Skip to main content

Physics V course sequence · Interactive lesson

LS coupling, term symbols and Hund's rules

A configuration is not a level. Antisymmetry decides which L and S survive, the leftover electron repulsion decides which term lies lowest, and ξ(r) L⋅S splits that term into a J ladder whose spacings you can check against a measured spectrum.

UPV-12.07 · Lesson 7 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: LS coupling, term symbols and Hund's rulesFour lanes of a p² level diagram, all on one energy scale: the three ³P fine-structure levels at E_J = (A/2)[J(J+1) − 4] and the ¹D₂ term, both measured from the ³P centre of gravity (dashed line; higher on the page is higher energy). With A = 20 cm⁻¹ the ³P levels sit at -40, -20 and 20 cm⁻¹ and ¹D₂ at 200 cm⁻¹; the arrows mark the intervals A and 2A the Landé rule fixes, and the lowest level is J = 0.A2A³P₀³P₁³P₂¹D₂p² · energy above the ³P centre of gravity / cm⁻¹E(³PJ) = (A/2)[J(J+1) − 4] → −2A, −A, +AA = 20 3|A| = 60 D = 200 3|A|/D = 0.300
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

One configuration, several terms, and only one of them is the ground state.

The key idea

In LS (Russell–Saunders) coupling the electrons' orbital angular momenta are summed into a total L and their spins into a total S, and only then are L and S coupled into J = L + S — an order that is justified only while the residual electrostatic repulsion outweighs the spin-orbit interaction.

Example. Carbon's 2p² subshell holds 15 antisymmetric microstates, which LS coupling sorts into ³P (9 states), ¹D (5) and ¹S (1); spin-orbit then splits ³P alone, putting ³P₁ 16.40 cm⁻¹ and ³P₂ 43.40 cm⁻¹ above the ground level ³P₀.

The complete physical model and assumptions

LS coupling is not a new physical law; it is a claim about which of three energies is biggest. The central field the self-consistent calculation supplies is the largest and fixes the configuration. What that central field failed to absorb of Σ e²/4πε₀rᵢⱼ comes next. The spin-orbit term Σ ξ(rᵢ) lᵢ⋅sᵢ is smallest. Because the residual repulsion is a scalar under rotating every orbital coordinate at once, and contains no spin operator at all, it commutes with L = Σ lᵢ and with S = Σ sᵢ separately, so both stay good quantum numbers and the configuration's states break into terms ²ˢ⁺¹L, each (2L+1)(2S+1)-fold degenerate. Antisymmetry then decides which (L, S) pairs exist at all: two equivalent nl electrons keep only L + S even, which is how p² keeps ³P, ¹D and ¹S out of the six terms two inequivalent p electrons would give. Hund's three rules rank the terms of that one configuration, and the smallest energy in the hierarchy resolves each term into levels labelled by J, spaced by the Landé rule EJ − E(J−1) = AJ. The cost is the hierarchy itself. ζₙₗ climbs roughly as Z⁴/n³ while the residual electrostatic splitting hardly moves down a column, so in heavy atoms the ordering that justified L and S collapses, term symbols become labels on states that are really mixtures, and jj coupling takes over at the far end.

1Why L and S survive as separate labels

Split the Hamiltonian as H = Hcf + Hᵣₑₛ + HSO. Hcf is the central field the self-consistent calculation supplies, and it fixes the configuration. Hᵣₑₛ is whatever part of Σ(i<j) e²/4πε₀rᵢⱼ the central field failed to absorb. HSO = Σᵢ ξ(rᵢ) lᵢ⋅sᵢ, with ξ(r) = (1/2mₑ²c²r) dV/dr. LS coupling is the assumption Hᵣₑₛ ≫ HSO, and nothing else. Now ask what Hᵣₑₛ commutes with. It is a scalar under rotating every orbital coordinate simultaneously, so [Hᵣₑₛ, L] = 0; it contains no spin operator at all, so [Hᵣₑₛ, S] = 0. It does not commute with any individual lᵢ, so the one-electron labels are already gone — only the totals survive. That leaves the commuting set (H, L², S², J², Jz, Π) and the coupled basis |L S J MJ⟩, assembled from |L ML⟩|S MS⟩ by Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. HSO commutes with J² and Jz but not with Lz or Sz, which is exactly why the uncoupled basis stops being useful the moment fine structure matters.

