
Nuclear, particle & quantum-information sequence · Interactive lesson
Induced fission and neutron moderation
Two different problems wear one name here. First: why a thermal neutron splits U-235 and bounces off U-238. Then: how to carry a 2 MeV neutron down to 0.025 eV through a forest of capture resonances without losing it — and why the fastest slower-down is not the best moderator.
UPV-16.02 · Lesson 2 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Nuclear, particle & quantum-information sequence. These units continue into nuclear and particle physics and quantum information. Follow your university’s prerequisites, mathematical depth and assessment; this independent pathway is not a universal programme specification.
Build the model
The neutron must cross a forest that is trying to absorb it.
The key idea
Induced fission is the decay of a compound nucleus formed by neutron capture, and moderation is the elastic slowing-down that delivers the neutron to the energy where that capture is most likely to end in fission.
Example. A 2 MeV fission neutron needs 18 elastic collisions with hydrogen, or 115 with carbon, to reach 0.0253 eV — where ²³⁵U's fission cross-section is 585 b against ²³⁸U's, which is of order 10⁻⁵ b.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Everything here follows from one fact: the neutron and the target do not stay separate. A slow neutron captured into ²³⁸U's 6.67 eV resonance forms a compound nucleus that lives about 2.7 × 10⁻¹⁴ s — some 10⁸ times longer than a nucleon needs to cross the nucleus — so by the time it decays the state has forgotten how it was made, and the cross-section factorises into a formation term times a branching ratio Γb/Γ. That long life means a narrow width, so the cross-section is a ladder of Breit-Wigner poles rather than a smooth curve, with a 1/v tail below the lowest one. Which nuclide those poles belong to is settled by pairing: adding a neutron to odd-N ²³⁵U makes even-even ²³⁶U and releases 6.545 MeV, above the roughly 6 MeV saddle, so the neutron needs no kinetic energy of its own; the same neutron on ²³⁸U releases only 4.806 MeV and must bring about 1 MeV with it. Fission at rest therefore means slowing the neutron by eight decades in energy — and the path down runs straight through ²³⁸U's capture resonances. Elastic kinematics fix the price: α = ((A−1)/(A+1))² sets the most one collision can take, a fraction 1 − α; ξ = 1 + α ln α/(1−α) is what it takes on average; and the trip costs ln(E₀/E)/ξ collisions. The cost is that no moderator is free. The nucleus that slows fastest, hydrogen, also absorbs, and the design question splits into two figures of merit that rank the candidates in different orders, with water first on one and last on the other.
1The compound nucleus lives long enough to forget
A slow neutron does not glance off a heavy nucleus; it is absorbed, and the binding energy it brings is shared among all the nucleons. At ²³⁸U's 6.67 eV level the ²³⁹U* state decays with a total width Γ = Γₙ + Γγ = 24.5 meV, so it lives τ = ħ/Γ = 6.58 × 10⁻¹⁶ eV⋅s ÷ 0.0245 eV = 2.7 × 10⁻¹⁴ s. A nucleon crosses a nucleus of that size in about 2 × 10⁻²² s, so the compound nucleus survives some 10⁸ crossings; the ²³⁶U* levels reached from ²³⁵U are broader, because a fission width adds to a radiative width of about 35 meV, but they too last millions of crossings — long enough for every memory of the entrance channel except energy, angular momentum and parity to be washed out. That is Bohr's independence hypothesis, and it buys the factorisation the rest of the topic rests on: σ(n, b) = σCN × Γb/Γ. Capture, fission and re-emission of the neutron then become one formation cross-section shared out by branching ratios, and only Γf/Γ carries anything specifically about fission. It is an approximation with a stated domain: it fails for direct reactions, and it weakens toward the fast end of the fission spectrum, where direct and pre-equilibrium emission take a growing share of collisions before a compound state has formed.
