Skip to main content

Quantum core · institution-dependent · Interactive lesson

Eₙ = (n + ½)ℏω and zero-point energy

Two claims share one formula, and they need separating. The gap ℏω is what a spectrometer reads; the ½ is what it never reads. Derive the floor from the commutator instead of asserting it, then meet the experiments — isotope shifts, Casimir plates — where the half-quantum finally moves a dial.

UPV-07.04 · Lesson 4 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Eₙ = (n + ½)ℏω and zero-point energyLevels Eₙ = (n + ½)ℏω inside a fixed parabola V = ½kx², k = 500 N m⁻¹: only the reduced mass moves. Each rung ends on the curve, at its classical turning points. The right-hand arrow measures ½ℏω = 187 meV above the well bottom; the central arrow spans one gap, 375 meV, and the dot marks rung n. Here ω̃ = 3021 cm⁻¹.k = 500 N m⁻¹, fixed by the electronsμ = 0.93 uℏω = 375 meV, every gap alikeE₀ = ½ℏω = 187 meVE / meV0rung ends = classical turning points, x from −32 to +32 pm
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.

Quantum core · institution-dependent. Your university determines the required depth of these quantum topics, including the use of operators, differential equations and computation. Institution-dependent does not automatically mean optional.

1

Build the model

The rungs are evenly spaced, and the lowest one is not zero.

The key idea

The oscillator's energy eigenvalues are Eₙ = (n + ½)ℏω: an infinite ladder of equally spaced rungs whose lowest, the zero-point energy ℏω/2, lies above the bottom of the well and cannot be lowered at fixed ω.

Example. CO's stretch has ω̃ = 2170 cm⁻¹, so ℏω = 269 meV and E₀ = 134.5 meV. Since ℏω/kB = 3.12×10³ K, at 300 K only 3 molecules in 10⁵ sit above the floor — and every one of the rest still carries that 134.5 meV.

The complete physical model and assumptions

Eₙ = (n + ½)ℏω welds two claims together, and they carry different evidential weight. The first is the spacing: because Ĥ = ℏω(â†â + ½) and â†â has the integer spectrum the ladder argument forced, every rung sits exactly ℏω above the last — no n², no −1/n², no crowding at a limit — which is why a harmonic bond absorbs in one band rather than a series, and why the ½ never appears in a transition frequency. The second is the floor. Setting â|0⟩ = 0 gives ⟨0|Ĥ|0⟩ = ℏω/2 in one line, but that is no artefact of how the factorisation was ordered: every normalised state has ⟨Ĥ⟩ ≥ σₚ²/2m + ½mω²σₓ², and minimising that subject only to σₓ σₚ ≥ ℏ/2 returns ℏω/2, attained at σₓ = √(ℏ/2mω) and σₚ = √(mℏω/2) with the kinetic and potential shares equal. Non-commutation, not the ladder, is what forbids sitting still at the bottom of the well. The cost is sharp. For one oscillator at fixed ω the ½ is a c-number you may legally subtract, invisible in every commutator and every spectrum. What you may not do is call it a constant, because ½ℏ√(k/μ) moves whenever the force constant, the reduced mass or a boundary condition moves — which is why deuterium shifts a dissociation energy by tens of meV, and why the same ½ summed over the field modes between two mirrors is a pressure you can measure.

1Read the spectrum straight off â†â

The whole result is one substitution. The factorisation gave Ĥ = ℏω(â†â + ½), and the ladder argument gave the number operator â†â the spectrum n = 0, 1, 2, … . Since Ĥ is ℏω times that operator plus a c-number, the two share eigenvectors, and acting on |n⟩ returns Ĥ|n⟩ = ℏω(n + ½)|n⟩. So Eₙ = (n + ½)ℏω, in the same basis (|n⟩), with no differential equation anywhere and no boundary condition imposed by hand — norm positivity did that work when the ladder was forced to terminate. Two things the algebra does not supply are worth naming now. It does not prove that each rung is one-dimensional: non-degeneracy follows from a separate theorem about normalisable solutions of a second-order ODE in one dimension, and it fails outright in three, where the isotropic oscillator's level n carries (n+1)(n+2)/2 states. And it says nothing about whether this quadratic Ĥ is the right Hamiltonian — that question belongs to the cubic term you dropped at the minimum.

