Skip to main content

Nuclear, particle & frontier orientation · Interactive lesson

The quark model and hadron spectroscopy

By 1962 the particle table had outgrown the word elementary. This is the lesson where you stop memorising hadrons and start generating them: put u, d and s on an isospin-and-hypercharge lattice, multiply the triplets, and watch the octets, decuplets and nonets fall out — one missing site and all.

UPIV-14.06 · Lesson 6 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: The quark model and hadron spectroscopyWeight diagram of the J^P = 3/2⁺ baryon decuplet in the (I₃, Y) plane: ten open sites, four Δ along the top row at Y = +1, then three Σ*, two Ξ*, and the Ω⁻ alone at the apex. The filled marker is the state with 2 u, 1 d and 0 s quarks, at I₃ = 0.5, Y = 1, where Gell-Mann–Nishijima gives Q = 1.0 e. Each row down adds one strange quark and about 150 MeV.3 ⊗ 3 ⊗ 3 ⊃ 10 : the JP = 3/2⁺ decupletΔ⁺⁺ = uuuΩ⁻ = sssI₃I₃ = 0.5 Y = B + S = 1 Q = 1.0 e
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.

Nuclear, particle & frontier orientation. These numbered units provide nuclear, particle and frontier orientation, not a substitute for a complete specialist course. Check your university’s required depth and prerequisites.

1

Build the model

Two hundred hadrons, three light quarks, one lattice.

The key idea

The quark model builds every hadron as a colour-singlet bound state — three quarks for a baryon, a quark and an antiquark for a meson — and sorts them into SU(3) flavour multiplets by their isospin and hypercharge.

Example. The Ξ⁻ is dss: B = 1 and S = −2 give Y = −1, so Q = I₃ + Y/2 = −1/2 − 1/2 = −1, which is exactly the charge measured, on a state of mass 1321.7 MeV/c².

The complete physical model and assumptions

By 1961 the hadron list had passed a hundred entries with no principle sorting them. Gell-Mann and Ne'eman noticed that plotting each hadron by its third isospin component I₃ and its hypercharge Y = B + S does not scatter the states: they land on hexagons with a doubled centre, on triangles, on lattices of exactly eight or ten sites. Those are the weight diagrams of SU(3), the group you get by treating u, d and s as three interchangeable states of one object. Multiplying the fundamental triplet reproduces the observed patterns and nothing else — 3 ⊗ 3̄ = 8 ⊕ 1 for mesons, 3 ⊗ 3 ⊗ 3 = 10 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 1 for baryons — and charge is not an independent label but the fixed combination Q = I₃ + Y/2. The pattern also left one site empty and set its mass by the equal spacing of the rows; the Ω⁻ turned up in 1964 within a percent of it. Two costs come with the win. Antisymmetry fails for the Δ⁺⁺ = uuu unless quarks carry a further three-valued label, so the flavour model cannot stand without colour. And turning patterns into masses needs an effective constituent mass of a few hundred MeV per quark, fitted to the very spectrum it then describes. The quark model is an exact classifier and a parametrisation of masses — not a theory of them.

1Two axes that sort two hundred hadrons

Isospin came first: the proton and neutron differ by 1.3 MeV out of 939, so treat them as one particle carrying a two-valued label, I₃ = ±1/2. Strangeness came next, invented to explain why kaons and lambdas are always produced in pairs by the strong force and then decay slowly and singly — S is conserved by the strong interaction and violated by the weak. Combine the two into the hypercharge Y = B + S and plot every hadron at its point (I₃, Y). The spin-1/2 baryons land on eight sites: a hexagon with p and n along the top at Y = +1, the three Σ and the Λ across the middle at Y = 0, and the two Ξ below at Y = −1, the centre doubly occupied by Λ and Σ⁰. The spin-3/2 baryons land on a triangle of ten. Charge never needs an axis of its own, because Q = I₃ + Y/2 reads it off the two you already have.

2Three quarks, and the multiplets that follow

Put u at (I₃, Y) = (+1/2, +1/3), d at (−1/2, +1/3) and s at (0, −2/3) — a small triangle — and Q = I₃ + Y/2 returns +2/3, −1/3 and −1/3 as required. Antiquarks sit at the reflected points. The patterns are then vector addition. A meson is qq̄, so its site is the sum of a quark site and an antiquark site, and the nine sums fall on a hexagon with a triply occupied centre: 3 ⊗ 3̄ = 8 ⊕ 1, the nonet. A baryon is qqq, giving 27 combinations that sort by exchange symmetry into 3 ⊗ 3 ⊗ 3 = 10 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 1 — a fully symmetric decuplet, two mixed octets and an antisymmetric singlet, and 10 + 8 + 8 + 1 = 27. That arithmetic is the content of the model. Nothing in it permits a light-quark baryon multiplet of six or twelve states, and none has ever been found.