2A resonance has a height, a width, and a temperature
Near an isolated level, σ(n, b) = π ƛ² gJ Γₙ Γb/[(E − Eᵣ)² + Γ²/4], with π ƛ² = 6.51 × 10⁵ b⋅eV/E and gJ = (2J+1)/[2(2I+1)] counting the fraction of entrance spin states that can reach the level. Take ²³⁸U's lowest resonance, Eᵣ = 6.67 eV, Γₙ = 1.5 meV, Γγ = 23 meV, on a spin-zero target so gJ = 1. At the peak the denominator is Γ²/4, giving σ₀ = 4 × (6.51 × 10⁵/6.67) × (1.5 × 23)/24.5² = 2.2 × 10⁴ b. That is ten thousand times the geometric πR² ≈ 1.7 b, because the scale in the formula is the neutron's reduced wavelength, not the nuclear radius. What a spectrometer actually records is broader and lower: thermal motion of the target smears the level over a Doppler width Δ = √(4Eᵣ kT/A) = √(4 × 6.67 × 0.0259/238) = 54 meV, more than twice the natural Γ. Heating the fuel conserves the area under the peak but lowers its height and widens its wings; in a fuel lump the flux is already depressed at the peak and not in the wings, so the broadened line captures more neutrons, and that is where the prompt negative temperature coefficient comes from.
3Why the tail is 1/v, and why tables say 2200 m/s
Below the lowest resonance, two energy dependences meet. The geometric factor π ƛ² = πħ²/(2mE) falls as 1/E. The s-wave neutron width rises as Γₙ = Γₙ⁰√(E/1 eV), because a zero-angular-momentum neutron faces no centrifugal barrier and its penetrability goes as k. The denominator, meanwhile, is frozen at Eᵣ². Multiply the three: σₐ ∝ E(−1/2) ∝ 1/v. So σv is a constant, and the reaction rate per unit volume, N ∫σ(v) v n(v) dv = N σv n, depends only on the total neutron density n and not on how those neutrons are spread over speed. That is why cross-sections are tabulated at a single point, E = 0.0253 eV, v = 2200 m s⁻¹: for a 1/v absorber that one number reproduces the rate in any Maxwellian spectrum, at any moderator temperature. Real nuclides are not perfectly 1/v, and the correction is Westcott's g-factor — 0.976 for ²³⁵U fission at 20 °C, so a 2.4% error if you ignore it, and much larger for ²³⁹Pu, whose 0.3 eV resonance sits on the shoulder of the thermal peak.
4Pairing decides which nuclide a thermal neutron can split
Capture on ²³⁵U makes ²³⁶U* with excitation E* = Sₙ + Eₙ⋅A/(A+1). From atomic masses, Sₙ(²³⁶U) = (235.043930 + 1.008665 − 236.045568) u × 931.494 MeV/u = 6.545 MeV, and the saddle-point barrier of ²³⁶U sits near 6 MeV. The neutron therefore clears the barrier bringing no kinetic energy at all: ²³⁵U is fissile. Repeat on ²³⁸U and Sₙ(²³⁹U) = 4.806 MeV, roughly 1.4 MeV short of ²³⁹U's saddle, so ²³⁸U is fissionable but only above a threshold near 1 MeV. Most of the 1.74 MeV difference is pairing, counted twice. ²³⁵U has 143 neutrons, odd; the captured neutron pairs off and the even-even product keeps the pairing energy δ ≈ 12 A(−1/2) = 0.78 MeV at A = 236. ²³⁸U's 146th neutron is already paired, and the 147th arrives with no partner, so ²³⁹U forgoes the same δ. Gaining δ in one case and forgoing it in the other gives 2δ ≈ 1.56 MeV; the smooth fall of Sₙ with neutron excess supplies the remaining 0.18 MeV. The consequence at thermal energy is stark: σf = 585 b for ²³⁵U against order 10⁻⁵ b for ²³⁸U. Get a neutron down to 0.0253 eV and the 0.72% minority isotope does essentially all the work.
