
Quantum core · institution-dependent · Interactive lesson
Asymptotic form, Hermite polynomials and quantisation
No walls, no nodes imposed by hand — so where does the ladder come from? This lesson earns the oscillator spectrum the honest way: factor out the Gaussian the equation demands at infinity, hand what remains to a power series, and let normalisability kill every energy except Eₙ = (n + ½)ħω.
UPIV-08.03 · Lesson 3 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Quantum core · institution-dependent. Departments differ in how much quantum mechanics they include in Physics IV or teach in a dedicated course. Follow your university’s required mathematical depth and assessment; these numbered units are not automatically optional.
Build the model
Solve the oscillator by series: the boundary condition at infinity is the quantiser.
The key idea
The oscillator's bound states are Hermite polynomials times a Gaussian, and they exist only at Eₙ = (n + ½)ħω because only there does the power series multiplying the Gaussian terminate rather than outgrow it.
Example. At K = 2E/ħω = 5 the even chain stops at once: a₂ = −2, a₄ = 0, so h = 1 − 2ξ² ∝ H₂ and E₂ = 2.5 ħω — for a CO-like bond with ħω = 0.266 eV, that is 0.665 eV.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Scaled to its natural units the oscillator equation reads ψ″ = (ξ² − K)ψ, with everything about the particular oscillator absorbed into K = 2E/ħω. Far out, the equation forces ψ toward e(±ξ²/2); only the decaying branch can be a state, so write ψ = h(ξ)e(−ξ²/2) and ask what h must be. A power series answers with a two-step recursion, aⱼ₊₂ = aⱼ(2j + 1 − K)/((j + 1)(j + 2)) — and here is the trap: for generic K the recursion never ends, its coefficients fall off in the same ratio as those of e(+ξ²), and the "solution" rebuilds the diverging exponential already thrown away. Every K solves the differential equation; almost no K yields a normalisable state. Rescue comes only when a numerator vanishes: K = 2n + 1, that is Eₙ = (n + ½)ħω, with the still-running opposite-parity chain set to zero by hand. Quantisation here is a boundary condition at infinity playing exactly the role the walls played for the box, and because the recursion steps by two, every eigenfunction comes out even or odd. The price of the method is the assumption it leans on: the potential must stay exactly quadratic out to infinity, which no real bond does.
1One number survives the scaling
Topic 8.2 built the yardsticks: the length x₀ = √(ħ/mω) and the energy ħω. Measure position in x₀ — set ξ = x/x₀ — and the time-independent equation collapses to d²ψ/dξ² = (ξ² − K)ψ with K = 2E/ħω. Mass, frequency and ħ have all been absorbed. For H³⁵Cl the yardstick is x₀ ≈ 10.9 pm; for a trapped ion in a megahertz trap it is roughly a thousand times larger — yet both face the identical dimensionless equation. That is the power of the reduction: the question "what are the energies of this oscillator?" becomes "for which pure numbers K does this one equation possess a solution that dies at infinity?" Answer it once, and every harmonic oscillator in nature is solved.
2Keep only the tail that dies
Far from the origin ξ² dwarfs K and the equation is approximately ψ″ = ξ²ψ. Try ψ = e(±ξ²/2): differentiating gives ψ″ = (ξ² ± 1)e(±ξ²/2), which is ξ²ψ up to a correction that fades as ξ grows — so both exponentials are legitimate asymptotic behaviours, and a general solution carries a mixture of them. A normalisable state can carry none of the growing one. So make the survivor explicit: write ψ(ξ) = h(ξ)e(−ξ²/2) exactly — a change of unknown, not an approximation — and substitute back. The Schrödinger equation becomes Hermite's equation, h″ − 2ξh′ + (K − 1)h = 0. Nothing is quantised yet. The move has simply reassigned the labour: the Gaussian handles the decay, and h's only obligation is to grow slowly enough not to wreck it.
