
Physics V course sequence · Interactive lesson
Selection rules: parity and Wigner-Eckart
Most pairs of levels in an atom never make a line, and this is where you learn to say which before measuring anything. Two symmetry arguments do it: inversion kills every pair that keeps its parity, and Wigner-Eckart reduces whatever survives to one number times a table of 3-j symbols that also gives the relative strengths.
UPV-13.04 · Lesson 4 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Build the model
Two symmetries decide which lines a spectrum is allowed to show.
The key idea
A selection rule is the statement that a transition's matrix element vanishes identically by symmetry — parity under inversion, the Wigner-Eckart 3-j factor under rotation — so the line is absent whatever the radial wavefunctions happen to be.
Example. Hydrogen 2p → 1s has Δl = −1 and opposite parity, so it runs at A = 6.27 × 10⁸ s⁻¹, a lifetime of 1.60 ns; 2s → 1s has Δl = 0 with both states even, its dipole element is exactly zero, and the level survives 0.12 s until two photons carry it down.
The complete physical model and assumptions
The rate of an electric-dipole line is set by one number, |⟨f|d⋅ε̂|i⟩|², and two symmetries decide when that number must vanish identically. Inversion is the blunt one: the dipole d = −e Σᵢ rᵢ is odd, so sandwiching it between two states of the same parity forces the element to equal minus itself, hence zero — the Laporte rule, which for one jumping electron reads Δl = ±1. Rotation is the sharp one. The operator d is a rank-1 spherical tensor, and the Wigner-Eckart theorem says every one of its 3(2J+1)(2J′+1) matrix elements is the same reduced element ⟨γ′J′‖d‖γJ⟩ times a Clebsch-Gordan coefficient that depends on nothing but angular-momentum bookkeeping. That single statement does two jobs: the coefficient vanishes unless |J−1| ≤ J′ ≤ J+1 and m′ = m + q, which is the selection rule, and where it does not vanish its square is the relative strength of every Zeeman component of the line, each in the polarisation its q fixes — obtained without a single radial integral; comparing the fine-structure lines of a multiplet takes one more recoupling coefficient, a 6-j symbol. The cost is honesty about scope. These are theorems about the symmetry of the operator, not about the atom: ΔS = 0 and ΔL = 0, ±1 hold only while the eigenstates are genuinely LS states, and forbidden never means impossible, only that the leading term of e(ik⋅r) = 1 + ik⋅r + … gave zero and the next term takes over, suppressed by a factor of order (α/2)² ≈ 10⁻⁵ rather than switched off.
1A selection rule is a matrix element that must vanish
Fermi's golden rule gives the electric-dipole rate as Γ ∝ |⟨f|d⋅ε̂|i⟩|² times a density of final states, so a forbidden transition is one whose integral is not small but identically zero, for every radial function you could put in it. Write the operator down and read the rules off it: d = −e Σᵢ rᵢ is a one-body, spin-free, parity-odd, rank-1 object. Each of those four words closes a different set of lines. One-body forbids two electrons jumping at once, as far as a single configuration describes each level. Spin-free gives ΔS = 0. Parity-odd gives the Laporte rule. Rank-1 gives the ΔJ and ΔmJ rules through Wigner-Eckart. Nothing about Z, screening or the radial overlap appears anywhere in that list; those quantities set how bright an allowed line is, never whether it exists. Inversion and rotation are logically independent symmetries, so a line must clear both gates, and most level pairs in an atom fail at least one.
