
Nuclear, particle & frontier orientation · Interactive lesson
Fusion and the Gamow peak
The Sun's core is five hundred times too cold to climb the proton–proton barrier, and it burns anyway. This topic locates the narrow window of energies where a rare fast particle meets a barrier thin enough to tunnel, and turns that window into a reaction rate.
UPIV-13.09 · Lesson 9 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Nuclear, particle & frontier orientation. These numbered units provide nuclear, particle and frontier orientation, not a substitute for a complete specialist course. Check your university’s required depth and prerequisites.
Build the model
Almost nothing fuses at the typical thermal energy kT.
The key idea
The Gamow peak is the band of collision energies — high on the Maxwell tail, yet far below the Coulomb barrier — that contributes almost all of a thermonuclear reaction's rate.
Example. For p+p in the Sun's core, kT = 1.29 keV and the barrier is about 720 keV, yet the peak sits at E₀ = 5.9 keV, is Δ = 6.4 keV wide, and is suppressed by e(−13.7) ≈ 1.1×10⁻⁶.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Two nuclei feel the strong force only at a couple of femtometres, and reaching that separation costs a Coulomb energy of order an MeV, while the thermal energy kT in the Sun's core is only 1.29 keV. Classically the Sun cannot shine. Two exponentials rescue it, and neither is worth anything alone. Barrier penetration contributes exp(−b/√E), fantastically small at kT but climbing steeply with energy; the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution contributes exp(−E/kT), which collapses just as steeply. Their product is a hump — the Gamow peak — centred at E₀ = (EG(kT)²/4)¹⁄³, far out on the thermal tail and still far below the barrier top, and essentially the whole reaction rate comes from the few keV around it. Locating that hump is the entire calculation. It says which energies a cross-section measurement must reach, why the rate follows a steep local power law Tⁿ with n = (τ−2)/3 rather than an Arrhenius exponential, and why moving from p+p to p+¹⁴N, with seven times the charge product, turns hydrogen burning from a T⁴ process into a T²⁰ one and hands the Sun's job to a different cycle in a heavier star. The cost is two assumptions: a non-degenerate Maxwellian plasma, which a white dwarf does not have, and a smooth non-resonant cross-section, which D–T does not have.
1Classically, the Sun is dark
Two protons feel the strong force only when their centres are a couple of femtometres apart, and getting there costs Coulomb energy: with e²/4πε₀ = 1.44 MeV⋅fm, pushing them to 2.0 fm costs 0.72 MeV. The Sun's core sits at 1.5×10⁷ K, so kT = 1.29 keV, and the barrier is 557 kT high. A classical activation estimate — the fraction of pairs with enough energy to go over — gives e(−557) ≈ 10(−242). Multiply by every proton–proton collision the Sun has had in 4.6 billion years, of order 10⁸², and you still predict 10(−160) reactions. The Sun shines, so this is not a picture that needs a correction factor; it is the wrong picture. Whatever supplies the rate must send particles through the barrier, not over it.
2Tunnelling supplies the factor e(−b/√E)
Run WKB across the Coulomb barrier: the transmission is exp(−(2/ħ)∫√(2μ(V−E)) dr) between the classical turning points. For E well below the barrier top that integral collapses to 2πη, with η = Z₁Z₂αc/v the Sommerfeld parameter. Substituting E = ½μv² converts it to exp(−b/√E), where b = √EG and EG = 2μc²(παZ₁Z₂)². Everything about the pair — charges and reduced mass — is compressed into b, which scales as Z₁Z₂√μ: 22.2 keV^½ for p+p, 25.6 for p+d, 34.4 for D+T, 212 for p+¹⁴N. The function is savage at low energy. At E = 1.29 keV it is 3.3×10⁻⁹; at 5.9 keV, 1.1×10⁻⁴; at 30 keV, 1.7×10⁻². Merely doubling the energy from 5.9 to 11.8 keV multiplies it by about 15.