5One collision: the worst case and the average
Elastic scattering in the centre of mass leaves the neutron's speed unchanged and only turns it, so back in the lab the outgoing energy runs from E down to αE with α = ((A−1)/(A+1))². For hydrogen α = 0 and a single collision can take everything; for carbon α = 0.716, so no collision can take more than 28%; for ²³⁸U itself α = 0.983. Below a few hundred keV, s-wave scattering is isotropic in the centre of mass, which makes E′ uniform on [αE, E]. Averaging the lethargy gain over that flat distribution, ξ = ∫ from αE to E of ln(E/E′) dE′/[(1−α)E] = 1 + α ln α/(1−α), gives a number that does not depend on E — the reason lethargy rather than energy is the natural variable, and the reason the slowing-down line is straight. The values: ξ = 1 for H, 0.725 for D, 0.207 for Be, 0.158 for C, 0.00838 for ²³⁸U. Collisions from 2 MeV to 0.0253 eV, N = ln(E₀/E)/ξ = 18.19/ξ, are 18, 25, 88, 115 and 2170. Count only the 1 eV–1 keV band, of lethargy width 6.91, and hydrogen spends 7 collisions inside ²³⁸U's resonance forest where carbon spends 44.
6Rank moderators twice and get two different orders
Moderating power is ξΣₛ, the lethargy removed per centimetre travelled: 1.28 cm⁻¹ for light water, 0.18 for heavy water, 0.060 for graphite. On that measure water wins by a factor of 21. Moderating ratio is ξΣₛ/Σₐ, the same slowing-down weighed against parasitic absorption: about 70 for water, 190 for reactor graphite, 5700 for 99.75% heavy water. Water drops from first to last, and that reversal is the design decision. Hydrogen's α = 0 is pure equal-mass kinematics, but every hydrogen nucleus that offers it also offers 0.332 b of radiative capture, n + p → d + γ; you cannot buy the first without paying the second. Natural uranium yields η = ν σf/σₐ = 2.42 × 4.21/7.59 = 1.34 neutrons per absorption in fuel, so barely a third of a neutron of margin has to cover leakage, structure and every other loss. Heavy water fits inside that margin and light water does not — which is why CANDU runs unenriched fuel while every light-water reactor enriches to 3–5% ²³⁵U, and why graphite piles compensate with wide lattice pitch and lumped fuel that self-shields the resonances.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Compound-nucleus factorisation
σ(n, b)(E) = σCN(E) × Γb/Γ, Γ = Σᵢ Γᵢ
One formation cross-section, shared out: capture, fission and re-emission all come from the same σCN, and fission enters only through Γf/Γ.
Γᵢ are partial widths in eV; the branching Γb/Γ is independent of how the state was formed.Single-level Breit-Wigner
σ(n, b)(E) = π ƛ² gJ Γₙ Γb / [(E − Eᵣ)² + Γ²/4]
Peak and width are separate observables: σ(Eᵣ) = 4 π ƛ² gJ Γₙ Γb/Γ², while Γ alone fixes the compound lifetime through Γτ = ħ.
π ƛ² = 6.51 × 10⁵ b⋅eV / E; gJ = (2J+1)/[2(2I+1)]; Γ = Σ Γᵢ is the FWHM, in eV.The 1/v tail below the first resonance
σₐ(E) ≈ π ƛ² gJ Γₙ(E) Γγ / Eᵣ² ∝ E(−1/2) ∝ 1/v
σv is constant, so one tabulated value at 0.0253 eV and 2200 m s⁻¹ reproduces the rate in any Maxwellian — up to Westcott's g-factor.
Holds for E ≪ Eᵣ, where Γₙ = Γₙ⁰ √(E/1 eV) and π ƛ² ∝ 1/E; σ in barns, E in eV.Fissile test: excitation against the saddle
E* = Sₙ + Eₙ⋅A/(A+1) vs Efδ ≈ 12 A(−1/2) MeV
Pairing alone separates fissile from threshold: ²³⁵U clears the barrier on capture, ²³⁸U must be handed about 1 MeV of kinetic energy first.
Sₙ(²³⁶U) = 6.545 MeV, Sₙ(²³⁹U) = 4.806 MeV, both saddles near 6 MeV; δ = 0.78 MeV at A = 236.Elastic collision: the limit and the average
α = ((A−1)/(A+1))², ξ = 1 + α ln α/(1 − α)
ξ does not depend on E, so collisions to slow from E₀ to E is just ln(E₀/E)/ξ — 18 in H, 25 in D, 115 in C, 2170 in ²³⁸U.