2Parity: a one-line argument that kills half the pairs
Let Π be the inversion operator, Π² = 1, and let the atomic states be parity eigenstates, Π|i⟩ = πᵢ|i⟩ with π = ±1 — they can always be chosen so, because the Coulomb Hamiltonian commutes with Π. Insert Π†Π = 1 on both sides of the dipole: ⟨f|d|i⟩ = ⟨f|Π†(Π d Π†)Π|i⟩ = πf πᵢ(−1)⟨f|d|i⟩, since d is odd. Either πf πᵢ = −1 or the element is zero. Within electromagnetism there is no third case and no small residue; the weak interaction's parity violation leaves an E1 amplitude near 10⁻¹¹ e a₀ between caesium's 6s and 7s, far below anything an emission spectrum shows. For an atom π = (−1)(Σ lᵢ), so a single active electron must change l by an odd amount, and the rank-1 triangle |l−1| ≤ l′ ≤ l+1 then narrows that to Δl = ±1 exactly. The consequence is visible in the hydrogen lifetimes: 2p → 1s has Δl = −1 and decays in 1.60 ns, while 2s → 1s has Δl = 0 with both states even, its dipole element is zero to all orders in the radial integral, and the level survives 0.12 s — a factor of 7.6 × 10⁷ — before two-photon emission takes it down. Parity is the reason the metastable level exists at all.
3π and σ: ΔmJ is a statement about polarisation
The factorisation is quoted here, not rederived: by UPV-11.09 and UPV-12.09, ⟨γ′J′m′|dq|γJm⟩ is one reduced element times ⟨J m; 1 q | J′ m′⟩/√(2J′+1), and that coefficient vanishes unless ΔJ = 0, ±1 with 0 → 0 barred and m′ = m + q. What a spectroscopist adds is that q is not bookkeeping. It is the photon's angular-momentum projection on the field axis, so every Zeeman component leaves the atom in a definite polarisation. A π component, q = 0, radiates like a dipole oscillating along B: intensity ∝ sin²θ at angle θ from the field, polarised linearly along B. A σ± component, q = ±1, radiates like a dipole rotating in the plane normal to B: intensity ∝ (1 + cos²θ)/2, circular when seen along the field and linear, perpendicular to B, when seen across it. Two viewing directions therefore sort any Zeeman pattern. Across the field every component is present, and a linear polariser separates them, passing π when set along B and σ when set across it. Along the field the π components vanish, because an oscillating dipole sends nothing down its own axis, and σ⁺ and σ⁻ arrive with opposite circular handedness — which is how Hale read magnetic fields in sunspots in 1908, and how a solar magnetograph still reads the sign of the line-of-sight field.
4The m-dependence is geometry you can read straight off
Because the reduced element is m-independent, the entire Zeeman pattern of a line is fixed by 3-j symbols alone, before any atomic structure calculation. Two readings are worth memorising. For a ΔJ = 0 line the π branch goes as m², so the m = 0 → m′ = 0 component is exactly missing: a Zeeman fan with a hole in the middle is the fingerprint of J → J. For a ΔJ = +1 line at the stretched state m = J, the σ⁺ branch reaches the largest value any single branch can have, exactly 1, against 1/(J+1) for π and 1/[(2J+1)(J+1)] for σ⁻ — with J = 2 that is 1, ⅓ and 1/15. Drive σ⁺ light on that transition and the excited |J+1, J+1⟩ state has no lower sublevel to reach but |J, J⟩, so the cycle closes and you have the transition every magneto-optical trap runs on. Finally Σq |⟨J m; 1 q|J′ m+q⟩|² = (2J′+1)/(2J+1), independent of m: the sum rule that makes every sublevel of an upper level decay at the same rate, which is why a lifetime is a property of a level and not of a sublevel.
5Intercombination lines: how strong a broken rule gets
Quote the LS rules in one line from UPV-12.09: the dipole acts on no spin coordinate, so between pure LS states ΔS = 0 and ΔL = 0, ±1 with 0 → 0 barred. On a term diagram this splits the singlet and triplet ladders apart, and the spectroscopist's question is how bright the lines that cross between them are. Spin-orbit mixes levels of equal J and parity, so to first order the nominal ³P₁ is |³P₁⟩ + ε|¹P₁⟩ with ε = ⟨¹P₁|HSO|³P₁⟩/(E(³P₁) − E(¹P₁)), the spin-orbit matrix element over the singlet-triplet gap. The crossing line borrows the allowed line's reduced element, so Aᵢₙₜ/Aₐₗₗ = ε²(λₐₗₗ/λᵢₙₜ)³, and only J = 1 can borrow: ³P₀ → ¹S₀ is 0 → 0 and ³P₂ → ¹S₀ needs ΔJ = 2, so neither has an E1 route while J is a good quantum number. Down a column the numerator grows far faster than the gap — spin-orbit rises as Z⁴ in a hydrogenic ion and more slowly, but still steeply, for a screened valence electron — so the crossing line brightens by orders of magnitude. Strontium's 689 nm line runs at 4.7 × 10⁴ s⁻¹, about 4000 times slower than its 461 nm singlet line; mercury's 253.7 nm line runs at 8.0 × 10⁶ s⁻¹, only 95 times slower than its 184.9 nm line, and the Hard example turns that ratio into ε. A kilohertz-wide intercombination line is a tool rather than a nuisance: strontium's is what laser-cools the atoms below a microkelvin.
