Skip to main content

Nuclear, particle & quantum-information sequence · Interactive lesson

Mesons: JPC and neutral-meson mixing

Learn to label a meson before you look it up: L and S hand you P and C in one line, and the same line says which labels no quark–antiquark pair can carry. Then the two places the naive nonet fails — η and η′ are a rotation of octet and singlet, and a neutral kaon is not an eigenstate of its own decay.

UPV-17.07 · Lesson 7 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Mesons: J^PC and neutral-meson mixingProbability that a kaon born as K⁰ is found as K⁰ (solid) or K̄⁰ (dashed) against time in K_S lifetimes, computed from the eigenvalues of M − iΓ/2 with CP conserved. At t = 2.0 τ_S, Δm/Γ_S = 0.474, Γ_L/Γ_S = 0.002: P(K⁰) = 0.390, P(K̄⁰) = 0.176.10.5probability of each flavoursolid: P(K⁰ → K⁰)dashed: P(K⁰ → K̄⁰)t = 2.0 τS: K⁰ 0.39 K̄⁰ 0.18t = 06 τS12 τS
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.

Nuclear, particle & quantum-information sequence. These units continue into nuclear and particle physics and quantum information. Follow your university’s prerequisites, mathematical depth and assessment; this independent pathway is not a universal programme specification.

1

Build the model

Two signs from L and S, one rotation angle, and one Hamiltonian that is not Hermitian.

The key idea

A meson's JPC is the triple of eigenvalues of total angular momentum, parity and charge conjugation on a colour-singlet qq̄ state, fixed by its orbital L and spin S through P = (−1)(L+1) and C = (−1)(L+S), with C defined only when the state is its own antiparticle.

Example. The π⁰ has L = 0 and S = 0, so J = 0, P = (−1)¹ = −1 and C = (−1)⁰ = +1: JPC = 0⁻⁺. Two photons carry C = (−1)² = +1 and three carry −1, so π⁰ → γγ is allowed and π⁰ → 3γ is not; the measured 3γ branch is below 3.1 × 10⁻⁸.

The complete physical model and assumptions

A meson is a colour-singlet quark–antiquark pair whose state lives in a tensor product, orbital ⊗ spin ⊗ flavour ⊗ colour, and parity and charge conjugation act on it factor by factor, so their eigenvalues follow from two labels: P = (−1)(L+1), the orbital sign times the intrinsic −1 the Dirac equation gives a fermion–antifermion pair, and C = (−1)(L+S), the cost of swapping quark and antiquark in space, spin and Fermi statistics. Two consequences pay for the bookkeeping. Every JPC is reachable from some (L, S) except a short list of exotics, so a resonance carrying 1⁻⁺ cannot be a qq̄ pair at all. And C is an eigenvalue only when the state is its own antiparticle, which is exactly where flavour turns subtle: with mₛ ≠ mᵤ the octet and singlet η₈ and η₁ are not mass eigenstates, and the physical η and η′ are a rotation of them through θP ≈ −11°. The neutral kaon goes one step further. K⁰ and K̄⁰ are what the strong force makes, but the weak force connects them and lets both decay, so their two-dimensional effective Hamiltonian M − iΓ/2 is not Hermitian; its eigenvectors KS and KL have masses split by Δm and lifetimes 570 times apart, and a beam born as K⁰ oscillates in strangeness. The price: L and S are potential-model labels, not conserved quantities; θP is fitted, not derived; and M − iΓ/2 is second-order perturbation theory that assumes exponential decay.

1Build the state space before assigning anything

A meson is |ψ⟩ = |orbital⟩ ⊗ |spin⟩ ⊗ |flavour⟩ ⊗ |colour⟩, with the colour factor pinned to the singlet (rr̄ + gḡ + bb̄)/√3, which is symmetric under q ↔ q̄ and drops out of every sign count below. The orbital factor is a relative-coordinate wavefunction R(r) YLm(r̂), the spin factor is one of the four states of ½ ⊗ ½ (singlet S = 0, triplet S = 1), and J comes from L ⊗ S by Clebsch–Gordan: J = L for S = 0, and J = L − 1, L, L + 1 for S = 1 and L ≥ 1, but only J = 1 when L = 0. J, P and C commute with the strong Hamiltonian; L and S do not: they are labels of the potential-model basis in which the state is written, and spin–orbit and tensor forces mix them, so the ρ is mostly ³S₁ with a ³D₁ admixture. That is why assignments use the spectroscopic name n(2S+1)LJ for the dominant component and JPC for what is actually conserved.