3Two chains that never mix
Feed Hermite's equation the series h = Σ aⱼξʲ and equate coefficients of each power: aⱼ₊₂ = aⱼ(2j + 1 − K)/((j + 1)(j + 2)). Two seeds, a₀ and a₁, generate everything — exactly the two free constants a second-order equation owes you — and because the recursion steps by two, the even-j chain and the odd-j chain never communicate. Any solution splits into an even function plus an odd one, so the eventual eigenfunctions will have definite parity: a direct consequence of stepping by two, itself a consequence of the potential being even in ξ. Watch a chain die in real time at K = 5: a₂ = (1 − 5)/2 = −2, then a₄ = a₂(5 − 5)/12 = 0, and every later even coefficient inherits the zero. The chain has snapped shut at h = 1 − 2ξ², which is H₂ up to the factor −2.
4The unterminated series is the enemy in disguise
Suppose no numerator ever vanishes. For large j the ratio aⱼ₊₂/aⱼ = (2j + 1 − K)/((j + 1)(j + 2)) → 2/j. Now compare the function banished at the start: e(+ξ²) = Σ ξ(2m)/m! steps its coefficients by 1/(m + 1) = 2/(j + 2) — the same tail. So an unterminated h grows like e(+ξ²), and ψ = h⋅e(−ξ²/2) grows like e(+ξ²/2): the series has quietly rebuilt the diverging exponential the factorisation threw away. This is the crux of the topic. The differential equation itself is perfectly happy at every K — solutions exist for E = 0.3 ħω, for 1.2 ħω, for π ħω — but all of them blow up at infinity. Solving the equation was never the hard part; being a state is.
5Termination quantises — and one chain must be killed by hand
The only escape is a numerator hitting zero: 2n + 1 − K = 0 for some integer n, so K = 2n + 1 and Eₙ = (n + ½)ħω. Equal rungs ħω apart, and a lowest rung of ½ħω that nobody inserted — the zero-point energy drops out of the termination itself. But termination stops one chain only. If n is even, the odd chain still runs forever and would drag its e(+ξ²) tail along, so its seed must be set to zero by hand: a₁ = 0. If n is odd, a₀ = 0 instead. Each allowed energy therefore owns exactly one state — no degeneracy in one dimension — a polynomial of a single parity times the Gaussian. Count what the argument used: no wall, no node-counting, no operator algebra. Only the demand that ∫|ψ|² dx be finite.
6Name the polynomials, then audit one
With the convention that the leading coefficient is 2ⁿ, the terminated chains are the Hermite polynomials: H₀ = 1, H₁ = 2ξ, H₂ = 4ξ² − 2, H₃ = 8ξ³ − 12ξ, linked by Hₙ₊₁ = 2ξHₙ − 2nHₙ₋₁. Hₙ has n real zeros, so ψₙ has n nodes, and parity (−1)ⁿ — the quantum number is readable off a graph of the state. Never trust a quoted polynomial: audit H₂ against Hermite's equation at K = 5. h″ = 8; −2ξh′ = −16ξ²; (K − 1)h = 4(4ξ² − 2) = 16ξ² − 8. Sum: 8 − 16ξ² + 16ξ² − 8 = 0. It passes. Gaussian integrals then fix the normalisation, ψₙ(x) = (mω/πħ)¹⁄⁴(2ⁿn!)(−1/2) Hₙ(ξ) e(−ξ²/2) — the closed form every later topic in this unit quotes.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Dimensionless oscillator equation
d²ψ/dξ² = (ξ² − K)ψ
Every oscillator becomes the same equation; quantisation becomes a statement about the single number K.