6Forbidden means slow: the next term in e(ik⋅r)
The dipole approximation came from truncating e(ik⋅r) ≈ 1 inside the (e/m)A⋅p coupling. When that leading term's matrix element vanishes, the next order does the work: the antisymmetric part of ik⋅r gives the magnetic dipole M1, the symmetric part the electric quadrupole E2. Compared at the same frequency, M1 is down by (μB/(e a₀ c))² = (α/2)², since μB/(e a₀) = αc/2 is half the Bohr-orbit speed, and E2 by roughly (ka)², with a the size of the state. For hydrogenic transitions ħω ≈ ½α²mc² and a ≈ a₀ = ħ/(αmc), so ka₀ ≈ α/2 = 3.6 × 10⁻³ and both multipoles pay a factor of order α²; for Lyman-α exactly, k = 2π/121.6 nm gives ka₀ = 2.74 × 10⁻³ and (ka₀)² = 7.5 × 10⁻⁶. This is why forbidden lines are the astronomer's instrument. At nebular densities near 10² cm⁻³ collisional de-excitation is slower than a forbidden rate of order 10⁻² s⁻¹, so the [O III] and [N II] lines dominate the optical spectrum of an H II region although no laboratory discharge shows them; and hydrogen's 21 cm hyperfine line, an M1 transition with A = 2.9 × 10⁻¹⁵ s⁻¹ and a lifetime near 11 million years, maps the whole Galaxy.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Wigner-Eckart factorisation, quoted
⟨γ′J′m′|Tkq|γJm⟩ = C(J mk q | J′ m′) ⟨γ′J′‖Tk‖γJ⟩ / √(2J′+1)
Derived in UPV-11.09 and UPV-12.09 and used here as a lookup table: it vanishes unless ΔJ = 0, ±1 with 0 → 0 barred and m′ = m + q.
C is a Clebsch-Gordan coefficient, pure geometry; the reduced element carries T's units (C m for d) and all the radial physics.Spherical components of the dipole
d₀ = −e zd+1 = +e (x + i y)/√2d-1 = −e (x − i y)/√2
q = 0 is π light polarised along B, q = ±1 is σ± circular in the plane normal to it — so ΔmJ = q is a statement about your polariser.
q labels the photon's angular-momentum projection on the quantisation axis; x, y, z in metres and e = 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ C.What the π and σ components look like
π (q = 0): I(θ) ∝ sin²θ, linear along Bσ± (q = ±1): I(θ) ∝ (1 + cos²θ)/2
Across B the σ components are linear, perpendicular to B, at half the π weight; along B the π components vanish and σ⁺ and σ⁻ arrive with opposite circular handedness.
θ is the angle between B and the line of sight. Both patterns integrate to 8π/3 over the sphere, so each component's total rate is still its squared Clebsch-Gordan coefficient.Laporte parity rule
Π d Π† = −d ⇒ ⟨f|d|i⟩ = −πᵢ πf ⟨f|d|i⟩
A test Wigner-Eckart cannot see. It kills Δl = 0, so s → s, p → p and 2s → 1s stay dark however favourable the ΔJ arithmetic looks.
Non-zero only if πᵢ πf = −1. Atomic parity is π = (−1)(Σ lᵢ), so one jumping electron must change l by an odd amount, which the rank-1 triangle trims to Δl = ±1.Intercombination lines borrow strength
|³P₁⟩ + ε|¹P₁⟩ ⇒ Aᵢₙₜ/Aₐₗₗ = ε² (λₐₗₗ/λᵢₙₜ)³
The crossing line uses the allowed line's reduced element, so its rate measures how much singlet the triplet carries: spin-orbit over the singlet-triplet gap, which grows steeply down a column of the table.