2Clebsch-Gordan first, antisymmetry second

Two inequivalent p electrons — 2p3p — are told apart by n, so nothing is forbidden. L runs 0, 1, 2 and S runs 0, 1, giving ¹S, ¹P, ¹D, ³S, ³P and ³D; the states count 1 + 3 + 5 + 3 + 9 + 15 = 36 = (3×2)². Make them equivalent — 2p² — and both electrons must share the same six spin-orbitals, so only C(6,2) = 15 antisymmetric states exist and more than half the terms have to go. The survivors are those whose spatial and spin functions carry opposite exchange symmetry: for two electrons of the same l the spatial function has exchange parity (−1)L and the spin function (−1)(S+1), so an antisymmetric product needs L + S even. That leaves ³P, ¹D and ¹S, with 9 + 5 + 1 = 15. If you do not trust the shortcut, run the microstate table instead — list every allowed (mₗ, mₛ) pair, tabulate ML and MS, then strip off the largest available term and repeat until the table is empty. Holes work as well as electrons, so p⁴ carries the terms of p² and d⁸ those of d², which is the fastest route to oxygen and to nickel.

3Hund's rules are electrostatics, not magnetism

The first rule takes the largest S, and the mechanism is not magnetic. A high-spin state forces an antisymmetric spatial function, which vanishes at r₁₂ = 0 and digs a Fermi hole, so the electrons see less of 1/r₁₂ and the high-spin term sits 2K below the low-spin term built on the same configuration, K being the exchange integral. Helium shows the size of it: 1s2s ³S lies 0.80 eV below 1s2s ¹S, four orders of magnitude more than a magnetic dipole-dipole coupling between the two spins could manage. The second rule takes the largest L available at that S, for the related reason that electrons circulating the same way meet each other less often. The third rule is different in kind — it is nothing but the sign of A, positive below half filling and negative above, so the multiplet is regular in carbon and inverted in oxygen. Note what the rules do not do. They order the terms of a single configuration, and reliably only the lowest of them; they do not order the excited terms, and they say nothing about which configuration wins, which is why chromium is 3d⁵4s¹ rather than 3d⁴4s².

4Turning L⋅S into a number, and the interval rule

J = L + S gives J² = L² + S² + 2 L⋅S, so inside a single term, where L² and S² are already fixed numbers, ⟨L⋅S⟩ = (ħ²/2)[J(J+1) − L(L+1) − S(S+1)]. Project the one-electron sum Σ ξ(rᵢ) lᵢ⋅sᵢ onto that one term and it collapses to a single constant multiplying L⋅S: for the maximum-multiplicity term of one open subshell A = ±ζₙₗ/(2S), the sign following the filling. The level shift is then ESO(J) = (A/2)[J(J+1) − L(L+1) − S(S+1)]. Subtract neighbours: J(J+1) − (J−1)J = 2J, so EJ − E(J−1) = AJ. That is the Landé interval rule, and it says the successive gaps of a multiplet stand in the ratio 1 : 2 : 3 …, counting up from the smallest J. For ³P, with L = S = 1, the bracket is J(J+1) − 4 and the three levels sit at −2A, −A and +A. Check the weighted sum: 1(−2A) + 3(−A) + 5(+A) = 0, the general centre-of-gravity theorem ΣJ (2J+1) ESO(J) = 0. Spin-orbit coupling redistributes a term's energy among its levels; it never moves the term.

5The interval rule as a measurement: carbon to lead

Carbon's 2p² ³P has ³P₁ at 16.40 cm⁻¹ and ³P₂ at 43.40 cm⁻¹ above ³P₀. Read A off the first interval: A = +16.40 cm⁻¹, so ζ₂p = 2A = 32.8 cm⁻¹. It is positive, so the multiplet is regular and J = 0 lies lowest, exactly as Hund's third rule requires for 2 electrons in a capacity of 6. The rule then predicts E₂ − E₀ = 3A = 49.20 cm⁻¹ against the measured 43.40 cm⁻¹, high by 5.80 cm⁻¹ or 13.4%; equivalently the observed interval ratio is 27.00/16.40 = 1.65 rather than 2. That deficit is physics, not sloppiness, but name the right physics. It is not configuration interaction: second-order spin-orbit mixing of ³P₂ with the ¹D₂ term 10192.6 cm⁻¹ above it shifts the level by at most ζ²/ΔE = 32.8²/10192.6 = 0.11 cm⁻¹, some fifty times too small, and mixing with the far more distant 2p3p configuration is smaller still. What a one-body ξ(r) l⋅s form cannot contain is the two-body magnetic interaction between the electrons — the spin-spin and spin-other-orbit terms — and in a light atom those are exactly the size of the discrepancy. Silicon's 3p² does better, with intervals of 77.1 and 146.0 cm⁻¹ for a ratio of 1.89. Lead's 6p² gives 7819 and 2831 cm⁻¹, a ratio of 0.36 — not a strained rule but a broken one, and the A fitted from lead's first interval means nothing.

