Skip to main content

Nuclear, particle & quantum-information sequence · Interactive lesson

The decay law, Γ, and where it fails

Nobody has ever caught a nucleus ageing. This lesson shows why: Fourier-transform a Lorentzian line and the exponential drops out with λ = Γ/ħ, so the decay law is a claim about a lineshape and about an ensemble average — and it names the two clocks at which that claim stops holding.

UPV-15.01 · Lesson 1 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: The decay law, Γ, and where it failsLeft: the level's energy distribution ρ(E), a Breit–Wigner whose full width at half maximum is Γ = 4.7 neV, marked by the arrow on the half-height line. Right: the squared modulus of its Fourier transform, the survival probability S(t) = exp(−Γt/ħ), which passes 1/e at the mean life τ = 140 ns (open circle). The filled circle reads S = 0.368 at t = 140 ns.ρ(E) ∝ 1/[(E−E₀)² + Γ²/4]S(t) = |a(t)|² = exp(−Γt/ħ)Γ = 4.7 neVτ = ħ/Γ = 140 nsE − E₀ (neV)t (ns)t = 140 ns → S = 0.368
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.

Nuclear, particle & quantum-information sequence. These units continue into nuclear and particle physics and quantum information. Follow your university’s prerequisites, mathematical depth and assessment; this independent pathway is not a universal programme specification.

1

Build the model

The exponential is a Fourier transform, not a postulate.

The key idea

The decay law says an unstable state's survival probability falls as e(−λt) with a rate λ = Γ/ħ fixed by the full width of its energy line, so the expected number of survivors in an ensemble is N₀e(−λt).

Example. The 14.4 keV level of ⁵⁷Fe has natural width Γ = 4.64 × 10⁻⁹ eV, so λ = Γ/ħ = 4.64 × 10⁻⁹ ÷ 6.582 × 10⁻¹⁶ = 7.05 × 10⁶ s⁻¹ and τ = 142 ns: the linewidth Mössbauer absorption resolves is the same number as the clock.

The complete physical model and assumptions

Start from the state, not from the statistics. An unstable state |ψ(0)⟩ is not an eigenstate of the full Ĥ, so expand it on Ĥ's continuous spectrum with outgoing-wave boundary conditions; each |E⟩ then merely collects a phase e(−iEt/ħ), and the survival amplitude a(t) = ⟨ψ(0)|ψ(t)⟩ = ∫ρ(E)e(−iEt/ħ)dE is the Fourier transform of the state's own energy distribution ρ(E) = |⟨E|ψ(0)⟩|². Wigner and Weisskopf showed that a discrete level fed into a smooth, broad continuum acquires a pole at E₀ − iΓ/2, so ρ is a Breit–Wigner of full width Γ — and the transform of a Lorentzian is an exponential, S(t) = |a(t)|² = e(−Γt/ħ). Read backwards, a rate is a linewidth: λ = Γ/ħ. Averaging that survival probability over N₀ independent nuclei gives ⟨N⟩ = N₀e(−λt), the mean of a binomial rather than the trajectory of anything. What the model costs is the Lorentzian itself: it has divergent ⟨H²⟩ and reaches to E = −∞, and no real level does either. Restore a finite ⟨H²⟩ and survival starts quadratic; restore a decay threshold and survival must eventually beat any exponential.

1The survival amplitude is a Fourier transform

An unstable state cannot be an eigenstate of the full Hamiltonian; an eigenstate would sit still forever. So prepare |ψ(0)⟩ and expand it on Ĥ's continuous spectrum, |ψ(0)⟩ = ∫dE c(E)|E⟩, with the boundary condition that the decay products are purely outgoing. In that basis time evolution is trivial — each |E⟩ collects the phase e(−iEt/ħ) — so the survival amplitude is a(t) = ⟨ψ(0)|e(−iĤt/ħ)|ψ(0)⟩ = ∫dE ρ(E) e(−iEt/ħ), with ρ(E) = |c(E)|² normalised to one. That is the Fock–Krylov theorem, and it is the entire apparatus of this topic: a decay law is not an extra postulate bolted onto quantum mechanics, it is the Fourier transform of a lineshape. Settle what ρ(E) looks like and the time dependence is already decided.

2Wigner–Weisskopf: a Lorentzian in, an exponential out

Weisskopf and Wigner solved the coupled amplitude equations for a discrete level emptying into a smooth, broad continuum and found a complex pole at E₀ − iΓ/2: a level shift and a width. The matching ρ is the Breit–Wigner line, ρ(E) = (Γ/2π)/[(E−E₀)² + Γ²/4], and its transform is a one-line contour integral, a(t) = e(−iE₀t/ħ)e(−Γt/2ħ). Squaring kills the phase and leaves S(t) = e(−Γt/ħ). Read that backwards and a rate is a linewidth: λ = Γ/ħ, τ = ħ/Γ. The single reciprocal covers everything measurable. The Z boson's Γ = 2.495 GeV gives τ = 2.6 × 10⁻²⁵ s, far too short for any track; the 14.4 keV level of ⁵⁷Fe has Γ = 4.64 × 10⁻⁹ eV and τ = 142 ns, narrow enough that Mössbauer absorption resolves it. Nearly eighteen orders of magnitude, one formula.