3The empty corner and the Ω⁻

In 1962 the 3/2⁺ decuplet had nine of its ten sites filled: four Δ at 1232 MeV with S = 0, three Σ* at 1385 with S = −1, two Ξ* at 1533 with S = −2. The apex, S = −3, was empty. Read the rows: 1385 − 1232 = 153 MeV and 1533 − 1385 = 148 MeV, a constant step near 150 MeV each time a light quark is swapped for a strange one. Extrapolating gives 1533 + 150 = 1683 MeV, and Q = I₃ + Y/2 with I₃ = 0 and Y = 1 − 3 = −2 gives Q = −1. Better still, at that mass every strangeness-conserving strong channel is shut — the lightest, Ξ⁰K⁻, needs 1809 MeV — so the state has to decay weakly and will leave a visible track. Brookhaven found it in 1964: mass 1672.5 MeV/c², charge −1, lifetime 8.2 × 10⁻¹¹ s. The octet obeys the same discipline through Gell-Mann–Okubo, (MN + MΞ)/2 = (3MΛ + MΣ)/4, which gives 1128.6 against 1135.1 MeV.

4The Δ⁺⁺ forces a fourth label

Write the Δ⁺⁺ out. Its content is uuu, its spin is 3/2, and in the ground state there is no orbital angular momentum, so L = 0. Take the factors in turn. The spatial part with L = 0 is symmetric under swapping any two quarks. The flavour part, three identical u, is symmetric. The Jz = +3/2 state has all three spins up, so the spin part is symmetric too. Their product is symmetric — and three identical spin-1/2 fermions may not occupy a symmetric state. Either quarks are not fermions, or a factor is missing. The missing factor is colour: a label taking three values, combined as εabc qa qb qc, which changes sign under any exchange and restores the antisymmetry. Δ⁻ = ddd and Ω⁻ = sss make the identical demand. Colour would be a cheap patch if this were its only evidence, but two independent measurements confirm the count of three: the ratio R of hadron to muon-pair production in e⁺e⁻ annihilation is three times the naive quark sum, reaching 10/3 above the charm threshold, and the π⁰ → γγ rate goes as Nc² and comes out a factor of nine above the colourless prediction.

5Spin splits what flavour cannot

Classification says nothing about mass, so the model adds one term: M = Σᵢmᵢ + A Σ(i<j)(Sᵢ⋅Sⱼ)/(mᵢmⱼ), the colour analogue of a magnetic dipole–dipole interaction, which is where the 1/(mᵢmⱼ) comes from. Its power shows wherever flavour is degenerate. The ρ and the π have the same quark content and differ only in whether the pair's spins are parallel or antiparallel — yet they differ by 637 MeV, more than four pion masses. The K* and K, with one quark replaced by the heavier s, differ by only 396 MeV, and the ratio 637/396 = 1.61 is mₛ/mᵤ read straight off the spectrum. The Λ and the Σ⁰ are both uds and sit on the same lattice site, and the model still separates them: the Λ carries its ud pair in a spin singlet, the Σ⁰ in a triplet, so the Λ lies lower, 1115.7 against 1192.6 MeV. A 77 MeV gap between two states of identical quark content is spin doing the work.

6Fitted, not derived

Be clear about which half of this lesson is theorem and which is fit. The multiplet structure is group theory: given three flavours, 8 ⊕ 1 and 10 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 1 are forced, and Q = I₃ + Y/2 then holds site by site once Y is defined as B + S. The masses are another matter. The constituent values mᵤ ≈ 310 and mₛ ≈ 490 MeV/c² are fitted to the spectrum they are then used to describe, and they are not the masses in the QCD Lagrangian, which are roughly 2.2, 4.7 and 93 MeV/c² for u, d and s. The hyperfine constant A is fitted as well, and the η–η′ mixing angle is a third free number. The framework is also non-relativistic, which sits awkwardly with a 310 MeV/c² quark confined to about 1 fm, where the uncertainty principle alone gives it p ≈ ħ/r ≈ 200 MeV/c. The quark model organises the spectrum and predicts gaps inside it; computing a hadron mass from first principles waits for lattice QCD.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Gell-Mann–Nishijima relation

Q = I₃ + Y/2, Y = B + S

Charge is not an independent label: fix I₃ and Y, and Q is forced.

Q in units of e; I₃, B and S are pure numbers. In full, Y = B + S + C + B̃ + T.

SU(3) flavour products

3 ⊗ 3̄ = 8 ⊕ 1, 3 ⊗ 3 ⊗ 3 = 10 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 8 ⊕ 1

Predicts nonets, octets and decuplets — and forbids every other multiplet size.

u, d, s as one triplet; the numbers count states, and 10 + 8 + 8 + 1 = 27.

Baryon antisymmetry and the colour singlet

ψ = ψspace ψₛₚᵢₙ ψflavour ψcolour, ψcolour = εabc qa qb qc

Δ⁺⁺ = uuu with L = 0 and S = 3/2 is symmetric in the first three factors, so colour must supply the minus sign.

a, b, c run over the three colours; εabc flips sign under any exchange.