3Folding the two exponentials gives one hump
Multiply the population factor e(−E/kT), which collapses as E rises, by the penetration factor e(−b/√E), which explodes. The combined exponent is f(E) = E/kT + b/√E; setting df/dE = 1/kT − b/(2E³⁄²) to zero gives the Gamow peak at E₀ = (b⋅kT/2)²⁄³ = (EG(kT)²/4)¹⁄³. For p+p in the Sun that is (22.2 × 1.29/2)²⁄³ = 5.9 keV — 4.6 kT, and still 122 times below the barrier. Expanding f about E₀ gives a Gaussian of full 1/e width Δ = 4√(E₀kT/3) = 6.4 keV, with peak value e(−τ) where τ = f(E₀) = 3E₀/kT = 13.7. Note that Δ/E₀ = 4/√τ, so the solar pp 'peak' is about as wide as its own centre energy: a broad, lopsided hump, not a spike, yet the Gaussian integral still lands within about 3% of the exact one. Only when τ is large — CNO's 62 — is it genuinely narrow.
4The S-factor is what a laboratory can report
Write the cross-section as σ(E) = S(E)e(−b/√E)/E. The 1/E is the geometric πƛ² factor and the exponential is the barrier; whatever remains, S(E), is nuclear structure, and for a non-resonant reaction it varies slowly enough to extrapolate across decades. The numbers show why that matters. S(0) for p+p is 4.0×10⁻²⁵ MeV⋅b, absurdly small because a proton must weak-decay into a neutron during the collision; for ³He+³He it is 5.4 MeV⋅b, twenty-five orders of magnitude larger. At the solar Gamow peak the p+p cross-section is around 10⁻²⁶ barn — it has never been measured and never will be, and the rate is computed from weak-interaction theory instead. Accelerators reach 0.1–1 MeV, underground laboratories such as LUNA a few tens of keV, and S bridges the gap. The trap is resonance: D+T has a broad ⁵He level at 64 keV, so its S is anything but flat and the smooth Gamow formula misleads.
5Two hydrogen-burning routes, two temperature exponents
Doing the Gaussian integral gives ⟨σv⟩ ∝ (kT)(−2/3)e(−τ), and since τ ∝ (kT)(−1/3) the local logarithmic slope is n = d ln⟨σv⟩/d ln T = (τ−2)/3. For solar p+p, τ = 13.7 gives n = 3.9. The CNO cycle's slowest link, ¹⁴N(p, γ)¹⁵O, has Z₁Z₂ = 7 and b = 212 keV^½, so at the same temperature E₀ = 26.6 keV, τ = 61.7 and n = 19.9. Both routes do identical book-keeping — 4¹H → ⁴He + 2e⁺ + 2νₑ, releasing 26.73 MeV once the positrons annihilate, of which neutrinos carry off about 0.6 MeV in the pp chain and 1.7 MeV in CNO — but they answer temperature completely differently: a core 10% hotter multiplies CNO by 6.7 and pp by only 1.45. That is why the two cross near 1.7×10⁷ K, why stars above roughly 1.3 M☉ burn by CNO, and why the Sun at 1.5×10⁷ K draws only about 1% of its luminosity from CNO, a fraction Borexino has now measured. Remember n is a local slope, not a law: it falls as T rises.
6From a stellar rate to a reactor criterion
The rate per unit volume is r₁₂ = n₁n₂⟨σv⟩/(1 + δ₁₂), the Kronecker δ halving the identical-particle cases p+p and D+D so no pair is counted twice. With nₚ ≈ 3×10³¹ m⁻³ in the solar core this yields a central power density near 280 W m⁻³ — less than a compost heap. The Sun is bright because it is enormous, not because its core is fierce. A reactor has no such option: it runs D–T at kT ≈ 15 keV, where ⟨σv⟩ is some 10²⁷ times the solar p+p value, and the problem becomes holding the energy in, which is the Lawson condition nTτE ≳ 3×10²¹ m⁻³ keV s. Two assumptions sit underneath all of this. The plasma must be non-degenerate and Maxwellian — in a white dwarf it is neither, and reactions become pycnonuclear, driven by density rather than temperature — and the barrier must be the bare Coulomb one, though electrons screen it: in the solar plasma they lift the p+p rate by a few per cent, and in the laboratory the target's bound electrons lift measured rates by up to tens of per cent at the lowest energies, biasing exactly the low-energy data you most want.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Non-resonant cross-section
σ(E) = S(E) e(−b/√E) / E
Peels off the two known energy dependences, leaving S(E) flat enough to extrapolate over decades.