ΔS = 0 and ΔL = 0, ±1 hold only between pure LS states (UPV-12.09). To first order ε = ⟨¹P₁|HSO|³P₁⟩/(E(³P₁) − E(¹P₁)), a dimensionless ratio of two energies; the λ ratio carries the ω³ of the rate.What forbidden costs you
A(M1)/A(E1) ∼ (α/2)²A(E2)/A(E1) ∼ (k a₀)²
Forbidden means the leading term of e(i k⋅r) vanished, not that the line cannot occur — and a slow radiative rate is exactly what lets collisions compete, which makes nebular lines density diagnostics.
Compared at the same frequency; α = 1/137.04, k = 2π/λ, a₀ = 5.29 × 10⁻¹¹ m. (α/2)² = 1.3 × 10⁻⁵; for Lyman-α, k a₀ = 2.7 × 10⁻³ and (k a₀)² = 7.5 × 10⁻⁶, so both are α² effects.Interactive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Set ΔJ = 0 with J = 0 and all three bars vanish: 0 → 0 has no coupling at all. Keep ΔJ = 0, raise J to 2 and slide m to 0 — now only the π bar dies, because that branch goes as m². Push ΔJ to 2 and everything drops to zero: the rank-1 triangle has no solution.
Live results
- σ⁺ BRANCH Δm = +1
- 0.400
- π BRANCH Δm = 0
- 0.600
- σ⁻ BRANCH Δm = −1
- 0.400
- SUM OVER q
- 1.400
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Initial J: 2; ΔJ = J′ − J: 1; Initial mJ: 0
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The commonest error is to treat ΔJ = 0, ±1 and ΔmJ = 0, ±1 as the entire rule book, and conclude that any pair of levels satisfying them is connected. Wigner-Eckart is a theorem about rotations; it knows nothing whatever about inversion. Hydrogen's 2s → 1s passes every angular-momentum test — ΔJ = 0 between two J = ½ levels, ΔmJ = 0 or ±1 — and its dipole matrix element is still exactly zero, because both states are even while d is odd. Parity is a second, independent symmetry, and a line must clear both gates. The other half of the error is reading forbidden as impossible. It means only that the leading term of the multipole expansion vanished: 2s does decay, by two-photon emission, in 0.12 s.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
Decide which of these hydrogen transitions are electric-dipole allowed, and name the rule that closes each of the others: 3d → 2p, 3s → 2s, 3p → 2p, 3d → 1s. Then apply the ΔJ test to the surviving line's fine-structure components.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Parity first. A one-electron state has π = (−1)l and d is odd, so the two levels must differ in parity: only an odd Δl can survive, and the rank-1 triangle |l−1| ≤ l′ ≤ l+1 narrows that to Δl = ±1.
- 3d → 2p: l goes 2 → 1, so Δl = −1 and the parities are even → odd. Allowed.
- 3s → 2s and 3p → 2p both have Δl = 0, so πᵢ πf = +1 and ⟨f|d|i⟩ = −⟨f|d|i⟩ = 0. Dark at E1, whatever the radial overlap.
- 3d → 1s has Δl = −2: parity is unchanged, and the triangle fails too since |2−1| ≤ 0 is false. Doubly barred, and it appears only as a weak E2 line.
- Now the ΔJ test inside 3d → 2p. The 3d term splits into ²D₅⁄₂ and ²D₃⁄₂, the 2p into ²P₃⁄₂ and ²P₁⁄₂. ΔJ = 0, ±1 kills ²D₅⁄₂ → ²P₁⁄₂, which needs ΔJ = −2; the other three pairings survive.
Answer. Only 3d → 2p is E1-allowed. 3s → 2s and 3p → 2p keep their parity; 3d → 1s changes l by 2. Inside 3d → 2p, three of the four fine-structure pairings survive — ²D₅⁄₂ → ²P₁⁄₂ is barred by ΔJ = −2.
