IB Diploma Physics · unit E
Nuclear and quantum physics
Connect the ideas, make your working visible, and test the result. Use the hints when you need a starting point; open the full solution after your attempt.
Extra challenging questions
A selection from this pathway. Open a topic below for its complete practice and challenge set.
Inferring discrete levels from a line spectrum
An idealised atom has the supplied energy levels relative to ionisation at 0 eV. Use h = 4.14×10⁻¹⁵ eV s and c = 3.0×10⁸ m s⁻¹. The atom initially occupies the −1.5 eV level; allowed transitions between all listed levels may emit photons. Supplied data (Level index; Energy / eV): (1, -6), (2, -3), (3, -1.5). (a) List the possible emitted photon energies in cascades and find the shortest emitted wavelength. [3 marks] (b) From the −6.0 eV ground level, can isolated 2.0 eV and 6.5 eV photons be absorbed? Explain what line spectra establish about the model. [3 marks]
Idealised energy levels
Supplied question data. Read the labelled axes and use the observations to test the physical model.
Vertical axis (y): Energy / eV
Horizontal axis (x): Level index
Read the exact data as a table
| Level index | Energy / eV |
|---|---|
| 1 | -6 |
| 2 | -3 |
| 3 | -1.5 |
These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. No fitted trend is drawn.
Show a hint
Begin with part (a): List the possible emitted photon energies in cascades and find the shortest emitted wavelength.
Reveal the worked solution
- Energy drops are (−1.5)−(−3.0)=1.5 eV, (−3.0)−(−6.0)=3.0 eV and (−1.5)−(−6.0)=4.5 eV.
- A direct transition emits one 4.5 eV photon; a two-step cascade emits separate 1.5 and 3.0 eV photons, not one of each plus 4.5 eV in the same decay.
- The greatest photon energy gives shortest wavelength: λ = hc/E = (4.14×10⁻¹⁵)(3.0×10⁸)/4.5≈2.76×10⁻⁷ m.
- A bound–bound absorption must match an allowed energy difference; the listed ground-state excitation gaps are 3.0 and 4.5 eV, not 2.0 eV.
- Ground-state ionisation needs 6.0 eV. Absorbing 6.5 eV can free the electron with 0.5 eV excess kinetic energy, neglecting recoil.
- Discrete lines support quantised energy changes. They do not show electrons following literal tiny planetary trajectories, and a real atom may have selection rules absent from this idealised model.
Answer (a) Possible photons: 1.5, 3.0 and 4.5 eV; shortest wavelength≈276 nm. (b) A 2.0 eV photon matches no listed excitation; a 6.5 eV photon can ionise the atom, leaving 0.5 eV kinetic energy.
Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.
The rare deflections that changed the atomic model
A narrow alpha-particle beam strikes a very thin gold foil. Detectors covering equal solid angles record the supplied count rates; values are illustrative rather than a full scattering-law fit. Most alpha particles pass close to the forward direction. Gold-197 has atomic number 79, and an alpha particle is a helium-4 nucleus of charge +2e. Supplied data (Scattering angle / °; Counts per minute): (10, 100000), (30, 10000), (60, 1000), (90, 100), (150, 10). (a) Explain what the common small deflections and rare large deflections imply, and compare them with a model of diffuse positive charge. [3 marks] (b) Determine proton, neutron and electron numbers in neutral gold-197 and in a gold-197 ion of charge +3e. Describe an isotope and balance alpha emission from a parent with A = 201, Z = 81. [3 marks]
Illustrative alpha-scattering observations
Supplied question data. Read the labelled axes and use the observations to test the physical model.
Vertical axis (y): Counts per minute
Horizontal axis (x): Scattering angle / °
Read the exact data as a table
| Scattering angle / ° | Counts per minute |
|---|---|
| 10 | 100000 |
| 30 | 10000 |
| 60 | 1000 |
| 90 | 100 |
| 150 | 10 |
These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. No fitted trend is drawn.
Show a hint
Begin with part (a): Explain what the common small deflections and rare large deflections imply, and compare them with a model of diffuse positive charge.
Reveal the worked solution
- Most projectiles cross the foil with little change in direction, so atoms are not solid dense obstacles across their full dimensions.
- A rare close encounter with concentrated positive nuclear charge can strongly repel an alpha particle. Very large deflections require a strong local interaction and a sufficiently massive scattering centre.
- A diffuse positive-charge model would spread the repulsion over the atomic volume and struggles to explain the observed rare strong deflections. The evidence supports a compact nucleus, while this count table alone does not determine an exact nuclear radius.
- Atomic number gives 79 protons. Neutrons are A−Z = 197−79 = 118; neutrality requires 79 electrons.
- A +3e ion has lost three electrons and has 76; its nucleus is unchanged. An isotope has the same proton number but a different neutron number.
- Alpha emission removes A = 4 and Z = 2: ²⁰¹₈₁X → ¹⁹⁷₇₉Au + ⁴₂He. Both nucleon and charge numbers balance.
Answer (a) Most atomic volume is sparsely occupied; positive charge and most mass are concentrated in a small nucleus. (b) Neutral Au-197: 79 p, 118 n, 79 e; Au³⁺ has 76 e. Alpha daughter: A = 197, Z = 79.
Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.