E is centre-of-mass energy in keV; S(E) in keV⋅barn; b in keV^½Gamow energy and Gamow constant
EG = 2μc²(π α Z₁Z₂)², b = √EG
One number carries the whole pair, since b scales as Z₁Z₂√μ.
μ = reduced mass. p+p: EG = 493 keV, b = 22.2 keV^½; D+T: b = 34.4 keV^½Gamow peak energy
E₀ = (b⋅kT/2)²⁄³ = (EG(kT)²/4)¹⁄³
The one energy that dominates the rate integral — neither kT nor the barrier height.
In keV. Solar core kT = 1.29 keV gives E₀ = 5.9 keV for p+pPeak width, height, and slope
Δ = 4√(E₀kT/3), τ = 3E₀/kT, ⟨σv⟩ ∝ Tⁿ with n = (τ−2)/3
Δ is the band a laboratory must cover; e(−τ) is the Boltzmann and barrier suppression combined at the peak.
Δ/E₀ = 4/√τ. Solar p+p: Δ = 6.4 keV, τ = 13.7, exponent n = 3.9Rate per unit volume
r₁₂ = n₁ n₂ ⟨σv⟩ / (1 + δ₁₂)
The delta halves p+p and D+D so each identical pair is counted once, not twice.
m⁻³ s⁻¹, with n in m⁻³ and ⟨σv⟩ in m³ s⁻¹; δ₁₂ = 1 for identical nucleiLawson triple product (D–T)
n T τE ≳ 3×10²¹ m⁻³ keV s
The reactor version of the same physics: you must hold the plasma, not merely heat it.
τE is the energy confinement time; T in keV, near the 15 keV operating optimumInteractive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Push T from 15 to 40 and the peak slides right and lifts — that is the Tn law made visible. Then set b = 34.4, the D–T value, against 22.2 for p+p: the peak moves right but sinks, because the charges are the same but the reduced mass is 2.4 times larger and b grows as √μ, so the window is rarer and higher in energy.
Live results
- PEAK ENERGY E₀
- 5.90 keV
- PEAK WIDTH Δ
- 6.38 keV
- EXPONENT τ = 3E₀/kT
- 13.7
- RATE SLOPE n
- 3.9
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Plasma temperature T: 15 10⁶ K; Gamow constant b: 22.2 √keV
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The classic error is to keep the classical picture and bolt tunnelling on in the wrong place — writing the rate as e(−EC/kT) with EC the barrier height, or, more subtly, evaluating the cross-section at the thermal energy kT and multiplying by the number of particles. Both fail for the same reason: the rate is an integral, and its integrand is a product of two functions pulling in opposite directions, so neither endpoint dominates it. In the Sun the integrand at 5.9 keV beats the one at kT = 1.29 keV by a factor of about 900, even though vastly more protons sit near kT. The other half of the error is to imagine the Gamow peak is a resonance, or a property of the nuclei. It is neither. It is the maximum of a product of two perfectly smooth monotonic functions, and it shifts whenever the temperature shifts, as (kT)²⁄³.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
The Sun's core is at T = 1.5×10⁷ K. Using k = 8.617×10⁻⁸ keV K⁻¹ and e²/4πε₀ = 1.44 MeV⋅fm, find kT, estimate the Coulomb barrier for two protons brought to r = 2.0 fm, and show that a classical Boltzmann estimate leaves the Sun dark.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Thermal energy: kT = (8.617×10⁻⁸ keV K⁻¹)(1.5×10⁷ K) = 1.2926 keV ≈ 1.29 keV. This sets the scale of a broad distribution, not a threshold — the Maxwell tail runs far above it.
- Barrier: EC = Z₁Z₂e²/4πε₀r = (1)(1)(1.44 MeV⋅fm)/(2.0 fm) = 0.72 MeV = 720 keV.
- Ratio: EC/kT = 720/1.2926 = 557, so the barrier is 557 kT high.
- Classical estimate: the fraction of pairs above the barrier goes as e(−557) = 10(−557/2.303) = 10(−242).
- The Sun has run of order 10⁸² proton–proton collisions in 4.6 Gyr, so this predicts 10(−160) reactions — effectively zero. The barrier has to be tunnelled, not climbed.
