Skip to main content

Physics IV course sequence · Interactive lesson

Radial probability and the virial theorem

The radial function is only half an answer. Turn it into probability per unit radius, learn which average of r a question is really asking for, and let the virial theorem hand you the kinetic and potential shares of the energy without another integral.

UPIV-10.07 · Lesson 7 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Radial probability and the virial theoremRadial density for the circular state n = 1, l = 0, drawn as r^0.0 times |R|² and rescaled so its own peak is 1. That peak sits at 0.00 a₀. The bold dashed vertical is the true radial-probability peak r = n²a₀ = 1 a₀; the faint one is the mean ⟨r⟩ = 1.5 a₀. The horizontal axis is r in units of n²a₀.circular state n = 1, l = 0drawing r⁰ |R|²peak at 0.00 a₀j = 2 gives the true P(r)bold dashed: r = n²a₀faint dashed: ⟨r⟩ = 1.5 a₀1012r / n²a₀
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

Probability per unit radius, not per unit volume — and no single radius.

The key idea

The radial probability density P(r) = r²|Rₙₗ(r)|² is the probability per unit radius of finding the electron in the shell between r and r + dr, and every radius an atom is said to have — most probable, mean, or 1/⟨1/r⟩ — is read off it, as its peak or as one of its averages.

Example. For hydrogen 1s, P(r) = (4r²/a₀³)e(−2r/a₀) peaks at r = a₀ = 0.0529 nm, yet ⟨r⟩ = 1.5a₀ = 0.0794 nm and only 32.3% of the probability lies inside a₀.

The complete physical model and assumptions

The radial equation handed you Rₙₗ(r); this topic turns it into numbers an experiment can check, and the first move is the one people get wrong. |ψ|² is a probability per unit volume, but a question about distance alone asks how much probability lies in the shell between r and r + dr, whatever the direction, and that shell has area 4πr². Integrating the angles out therefore leaves P(r) = r²|Rₙₗ(r)|² = |u(r)|², a probability per unit radius — and every radius an atom has is read off that one function, as its peak or as one of its averages. They disagree, and they are meant to: for 1s the most probable shell is at a₀, the mean is 1.5a₀, and ⟨1/r⟩ is 1/a₀ rather than 1/(1.5a₀). What ties the averages back to physics is the virial theorem, which for an inverse-square force splits the energy with no further integration: ⟨T⟩ = −Eₙ and ⟨V⟩ = 2Eₙ, so hydrogen's ground state pays 13.6 eV of kinetic energy to sit in a 27.2 eV well. That is the payoff, and the bill comes with it — every one of these numbers is read off a distribution with no edge, so "the size of the hydrogen atom" names a chosen summary, not a property of the atom.

1Two densities, and the r² between them

|ψ|² is a probability per unit volume, in m⁻³: multiply it by a small volume and you get a probability. Ask only how far out the electron is, though, and direction drops out: the probability you want is the one in the thin shell between r and r + dr, and that shell has volume 4πr²dr. Writing ψ = Rₙₗ(r)Yₗₘ(θ, φ) and integrating the angles out, with the spherical harmonic normalised so its angular integral is 1, leaves P(r) = r²|Rₙₗ(r)|², the radial probability density, in m⁻¹ — probability per unit radius, integrating to 1 over all r. The r² is geometry, the growing area of the shell; it is not part of the wavefunction. That one factor is why the 1s state has |ψ|² largest at the nucleus while P(r) is zero there: the density is highest exactly where there is almost no shell to put it in. The substitution u = rR has already swallowed the factor, so P(r) = |u(r)|² and the norm is the integral of |u|² dr with nothing further attached.

2The 1s shell: peak at a₀, mean at 1.5a₀

Put R₁₀ = 2a₀(−3/2)e(−r/a₀) into P = r²|R|² to get P₁ₛ(r) = (4r²/a₀³)e(−2r/a₀). Differentiating, dP/dr goes as 2r − 2r²/a₀, which vanishes at r = a₀: the most probable shell sits exactly at the Bohr radius, 0.0529 nm — the radius of Bohr's orbit, now meaning something different. The mean is a different question with a different answer. ⟨r⟩ = ∫rP dr = 1.5a₀ = 0.0794 nm, half as far out again, because P is skewed: it climbs from zero over a width of order a₀ and then decays over a comparable width, but only the decaying side has a tail. Integrating P confirms the shape — 32.3% of the probability lies inside a₀, and 57.7% inside ⟨r⟩ itself, so more than half the cloud is closer in than the mean. Neither number is 'the radius of hydrogen'. Both are honest summaries of one distribution that has no edge at all.