Same light energy, different photon counts
A source emits monochromatic pulses of equal energy 6.626×10⁻⁶ J at two frequencies: 5.0×10¹⁴ Hz and 1.0×10¹⁵ Hz. Use h = 6.626×10⁻³⁴ J s and c = 3.0×10⁸ m s⁻¹. The graph provides photon energy as a function of frequency. Supplied model: Use photon energy E = hf, wavelength λ = c/f and photon count N = Epulse/Ephoton. Supplied data (Frequency / 10¹⁴ Hz; Photon energy / 10⁻¹⁹ J): (0, 0), (5, 3.313), (10, 6.626). (a) Calculate each wavelength, photon energy and photon count. Identify the approximate spectral region of each pulse. [3 marks] (b) Explain why interference supports a wave model while photon-counting detection needs a particle-like model. Evaluate the claim that all electromagnetic radiation has identical biological effects. [3 marks]
Photon-energy model
Supplied question data. Read the labelled axes and use the observations to test the physical model.
Vertical axis (y): Photon energy / 10⁻¹⁹ J
Horizontal axis (x): Frequency / 10¹⁴ Hz
Read the exact data as a table
| Frequency / 10¹⁴ Hz | Photon energy / 10⁻¹⁹ J |
|---|---|
| 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 3.313 |
| 10 | 6.626 |
These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. Lines join the supplied values; they are not a fitted model.
Show a hint
Begin with part (a): Calculate each wavelength, photon energy and photon count. Identify the approximate spectral region of each pulse.
Reveal the worked solution
- Use λ = c/f: the lower frequency has wavelength 6.0×10⁻⁷ m and the higher 3.0×10⁻⁷ m.
- Ephoton = hf gives 3.313×10⁻¹⁹ and 6.626×10⁻¹⁹ J. Dividing equal total pulse energy by these values gives 2.0×10¹³ and 1.0×10¹³ photons.
- 600 nm is visible light and 300 nm is ultraviolet. Both propagate at c in vacuum; the higher-frequency pulse contains fewer photons for the same total energy.
- Spatial interference patterns follow phase and superposition, which a simple stream of classical particles does not explain.
- Localized detector events with frequency-dependent energy are described by photons. These are complementary descriptions of quantum light rather than literal tiny balls riding classical waves.
- Absorption, penetration, dose and photon energy depend on wavelength and material. Ultraviolet can cause photochemical damage; exposure assessment cannot be inferred from vacuum speed alone.
Answer (a) 600 nm, 3.313×10⁻¹⁹ J, 2.0×10¹³ photons; 300 nm, 6.626×10⁻¹⁹ J, 1.0×10¹³ photons. (b) Different models describe different observations; common vacuum speed does not imply identical interaction or hazard.
Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.
A photoelectric threshold measured with stopping voltage
A metal's stopping-potential measurements against incident-light frequency are supplied. Use electron charge e = 1.60×10⁻¹⁹ C and Kmax = eVs. The stopping-potential fit extrapolates to Vs = 0 at 5.0×10¹⁴ Hz. Assume one-photon photoemission and no contact-potential correction. Supplied data (Frequency / 10¹⁴ Hz; Stopping potential / V): (5, 0), (6, 0.414), (7, 0.828), (8, 1.242). (a) Estimate Planck's constant and the work function from the graph; find maximum electron kinetic energy at 8.0×10¹⁴ Hz. [3 marks] (b) Predict the effect of doubling intensity at fixed frequency above threshold, and of using intense light below threshold. [3 marks]
Photoelectric stopping potential
Supplied question data. Read the labelled axes and use the observations to test the physical model.
Vertical axis (y): Stopping potential / V
Horizontal axis (x): Frequency / 10¹⁴ Hz
Read the exact data as a table
| Frequency / 10¹⁴ Hz | Stopping potential / V |
|---|---|
| 5 | 0 |
| 6 | 0.414 |
| 7 | 0.828 |
| 8 | 1.242 |
These are the supplied values, not a worked answer. No fitted trend is drawn.
Show a hint
Begin with part (a): Estimate Planck's constant and the work function from the graph; find maximum electron kinetic energy at 8.0×10¹⁴ Hz.
Reveal the worked solution
- Einstein's relation gives Vs = (h/e)f−φ/e. Graph slope is 0.414/(1.0×10¹⁴) = 4.14×10⁻¹⁵ V s.
- Thus h = e×slope = 6.624×10⁻³⁴ J s. At threshold, φ = hf0 = 3.312×10⁻¹⁹ J, or 2.07 eV.
- At 8.0×10¹⁴ Hz, Kmax = eVs = (1.60×10⁻¹⁹)(1.242)≈1.987×10⁻¹⁹ J. The graph intercept is an energy-per-charge condition, not a delay.
- At fixed frequency, each photon carries the same hf. Doubling intensity supplies more photons per second, which can increase photocurrent if collection and material conditions remain unchanged.
- Stopping potential depends on the maximum energy per emitted electron, so it does not double with intensity.
- Below threshold each photon lacks the work-function energy. Increasing photon arrival rate does not fix that within the stated single-photon model; multiphoton regimes are outside this approximation.
Answer (a) h≈6.624×10⁻³⁴ J s; work function≈3.312×10⁻¹⁹ J = 2.07 eV; Kmax≈1.987×10⁻¹⁹ J = 1.242 eV. (b) Above threshold, emission rate can rise without changing Kmax; below threshold the ideal one-photon model predicts no photoemission.
Compare the assumptions, method and units with your attempt. Explain any correction before trying another question.