Skip to main content

Physics V course sequence · Interactive lesson

Identical particles and the exchange operator

The labels you write on two electrons are yours, not nature's. Here you meet the operator that audits them, learn what its ±1 eigenvalues do and do not prove, and see exactly which line of the standard argument is a theorem and which is an axiom smuggled in beside it.

UPV-12.01 · Lesson 1 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Identical particles and the exchange operatorAmplitude of a two-particle state plotted along x₁ with particle 2 held at x₂ = 0.23L in a box of width L, built from orbitals 1 and 2. The mixing η = 0.0 gives ⟨P₁₂⟩ = 0.00 and a symmetric weight of 0.50. Each slice is divided by an upper bound on its own amplitude, so read the sign and the zero crossing, not the height.⟨P₁₂⟩ = 0.00x₂ = 0.23 Lamplitude Ψ along x₁orbitals 1, 2+Ψ−Ψ0Ldashed: x₁ = x₂
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

A commutator conserves exchange character; a postulate chooses it.

The key idea

The exchange operator P̂ᵢⱼ swaps the labels of two identical particles in a state, and because it is Hermitian and squares to the identity its only eigenvalues are +1 for a symmetric state and −1 for an antisymmetric one.

Example. In the ordered basis (|αβ⟩, |βα⟩) with ⟨α|β⟩ = 0, P̂₁₂ is the matrix with rows (0, 1) and (1, 0) — literally σₓ — so its characteristic polynomial is λ² − 1, its eigenvalues are +1 and −1, and no third value is available.

The complete physical model and assumptions

A two-particle wavefunction carries a label nature never issued: it calls one particle 1 and the other 2, and no measurement can ever return that name. The operator that audits the label is the transposition P̂₁₂, which swaps the two slots of the tensor product. It is Hermitian and satisfies P̂₁₂² = Î, so it is unitary too and its spectrum is exactly +1 and −1; on the span of |αβ⟩ and |βα⟩ it is σₓ, with eigenvectors (|αβ⟩ ± |βα⟩)/√2. Because a Hamiltonian for identical particles is symmetric under the swap — any pair interaction written in |r₁ − r₂| included — [Ĥ, P̂₁₂] = 0, and exchange character is a constant of the motion. That is the whole yield of the dynamics, and it is less than it looks: a conserved quantity is preserved, not chosen. Nothing in the Schrödinger equation forbids a state that is 20% symmetric and 80% antisymmetric; it merely keeps it that way. Confining nature to the totally symmetric sector or the totally antisymmetric sector, under every transposition at once, is a separate postulate — and for N ≥ 3 a strong one, because the transpositions do not commute with each other and only two irreducible representations of SN are one-dimensional. That axiom is the price non-relativistic quantum mechanics pays; relativistic field theory repays it through spin-statistics, and two-dimensional systems, where exchange is a braid rather than a permutation, decline to pay at all.

1A name no apparatus returns

Write ψ(r₁, r₂) and you have already done something nature did not: you named one electron 1 and the other 2. No apparatus returns that name. An electron carries no serial number, and a detector reports a click at a place, not an identity. The formal version of that complaint is an operator: P̂₁₂|α⟩₁|β⟩₂ = |β⟩₁|α⟩₂, or in the position representation (P̂₁₂ψ)(r₁, r₂) = ψ(r₂, r₁). Notice what it swaps. It exchanges the two slots of the tensor product H ⊗ H, not the coordinates inside one slot, and it is defined by its action on product states and then extended linearly to every superposition. Notice also what it does not require. The swap map can be written down for any two particles whose one-particle spaces are the same space — an electron and a proton included, both living in L²(R³) ⊗ C². What makes a pair identical is the extra fact that Ĥ is unchanged by the swap, and only then does the swap commute with the dynamics. So the opening move of this topic is to convert a philosophical worry about names into a linear operator you can diagonalise beside the Hamiltonian.