Both dimensionless; E′ uniform on [αE, E] for isotropic s-wave CM scattering. ξ(H)=1, ξ(D)=0.725, ξ(C)=0.158.Two figures of merit that disagree
moderating power = ξΣₛmoderating ratio = ξΣₛ/Σₐ
Power says how fast the neutron gets down; ratio says whether it arrives. Natural uranium, with η = 1.34, can only afford to optimise the second.
Σₛ, Σₐ macroscopic, in cm⁻¹. H₂O 1.28, D₂O 0.18, C 0.060 cm⁻¹; ratios near 70, 5700, 190.Interactive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Drag A from 12 to 1 and watch the line steepen: carbon spends 44 collisions inside the resonance forest on its way to thermal, hydrogen only 7 — speed that hydrogen pays for with a 0.332 b capture cross-section carbon does not have.
Live results
- Α ((A−1)/(A+1))²
- 0.716
- LETHARGY GAIN ξ
- 0.158
- COLLISIONS TO 0.025 eV
- 115 collisions
- OF THOSE, IN 1 eV–1 keV
- 44 collisions
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Moderator mass number A: 12; Fission neutron energy E₀: 2.0 MeV; Collisions elapsed n: 20
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The trap is ranking moderators by how fast they slow neutrons. Light water's moderating power ξΣₛ is 1.28 cm⁻¹ against graphite's 0.060, so water thermalises a fission neutron in about 20 collisions where graphite needs 115 — and every extra graphite collision looks like another chance to be lost in ²³⁸U's resonances. That reasoning gives the wrong answer, because ξΣₛ is a rate and says nothing about survival. The second figure of merit, ξΣₛ/Σₐ, reverses the order: roughly 70 for water, 190 for graphite, 5700 for heavy water. Hydrogen's α = 0 comes packaged with its 0.332 b radiative capture, and with natural uranium's η = 1.34 there is no margin to spend on it. That is why light-water reactors must enrich the fuel and CANDU need not — the same physics, read through the correct figure of merit.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
Beryllium-9 has been proposed as a moderator. Find the largest fractional energy loss one elastic collision can produce, the mean lethargy gain ξ, and the number of collisions needed to bring a 2.0 MeV fission neutron to 0.0253 eV. Compare with graphite's 115.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- α = ((A−1)/(A+1))² with A = 9 gives α = (8/10)² = 0.640. A collision cannot leave the neutron below 0.640 E, so the largest possible loss in one hit is 1 − α = 36% of the incident energy.
- ξ = 1 + α ln α/(1 − α) = 1 + 0.640 × ln 0.640 / 0.360. With ln 0.640 = −0.4463, the second term is 0.640 × (−0.4463)/0.360 = −0.7934.
- So ξ = 0.2066. Each collision costs the neutron a factor e0.2066 = 1.23 in energy on average, whatever energy it starts from — that constancy is exactly why lethargy is the right variable.
- Total lethargy needed: u = ln(2.0 × 10⁶/0.0253) = ln(7.905 × 10⁷) = 18.19. Collisions N = u/ξ = 18.19/0.2066 = 88.
- Graphite (A = 12, ξ = 0.158) needs 115, so beryllium is 24% faster per neutron. It is also toxic, expensive, and (n,2n) active above about 1.7 MeV — none of which ξ can tell you.
Answer. α = 0.640, ξ = 0.207, and N = 88 collisions from 2.0 MeV to 0.0253 eV — 24% fewer than graphite's 115.
MediumExample 2
U-238's lowest s-wave resonance sits at Eᵣ = 6.67 eV with Γₙ = 1.5 meV, Γγ = 23 meV and J = 1/2 on a spin-zero target. Find the peak radiative-capture cross-section, then extrapolate the single-level tail down to 0.0253 eV and compare it with the tabulated thermal value of 2.68 b.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- π ƛ² = 6.51 × 10⁵ b⋅eV / E, so at the resonance π ƛ² = 6.51 × 10⁵/6.67 = 9.76 × 10⁴ b. The target has I = 0, so gJ = (2J+1)/[2(2I+1)] = 2/2 = 1.