3Constant hazard is the whole physical content

Define the hazard rate h(t) = −(d/dt) ln S(t): the chance per unit time of going now, given survival up to now. For S = e(−λt) it is the constant λ, and constancy is exactly memorylessness, since S(t+s)/S(s) = e(−λt) = S(t) for every s. A nucleus that has already waited ten half-lives faces precisely the odds of one made a microsecond ago; nothing inside it is running down. Contrast a filament lamp or a person, whose hazard climbs with age — the exponential is the unique distribution with no age at all. The same distribution explains why the half-life and the mean life differ: T½ = τ ln2 = 0.693τ is the median of the decay-time density f(t) = λe(−λt), while τ is its mean, dragged later by the tail.

4One nucleus decays; N₀ nuclei make a law

Nothing so far predicts when a given nucleus goes, and nothing can. Each nucleus is an independent Bernoulli trial with survival probability p(t) = e(−λt), so the number left is a binomial variable: ⟨N⟩ = N₀p and Var N = N₀p(1−p). The smooth curve is the mean; real data scatter about it with σ = √(N₀p(1−p)). Take N₀ = 400 and wait one half-life: ⟨N⟩ = 200 with σ = 10, a 5% run-to-run wobble the textbook curve never draws. The relative scatter √((1−p)/N₀p) grows as the source empties, which is why the last decades of a decay curve are the noisy ones and why counting statistics, not the fitting, usually limit a measured λ. So dN/dt = −λN holds exactly for the expectation value ⟨N⟩ at any N₀, and describes the count itself only as N₀ → ∞, when the relative scatter vanishes.

5Short times: survival starts flat, not sloping

Expand the amplitude directly: a(t) = 1 − i⟨H⟩t/ħ − ⟨H²⟩t²/2ħ² + …, so S(t) = 1 − (ΔE)²t²/ħ² + O(t⁴) with (ΔE)² = ⟨H²⟩ − ⟨H⟩². Survival is quadratic and its slope at t = 0 is zero, which is why repeated fast measurement can freeze a decay — the quantum Zeno effect. An exponential has slope −λ at t = 0, so it cannot be right there. Why does the Lorentzian give an exact exponential anyway? Because ∫E²ρ(E)dE diverges for a Breit–Wigner: ΔE is infinite, τZ = ħ/ΔE collapses to zero and the quadratic window shuts. Any real ρ(E) falls faster than 1/E³ far from E₀, so ΔE is finite and the window reopens. Survival then sits above the exponential while t²/τZ² < t/τ, that is for t < τZ²/τ. For a Lorentzian cut off a distance W from E₀, (ΔE)² ≈ ΓW/π, so that window closes at τZ²/τ ≈ πħ/W whatever Γ is; for ⁵⁷Fe, cut off at its threshold 14.4 keV below E₀, that is about 1.4 × 10⁻¹⁹ s.

6Long times: the spectrum has a floor

The decay products cannot carry away less than their own rest energy, so ρ(E) vanishes below a threshold Eₘᵢₙ. That single fact settles the far tail. A spectral density supported on a half-line cannot have a transform that decays exponentially for all t — the Paley–Wiener theorem — so S(t) must eventually fall more slowly than e(−λt), typically as a power law whose exponent is set by how ρ(E) switches on at threshold. The crossover arrives only after the exponential has run some 50 to 100 lifetimes. For ⁵⁷Fe that means waiting until S ≈ e(−50) ≈ 2 × 10⁻²², whereas a sample of 10²⁰ nuclei has lost its last one at 46τ = 6.5 μs. Both failures are theorems and both are hidden: the exponential owns the nearly fourteen decades between them, which is the only stretch an experiment ever visits. Non-exponential tails have been observed in organic-molecule luminescence, never yet in nuclear decay.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Survival amplitude

a(t) = ⟨ψ(0)|ψ(t)⟩ = ∫ ρ(E) e(−iEt/ħ) dE

Turns a rate question into a lineshape question: the clock is the Fourier partner of the spectrum.

ρ(E) = |⟨E|ψ(0)⟩|² in eV⁻¹, with ∫ρ dE = 1; t in s

Breit–Wigner line, exponential decay

ρ(E) = (Γ/2π)/[(E−E₀)² + Γ²/4] ⇒ S(t) = e(−Γt/ħ)

The only lineshape whose transform is exponential at every t — and it manages that because its ⟨H²⟩ diverges.

Γ is the full width at half maximum in eV; E₀ is the line centre

Rate, width, lifetime, half-life

λ = Γ/ħ = 1/τ, T½ = τ ln2

Γ = 1 eV means τ = 6.6 × 10⁻¹⁶ s. Quote a width and the half-life comes free.