2P̂₁₂ is σₓ in disguise

Two properties do all the work. Hermiticity follows from relabelling the dummy integration variables in ⟨Φ|P̂₁₂Ψ⟩ = ∫∫ Φ*(r₁, r₂) ψ(r₂, r₁) d³r₁ d³r₂, so P̂₁₂† = P̂₁₂ and its eigenvalues are real. Involution is even cheaper: swapping the slots twice restores them, so P̂₁₂² = Î exactly, which forces λ² = 1 and hence λ = ±1. The two facts together make P̂₁₂ unitary as well, since P̂₁₂†P̂₁₂ = Î. Now take orthonormal orbitals α ≠ β and restrict to the two-dimensional span of |αβ⟩ and |βα⟩. In that ordered basis P̂₁₂ carries zeros on the diagonal and ones off it — it is σₓ, the same matrix you diagonalised for spin along the x axis. Its eigenvectors are therefore the familiar pair (|αβ⟩ ± |βα⟩)/√2, and the projectors onto the two sectors are Ŝ₊ = ½(Î + P̂₁₂) and Ŝ₋ = ½(Î − P̂₁₂), built exactly like ½(Î ± σₓ), with Ŝ₊ + Ŝ₋ = Î and Ŝ₊Ŝ₋ = 0.

3A commutator conserves; it does not select

For identical particles Ĥ is symmetric under the swap: the kinetic term is a sum over particles, an external potential is the same function for each, and a pair interaction written in |r₁ − r₂| is untouched by relabelling. So [Ĥ, P̂₁₂] = 0, and Ehrenfest's theorem gives d⟨P̂₁₂⟩/dt = 0. That is genuinely useful — exchange parity is a good quantum number, and a state prepared antisymmetric stays antisymmetric under any symmetric interaction, however strong. But read carefully what it does not say. Take |Ψ⟩ = (3|αβ⟩ − |βα⟩)/√10, a perfectly legitimate vector in the two-particle space. Its symmetric weight is ‖Ŝ₊|Ψ⟩‖² = 0.20, its antisymmetric weight 0.80, and ⟨P̂₁₂⟩ = 0.20 − 0.80 = −0.60. Every one of those numbers is frozen for all time by the very commutator that was supposed to help. Conservation preserves what it is handed; it never manufactures an eigenstate. If nature contains no such state, something outside the Schrödinger equation has to say so.

4For three particles the transpositions stop commuting

With N = 2 there is one transposition and the story is a two-level system. With N ≥ 3 the permutation group SN is non-abelian, and the postulate changes shape. Write |αβγ⟩ for particle 1 in α, 2 in β, 3 in γ. Then P̂₁₂P̂₂₃|αβγ⟩ = P̂₁₂|αγβ⟩ = |γαβ⟩, while P̂₂₃P̂₁₂|αβγ⟩ = P̂₂₃|βαγ⟩ = |βγα⟩. Those are different states, so [P̂₁₂, P̂₂₃] ≠ 0 and no basis diagonalises every transposition at once. Demanding one simultaneous ±1 eigenvalue for all of them is therefore a real restriction, not bookkeeping: it can be met only inside a one-dimensional irreducible representation of SN, and SN has exactly two, the trivial one and the sign one. For three distinct orbitals the six orderings span six dimensions, decomposing as 6 = 1 + 1 + 2 × 2 — one totally symmetric state, one totally antisymmetric state, and a two-dimensional mixed-symmetry representation appearing twice. The postulate keeps two of those six dimensions and throws away four.

5Where the postulate comes from, and where it breaks

Non-relativistic quantum mechanics cannot derive the choice; relativistic quantum field theory can. Pauli's spin-statistics theorem shows that Lorentz invariance, a Hamiltonian bounded below, and microcausality — local observables commuting at spacelike separation — force integer-spin fields to be quantised with commutators and half-integer-spin fields with anticommutators, which is precisely the symmetric and the antisymmetric sector. A composite counts by its constituents, as long as nothing probes its internal structure: helium-4 carries 2 protons, 2 neutrons and 2 electrons, six fermions in all, so it is a boson and goes superfluid at 2.17 K, while helium-3 carries 2 protons, 1 neutron and 2 electrons, five fermions, so it is a fermion and must pair before it can flow — which it manages only in the millikelvin range, at 0.93 mK on the saturated vapour curve and 2.5 mK at the melting pressure. The postulate also has a boundary. In two dimensions the configuration space of two identical particles is not simply connected, exchange is a braid carrying a winding number rather than a permutation, and the exchange phase may be any e(iθ). Those are anyons — not a loophole in the algebra, a different topology.

