Skip to main content
University Physics III

University Physics III · Atomic Physics · 10.06

Electron spin and the Stern-Gerlach experiment

Two-valued beam splitting in an inhomogeneous field, spin one-half with two projections, the spin magnetic moment with a g factor of about 2.0023, and spin as intrinsic; no spinning-sphere picture survives, because a classical sphere of that size would need a surface speed above c, and the departure of g from exactly 2 needs quantum electrodynamics.

Course-map guide · not a complete lesson or simulation

Scope & orientation

What this subsection covers

Two-valued beam splitting in an inhomogeneous field, spin one-half with two projections, the spin magnetic moment with a g factor of about 2.0023, and spin as intrinsic; no spinning-sphere picture survives, because a classical sphere of that size would need a surface speed above c, and the departur…

A strong response uses radial probability density plots and states where the model stops being reliable.

Reasoning checklist

Evidence, assumptions and limits

01

Assumptions to state

State the system, observable, approximation, and conditions held fixed before using a model.

02

Evidence to collect

Where do numerically integrated hydrogen radial functions place the most probable radius, and how does it compare with the Bohr radius for each n and l?

Read the complete note

Where do numerically integrated hydrogen radial functions place the most probable radius, and how does it compare with the Bohr radius for each n and l? Useful evidence includes radial solutions, normalisation checks, plots of the radial probability density formed as r-squared times the modulus-squared radial function, most probable and mean radii, grid-convergence tests, and a stated non-relativistic fixed-nucleus limit.

03

Limits to state

This GioPhysics course map is an adaptable learning sequence, not academic credit, accreditation, or a universal university syllabus.

Read the complete note

This GioPhysics course map is an adaptable learning sequence, not academic credit, accreditation, or a universal university syllabus. Third-semester content is the least standardised of the introductory sequence: departments place oscillations, waves, optics, and thermal physics differently, and the modern-physics units here are a bounded survey rather than a complete course in relativity, quantum mechanics, atomic, nuclear, or particle physics. Follow your institution's published scope, notation, laboratory programme, and assessment rules. A result should be checked against units, signs, limiting cases, and the conditions under which its model was derived.

Diagram & examples

Work the claim before choosing an equation

Interactive concept map

Follow the model from claim to evidence.

01 · Physical claimElectron spin and the Stern-Gerlach experiment

Two-valued beam splitting in an inhomogeneous field, spin one-half with two projections, the spin magnetic moment with a g factor of about 2.0023, and spin as intrinsic.

Read the complete note

Two-valued beam splitting in an inhomogeneous field, spin one-half with two projections, the spin magnetic moment with a g factor of about 2.0023, and spin as intrinsic; no spinning-sphere picture survives, because a classical sphere of that size would need a surface speed above c, and the departure of g from exactly 2 needs quantum electrodynamics.

02 · RepresentationThe subsection's claim

Model, evidence, and boundary

03 · TestPrediction before measurement

When should a model used for Electron spin and the Stern-Gerlach experiment be revised?

04 · Evidence & boundaryDecide, then qualify

Where do numerically integrated hydrogen radial functions place the most probable radius, and how does it compare with the Bohr radius for each n and l?

Read the complete note

Where do numerically integrated hydrogen radial functions place the most probable radius, and how does it compare with the Bohr radius for each n and l? Useful evidence includes radial solutions, normalisation checks, plots of the radial probability density formed as r-squared times the modulus-squared radial function, most probable and mean radii, grid-convergence tests, and a stated non-relativistic fixed-nucleus limit.

Interactive diagram for Electron spin and the Stern-Gerlach experiment: follow the physical claim through its representation, proposed test, evidence, and model boundary.

modelModel, evidence, and boundary turns the stated idea into a representation that can make a prediction.

Example questions

Try the reasoning before revealing the structure.

Diagram check

When should a model used for Electron spin and the Stern-Gerlach experiment be revised?

Quick check

Test the reasoning, not recall

When should a model used for Electron spin and the Stern-Gerlach experiment be revised?

Choose an answer to test the model.