
Physics V course sequence · Interactive lesson
Selection rules from Wigner–Eckart
A many-electron atom carries more labels than it conserves, so a list of selection rules cannot be trusted blindly. Read ΔJ and ΔM off a 3j symbol, see which rules LS coupling adds and how spin–orbit mixing leaks them, and turn the same theorem inward on one level to space its Zeeman fan with the Landé gJ.
UPV-12.09 · Lesson 9 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Build the model
Inside a multiplet, one reduced element and a 3j symbol fix every component.
The key idea
The Wigner–Eckart theorem says that every matrix element of a rank-k spherical tensor between angular-momentum multiplets equals one m-independent reduced matrix element times a 3j symbol; an angular-momentum selection rule is a 3j symbol that vanishes.
Example. For sodium's D2 line the upper ²P₃/₂ has four M values and the lower ²S₁/₂ has two, so eight amplitudes share one reduced element ⟨²S₁/₂‖d‖²P₃/₂⟩; six survive with ΔM = 0, ±1 and the two needing ΔM = ±2 are exactly zero.
The complete physical model and assumptions
An atomic Hamiltonian is rotationally invariant, and that single fact does most of the work of spectroscopy. The dipole operator d = −e Σᵢ rᵢ is not a scalar, but it is not arbitrary either: its three components can be rearranged into a rank-one spherical tensor T¹q, an object that transforms among itself under rotation exactly the way a j = 1 multiplet of kets does. Schur's lemma then forces the answer. Every one of the (2j+1)(2j′+1)(2k+1) matrix elements of Tkq between two multiplets is one and the same number — the reduced matrix element ⟨α′j′‖Tk‖αj⟩ — multiplied by a purely geometric coefficient fixed by the m labels alone. An angular-momentum selection rule is a coefficient that is exactly zero, not a small one, so a line it forbids can appear only through a different operator, such as the electric quadrupole, or after a perturbation that breaks J itself has mixed in a state the dipole can reach. The cost is severe and worth stating out loud: the theorem supplies ratios, never rates. The reduced element still needs a radial integral you have to do; rotational symmetry is blind to reflection, and a theorem about the total J cannot see how J is shared between L and S — so Δℓ = ±1 and ΔS = 0 have to be argued separately, one from parity and one from a coupling scheme that heavy atoms break.
1From one electron to the whole atom
UPV-11.09 built the factorisation for hydrogen, and it carries over in one line: ⟨α′J′M′|T¹q|αJM⟩ = (−1)(J′−M′) ( J′ 1 J ; −M′ q M ) ⟨α′J′‖T¹‖αJ⟩. What changes in a many-electron atom is which angular momentum the theorem may be applied to. The atomic dipole d = −e Σᵢ rᵢ is a sum of one-electron vectors, and a sum of rank-one tensors is still rank one, so the theorem holds for the atom as a whole. But the electron–electron repulsion couples each ℓᵢ to the others, and spin–orbit couples L to S, so the only angular momentum the electrons conserve exactly is their total J. The exact rules are therefore the rules on J and M; rules on L, on S or on a single electron's ℓ hold only as far as those labels do. The saving is as large as in hydrogen: for sodium's D2 line, 4 upper M values × 2 lower M values × 3 values of q make 24 amplitudes, every one a 3j symbol times the single reduced element ⟨²S₁/₂‖d‖²P₃/₂⟩, of order e a₀. In a many-electron atom that one number also absorbs everything a central-field picture leaves out — configuration mixing, core polarisation — without touching a single ratio between the 24.