Answer. kT = 1.29 keV, EC ≈ 0.72 MeV = 557 kT, and e(−557) ≈ 10(−242). Classical activation under-predicts the Sun by roughly 160 orders of magnitude, so stellar fusion is a tunnelling problem.
MediumExample 2
For p+p the Gamow constant is b = 22.2 keV^½. At the solar core temperature (kT = 1.29 keV) locate the Gamow peak, find its width and the exponent τ, and compare the rate integrand at the peak with its value at E = kT.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- The integrand is e(−E/kT) × e(−b/√E) = e(−f), with f(E) = E/kT + bE(−1/2).
- Set df/dE = 1/kT − b/(2E³⁄²) = 0, giving E₀³⁄² = b⋅kT/2, so E₀ = (b⋅kT/2)²⁄³.
- Numerically b⋅kT/2 = 22.2 × 1.29/2 = 14.32, and 14.32²⁄³ = 5.90 keV — that is 4.6 kT, and 122 times below the 720 keV barrier.
- Exponent: τ = f(E₀) = 3E₀/kT = 3(5.90)/1.29 = 13.7, so the peak height is e(−13.7) = 1.1×10⁻⁶. Width: Δ = 4√(E₀kT/3) = 4√(5.90 × 1.29/3) = 4√2.54 = 6.4 keV.
- At E = kT the integrand is e(−1 − 22.2/√1.29) = e(−1 − 19.5) = e(−20.5) = 1.2×10⁻⁹.
- Ratio: 1.1×10⁻⁶ ÷ 1.2×10⁻⁹ ≈ 9×10². Energies near kT contribute nearly a thousand times less than the peak, despite holding far more particles.
Answer. E₀ = 5.9 keV (4.6 kT), Δ = 6.4 keV, τ = 13.7. The integrand at E₀ exceeds the one at kT by about 9×10², which is why the rate is set by a band around 5.9 keV rather than by kT itself.
HardExample 3
The CNO cycle's slowest link is ¹⁴N(p, γ)¹⁵O, with reduced mass μc² = 875 MeV and Z₁Z₂ = 7. Taking πα = 0.02293 and the solar kT = 1.29 keV, find its Gamow energy, peak energy, τ and local temperature exponent, and use them to say why the Sun runs on the pp chain while a 1.5 M☉ star does not.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- Gamow energy: EG = 2μc²(παZ₁Z₂)² = 2(875 MeV)(0.02293 × 7)² = 1750 × 0.02576 = 45.1 MeV, so b = √(45 100 keV) = 212 keV^½ — 9.6 times the p+p value.
- Peak: E₀ = (b⋅kT/2)²⁄³ = (212 × 1.29/2)²⁄³ = 137²⁄³ = 26.6 keV, four and a half times the pp peak at the same temperature.
- Exponent: with kT carried unrounded as 1.2926 keV, τ = 3E₀/kT = 3(26.6)/1.2926 = 61.7, so the integrand peaks at e(−61.7) ≈ 1.6×10⁻²⁷, against 1.1×10⁻⁶ for p+p — in this Gamow factor alone CNO is handicapped by 21 orders of magnitude at this temperature.
- Temperature slope: n = (τ − 2)/3 = (61.7 − 2)/3 = 19.9, against 3.9 for p+p.
- A core 10% hotter therefore multiplies CNO by 1.1019.9 = 6.7 and pp by only 1.103.9 = 1.45. So their ratio climbs about 4.6-fold for every 10% rise in T, and for solar composition the two rates cross near 1.7×10⁷ K.
- A 1.5 M☉ star has a core hotter than that, so it burns hydrogen by CNO; and because n ≈ 20 makes its energy generation hair-trigger in T, the released power is concentrated enough to drive a convective core, which the Sun does not have.
Answer. EG = 45 MeV, b = 212 keV^½, E₀ = 26.6 keV, τ = 61.7, n ≈ 20 — against 493 keV, 22.2 keV^½, 5.9 keV, 13.7 and n ≈ 3.9 for p+p. CNO loses badly at 1.5×10⁷ K but gains 6.7× per 10% in T, so it takes over above about 1.7×10⁷ K.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
The Gamow peak is the band of collision energies — high on the Maxwell tail, yet far below the Coulomb barrier — that contributes almost all of a thermonuclear reaction's rate.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.