2Even rungs: what a constant gap buys

Eₙ₊₁ − Eₙ = ℏω for every n, and that uniformity is unusual. An electron in a 0.30 nm infinite well has E₁ = 4.18 eV and gaps of 3E₁ = 12.5 eV, then 5E₁ = 20.9 eV, widening without limit; hydrogen's gaps instead shrink like 1/n² − 1/(n+1)² and pile up at the ionisation limit. Only the oscillator repeats itself. Three consequences follow. A harmonic bond has a single fundamental band: in this model CO absorbs at 2170 cm⁻¹ from n = 0 and at exactly the same frequency from n = 1, so hot bands lie on top of the fundamental and only anharmonicity separates them. Real CO absorbs at 2143 cm⁻¹ from n = 0 and about 27 cm⁻¹ lower from n = 1, and that splitting, 2ω̃ₑx̃ₑ, is a direct read of the anharmonic terms. Every superposition is periodic, since |ψ(t)⟩ = e(−iωt/2) Σ cₙ e(−inωt)|n⟩ returns to the same physical state after 2π/ω — the ket itself comes back as −|ψ(0)⟩, the sign being the ½ — which is what later lets a coherent state follow a classical orbit without spreading. And in that expression the ½ appears only as a global phase, so no probability can see it.

3The floor, and exactly how arbitrary it is

Put the ground state into the Hamiltonian: ⟨0|Ĥ|0⟩ = ℏω⟨0|â†â|0⟩ + ½ℏω, and â|0⟩ = 0 kills the first term, leaving E₀ = ℏω/2. Now ask what that number is worth. Add a constant C to any Hamiltonian and no eigenvector, no commutator, no transition frequency and no probability changes; a global phase e(−iCt/ℏ) is the whole effect. So for a single oscillator at fixed ω you may write Ĥ′ = ℏω â†â and lose nothing, and in that strict sense E₀ = ℏω/2 is a choice of zero. What makes it physics is that it is not a constant. Written out it is ½ℏ√(k/μ), a function of the force constant and the reduced mass, so anything that changes either changes the floor by a definite, calculable amount — and differences of floors are precisely what an experiment can reach. Keep the two statements apart: an absolute zero-point energy is a convention, a difference of zero-point energies is data.

4Uncertainty returns the same ℏω/2, with no ladder

Suppose you had never met â. Take any normalised state and write ⟨Ĥ⟩ = ⟨p̂²⟩/2m + ½mω²⟨x̂²⟩, then split each second moment into a spread and a mean: ⟨Ĥ⟩ = σₚ²/2m + ⟨p̂⟩²/2m + ½mω²σₓ² + ½mω²⟨x̂⟩². The two mean terms are non-negative, so drop them — displacing the state or setting it moving only costs energy. For what remains, A + B ≥ 2√(AB) gives σₚ²/2m + ½mω²σₓ² ≥ ω σₓ σₚ, and Robertson gives σₓ σₚ ≥ ℏ/2, so ⟨Ĥ⟩ ≥ ℏω/2 for every vector in the space. Both inequalities tighten at once when σₚ = mωσₓ and σₓ σₚ = ℏ/2, which forces σₓ = √(ℏ/2mω) and σₚ = √(mℏω/2), with kinetic and potential each holding ℏω/4. The ground state is therefore not a state that happens to have this energy; it is the minimiser. Squeeze σₓ and σₚ must grow, and the potential energy saved is more than repaid in kinetic energy.

5How big is ℏω/2, and where it stops mattering

Put numbers on both ends of the scale. CO's stretch at ω̃ = 2170 cm⁻¹ gives ℏω = 269 meV and E₀ = 134.5 meV. In temperature units that is ℏω/kB = 3.12×10³ K, so at 300 K the mean occupancy is 1/(e10.41 − 1) = 3.0×10⁻⁵: essentially every molecule in the room sits on the ground rung, and every one of them carries 134.5 meV that no cooling can remove. The spread that energy corresponds to is σₓ = √(ℏ/2μω) = 3.37 pm for μ = 6.856 u — about 3% of the 112.8 pm bond, which is why zero-point motion matters for hydrogen-bond geometry and tunnelling rates but rarely for the shape of a molecule. At the other end, a 2 s pendulum has ω = π rad s⁻¹, so its rungs are ℏω = 3.3×10⁻³⁴ J apart and its floor is 1.0×10⁻¹⁵ eV, while a 1 mJ swing sits at n = 3×10³⁰. The ladder is still there; nothing in a laboratory resolves a step that fine.