6Where LS coupling hands over to jj

The hierarchy that justified LS coupling is a contest between two numbers. The residual electrostatic splitting hardly changes down a column, because the valence orbitals stay similar in shape; ζₙₗ climbs steeply, roughly as Z⁴/n³. In group 14 the ³P spread measured against the ³P-to-¹D gap runs 43.4/10193 = 0.0043 for carbon and 10650/21458 = 0.50 for lead — a factor near 120, while the electrostatic gap merely doubles. When ζ wins, couple each electron first, lᵢ + sᵢ = jᵢ, then J = Σ jᵢ, and label the levels (j₁, j₂)J. Nothing about the state space changes: p² gives (½,½)₀, (3/2,3/2) with J = 0, 2 and (½,3/2) with J = 1, 2, which is 1 + 6 + 8 = 15 states carrying J = {0, 0, 1, 2, 2} — exactly the multiset LS coupling produced. Only the labels and the energies differ. Real heavy atoms sit in between, in intermediate coupling, which is why mercury's nominally spin-forbidden 6³P₁ → 6¹S₀ line at 254 nm is strong enough to run a lamp on.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Term symbol and its state count

²ˢ⁺¹LJ · 2J+1 states per level · ΣJ (2J+1) = (2L+1)(2S+1)

Fixes how many states hide behind one term label and how many levels it can split into.

Only L is printed as a letter: L = 0,1,2,3,4 become S, P, D, F, G, while the multiplicity 2S+1 and the total J are printed as numbers.

Angular-momentum addition (Clebsch-Gordan range)

L = |l₁−l₂| … l₁+l₂ · S = |s₁−s₂| … s₁+s₂ · J = |L−S| … L+S

Gives the full term list before antisymmetry: 2p3p yields ¹S ¹P ¹D ³S ³P ³D, 36 states.

Integer steps in each series, and every L pairs with every S while the electrons are inequivalent.

Antisymmetry cut for equivalent electrons

two equivalent nl electrons: L + S evenstates = C(4l+2, N)

Cuts p² down to ³P, ¹D and ¹S — 9 + 5 + 1 = 15, not the 36 of 2p3p.

C(6,2) = 15 for p², C(10,2) = 45 for d²; holes work too, so p⁴ carries the terms of p².

Spin-orbit energy inside one term

ESO(J) = (A/2)[J(J+1) − L(L+1) − S(S+1)]

Turns the operator into arithmetic: J² = L² + S² + 2 L⋅S, so ⟨L⋅S⟩ is fixed once J is.

For the maximum-multiplicity term of one open subshell A = ±ζₙₗ/(2S), plus below half filling and minus above, so carbon's A = 16.40 cm⁻¹ means ζ₂p = 2A = 32.8 cm⁻¹. A is not ζ.

Landé interval rule and centre of gravity

EJ − E(J−1) = A J , ΣJ (2J+1) ESO(J) = 0

One measured interval predicts the rest, and the size of the failure measures the departure from pure LS.

A in cm⁻¹ or eV; the second identity is the centre-of-gravity theorem for a single term.

Hydrogenic spin-orbit constant

ζₙₗ = α² Z⁴ R_∞hc / [n³ l(l+½)(l+1)]

Hydrogen 2p: ζ = 3.02×10⁻⁵ eV = 0.244 cm⁻¹, and since E(j=3/2) − E(j=1/2) = (3/2)ζ the doublet is 0.365 cm⁻¹. The Z⁴ is why LS holds in carbon and breaks in lead.

α² = 5.325×10⁻⁵, R_∞hc = 13.606 eV; ζ = 0 for l = 0, and screening replaces Z by Zeff.
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

20 cm⁻¹
−50 to 50 cm⁻¹; steps of 5.
200 cm⁻¹
40 to 220 cm⁻¹; steps of 10.