2Parity: one sign from the orbit, one from the Dirac equation

Parity sends r → −r, and on the relative wavefunction YLm(−r̂) = (−1)L YLm(r̂): even L is even, odd L is odd. The second factor is intrinsic. Applying the parity operator γ⁰ to the plane-wave solutions of the Dirac equation returns the particle spinors u with one sign and the antiparticle spinors v with the opposite one, so a fermion and its antifermion have opposite intrinsic parity and the pair contributes −1 whatever convention fixes the quark's own sign. Together, P = (−1)(L+1). Every L = 0 meson is therefore parity-odd — π, K, η, ρ, ω, φ all carry P = −1 — and the first positive-parity nonets, the a₀, a₁, a₂ and b₁ families near 1.2 to 1.5 GeV, cost one unit of orbital excitation. Read the sign off a decay and you have a check: ρ → ππ puts the two pions in an L = 1 wave, parity (−1)¹ for the wave times (−1)² for two pions, giving −1 and matching the ρ.

3Charge conjugation: swap q and q̄ and count the signs

Ĉ turns every quark into its antiquark, so Ĉ|q(1) q̄(2)⟩ ∝ |q̄(1) q(2)⟩. To compare with the original, relabel the two particles: exchanging positions costs (−1)L, exchanging spins costs +1 for the symmetric triplet and −1 for the antisymmetric singlet, that is (−1)(S+1), and exchanging two fermion operators costs −1. The product is C = (−1)(L+S). It is an eigenvalue only if the swapped state is the same state: uū, dd̄, ss̄, cc̄, bb̄ and their combinations. For K⁰ = ds̄ the operator returns K̄⁰ = sd̄, a different ket, and for π⁺ it returns π⁻. Charged members of an isospin multiplet get G = C(−1)I instead, with C the neutral member's value: pions have G = −1, so n pions carry (−1)ⁿ, which is why the ρ (G = +1) goes to two pions and the ω (G = −1) to three. Tabulate L and S: L = 0 gives 0⁻⁺ and 1⁻⁻; L = 1 gives 1⁺⁻ and 0⁺⁺, 1⁺⁺, 2⁺⁺; L = 2 gives 2⁻⁺ and 1⁻⁻, 2⁻⁻, 3⁻⁻. Missing from every row are 0⁻⁻ and the series 0⁺⁻, 1⁻⁺, 2⁺⁻, … with P = (−1)J and C = −P. Those are the exotics; π₁(1600) with 1⁻⁺ is evidence for glue or a second qq̄ pair inside the hadron.

4η and η′: the octet and singlet are not mass eigenstates

Flavour SU(3) gives 3 ⊗ 3̄ = 8 ⊕ 1, and the neutral I = 0 members of the pseudoscalar nonet are η₈ = (uū + dd̄ − 2ss̄)/√6 and η₁ = (uū + dd̄ + ss̄)/√3. If the symmetry were exact those would be the eigenstates. It is not: the quark-mass term with mₛ ≫ mᵤ, md transforms as the eighth component of an octet and has a non-zero matrix element between 8 and 1, so in the (η₈, η₁) basis the mass-squared matrix has an off-diagonal entry and the physical states are a rotation, |η⟩ = cos θP |η₈⟩ − sin θP |η₁⟩ and |η′⟩ = sin θP |η₈⟩ + cos θP |η₁⟩. The angle is fixed by the eigenvalues: with mη₈² = (4mK² − mπ²)/3 = (569 MeV)² from Gell-Mann–Okubo, sin² θP = (mη₈² − mη²)/(mη′² − mη²) = 0.039, so θP ≈ −11°. The vector nonet does the same with θV ≈ 39°, near the ideal 35.3° at which ω = (uū + dd̄)/√2 and φ = ss̄, which is why φ → KK̄ takes 83% of its decays while φ → 3π is suppressed. Pseudoscalars sit far from ideal because the U(1)A anomaly lifts the singlet: η′ at 958 MeV is the cost of that, and the angle itself is fitted, never derived.

5K⁰–K̄⁰: a two-level system with a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian

The strong interaction makes definite strangeness: π⁻p → ΛK⁰ produces |K⁰⟩ = ds̄, never K̄⁰ = sd̄. The weak interaction ignores that label: a two-W box diagram connects K⁰ to K̄⁰ (ΔS = 2), and both decay to the same ππ and πππ channels. Project onto the two-dimensional kaon subspace and second-order perturbation theory (Weisskopf–Wigner) gives Heff = M − iΓ/2, where Mᵢⱼ holds masses and energy shifts and Γᵢⱼ = 2π Σf ⟨i|HW|f⟩⟨f|HW|j⟩ δ(Ef − mK) holds decay rates. Γ is Hermitian but −iΓ/2 is anti-Hermitian, so Heff is not: the norm of a state falls with time, which is what decay means. CPT sets M₁₁ = M₂₂ and Γ₁₁ = Γ₂₂. With CP conserved and the phase convention CP|K⁰⟩ = |K̄⁰⟩, the eigenvectors are KS = (K⁰ + K̄⁰)/√2 with CP = +1 and KL = (K⁰ − K̄⁰)/√2 with CP = −1. The eigenvalues differ in both parts: KS → ππ is fast, τS = 0.895 × 10⁻¹⁰ s, while KL, being CP-odd, cannot reach ππ and is left with three-body channels, πππ with under 100 MeV to spare and semileptonic πℓν, so τL = 5.12 × 10⁻⁸ s, 570 times longer; and Δm = mL − mS = 3.48 × 10⁻⁶ eV. Since 1964, KL → ππ at 2 × 10⁻³ has shown CP is not exact, so this holds only to that accuracy.