3One standard integral does most of the work

Every 1s expectation value is the same integral, ∫₀^∞ rᵏe(−br) dr = k!/b(k+1), taken with b = 2/a₀. Normalisation is the k = 2 case: (4/a₀³)(2!/(2/a₀)³) = (4/a₀³)(a₀³/4) = 1, as it must be. Then ⟨r⟩ is k = 3: (4/a₀³)(6a₀⁴/16) = 1.5a₀. ⟨r²⟩ is k = 4: (4/a₀³)(24a₀⁵/32) = 3a₀². And ⟨1/r⟩ is k = 1: (4/a₀³)(a₀²/4) = 1/a₀. Those three numbers already say something the peak alone cannot. The spread is Δr = √(⟨r²⟩ − ⟨r⟩²) = √(3 − 2.25) a₀ = 0.866a₀, so Δr/⟨r⟩ = 1/√3 = 0.577. The 1s cloud is 58% as wide as it is big. An atomic radius quoted to three figures without saying which measure it is has quoted noise in the last two.

4Which averages remember l, and which forget

For a general hydrogenic state, ⟨r⟩ = (a₀/2Z)[3n² − l(l+1)]: it grows as n², shrinks as 1/Z, and at fixed n a larger l is slightly more compact — 2s gives 6a₀ against 2p's 5a₀, because although the 2s state reaches in close to the nucleus through its inner lobe, its outer lobe, which carries most of the weight, reaches further out. ⟨1/r⟩ = Z/(n²a₀) is stranger: it takes the same value for every l allowed at that n. You can get it without an integral by differentiating Eₙ with respect to the coupling e² (the Hellmann-Feynman theorem), and it is exactly the l-degeneracy of the Coulomb spectrum written as an average. ⟨1/r²⟩ = Z²/[n³(l + ½)a₀²] does remember l. That alone splits nothing in hydrogen, because the centrifugal energy it measures is traded against radial kinetic energy inside the same Eₙ; but the fine-structure corrections, weighted the same way towards small r, do split what the Coulomb energy could not, and they combine so the result depends on n and j alone. And these are averages of different functions: for 3d, ⟨1/r⟩ = 1/(9a₀) while 1/⟨r⟩ = 1/(10.5a₀).

5The virial theorem splits E without another integral

For any stationary state, 2⟨T⟩ = ⟨r ⋅ ∇V⟩. If V goes as rk this collapses to 2⟨T⟩ = k⟨V⟩, and the Coulomb potential has k = −1, so 2⟨T⟩ = −⟨V⟩. Combine that with E = ⟨T⟩ + ⟨V⟩ and the whole split comes free: ⟨T⟩ = −Eₙ and ⟨V⟩ = 2Eₙ. For 1s that reads ⟨T⟩ = +13.606 eV and ⟨V⟩ = −27.211 eV against E₁ = −13.606 eV, and ⟨1/r⟩ checks it independently — ⟨V⟩ = −(e²/4πε₀)⟨1/r⟩ = −27.211/n² eV, which is 2Eₙ for every n and every l. Two things are worth keeping. A bound state is not a state of small kinetic energy: the electron pays 13.6 eV of kinetic energy to sit in a 27.2 eV well, and the binding energy is only what is left over. And the result is a test — compute ⟨T⟩ and ⟨V⟩ any other way, and if they miss −E and 2E you have not got an eigenstate.

6What the numbers buy, and what they cost

⟨T⟩ = 13.606 eV for 1s converts to an rms speed of √(2⟨T⟩/mₑ) = 2.19 × 10⁶ m s⁻¹, which is c/137 — the fine-structure constant showing up as a velocity. That is also the size of what you neglected: relativistic corrections enter at (v/c)² ≈ 5 × 10⁻⁵ of the energy, which is precisely the scale of hydrogen fine structure. The averages then scale predictably, since ⟨r⟩ goes as n²/Z. He⁺ in 1s has ⟨r⟩ = 0.75a₀ = 0.040 nm with ⟨T⟩ = 54.4 eV, while a Rydberg s state at n = 50 has ⟨r⟩ = 3750a₀ ≈ 0.20 μm — an atom whose size is optical. The cost is identical in every case: these are moments of a distribution that never terminates. About a quarter of the 1s probability, 23.8%, lies beyond r = 2a₀, where a classical electron of energy −13.6 eV could not go at all.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Radial probability density

P(r) = r²|Rₙₗ(r)|² = |u(r)|², ∫₀^∞ P(r) dr = 1

The r² is the shell's area, not part of the wavefunction — it is what makes P vanish at the nucleus while |ψ|² is largest there.

P in m⁻¹, probability per unit radius; |ψ|² is in m⁻³, per unit volume; u = rR

The 1s shell: peak against mean

P₁ₛ(r) = (4r²/a₀³)e(−2r/a₀) · peak at a₀ · ⟨r⟩ = 1.5a₀

Two honest answers to 'how big is hydrogen'. The tail is one-sided, so the mean lands 50% beyond the most probable shell.

a₀ = 0.0529 nm, so the peak sits at 0.0529 nm and the mean at 0.0794 nm

Mean radius and mean square radius

⟨r⟩ = (a₀/2Z)[3n² − l(l+1)], ⟨r²⟩ = (n²a₀²/2Z²)[5n² + 1 − 3l(l+1)]

Size grows as n² and shrinks as 1/Z. At fixed n a larger l is more compact: 2s gives 6a₀ where 2p gives 5a₀.