MediumExample 2
Sodium's D lines both end on 3s ²S₁⁄₂: D2 from 3p ²P₃⁄₂ at 589.0 nm, D1 from 3p ²P₁⁄₂ at 589.6 nm. The recoupling 6-j symbol (j 1 j′; 0 ½ 1) has the same magnitude 1/√6 for j = 3/2 and j = 1/2, and both lines share one radial integral. Find the ratio of line strengths and then of the two lifetimes.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Line strength is the squared reduced element, S = e²(2j+1)(2j′+1)|6-j|²|⟨l‖C¹‖l′⟩|²R², in C² m² with R the radial integral in metres. With the 6-j magnitude and the radial part common to both, only the degeneracy factor differs.
- D2: (2⋅3/2+1)(2⋅1/2+1) = 4 × 2 = 8. D1: (2⋅1/2+1)(2⋅1/2+1) = 2 × 2 = 4. So S(D2) : S(D1) = 2 : 1 — the strength ratio is pure angular-momentum counting.
- The decay rate divides that strength among the upper sublevels: A = ω³S/(3πε₀ħc³ gᵤ) with gᵤ = 2Jᵤ + 1 = 4 for D2 and 2 for D1.
- A(D2)/A(D1) = (2/4) ÷ (1/2) × (ω₂/ω₁)³ = 1 × (589.6/589.0)³ = (1.001019)³ = 1.00306.
- So the predicted lifetime ratio is τ(D2)/τ(D1) = 1/1.00306 = 0.99695. Tabulated values are 16.25 ns and 16.30 ns, a ratio of 0.99693.
Answer. S(D2) : S(D1) = 2 : 1, yet A(D2)/A(D1) = 1.0031, so the lifetimes match to 0.3%: 16.25 ns against 16.30 ns. The doubled strength is shared among twice as many upper sublevels, so it never reaches the lifetime.
HardExample 3
Mercury's 253.7 nm line, 6 ³P₁ → 6 ¹S₀, is ΔS = 0 forbidden yet runs at A = 8.0 × 10⁶ s⁻¹, while the fully allowed 184.9 nm line 6 ¹P₁ → 6 ¹S₀ runs at A = 7.6 × 10⁸ s⁻¹. Model the upper level as |6³P₁⟩ + ε|6¹P₁⟩ and extract ε.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- In pure LS the dipole cannot connect S = 1 to S = 0: d carries no spin operator, so the spin overlap ⟨S′ = 0|S = 1⟩ = 0 factors the element to zero.
- Spin-orbit at Z = 80 mixes the two J = 1, odd-parity levels, so the physical state is |ψ⟩ = |6³P₁⟩ + ε|6¹P₁⟩ (normalised to first order). Only the admixed singlet reaches ¹S₀: ⟨¹S₀|d|ψ⟩ = ε⟨¹S₀|d|6¹P₁⟩.
- Both lines therefore share the reduced element ⟨¹S₀‖d‖¹P₁⟩, which cancels in the ratio. With A ∝ ω³|⟨d⟩|², Aᵢₙₜ/Aₐₗₗ = ε²(λₐₗₗ/λᵢₙₜ)³.
- The wavelength factor: (184.9/253.7)³ = (0.72881)³ = 0.38712.
- The measured ratio: Aᵢₙₜ/Aₐₗₗ = 8.0 × 10⁶ / 7.6 × 10⁸ = 1.0526 × 10⁻².
- So ε² = 1.0526 × 10⁻² / 0.38712 = 2.719 × 10⁻², giving ε = 0.165. The corresponding lifetimes are 1/(8.0 × 10⁶) = 125 ns and 1/(7.6 × 10⁸) = 1.32 ns.
Answer. ε = 0.165, so the nominal triplet carries about 2.7% singlet character by probability — enough to turn an LS-forbidden line into the 125 ns, 253.7 nm transition that every mercury lamp radiates.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
A selection rule is the statement that a transition's matrix element vanishes identically by symmetry — parity under inversion, the Wigner-Eckart 3-j factor under rotation — so the line is absent whatever the radial wavefunctions happen to be.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.