Constituent mass with hyperfine term

M = Σᵢ mᵢ + A Σ(i<j) (Sᵢ⋅Sⱼ)/(mᵢ mⱼ)

The 1/(mᵢmⱼ) is a product of magnetic moments: heavier pairs split less.

mᵤ ≈ md ≈ 310, mₛ ≈ 490 MeV/c²; A fitted. ⟨Sᵢ⋅Sⱼ⟩ = +ħ²/4 or −3ħ²/4.

Decuplet equal spacing

M(nₛ) ≈ 1232 + 150.5 nₛ MeV/c²

Put the Ω⁻ at 1684 MeV before it existed; it was found at 1672.5 MeV.

nₛ = 0 to 3 strange quarks; each row averaged over its isospin multiplet.

Gell-Mann–Okubo, the 1/2⁺ octet

(MN + MΞ)/2 = (3MΛ + MΣ)/4

1128.6 against 1135.1 MeV: the octet's spacing is fixed to 0.6% too.

Multiplet averages / MeV c⁻²: N 938.9, Ξ 1318.3, Λ 1115.7, Σ 1193.1.
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

2
0 to 3; steps of 1.
0
−3 to 0; steps of 1.

Try this. Hold S = 0 and raise nᵤ from 0 to 3: the marker walks the top row from Δ⁻ = ddd to Δ⁺⁺ = uuu and Q climbs from −1 to +2 in unit steps. Then drive S down to −3 — the rows narrow to a single site, the Ω⁻ at Q = −1, and the mass readout climbs about 150 MeV a step.

Live results

HYPERCHARGE Y = B + S
1.0
CHARGE Q = I₃ + Y/2
1.0 e
STRANGE QUARKS nₛ
0
EQUAL-SPACING MASS
1232 MeV/c²

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Physics IV modelWeight diagram of the J^P = 3/2⁺ baryon decuplet in the (I₃, Y) plane: ten open sites, four Δ along the top row at Y = +1, then three Σ*, two Ξ*, and the Ω⁻ alone at the apex. The filled marker is the state with 2 u, 1 d and 0 s quarks, at I₃ = 0.5, Y = 1, where Gell-Mann–Nishijima gives Q = 1.0 e. Each row down adds one strange quark and about 150 MeV.3 ⊗ 3 ⊗ 3 ⊃ 10 : the JP = 3/2⁺ decupletΔ⁺⁺ = uuuΩ⁻ = sssI₃I₃ = 0.5 Y = B + S = 1 Q = 1.0 e
Weight diagram of the JP = 3/2⁺ baryon decuplet in the (I₃, Y) plane: ten open sites, four Δ along the top row at Y = +1, then three Σ*, two Ξ*, and the Ω⁻ alone at the apex. The filled marker is the state with 2 u, 1 d and 0 s quarks, at I₃ = 0.5, Y = 1, where Gell-Mann–Nishijima gives Q = 1.0 e. Each row down adds one strange quark and about 150 MeV.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Up quarks nᵤ (at most 3 + S): 2; Strangeness S: 0

Baseline 2; choose 0 to 3, in steps of 1.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The commonest error is to read the constituent masses as the quarks' true rest masses and add them up. Three light quarks at about 310 MeV/c² give 930 MeV, so close to the proton's 938 that the arithmetic looks like a derivation — but the same rule gives 620 MeV for the pion, which weighs 138. The masses in the QCD Lagrangian are mᵤ ≈ 2.2 and md ≈ 4.7 MeV/c², so the proton's three quarks account for about 1% of it and the rest is gluon field and quark kinetic energy. A constituent mass is a fitted parameter that packages that energy into an effective particle, and different fits return different values for it. It reproduces the spectrum; it does not explain where the mass came from.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

A baryon is produced with charge Q = −1 and strangeness S = −2. Use the Gell-Mann–Nishijima relation Q = I₃ + (B + S)/2 to find its third isospin component, deduce its quark content, and name the isospin multiplet it belongs to.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 4 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

The JP = 3/2⁺ decuplet rows have multiplet-average masses 1232 MeV/c² (Δ, S = 0), 1385 (Σ*, S = −1) and 1533 (Ξ*, S = −2). In 1962 the fourth row was empty. Predict the mass, the charge and the dominant decay mode of the state that belongs there.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

Vector and pseudoscalar meson masses: Mρ = 775, Mπ = 138, MK* = 892, MK = 496 MeV/c². The hyperfine term is A(S₁⋅S₂)/(m₁m₂). Extract mₛ/mᵤ from these four numbers, then use it to predict the Σ* − Σ mass gap from the Δ − N gap of 293 MeV.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

The Δ⁺⁺ is a uuu state with JP = 3/2⁺ and no orbital angular momentum between the quarks. Its existence was the argument that forced a new quantum number into the quark model. What exactly was the problem it exposed?
7

Review & continue

The quark model builds every hadron as a colour-singlet bound state — three quarks for a baryon, a quark and an antiquark for a meson — and sorts them into SU(3) flavour multiplets by their isospin and hypercharge.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.