2Read ΔJ and ΔM straight off the 3j symbol
A 3j symbol vanishes unless two conditions hold. Its bottom row must sum to zero, giving m′ = m + q; since q takes only the values −1, 0 and +1 for a rank-one tensor, that is ΔM = 0, ±1, with q fixed by the light itself — q = 0 is π, linearly polarised along the quantisation axis, and q = ±1 is σ±, circular about it. Its top row must close a triangle with sides j, 1 and j′, which reads |j − j′| ≤ 1 ≤ j + j′, and both halves earn their keep. The left half is the familiar ΔJ = 0, ±1; the right half is what forbids J = 0 → J′ = 0, because no triangle has sides 0, 1 and 0. Notice what is not forbidden: ΔJ = 0 is perfectly allowed away from 0 → 0. One further exact zero hides inside ΔJ = 0, though — ( j 1 j ; 0 0 0 ) = 0 — so M = 0 → M′ = 0 never appears on a J → J line.
3Parity is a second, independent gate
Rotational symmetry is blind to reflection, so no 3j symbol can see parity. UPV-13.04 derives the gate from P†rP = −r, and its result is all this lesson needs: a dipole element vanishes unless the two states have opposite parity. In a many-electron atom parity belongs to the configuration, π = (−1)(ℓ₁ + ℓ₂ + … + ℓN), so every term of one configuration shares it and no E1 line ever joins two of them — the ³P, ¹D and ¹S terms of a p² configuration can radiate among themselves only through M1 or E2. For one jumping electron the gate sharpens to Δℓ = ±1. The two gates are genuinely independent, and each catches what the other lets through. Sodium's 3s ²S₁/₂ → 4s ²S₁/₂ passes the triangle test (1/2, 1, 1/2 is a legal triangle) and passes ΔM, yet has no E1 amplitude, because s → s does not change parity. Mercury's 6s6p ³P₀ → 6s² ¹S₀ passes parity, odd to even, and in a spinless isotope has none because 0, 1, 0 is not a triangle.
4The spin rules are approximate, and heavy atoms show it
The dipole operator acts on spatial coordinates only: it is d ⊗ 1 in the spin factor. In an LS-coupled basis |L S J M⟩ the spin overlap factors straight out as δ(S′S), giving ΔS = 0, and applying Wigner–Eckart inside the orbital space gives ΔL = 0, ±1 with L = 0 ↛ L′ = 0. Both rest on LS coupling being a good description, which in turn needs the spin–orbit interaction Σᵢ ξ(rᵢ) ℓᵢ⋅sᵢ to stay small next to the residual electrostatic splitting between terms. That sum commutes with J but not with S², because it couples each electron's spin separately: inside one term it acts as ζ L⋅S and only splits the J levels, but between terms it connects S to S ± 1 at fixed J and parity. ξ grows roughly as Z⁴, so in a heavy atom the labels leak: a nominal ³P₁ carries a small ¹P₁ admixture and borrows strength through it. Mercury, Z = 80, is the standard case — 6s6p ³P₁ → 6s² ¹S₀ at 253.7 nm has A ≈ 8 × 10⁶ s⁻¹, against A ≈ 8 × 10⁸ s⁻¹ for the fully allowed ¹P₁ line at 184.9 nm. Suppressed a hundredfold, not absent. Put the same pair of levels in helium, Z = 2: the 1s2p ³P₁ → 1s² ¹S₀ branch runs at A ≈ 2 × 10² s⁻¹ against A ≈ 1.8 × 10⁹ s⁻¹ for the allowed 1s2p ¹P₁ → 1s² ¹S₀ at 58.4 nm, a suppression of 10⁷ rather than 10². Take that comparison from ³P₁ and not from helium's famous 7900 s metastable 2 ³S₁, tempting though it is: 1s2s → 1s² is s → s, so parity blocks E1 there whatever the spin character of the state, and the lifetime measures both gates at once and neither one on its own.