a₀ in metres, built from the reduced mass; Z the nuclear charge; l at most n − 1

The average that forgets l

⟨1/r⟩ = Z/(n²a₀)

It fixes ⟨V⟩ = −27.21Z²/n² eV, so the Coulomb energy cannot depend on l — the l-degeneracy written as an average.

units m⁻¹; identical for every l allowed at that n, and never equal to 1/⟨r⟩

The average that remembers l

⟨1/r²⟩ = Z²/[n³(l + ½)a₀²]

Averages weighted towards small r do separate states of one n, which is where fine structure and the quantum defect come from.

units m⁻²; the centrifugal energy is ħ²l(l+1)/2μ times this

Virial theorem in the Coulomb well

2⟨T⟩ = −⟨V⟩ ⇒ ⟨T⟩ = −Eₙ and ⟨V⟩ = 2Eₙ

For 1s: ⟨T⟩ = +13.6 eV inside a well of ⟨V⟩ = −27.2 eV. Both halves of E, with no second integral.

general form 2⟨T⟩ = k⟨V⟩ for V ∝ rk; here k = −1; Eₙ = −13.606Z²/n² eV
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

1
1 to 4; steps of 1.
0.0
0 to 2; steps of 0.5.

Try this. Leave n at 1 and push the r-power from 0 to 2: at 0 the marker sits on the axis, because |R|² for 1s is largest at the nucleus; at 2 it lands on the dashed line at r = a₀. Then hold the power at 2 and raise n — the faint mean line closes on the bold mode line as the shell goes classical.

Live results

PEAK OF DRAWN CURVE
0.00 a₀
MEAN RADIUS
1.5 a₀
MEAN KINETIC ⟨T⟩
13.61 eV
MEAN POTENTIAL ⟨V⟩
-27.21 eV

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Physics IV modelRadial density for the circular state n = 1, l = 0, drawn as r^0.0 times |R|² and rescaled so its own peak is 1. That peak sits at 0.00 a₀. The bold dashed vertical is the true radial-probability peak r = n²a₀ = 1 a₀; the faint one is the mean ⟨r⟩ = 1.5 a₀. The horizontal axis is r in units of n²a₀.circular state n = 1, l = 0drawing r⁰ |R|²peak at 0.00 a₀j = 2 gives the true P(r)bold dashed: r = n²a₀faint dashed: ⟨r⟩ = 1.5 a₀1012r / n²a₀
Radial density for the circular state n = 1, l = 0, drawn as r⁰ times |R|² and rescaled so its own peak is 1. That peak sits at 0.00 a₀. The bold dashed vertical is the true radial-probability peak r = n²a₀ = 1 a₀; the faint one is the mean ⟨r⟩ = 1.5 a₀. The horizontal axis is r in units of n²a₀.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Principal number n, with l = n − 1: 1; Powers of r in rj |R|²: 0.0

Baseline 1; choose 1 to 4, in steps of 1.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The commonest wreck here is treating the r² as part of the wavefunction. It is not: |ψ|² is a probability per unit volume and for 1s it is largest at the nucleus, while P(r) = r²|R|² is a probability per unit radius, vanishes there, and peaks at a₀. Both statements are true, of different densities, and neither says the electron "orbits at the Bohr radius". The arithmetic version of the same error is counting the shell factor twice. Working with R you must write the integral of |R|²r² dr; the substitution u = rR has already absorbed it, so the norm is the integral of |u|² dr and a further r² is a second helping. The third face of it is assuming the peak and the averages agree. For 1s the mode is a₀, ⟨r⟩ is 1.5a₀, and ⟨1/r⟩ is 1/a₀ rather than 1/(1.5a₀); a question that asks for "the radius" has not finished asking.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

The hydrogen 1s radial function is R₁₀(r) = 2a₀(−3/2)e(−r/a₀). Find the radius of the most probable shell and the mean radius ⟨r⟩, and say why the two differ. Take a₀ = 0.0529 nm.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 4 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

For the hydrogen 3d state (n = 3, l = 2), find ⟨V⟩, ⟨T⟩ and E from ⟨1/r⟩ = 1/(n²a₀), then compare the mean radius with the most probable radius. Use e²/4πε₀a₀ = 27.211 eV and ⟨r⟩ = (a₀/2)[3n² − l(l+1)].

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

For hydrogen 1s, find the fraction of the probability lying beyond the classical turning point, and the width Δr of the radial distribution. Take E₁ = −13.606 eV, e²/4πε₀a₀ = 27.211 eV, a₀ = 0.0529 nm and P(r) = (4r²/a₀³)e(−2r/a₀).

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

A hydrogen atom sits in the 3d state (n = 3, l = 2), for which ⟨r⟩ = 10.5a₀. What is ⟨V⟩, the expectation value of its Coulomb potential energy? Take e²/4πε₀a₀ = 27.21 eV.
7

Review & continue

The radial probability density P(r) = r²|Rₙₗ(r)|² is the probability per unit radius of finding the electron in the shell between r and r + dr, and every radius an atom is said to have — most probable, mean, or 1/⟨1/r⟩ — is read off it, as its peak or as one of its averages.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.