questions

Try the reasoning before revealing the structure.

Diagram check

What is the strongest test of a claim about Potential barriers and quantum tunnelling?

Quick check

Test the reasoning, not recall

What is the strongest test of a claim about Potential barriers and quantum tunnelling?

Choose an answer to test the model.