6Evolve in the eigenbasis, then rotate back to flavour

Time evolution is diagonal in the eigenbasis, so write the initial state there: |K⁰⟩ = (|KS⟩ + |KL⟩)/√2. Each component picks up its own factor, e(−imS t − ΓS t/2) and e(−imL t − ΓL t/2), and rotating back gives the K̄⁰ amplitude ½(eS − eL). Squaring, P(K⁰ → K̄⁰) = ¼[e(−ΓS t) + e(−ΓL t) − 2e(−(ΓS+ΓL)t/2) cos(Δm t)], the standard two-level beat at angular frequency Δm/ħ with two different dampings. At t = 2τS the numbers are e⁻² = 0.135, e(−0.0035) = 0.997 and 2e(−1.002) cos(0.948) = 0.428, so P(K̄⁰) = 0.176 while P(K⁰) = 0.390: nearly a third of the surviving kaons have flipped strangeness. The curves cross when cos(Δm t) = 0, at t = π/(2Δm) = 3.3τS, and once the KS component has died the beam is pure KL, half K⁰ and half K̄⁰ from then on. Experiments tag the flavour through semileptonic decays, K⁰ → π⁻e⁺ν and K̄⁰ → π⁺e⁻ν̄, and fit the asymmetry to extract Δm. In NumPy it is four lines: build H = M − 1j*G/2, apply scipy.linalg.expm(−1j*H*t) to the flavour-basis vector, and watch its norm fall.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Parity of a quark–antiquark pair

P = (−1)(L+1)

Every L = 0 meson is parity-odd, so the lightest nonets are 0⁻ and 1⁻; positive parity costs one unit of L and roughly 400 MeV.

L = orbital angular momentum of the qq̄ pair; the extra −1 is the intrinsic parity of a fermion–antifermion pair

Charge conjugation of a neutral qq̄ state

C = (−1)(L+S)

Swapping q and q̄ costs (−1)L in space, (−1)(S+1) in spin and −1 for fermion exchange. K⁰ is not an eigenstate: C|K⁰⟩ = |K̄⁰⟩.

S = 0 or 1 is the total quark spin; an eigenvalue only for flavour-neutral states such as uū, dd̄, ss̄, cc̄

Exotic JPC, forbidden to any qq̄ pair

0⁻⁻, 0⁺⁻, 1⁻⁺, 2⁺⁻, 3⁻⁺, …

A resonance carrying one of these, such as π₁(1600) with 1⁻⁺, cannot be a qq̄ pair: it needs excited glue, a second qq̄ pair, or a rethink.

The series has P = (−1)J with C = −P; S = 0 gives C = −P but P = (−1)(J+1), S = 1 gives C = P, and 0⁻⁻ fails because J = 0 with S = 1 forces L = 1 and P = +1

η–η′ singlet–octet rotation

|η⟩ = cos θP |η₈⟩ − sin θP |η₁⟩|η′⟩ = sin θP |η₈⟩ + cos θP |η₁⟩

θP is whatever angle diagonalises the 2×2 mass-squared matrix in the (η₈, η₁) basis; vectors give θV ≈ 39°, near the ideal 35.3° at which φ is pure ss̄.

η₈ = (uū + dd̄ − 2ss̄)/√6, η₁ = (uū + dd̄ + ss̄)/√3; θP ≈ −11° from the quadratic mass formula

Effective Hamiltonian of the K⁰–K̄⁰ pair

Heff = M − iΓ/2 in the (|K⁰⟩, |K̄⁰⟩) basis

Non-Hermitian because probability leaks into ππ and πππ. With CP conserved the eigenvectors are KS = (K⁰ + K̄⁰)/√2 and KL = (K⁰ − K̄⁰)/√2, split by Δm = 3.48 × 10⁻⁶ eV.

M and Γ are Hermitian 2×2 matrices of mass and decay rate, ħ = c = 1; CPT forces M₁₁ = M₂₂ and Γ₁₁ = Γ₂₂

Strangeness oscillation of a state born as K⁰

P(K⁰ → K̄⁰) = ¼[e(−ΓS t) + e(−ΓL t) − 2e(−(ΓS+ΓL)t/2) cos(Δm t)]

A two-level beat at angular frequency Δm/ħ, damped by two different lifetimes; tag the flavour by semileptonic decays and the asymmetry versus t returns Δm.