- Total width Γ = Γₙ + Γγ = 1.5 + 23 = 24.5 meV. At E = Eᵣ the Breit-Wigner denominator collapses to Γ²/4, so σ₀ = 4 π ƛ² gJ Γₙ Γγ/Γ² = 4 × 9.76 × 10⁴ × (1.5 × 23)/24.5².
- = 3.904 × 10⁵ × 34.5/600.25 = 3.904 × 10⁵ × 0.05748 = 2.2 × 10⁴ b — four orders of magnitude above the geometric πR² ≈ 1.7 b. Nothing about the nuclear radius sets this; π ƛ² does.
- Far below the resonance, (E − Eᵣ)² + Γ²/4 → Eᵣ² = 44.5 eV², while π ƛ² grows as 1/E and the s-wave neutron width falls as √E: Γₙ(0.0253 eV) = 1.5 meV × √(0.0253/6.67) = 0.0924 meV.
- π ƛ²(0.0253 eV) = 6.51 × 10⁵/0.0253 = 2.573 × 10⁷ b, so σγ = 2.573 × 10⁷ × (9.24 × 10⁻⁵ × 0.023)/44.5 = 1.2 b. The two E-dependences combine to E(−1/2), which is the 1/v law.
- That single level supplies about 45% of the tabulated 2.68 b. The rest comes from a bound level below neutron threshold and from the ladder above — one Breit-Wigner term is never the whole cross-section.
Answer. σ₀ = 2.2 × 10⁴ b at the peak; the single-level 1/v tail gives 1.2 b at 0.0253 eV, about 45% of the tabulated 2.68 b.
HardExample 3
Reactor graphite has density 1.60 g cm⁻³, σₛ = 4.75 b and σₐ = 0.0034 b at thermal energy. Compute its moderating power and moderating ratio, then find how much natural boron (σₐ = 767 b, molar mass 10.81 g mol⁻¹) it takes to pull the moderating ratio down to light water's 70.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- Atom density NC = (1.60/12.011) × 6.022 × 10²³ = 8.02 × 10²² cm⁻³. Then Σₛ = 8.02 × 10²² × 4.75 × 10⁻²⁴ = 0.381 cm⁻¹ and Σₐ = 8.02 × 10²² × 0.0034 × 10⁻²⁴ = 2.73 × 10⁻⁴ cm⁻¹.
- With ξ = 0.1577 the moderating power is ξΣₛ = 0.1577 × 0.381 = 0.0601 cm⁻¹ — about a twenty-first of light water's 1.28 cm⁻¹.
- Moderating ratio for pure carbon: ξΣₛ/Σₐ = 0.0601/2.73 × 10⁻⁴ = 220. Tables print about 190 for reactor graphite, and that gap is impurity, not physics.
- One part per million of boron by mass: NB = (10⁻⁶ × 1.60/10.811) × 6.022 × 10²³ = 8.91 × 10¹⁶ cm⁻³, so Σₐ(B) = 8.91 × 10¹⁶ × 767 × 10⁻²⁴ = 6.84 × 10⁻⁵ cm⁻¹ — a quarter of carbon's own absorption, from one part in a million.
- To reach a ratio of 70 the total absorption must be Σₐ = 0.0601/70 = 8.58 × 10⁻⁴ cm⁻¹, leaving 8.58 × 10⁻⁴ − 2.73 × 10⁻⁴ = 5.85 × 10⁻⁴ cm⁻¹ for boron.
- That is 5.85 × 10⁻⁴ / 6.84 × 10⁻⁵ = 8.6 ppm. Under nine parts per million of boron makes graphite no better a neutron economy than water — which is why the Chicago pile team specified graphite purity before anything else.
Answer. ξΣₛ = 0.0601 cm⁻¹ and ξΣₛ/Σₐ = 220 for pure graphite; about 8.6 ppm of natural boron drops the ratio to light water's 70.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
Induced fission is the decay of a compound nucleus formed by neutron capture, and moderation is the elastic slowing-down that delivers the neutron to the energy where that capture is most likely to end in fission.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.