6When indistinguishability actually changes an answer

Symmetrising costs nothing when the one-particle states do not overlap, because every cross term carries an overlap integral that has already vanished — two electrons in two different laboratories may be labelled without error. The scale that decides is the thermal de Broglie wavelength Λ = h/√(2πmkBT) set against the mean spacing n(−1/3). Argon at 300 K and one atmosphere has Λ = 0.016 nm against a spacing of 3.4 nm, so nΛ³ ≈ 1 × 10⁻⁷ and Maxwell–Boltzmann counting is safe. Liquid helium-4 has a spacing of 0.36 nm and Λ = 0.59 nm at 2.17 K, giving nΛ³ = 4.5; an ideal Bose gas at that density would condense at 3.13 K, against the measured λ-point of 2.17 K. Electrons at 300 K have Λ = 4.3 nm, some seventeen times the 0.25 nm spacing of atoms in a metal — which is why conduction electrons are degenerate at room temperature, and why two electrons on one atom can never be treated as distinguishable.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

The exchange operator

P̂₁₂ |α⟩₁|β⟩₂ = |β⟩₁|α⟩₂(P̂₁₂ψ)(r₁, r₂) = ψ(r₂, r₁)

Turns a worry about names into an operator you can diagonalise alongside Ĥ.

Acts on the tensor product H ⊗ H; dimensionless. It permutes the slots, never the coordinates inside one slot.

Hermitian and involutive, so λ = ±1

P̂₁₂† = P̂₁₂ , P̂₁₂² = Î ⟹ λ² = 1 ⟹ λ = ±1

Exchange parity is a two-valued label, not an adjustable dial — but this fixes the spectrum, not the state.

The two together also make P̂₁₂ unitary, since P̂₁₂†P̂₁₂ = P̂₁₂² = Î.

Sector projectors

Ŝ₊ = ½(Î + P̂₁₂) , Ŝ₋ = ½(Î − P̂₁₂)Ŝ₊ + Ŝ₋ = Î , Ŝ₊Ŝ₋ = 0

Splits any two-particle state into a symmetric part and an antisymmetric part, and weighs each one.

Each is a projector, since Ŝ₊² = Ŝ₊ and Ŝ₋² = Ŝ₋; ⟨P̂₁₂⟩ = ‖Ŝ₊|Ψ⟩‖² − ‖Ŝ₋|Ψ⟩‖².

Conservation, not selection

[Ĥ, P̂₁₂] = 0 ⟹ d⟨P̂₁₂⟩/dt = 0

Whatever exchange character a state starts with it keeps; no dynamics can push it into a sector.

Holds whenever Ĥ is unchanged by 1 ↔ 2, including any pair interaction written in |r₁ − r₂|.

The symmetrisation postulate

P̂ᵢⱼ|Ψ⟩ = +|Ψ⟩ (bosons) or P̂ᵢⱼ|Ψ⟩ = −|Ψ⟩ (fermions), for every i, j

The extra axiom the dynamics cannot supply, and the root from which exclusion later follows.

Integer spin takes +1, half-integer spin −1. The demand is on all N(N−1)/2 transpositions at once.

Two-particle sector states

|Ψ±⟩ = (|αβ⟩ ± |βα⟩)/√2 , with ⟨α|β⟩ = 0

Exclusion appears here first — antisymmetry kills a repeated orbital before any statement about occupancy.

For α = β the minus combination vanishes identically; the plus one is |αα⟩ and needs no √2.
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

0.23 L
0.05 to 0.95 L; steps of 0.06.
0.0
−1 to 1; steps of 0.1.
2
2 to 5; steps of 1.

Try this. Start at mixing zero, the labelled product state, and watch the filled dot sitting on the dashed coincidence line. Push the mixing to minus one and that dot drops to exactly zero — for every x₂ and every second orbital, the Fermi hole forced by antisymmetry alone. Push it to plus one and the dot lifts off zero again as ⟨P₁₂⟩ runs from −1 to +1.