Try this. Drag A negative: past half filling the multiplet inverts, ³P₂ drops below ³P₀ and LOWEST LEVEL J flips from 0 to 2. Then push |A| to 50 and D down to 40 — ³P₂ rises past ¹D₂ once |A| exceeds D, that is once 3|A|/D passes 3, and the LS labels stop meaning much. Real carbon is off this scale entirely: A = 16.4 cm⁻¹ against D ≈ 10160 cm⁻¹, a ratio of 0.005.

Live results

SPREAD E(³P₂)−E(³P₀)
60 cm⁻¹
GAP ³P₂ → ¹D₂
180 cm⁻¹
RATIO 3|A| / D
0.30
LOWEST LEVEL J
0

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Physics V modelFour lanes of a p² level diagram, all on one energy scale: the three ³P fine-structure levels at E_J = (A/2)[J(J+1) − 4] and the ¹D₂ term, both measured from the ³P centre of gravity (dashed line; higher on the page is higher energy). With A = 20 cm⁻¹ the ³P levels sit at -40, -20 and 20 cm⁻¹ and ¹D₂ at 200 cm⁻¹; the arrows mark the intervals A and 2A the Landé rule fixes, and the lowest level is J = 0.A2A³P₀³P₁³P₂¹D₂p² · energy above the ³P centre of gravity / cm⁻¹E(³PJ) = (A/2)[J(J+1) − 4] → −2A, −A, +AA = 20 3|A| = 60 D = 200 3|A|/D = 0.300
Four lanes of a p² level diagram, all on one energy scale: the three ³P fine-structure levels at EJ = (A/2)[J(J+1) − 4] and the ¹D₂ term, both measured from the ³P centre of gravity (dashed line; higher on the page is higher energy). With A = 20 cm⁻¹ the ³P levels sit at −40, −20 and 20 cm⁻¹ and ¹D₂ at 200 cm⁻¹; the arrows mark the intervals A and 2A the Landé rule fixes, and the lowest level is J = 0.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Spin-orbit constant A: 20 cm⁻¹; ¹D₂ above the ³P centre: 200 cm⁻¹

Baseline 20; choose −50 to 50, in steps of 5.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The multiplicity 2S+1 is not the number of J levels. It counts MS values, and those turn into distinct J only if L is large enough to absorb them: the number of levels is min(2S+1, 2L+1). ³P (L = 1, S = 1) does have three levels, J = 0, 1, 2, but ³S (L = 0, S = 1) has exactly one, J = 1, and calling it a triplet does not conjure ³S₀ or ³S₂ into existence. The same slip in reverse sends students hunting for the fine structure of nitrogen's ⁴S₃/₂ ground term, which has none, because L = 0 kills ξ(r) L⋅S outright. Keep three counts apart: (2L+1)(2S+1) states in the term, min(2S+1, 2L+1) levels inside it, and 2J+1 states in each level.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

Carbon's ground configuration is 1s² 2s² 2p². Count the antisymmetric microstates of the 2p² subshell, list the terms LS coupling allows, verify the count, and give the ground-state term symbol.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 4 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

Carbon's ³P term is measured with ³P₁ 16.40 cm⁻¹ and ³P₂ 43.40 cm⁻¹ above ³P₀. Fit the spin-orbit constant A from the first interval, use the Landé rule to predict the second, compare with the measurement, and express A in meV. Take 1 cm⁻¹ = 1.2398 × 10⁻⁴ eV.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

Show that jj coupling gives a p² configuration exactly the same set of J values as LS coupling, then use lead's measured 6p² levels — ³P₁ at 7819 cm⁻¹ and ³P₂ at 10650 cm⁻¹ above ³P₀, with ¹D₂ at 21458 cm⁻¹ — to decide which scheme its labels deserve. Compare with carbon, whose ³P spread is 43.4 cm⁻¹ against a ¹D₂ at 10193 cm⁻¹.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

Oxygen's ground configuration is 1s² 2s² 2p⁴. Which term symbol is its ground level, and on what grounds?
7

Review & continue

In LS (Russell–Saunders) coupling the electrons' orbital angular momenta are summed into a total L and their spins into a total S, and only then are L and S coupled into J = L + S — an order that is justified only while the residual electrostatic repulsion outweighs the spin-orbit interaction.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.