5The projection theorem spaces a Zeeman fan
Specialise to k = 1 with j′ = j: a vector operator acting inside one multiplet. Both V and J are rank one on the same space, so their reduced elements differ only by a number, and ⟨jm′|V|jm⟩ = (⟨J⋅V⟩/[ħ²j(j+1)]) ⟨jm′|J|jm⟩. Apply that to μ = −μB(L + 2S)/ħ and the number that falls out is the Landé factor gJ = 1 + [J(J+1) + S(S+1) − L(L+1)]/[2J(J+1)]. For ²P₃/₂, 1 + (3.75 + 0.75 − 2)/7.50 = 4/3; for ²P₁/₂, 1 + (0.75 + 0.75 − 2)/1.50 = 2/3; for ²S₁/₂, 2. A weak-field component then shifts by (gᵤ Mᵤ − gₗ Mₗ) μB B, so D2 opens into six lines at ±1/3, ±1 and ±5/3 in units of μB B, while D1 opens into four at ±2/3 and ±4/3. At 0.50 T one unit is μB B/h = 6.998 GHz, so D2 spans 23.3 GHz — safely inside the weak-field regime, since sodium's 3p fine-structure interval is 515 GHz. How many lines there are is the ΔM rule; where they sit is the projection theorem.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Wigner–Eckart theorem
⟨α′j′m′|Tkq|αjm⟩ = (−1)(j′−m′) ( j′ k j−m′ q m ) ⟨α′j′‖Tk‖αj⟩
Change m, m′ or q and only the 3j symbol moves. The reduced element is the same number throughout, so every relative line strength inside a multiplet is table lookup.
α collects every non-angular label. The reduced element carries the units of Tk; the 3j symbol is a pure number.Dipole inside an LS-coupled term
⟨α′L′S′J′‖d‖αLSJ⟩ = δ(S′S) (−1)(L′+S+J+1) √[(2J+1)(2J′+1)] (L′ J′ SJ L 1) ⟨α′L′‖d‖αL⟩
The 6j vanishes unless (L, L′, 1) and (J, J′, 1) are both triangles, so one line gives ΔS = 0, ΔL = 0, ±1 and ΔJ = 0, ±1 together — exact only while L and S are good labels.
Edmonds phase convention, as in the Wigner–Eckart theorem. The 6j symbol in braces is a pure number, ⟨α′L′‖d‖αL⟩ carries the C m, and δ(S′S) is the spin factor, because d is the identity on spin.Triangle and projection conditions
|j − 1| ≤ j′ ≤ j + 1 and m′ = m + q
( 0 1 0 ; 0 0 0 ) is identically zero, so no rank-one operator of any kind links two J = 0 levels.
Both conditions are read off the 3j symbol. For k = 1: ΔJ = 0, ±1 with J = 0 ↛ J′ = 0, and ΔM = 0, ±1.Parity, a separate gate
π = (−1)(ℓ₁ + ℓ₂ + … + ℓN), ⟨f|d|i⟩ = 0 unless πf πᵢ = −1
Rotational symmetry is blind to reflection, so no 3j symbol sees this gate: two terms of a single configuration never join by E1, however well their J values fit.
Laporte's rule, derived from P†rP = −r in UPV-13.04. Every term of one configuration shares its parity; for one jumping electron the rule sharpens to Δℓ = ±1.Projection theorem and the Landé factor
gJ = 1 + [J(J+1) + S(S+1) − L(L+1)] / [2J(J+1)]
Wigner–Eckart inside one multiplet: ²P₃/₂ gives 4/3, ²P₁/₂ gives 2/3, ²S₁/₂ gives 2 — the spacings of the D-line fans.
Dimensionless. Shift ΔE = gJ MJ μB B, with μB/h = 13.996 GHz T⁻¹ and μB = 5.788 × 10⁻⁵ eV T⁻¹.Why higher multipoles are slow
A(E2)/A(E1) ~ (a₀/λ)² ≈ 5 × 10⁻⁹ at λ = 729 nm
Ca⁺ 3d ²D₅/₂ can reach the ground state only by E2 and lives 1.17 s, against roughly 7 ns for an allowed E1 line.
a₀ = 5.29 × 10⁻¹¹ m. The expansion parameter is the atom's size divided by the wavelength of the light.Interactive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Set θ to 90° and the two π sticks stand tallest, 4 to 3 over the inner σ pair; drag θ to 0°, looking straight down the field, and they vanish entirely, because a photon travelling along B cannot be polarised along B. Raising B stretches the pattern without ever reordering it.