ξ = x/x₀ with x₀ = √(ħ/mω) in metres; K = 2E/ħω is a pure numberAsymptotic factorisation
ψ(ξ) = h(ξ) e(−ξ²/2)
The Gaussian carries the decay at infinity, so h only has to avoid growing like e(+ξ²).
an exact change of unknown; e(+ξ²/2) is discarded as unnormalisableHermite equation and recursion
h″ − 2ξh′ + (K − 1)h = 0 → aⱼ₊₂ = aⱼ(2j + 1 − K)/((j + 1)(j + 2))
Stepping by two is why even and odd never mix — parity is settled before any energy is.
h = Σ aⱼξʲ; the seeds a₀ and a₁ start an even and an odd chainTermination = quantisation
K = 2n + 1 ⟺ Eₙ = (n + ½)ħω, n = 0, 1, 2, …
The whole spectrum — equal spacing ħω and the ½ħω floor — from a boundary condition at infinity.
an unterminated chain grows as e(+ξ²) and destroys normalisabilityThe Hermite polynomials
H₀ = 1, H₁ = 2ξ, H₂ = 4ξ² − 2, H₃ = 8ξ³ − 12ξ
Hₙ has n real zeros and parity (−1)ⁿ: read the quantum number straight off a plotted state.
convention: leading coefficient 2ⁿ; Hₙ₊₁ = 2ξHₙ − 2nHₙ₋₁Normalised eigenfunctions
ψₙ(x) = (mω/πħ)¹⁄⁴ (2ⁿ n!)(−1/2) Hₙ(ξ) e(−ξ²/2)
The closed form the rest of the unit quotes for every expectation value and matrix element.
orthonormal, ∫ψₘψₙ dx = δₘₙ; ξ = x/x₀ is dimensionlessInteractive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Start at K = 1, the bare Gaussian, then step K by 0.05: the tails peel off the axis at once and only lie down again at K = 5. Flip parity to odd and the curve is pinned through zero at the origin, terminating at K = 3 and 7 instead.
Live results
- ENERGY E
- 0.50 ħω
- n = (K − 1)/2
- 0.00
- TAIL ψ(ξ = 4)
- 0.00
- DETUNING |K − (2n+1)|
- 0.00
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. K = 2E/ħω: 1.00; Parity (0 even, 1 odd): 0
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The Gaussian does not do the confining. Students see e(−ξ²/2) factored out and conclude ψ is already normalisable, with the series for h a harmless correction. It is the reverse: generically the recursion builds h into a function growing like e(+ξ²), which does not dent the Gaussian but overturns it, leaving ψ ~ e(+ξ²/2) — the very solution discarded at the start. The equation is solvable at every energy; a normalisable state exists at almost none, and that gap is the quantisation. A second slip follows: terminating one chain is not enough. If the even chain stops at j = n, the odd chain still runs forever, so its seed a₁ must be set to zero by hand — both moves are dictated by the same boundary condition at infinity, which here does all the work the walls did for the particle in a box.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
Set K = 7 and run the odd chain from a₁ = 1. Show the series terminates, build the resulting polynomial, and confirm it is proportional to H₃ = 8ξ³ − 12ξ. What energy does this state carry?
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- An odd state starts from a₁ = 1 with a₀ = 0. The recursion is aⱼ₊₂ = aⱼ(2j + 1 − K)/((j + 1)(j + 2)) with K = 7.
- j = 1: a₃ = a₁(3 − 7)/(2 × 3) = −4/6 = −2/3.
- j = 3: a₅ = a₃(7 − 7)/(4 × 5) = 0 — the numerator hits zero, and every later coefficient inherits it. The chain terminates.
- So h = ξ − (2/3)ξ³. Multiply by −12: −12h = 8ξ³ − 12ξ = H₃(ξ), so h ∝ H₃; the overall constant is fixed later by normalisation.
- Termination at j = n = 3 means K = 2n + 1 = 7, so E₃ = (3 + ½)ħω = 3.5 ħω.
Answer. h ∝ H₃ = 8ξ³ − 12ξ: an odd, three-node state with K = 7 and E₃ = 3.5 ħω.
