Skip to main content
GIOPHYSICS
Menu
← University Quantum Mechanics I

University Quantum Mechanics I · Introduction to Three-Dimensional Quantum Mechanics · 14.03

Central potentials and why Cartesian coordinates stop working

V depending on r alone is rotationally invariant, but r = √(x² + y² + z²) is in general no sum of separate pieces, so the xyz product fails and spherical coordinates are forced.

Course-map guide · not a complete lesson or simulation

Scope & orientation

What this subsection covers

V depending on r alone is rotationally invariant, but r = √(x² + y² + z²) is in general no sum of separate pieces, so the xyz product fails and spherical coordinates are forced.

A strong response uses polar plots of the squared spherical harmonic and states where the model stops being reliable.

Reasoning checklist

Evidence, assumptions and limits

01

Assumptions to state

State the system, observable, approximation, and conditions held fixed before using a model.

02

Evidence to collect

Does a spherical finite well always bind a state the way a one-dimensional well does, and how much deeper must it be before an l = 1 state appears?

Read the complete note

Does a spherical finite well always bind a state the way a one-dimensional well does, and how much deeper must it be before an l = 1 state appears? Useful evidence includes shot solutions u(r) started from u(0) = 0 with the small-r behaviour u ~ r(l+1) respected, eigenvalues located by node counting and sign changes, grid-spacing and cutoff convergence, binding thresholds for l = 0 and l = 1, and the 1D well for contrast.

03

Limits to state

This GioPhysics course map is an adaptable learning sequence, not academic credit, accreditation, or a universal university syllabus.

Read the complete note

This GioPhysics course map is an adaptable learning sequence, not academic credit, accreditation, or a universal university syllabus. It is a first dedicated quantum-mechanics course, distinct from University Physics V, which covers quantum mechanics alongside atomic, nuclear and particle physics in twenty units: this course is narrower, slower, and teaches the linear algebra it needs rather than assuming it. Hydrogen appears here as an introduction, with the full radial derivation belonging to a second course. A midterm examination is assumed around week 8. Follow your institution's published scope, notation, laboratory programme, and assessment rules. A result should be checked against units, signs, limiting cases, and the conditions under which its model was derived.

Diagram & examples

Work the claim before choosing an equation

Interactive concept map

Follow the model from claim to evidence.

01 · Physical claimCentral potentials and why Cartesian coordinates stop working

V depending on r alone is rotationally invariant, but r = √(x² + y² + z²) is in general no sum of separate pieces, so the xyz product fails and spherical coordinates are forced.

Read the complete note

V depending on r alone is rotationally invariant, but r = √(x² + y² + z²) is in general no sum of separate pieces, so the xyz product fails and spherical coordinates are forced. Coulomb, the potential hydrogen will need next week, is the case in point; the isotropic oscillator is the instructive exception that is central and additive at once and so separates both ways. Anything angle-dependent is not central at all.

02 · RepresentationThe subsection's claim

Model, evidence, and boundary

03 · TestPrediction before measurement

Which response about Central potentials and why Cartesian coordinates stop working is most defensible?

04 · Evidence & boundaryDecide, then qualify

Does a spherical finite well always bind a state the way a one-dimensional well does, and how much deeper must it be before an l = 1 state appears?

Read the complete note

Does a spherical finite well always bind a state the way a one-dimensional well does, and how much deeper must it be before an l = 1 state appears? Useful evidence includes shot solutions u(r) started from u(0) = 0 with the small-r behaviour u ~ r(l+1) respected, eigenvalues located by node counting and sign changes, grid-spacing and cutoff convergence, binding thresholds for l = 0 and l = 1, and the 1D well for contrast.

Interactive diagram for Central potentials and why Cartesian coordinates stop working: follow the physical claim through its representation, proposed test, evidence, and model boundary.

modelModel, evidence, and boundary turns the stated idea into a representation that can make a prediction.

Example questions

Try the reasoning before revealing the structure.

Diagram check

Which response about Central potentials and why Cartesian coordinates stop working is most defensible?

Quick check

Test the reasoning, not recall

Which response about Central potentials and why Cartesian coordinates stop working is most defensible?

Choose an answer to test the model.