Live results

EXCHANGE ⟨P₁₂⟩
0.00
SYMMETRIC WEIGHT
0.50
ANTISYMMETRIC WEIGHT
0.50
Ψ AT x₁ = x₂ (SCALED)
0.66

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Physics V modelAmplitude of a two-particle state plotted along x₁ with particle 2 held at x₂ = 0.23L in a box of width L, built from orbitals 1 and 2. The mixing η = 0.0 gives ⟨P₁₂⟩ = 0.00 and a symmetric weight of 0.50. Each slice is divided by an upper bound on its own amplitude, so read the sign and the zero crossing, not the height.⟨P₁₂⟩ = 0.00x₂ = 0.23 Lamplitude Ψ along x₁orbitals 1, 2+Ψ−Ψ0Ldashed: x₁ = x₂
Amplitude of a two-particle state plotted along x₁ with particle 2 held at x₂ = 0.23L in a box of width L, built from orbitals 1 and 2. The mixing η = 0.0 gives ⟨P₁₂⟩ = 0.00 and a symmetric weight of 0.50. Each slice is divided by an upper bound on its own amplitude, so read the sign and the zero crossing, not the height.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Position x₂ of particle 2: 0.23 L; Exchange mixing η: 0.0; Second orbital nb: 2

Baseline 0.23; choose 0.05 to 0.95, in steps of 0.06.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The commonest error is to believe the postulate has been derived. P̂₁₂² = Î shows the eigenvalues are ±1, and [Ĥ, P̂₁₂] = 0 shows exchange character is conserved, but neither statement says a physical state must be an eigenvector. (3|αβ⟩ − |βα⟩)/√10 is a legitimate vector in the two-particle space; under a symmetric Ĥ it evolves with ⟨P̂₁₂⟩ pinned at −0.60 forever, and only the symmetrisation postulate rules it out. The second error is to read the resulting correlation as a force. The ± sign changes the state, never the Hamiltonian: two non-interacting particles in a box whose spatial function is antisymmetric sit 2.09 times as far apart in rms separation as the same two orbitals combined symmetrically, and no term in Ĥ did that. The third error hides inside the second — it is the spatial factor that must be antisymmetric, not the state as a whole. Two electrons in the spin singlet carry a symmetric spatial function and sit at the smaller separation, so 'fermion' alone never tells you which of the two numbers applies.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

Two identical particles occupy orthonormal orbitals α and β. Normalise |Ψ⟩ = N(|αβ⟩ + 2|βα⟩) and |Φ⟩ = N(|αβ⟩ + 2i|βα⟩), then find ⟨P̂₁₂⟩ and the symmetric and antisymmetric weights for each. The two differ only in the relative phase of the second coefficient.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

Two identical non-interacting particles occupy the n = 1 and n = 2 orbitals of a one-dimensional infinite well of width L. Using ⟨x²⟩₁ = L²(1/3 − 1/2π²), ⟨x²⟩₂ = L²(1/3 − 1/8π²), ⟨x⟩₁ = ⟨x⟩₂ = L/2 and the cross element ⟨x⟩₁₂ = ⟨1|x|2⟩ = −16L/(9π²), compare the rms separation for a symmetric spatial state, an antisymmetric spatial state, and a labelled pair.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

Three identical particles occupy three distinct orthonormal orbitals α, β and γ. Show that the transpositions fail to commute, and count how much of the six-dimensional space the symmetrisation postulate keeps.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

Two identical particles have a Hamiltonian symmetric under exchange, so [Ĥ, P̂₁₂] = 0, and P̂₁₂² = Î. Using only those two facts, what can you say about the state |Ψ⟩ = (3|αβ⟩ − |βα⟩)/√10 prepared at t = 0, with α and β orthonormal?
7

Review & continue

The exchange operator P̂ᵢⱼ swaps the labels of two identical particles in a state, and because it is Hermitian and squares to the identity its only eigenvalues are +1 for a symmetric state and −1 for an antisymmetric one.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.