Live results
- π PAIR SEPARATION
- 4.67 GHz
- OUTER σ SHIFT
- 11.66 GHz
- π / INNER σ HEIGHT
- 1.33
- OUTER σ IN WAVELENGTH
- 13.5 pm
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Magnetic field B: 0.50 T; View angle θ from B: 90 °
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The error is to credit the Wigner–Eckart theorem with the whole list. It is a statement about rotations and nothing else, so it yields ΔJ = 0, ±1 with 0 ↛ 0, and ΔM = 0, ±1, and stops there. Δℓ = ±1 comes from parity, a separate symmetry; ΔS = 0 and ΔL = 0, ±1 come from the dipole being blind to spin in an LS-coupled basis, which is only as good as LS coupling itself. That difference has consequences you can measure. The electrons' own Hamiltonian, spin–orbit included, commutes with J, so nothing inside the electron cloud can leak a vanishing 3j symbol; only something that breaks J itself can — the nuclear spin through the hyperfine interaction, or an applied field. That is why ²⁰²Hg, whose nucleus has no spin, shows no 6s6p ³P₀ → 6s² ¹S₀ line in zero field, while ¹⁹⁹Hg shows a faint one. An approximate rule leaks through the atom's own dynamics, in proportion to how badly its assumption fails, which is why mercury's intercombination line at 253.7 nm is merely a hundred times weaker than the allowed one rather than missing. "Forbidden" names two different situations, and only one of them yields to the atom's own spin–orbit term.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
Sodium's D2 line is 3p ²P₃/₂ → 3s ²S₁/₂. Taking both levels as full M multiplets, count how many upper-to-lower M pairs carry a non-zero electric-dipole amplitude, and name the rule that kills the rest.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Upper ²P₃/₂ has Mᵤ = +3/2, +1/2, −1/2, −3/2; lower ²S₁/₂ has Mₗ = +1/2, −1/2. That is 4 × 2 = 8 pairs to test.
- The 3j symbol ( 1/2 1 3/2 ; −Mₗ q Mᵤ ) is non-zero only when its bottom row sums to zero, so q = Mₗ − Mᵤ with q restricted to −1, 0, +1. The amplitude therefore survives only for ΔM = Mᵤ − Mₗ = 0, ±1.
- Test the pairs. Mᵤ = +3/2 → Mₗ = −1/2 would need ΔM = +2, and Mᵤ = −3/2 → Mₗ = +1/2 would need ΔM = −2. Both lie outside the allowed set, so both 3j symbols are exactly zero.
- Every other pair works: 3/2→1/2, 1/2→1/2, 1/2→−1/2, −1/2→1/2, −1/2→−1/2 and −3/2→−1/2.
- Check the other gate separately: the triangle condition |3/2 − 1/2| = 1 ≤ 1 ≤ 2 is satisfied for every pair, so ΔJ removes nothing here, and parity is fine because p → s changes ℓ by one.
Answer. Six of the eight pairs survive. The two needing ΔM = ±2 vanish exactly, because a rank-one tensor shifts M by at most one unit; the triangle condition removes nothing here.
MediumExample 2
A cadmium ¹P₁ → ¹S₀ line is observed in a field of 0.80 T. Both terms are singlets, so the upper level has g = 1 and the lower has J = 0 and does not split. Find how many Zeeman components appear, where they sit in frequency, and what their squared 3j symbols are — then say what changes when the light is collected along the field instead of across it.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Upper Mᵤ = +1, 0, −1; lower Mₗ = 0 only. All three pairs have ΔM = 0, ±1, so all three survive — the normal Zeeman triplet.