ħ = 6.582 × 10⁻¹⁶ eV s; λ in s⁻¹, Γ in eV, τ and T½ in s

Constant hazard rate, memoryless survival

h(t) = −(d/dt) ln S(t) = λ, S(t+s)/S(s) = S(t)

No nucleus ages: the next second looks identical after 1 ns and after ten half-lives.

S is the dimensionless survival probability; h and λ in s⁻¹

The decay law as a binomial mean

⟨N⟩ = N₀ p, σN = √[N₀ p(1−p)], p = e(−λt)

N₀ = 400 after one half-life gives 200 ± 10. The smooth curve is an average, not a path.

N₀ independent nuclei, each one Bernoulli trial; σN counted in nuclei

The two regimes that break it

S = 1 − (ΔE)²t²/ħ² (t → 0)E ≥ Eₘᵢₙ ⇒ power law (t → ∞)

Zeno flatness only below τZ²/τ, with τZ = ħ/ΔE; a Paley–Wiener tail past roughly 50τ. Both real, both unobserved in nuclei.

(ΔE)² = ⟨H²⟩ − ⟨H⟩² taken over ρ(E), in eV²; Eₘᵢₙ is the decay threshold
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

4.7 neV
1 to 10 neV; steps of 0.1.
140 ns
0 to 700 ns; steps of 10.

Try this. Drag Γ from 1 to 10 neV and watch τ fall from 658 ns to 66 ns: one Fourier pair, no new physics. Then drag t and watch the last readout refuse to move — the next 100 ns multiplies the survival by the same factor whatever t you start from, which is what memoryless means.

Live results

MEAN LIFE τ = ħ/Γ
140 ns
HALF-LIFE T½ = τ ln2
97 ns
SURVIVAL S(t)
0.368
NEXT 100 ns S(t+100)/S(t)
0.490

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Physics V modelLeft: the level's energy distribution ρ(E), a Breit–Wigner whose full width at half maximum is Γ = 4.7 neV, marked by the arrow on the half-height line. Right: the squared modulus of its Fourier transform, the survival probability S(t) = exp(−Γt/ħ), which passes 1/e at the mean life τ = 140 ns (open circle). The filled circle reads S = 0.368 at t = 140 ns.ρ(E) ∝ 1/[(E−E₀)² + Γ²/4]S(t) = |a(t)|² = exp(−Γt/ħ)Γ = 4.7 neVτ = ħ/Γ = 140 nsE − E₀ (neV)t (ns)t = 140 ns → S = 0.368
Left: the level's energy distribution ρ(E), a Breit–Wigner whose full width at half maximum is Γ = 4.7 neV, marked by the arrow on the half-height line. Right: the squared modulus of its Fourier transform, the survival probability S(t) = exp(−Γt/ħ), which passes 1/e at the mean life τ = 140 ns (open circle). The filled circle reads S = 0.368 at t = 140 ns.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Line width Γ (FWHM): 4.7 neV; Elapsed time t: 140 ns

Baseline 4.7; choose 1 to 10, in steps of 0.1.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The usual presentation makes λ an axiom — each nucleus has a fixed chance per second, therefore dN/dt = −λN — and that circle leaves the exponential looking exact and unbreakable. It is neither. Constant hazard is a consequence of the state's line being Lorentzian, and the Lorentzian is a limit, not a law: it requires divergent ⟨H²⟩ and amplitude down to E = −∞, and no physical level has either. Two related slips follow. Γ is not spectrometer resolution; it is the true full width of the state's energy distribution and it survives deconvolution. And Γτ = ħ is not the operator uncertainty relation, because there is no self-adjoint time operator conjugate to Ĥ. It is a Fourier statement about one lineshape: narrow line, long life.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

The Z boson shows up in e⁺e⁻ annihilation as a Breit–Wigner resonance of full width Γ = 2.495 GeV. Taking ħ = 6.582 × 10⁻¹⁶ eV s, find its decay constant, mean life and half-life, then find its proper decay length cτ.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 4 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

A source contains N₀ = 400 atoms of a nuclide with T½ = 20 min. Find the expected number surviving at 20 min and at 60 min with the standard deviation of each, then find the probability that an atom still present at 60 min survives the following 20 min.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

The 14.4 keV level of ⁵⁷Fe has mean life τ = 141.8 ns. Find its natural width Γ and fractional width Γ/E₀. Then bound both failure regimes: estimate the Zeno time for a Lorentzian cut off at |E − E₀| ≈ E₀, find where the quadratic Zeno curve meets the exponential, and find when the exponential would empty a 10²⁰-nucleus sample.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

A level's energy distribution is measured. It is Breit–Wigner of width Γ across the resolved region, it is cut off at a threshold a few MeV below E₀, and far above E₀ it falls as 1/E⁴ rather than 1/E². What does that measured ρ(E) imply about the survival probability S(t)?
7

Review & continue

The decay law says an unstable state's survival probability falls as e(−λt) with a rate λ = Γ/ħ fixed by the full width of its energy line, so the expected number of survivors in an ensemble is N₀e(−λt).

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.