ħ = 1, so ΓS = 1/τS and ΓL = 1/τL; Δm = mL − mS = 0.529 × 10¹⁰ ħ s⁻¹; τS = 0.895 × 10⁻¹⁰ s, τL = 5.12 × 10⁻⁸ s; the + sign gives P(K⁰ → K⁰)
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

0.474
0 to 2; steps of 0.002.
0.002
0 to 1; steps of 0.001.
2.0 τS
0 to 12 τS; steps of 0.1.

Try this. Set Δm/ΓS to 0 and ΓL/ΓS to 1 and the dashed curve vanishes: degenerate eigenvalues mean no mixing. Restore 0.474 and 0.002, slide t to 2 τS to read P(K̄⁰) = 0.18, watch the curves cross at 3.3 τS, then push t past 8 τS, where only KL survives and the beam is half K̄⁰.

Live results

P(K⁰ → K⁰)
0.390
P(K⁰ → K̄⁰)
0.176
STRANGENESS ASYMMETRY
0.379
OSCILLATION PERIOD 2π/Δm
13.3 τS

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Physics V modelProbability that a kaon born as K⁰ is found as K⁰ (solid) or K̄⁰ (dashed) against time in K_S lifetimes, computed from the eigenvalues of M − iΓ/2 with CP conserved. At t = 2.0 τ_S, Δm/Γ_S = 0.474, Γ_L/Γ_S = 0.002: P(K⁰) = 0.390, P(K̄⁰) = 0.176.10.5probability of each flavoursolid: P(K⁰ → K⁰)dashed: P(K⁰ → K̄⁰)t = 2.0 τS: K⁰ 0.39 K̄⁰ 0.18t = 06 τS12 τS
Probability that a kaon born as K⁰ is found as K⁰ (solid) or K̄⁰ (dashed) against time in KS lifetimes, computed from the eigenvalues of M − iΓ/2 with CP conserved. At t = 2.0 τS, Δm/ΓS = 0.474, ΓL/ΓS = 0.002: P(K⁰) = 0.390, P(K̄⁰) = 0.176.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Mass splitting Δm / ΓS: 0.474; Width ratio ΓL / ΓS: 0.002; Observation time t: 2.0 τS

Baseline 0.474; choose 0 to 2, in steps of 0.002.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The rule C = (−1)(L+S) is not a property of every meson. Ĉ maps ds̄ to sd̄, so it takes K⁰ to K̄⁰ and π⁺ to π⁻; those states have no C eigenvalue at all, and writing C = +1 for a K⁰ because L = S = 0 is a category error, not a sign error. Only self-conjugate states such as π⁰, η, ρ⁰ and J/ψ carry C, and charged multiplet members get G-parity instead. The same confusion reappears at the kaon: students read the KL–KS mass difference as a particle–antiparticle mass difference and see a CPT violation. It is nothing of the kind. K⁰ and K̄⁰ are the CPT partners, and CPT is precisely what forces M₁₁ = M₂₂ in the effective Hamiltonian; KS and KL are its eigenvectors, superpositions of both, and nothing forbids the two eigenvalues of a 2×2 matrix from differing.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

Assign JPC to three quark–antiquark configurations: L = 0 with S = 1; L = 1 with S = 0; and L = 1, S = 1 coupled to J = 2. Name a light meson for each. Then decide which of 0⁺⁺ and 0⁺⁻ a qq̄ pair can form.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

Use the quadratic Gell-Mann–Okubo formula mη₈² = (4mK² − mπ²)/3 with mK = 497.6 MeV and mπ = 135.0 MeV, together with mη = 547.9 MeV and mη′ = 957.8 MeV, to find the singlet–octet mixing angle θP and the ss̄ fraction of the physical η.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

A K⁰ is produced at t = 0 in π⁻p → ΛK⁰. With τS = 0.8954 × 10⁻¹⁰ s, τL = 5.116 × 10⁻⁸ s and Δm = 0.5293 × 10¹⁰ ħ s⁻¹, find the probability that it is a K̄⁰ at t = 2τS, the time at which the beam is half K⁰ and half K̄⁰, and the K̄⁰ fraction once the KS component has decayed away.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

A resonance is measured to have JPC = 1⁻⁺. Which statement about its quark content is correct?
7

Review & continue

A meson's JPC is the triple of eigenvalues of total angular momentum, parity and charge conjugation on a colour-singlet qq̄ state, fixed by its orbital L and spin S through P = (−1)(L+1) and C = (−1)(L+S), with C defined only when the state is its own antiparticle.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.