- Shifts: ΔE = (gᵤ Mᵤ − gₗ Mₗ) μB B = Mᵤ μB B. With μB/h = 13.996 GHz T⁻¹ and B = 0.80 T, μB B/h = 11.20 GHz, so the components sit at −11.20, 0 and +11.20 GHz.
- Strengths: ( 0 1 1 ; 0 q m ) has magnitude 1/√3 for every allowed q, so all three squared 3j symbols equal 1/3, and they sum to 1. The three components are intrinsically equal in strength — geometry alone, no dynamics.
- Equal strength is not what a detector records, because the emission pattern depends on q. The ΔM = 0 component is π and radiates as sin²θ from the field axis; the ΔM = ±1 components are σ and radiate as (1 + cos²θ)/2.
- Across the field, θ = 90°, the ratio is π : σ : σ = 1 : 0.5 : 0.5 — the familiar triplet with a strong central line. Along the field, θ = 0°, the π factor is sin²0 = 0, so the central line disappears and only two oppositely circularly polarised σ lines remain.
Answer. Three components at 0 and ±11.20 GHz, with equal squared 3j symbols of 1/3. Across the field they appear as 1 : 0.5 : 0.5; along it the central π line vanishes and two oppositely circular σ lines remain.
HardExample 3
The sodium D2 line, 3p ²P₃/₂ → 3s ²S₁/₂ at 589.0 nm, is observed in a field of 0.50 T. Use the projection theorem to get the Landé factors, then find every Zeeman component's shift, the total span of the pattern in frequency, and the resolving power a spectrograph needs to separate the extreme components.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- Landé factors from gJ = 1 + [J(J+1) + S(S+1) − L(L+1)]/[2J(J+1)]. Upper ²P₃/₂ (L = 1, S = 1/2, J = 3/2): 1 + (3.75 + 0.75 − 2)/7.50 = 1 + 1/3 = 4/3. Lower ²S₁/₂ (L = 0, S = 1/2, J = 1/2): 1 + (0.75 + 0.75 − 0)/1.50 = 2.
- ΔM = 0, ±1 leaves the same six M-pairs as before, and each shifts by (gᵤ Mᵤ − gₗ Mₗ) μB B.
- In units of μB B: (3/2→1/2) gives 2 − 1 = +1; (1/2→1/2) gives 2/3 − 1 = −1/3; (1/2→−1/2) gives 2/3 + 1 = +5/3; and the mirror set −1, +1/3, −5/3. The two ΔM = 0 lines are the inner pair at ∓1/3 and are π; the four at ±1 and ±5/3 have ΔM = ±1 and are σ.
- Scale it: μB/h = 13.996 GHz T⁻¹, so at 0.50 T one unit is 6.998 GHz. The six components sit at ±2.33, ±7.00 and ±11.66 GHz.
- Span between the extreme components: 2 × 11.663 = 23.33 GHz. The zero-field line is at ν₀ = c/λ = 2.998 × 10⁸ / (589.0 × 10⁻⁹) = 5.090 × 10¹⁴ Hz.
- Δλ/λ = Δν/ν, so the span in wavelength is 589.0 nm × (23.33 × 10⁹ / 5.090 × 10¹⁴) = 589.0 × 4.58 × 10⁻⁵ = 0.0270 nm, and the required resolving power is λ/Δλ = 589.0/0.0270 ≈ 2.2 × 10⁴.
Answer. Six components at ±2.33, ±7.00 and ±11.66 GHz; a span of 23.3 GHz, or 0.027 nm at 589.0 nm, needing a resolving power near 2.2 × 10⁴ — beyond a small grating, easy for a Fabry–Pérot etalon.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
The Wigner–Eckart theorem says that every matrix element of a rank-k spherical tensor between angular-momentum multiplets equals one m-independent reduced matrix element times a 3j symbol; an angular-momentum selection rule is a 3j symbol that vanishes.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.