6Weighing the half-quantum

Three places where the ½ stops being invisible. Isotopes: H₂ and D₂ share one Born–Oppenheimer curve, so they share k and the well depth Dₑ, yet their measured bond energies differ by 0.078 eV — which is, to a quarter of a percent, the difference of their zero-point energies. That is the ½ on a balance. Condensed matter: helium's van der Waals well is so shallow that ℏω/2 exceeds it, and ⁴He will not solidify at any temperature below about 25 atmospheres. Fields: every mode of the electromagnetic field is one of these oscillators, so the vacuum between two mirrors carries Σ ½ℏωₖ. That sum diverges, but its dependence on the gap does not, and P = π²ℏc/240d⁴ predicts 13 Pa at 100 nm for perfect mirrors; real metals give less at so small a gap, and the force, once their finite conductivity is included, agrees with measurement. Where the accounting still fails is the absolute total: cut the same sum off at the Planck scale and it exceeds the observed vacuum energy density by some 120 orders of magnitude. Differences are trustworthy; the absolute is an open problem.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

The eigenvalue, read off the ladder

Ĥ = ℏω(â†â + ½) ⇒ Eₙ = (n + ½)ℏω, n = 0, 1, 2, …

One line fixes the whole spectrum: a ladder with no top, and a floor that is not the bottom of the well.

ω = √(k/m) in rad s⁻¹, ℏ = 1.055×10⁻³⁴ J s; every level non-degenerate in one dimension

Uniform spacing

Eₙ₊₁ − Eₙ = ℏω, for every n

A harmonic bond shows one fundamental band, not a series: treated as harmonic, CO absorbs at 2170 cm⁻¹ from every rung alike.

Contrast the infinite well, Eₙ ∝ n², and the Coulomb well, Eₙ ∝ −1/n²

Zero-point energy

E₀ = ⟨0|ℏω(â†â + ½)|0⟩ = ℏω/2, since â|0⟩ = 0

It comes from the ordering inside [â, â†] = 1, the same commutator that built the ladder.

Equivalently ½ℏ√(k/μ) — a function of force constant and reduced mass, not a constant

The same floor from uncertainty alone

⟨Ĥ⟩ ≥ σₚ²/2m + ½mω²σₓ² ≥ ω σₓ σₚ ≥ ℏω/2

No ladder assumed: non-commutation by itself forbids rest at the well bottom, and ⟨T̂⟩ = ⟨V̂⟩ = ℏω/4.

Drop the ⟨x̂⟩² and ⟨p̂⟩² terms, then AM–GM, then Robertson; equality at σₓ = √(ℏ/2mω), σₚ = √(mℏω/2)

Isotope shift of a bond energy

D₀ = Dₑ − ½ℏω, ω = √(k/μ) ⇒ D₀(D₂) − D₀(H₂) = ½ℏ(ωH − ωD)

The whole 0.078 eV by which D₂ outbinds H₂ is half-quantum — the ½ weighed, not inferred.

Same electrons, so k and Dₑ are unchanged; ω̃ falls 4401 → 3116 cm⁻¹ from H₂ to D₂

The same ½ summed over field modes

P = π²ℏc / (240 d⁴)

Σ ½ℏωₖ diverges, but its dependence on a boundary condition is finite and measured.

Ideal mirrors at T = 0, gap d in metres; 13 Pa at d = 100 nm, 1.3×10⁵ Pa at 10 nm
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

0.93 u
0.9 to 2.2 u; steps of 0.01.
0
0 to 2; steps of 1.