MediumExample 2
A student proposes E = 1.2 ħω for an even bound state of the oscillator. Run the even chain far enough to show what goes wrong, compare its tail with the series for e(+ξ²), and locate the allowed even energies either side.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- K = 2E/ħω = 2 × 1.2 = 2.4. An even trial starts from a₀ = 1 with a₁ = 0.
- Run the recursion: a₂ = (1 − 2.4)/2 = −0.700; a₄ = a₂(5 − 2.4)/12 = −0.152; a₆ = a₄(9 − 2.4)/30 = −0.0334; a₈ = a₆(13 − 2.4)/56 = −0.00632. No numerator (2j + 1 − 2.4) can ever vanish: 2j + 1 runs through the odd integers and 2.4 is not one.
- Watch the ratio aⱼ₊₂/aⱼ = (2j + 1 − 2.4)/((j + 1)(j + 2)): at j = 6 it is 10.6/56 = 0.189; by j = 40 it is 78.6/1722 = 0.0456, closing on 2/(j + 2) = 0.0476.
- The banished exponential e(+ξ²) = Σ ξ(2m)/m! steps its coefficients by exactly 1/(m + 1) = 2/(j + 2) — the same tail. So h grows like e(+ξ²), and ψ = h⋅e(−ξ²/2) grows like e(+ξ²/2).
- A wavefunction growing as e(+ξ²/2) has a divergent norm, so E = 1.2 ħω supports no state. The nearest even terminations are K = 1 and K = 5: E₀ = 0.5 ħω and E₂ = 2.5 ħω.
Answer. No — the chain never terminates, ψ grows as e(+ξ²/2), and the norm diverges. E = 1.2 ħω falls in the gap between the even eigenvalues E₀ = 0.5 ħω and E₂ = 2.5 ħω.
HardExample 3
H³⁵Cl vibrates with ħω = 0.358 eV; the reduced mass is μ = 1.63 × 10⁻²⁷ kg. From the terminated n = 1 chain, construct the normalised eigenfunction, locate the peaks of its probability density in picometres, and give E₁ in electronvolts.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- n = 1 terminates the odd chain at once: a₃ = a₁(3 − 3)/6 = 0, so h = a₁ξ ∝ H₁ = 2ξ and ψ₁ = C ξ e(−ξ²/2), with ξ = x/x₀ and x₀ = √(ħ/μω).
- Normalise: ∫|ψ₁|² dx = C²x₀ ∫ ξ²e(−ξ²) dξ = C²x₀(√π/2) = 1, so C = √2/(π¹⁄⁴√x₀) — exactly the closed form ψ₁(x) = (μω/πħ)¹⁄⁴ √2 ξ e(−ξ²/2).
- The density |ψ₁|² ∝ ξ²e(−ξ²) has derivative 2ξ(1 − ξ²)e(−ξ²), zero at ξ = 0 (the node) and ξ = ±1: the peaks sit one natural length either side of centre, x = ±x₀.
- Numbers: ω = 0.358 × 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ J ÷ 1.055 × 10⁻³⁴ J s = 5.44 × 10¹⁴ s⁻¹, so x₀ = √(1.055 × 10⁻³⁴ ÷ (1.63 × 10⁻²⁷ × 5.44 × 10¹⁴)) = 1.09 × 10⁻¹¹ m = 10.9 pm.
- E₁ = (1 + ½)ħω = 1.5 × 0.358 = 0.537 eV. The peaks sit at ±10.9 pm — about 9% of the 127 pm bond length, small enough that truncating the true potential at its quadratic term is still defensible on this rung.
Answer. ψ₁(x) = (μω/πħ)¹⁄⁴√2 ξ e(−ξ²/2) with ξ = x/x₀; the density peaks at x = ±x₀ = ±10.9 pm with a node at centre, and E₁ = 0.537 eV.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
The oscillator's bound states are Hermite polynomials times a Gaussian, and they exist only at Eₙ = (n + ½)ħω because only there does the power series multiplying the Gaussian terminate rather than outgrow it.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.