Try this. Slide μ from 0.93 u (a C–H bond) to 1.72 u (the same bond deuterated) and watch the parabola sit still while every rung drops: ω̃ falls from about 3020 to 2220 cm⁻¹ and the floor from 187 to 138 meV. Then move n and check that the gap arrow never changes length.

Live results

LEVEL Eₙ
187 meV
GAP Eₙ₊₁ − Eₙ
375 meV
ZERO-POINT E₀
187 meV
WAVENUMBER ω̃
3021 cm⁻¹

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Physics V modelLevels Eₙ = (n + ½)ℏω inside a fixed parabola V = ½kx², k = 500 N m⁻¹: only the reduced mass moves. Each rung ends on the curve, at its classical turning points. The right-hand arrow measures ½ℏω = 187 meV above the well bottom; the central arrow spans one gap, 375 meV, and the dot marks rung n. Here ω̃ = 3021 cm⁻¹.k = 500 N m⁻¹, fixed by the electronsμ = 0.93 uℏω = 375 meV, every gap alikeE₀ = ½ℏω = 187 meVE / meV0rung ends = classical turning points, x from −32 to +32 pm
Levels Eₙ = (n + ½)ℏω inside a fixed parabola V = ½kx², k = 500 N m⁻¹: only the reduced mass moves. Each rung ends on the curve, at its classical turning points. The right-hand arrow measures ½ℏω = 187 meV above the well bottom; the central arrow spans one gap, 375 meV, and the dot marks rung n. Here ω̃ = 3021 cm⁻¹.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Reduced mass μ: 0.93 u; Lower rung n of the marked gap: 0

Baseline 0.93; choose 0.9 to 2.2, in steps of 0.01.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The half-quantum is neither an additive constant you may quietly set to zero nor stored energy you may extract, and both errors come from reading ½ℏω as a number instead of as ½ℏ√(k/μ). For one oscillator at fixed ω it really is a c-number: it cancels from every transition frequency, commutes with everything, and enters e(−iĤt/ℏ) only as a global phase, so subtracting it changes no prediction. Change the parameters and it moves — deuterating a C–H bond drops the floor by about 50 meV, and moving two mirrors changes the mode sum between them. Nor is it fuel: ℏω/2 is the minimum of ⟨Ĥ⟩ over every normalised state, so no process at fixed ω takes a system below it. And it is not thermal jitter. At T = 0 the oscillator is in the pure state |0⟩, and ⟨x̂²⟩ ≠ 0 there because [x̂, p̂] = iℏ, not because anything is being kicked.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

Carbon monoxide's stretching mode has ω̃ = 2170 cm⁻¹. Find the level spacing ℏω and the zero-point energy E₀ in meV and in joules, find the temperature at which kBT equals ℏω, and say what fraction of the CO molecules in a 300 K room sit above the ground rung.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 4 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

Without using the ladder at all, show that ⟨Ĥ⟩ ≥ ℏω/2 for every normalised state of the oscillator, find the widths that attain the bound and the kinetic and potential shares there, then evaluate the ground-state position spread for CO (μ = 6.856 u, ω = 4.088×10¹⁴ rad s⁻¹, bond length 112.8 pm).

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

H₂ has ω̃ₑ = 4401 cm⁻¹. Deuterium substitution leaves the Born–Oppenheimer curve, and hence k and the well depth Dₑ, untouched. Predict ω̃ₑ(D₂), then predict the difference in dissociation energies D₀ and compare with the measured D₀(H₂) = 4.478 eV and D₀(D₂) = 4.556 eV. Take μ = 0.5039 u for H₂ and 1.0071 u for D₂, 1 cm⁻¹ = 1.2398×10⁻⁴ eV, and anharmonicity constants ω̃ₑx̃ₑ = 121.3 cm⁻¹ (H₂) and 61.8 cm⁻¹ (D₂).

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

A C–H stretch absorbs at 3000 cm⁻¹. Deuteration leaves the electronic curve, and so k and Dₑ, unchanged. What happens to the band and to D₀?
7

Review & continue

The oscillator's energy eigenvalues are Eₙ = (n + ½)ℏω: an infinite ladder of equally spaced rungs whose lowest, the zero-point energy ℏω/2, lies above the bottom of the well and cannot be lowered at fixed ω.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.