
Quantum core · institution-dependent · Interactive lesson
Position and momentum representations
Position is not where quantum mechanics lives; it is one basis among several. Learn to resolve the same state on momentum eigenstates, read probabilities straight off the transform, and see why nothing ever has to be normalised twice.
UPIV-05.04 · Lesson 4 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Quantum core · institution-dependent. Departments differ in how much quantum mechanics they include in Physics IV or teach in a dedicated course. Follow your university’s required mathematical depth and assessment; these numbered units are not automatically optional.
Build the model
One state, two component lists — and the transform that swaps them.
The key idea
The momentum representation of a state is the list of amplitudes Φ(p) got by projecting ψ onto the momentum eigenfunctions — the Fourier transform of ψ(x) with ħ setting the scale — whose squared modulus is the probability density per unit momentum.
Example. For an electron with ψ(x) = (2πσ²)(−1/4) e(−x²/4σ²) and σ = 1.0 nm, Φ(p) = (2σ²/πħ²)¹⁄⁴ e(−σ²p²/ħ²): a Gaussian of width σₚ = ħ/2σ = 5.3 × 10⁻²⁶ kg m s⁻¹, or about 99 eV/c.
The complete physical model and assumptions
A quantum state is a vector, and ψ(x) is only its component list on one particular basis — the eigenstates of position. The momentum operator has its own complete set, the plane waves uₚ(x) = e(ipx/ħ)/√(2πħ), and resolving the same vector on those gives a second component list Φ(p) = ⟨uₚ|ψ⟩, which works out to be the Fourier transform of ψ with ħ carrying the units. Nothing is lost in the change: the inverse integral rebuilds ψ from Φ, Parseval's theorem shows the two lists share a norm, and Born's rule applies to each in its own variable — |ψ|² per unit length, |Φ|² per unit momentum. What the change buys is that momentum questions become ordinary averages, ⟨p²⟩ = ∫p²|Φ|² dp instead of a derivative sandwiched inside an integral, and that the reciprocity of the two widths becomes a theorem about transforms rather than an extra postulate. What it costs is the pretence that sharp momentum is available: the momentum eigenfunctions are not square-integrable, so they are basis elements and not states. Every real preparation is a packet whose Φ has finite width, and the two pictures constrain each other precisely because they are two readings of one object, not two independent things a particle separately has.
1ψ and Φ are two component lists for one vector
In a finite-dimensional space you expand a vector on a basis and keep the list of coefficients; change the basis and the list changes while the vector does not. Quantum states work the same way. Project |ψ⟩ on the position eigenstates and you recover ψ(x) = ⟨x|ψ⟩, the function you have been drawing all along. Project the same ket on the eigenstates of p̂ = −iħ d/dx, which are uₚ(x) = e(ipx/ħ)/√(2πħ) with p̂ uₚ = p uₚ, and you get Φ(p) = ⟨uₚ|ψ⟩ = ∫ uₚ*(x) ψ(x) dx = (2πħ)(−1/2) ∫ ψ(x) e(−ipx/ħ) dx. The integral happens to be a Fourier transform, but it did not arrive as a technique borrowed from signal processing: it is an overlap, computed the way every overlap is. Because the inverse integral rebuilds ψ from Φ, neither list outranks the other. Which one you write down is a question about the problem in front of you, not about the electron: a well with walls is easiest in x, a beam through a monochromator is easiest in p.
2Where 2πħ comes from, and what it does to the units
Fourier inversion fixes only the product of the two prefactors: substitute one transform into the other and ψ comes back only if the forward and inverse constants multiply to 1/2πħ. The symmetric convention splits that factor evenly, (2πħ)(−1/2) on each side, so the two transforms differ only in the sign of the exponent, and it is the one split that makes the transform unitary, as the next section shows. The same factor is what δ-normalises the plane waves themselves, ⟨uₚ′|uₚ⟩ = δ(p − p′); that continuous-spectrum bookkeeping is worked in Continuous spectra and the momentum-space wavefunction (UPIV-06.07), and nothing here needs more of it. Now count units. In one dimension [ψ] = m(−1/2), so ∫ψ dx carries m¹⁄²; and [ħ] = J s = (kg m s⁻¹)⋅m, so dividing by √(2πħ) leaves [Φ] = (kg m s⁻¹)(−1/2). |Φ(p)|² is therefore a probability per unit momentum while |ψ(x)|² is one per unit length: the two numbers are never comparable, and a peak height in one picture tells you nothing about a peak height in the other. Asymmetric conventions exist, with all of the 2πħ on one side; they are legal, but silently mixing two of them breaks Parseval, so declare yours once and keep it.
3Parseval: normalise once, and both pictures are normalised
Substitute the transform into ∫|Φ(p)|² dp and it becomes (2πħ)(−1) ∫dp ∫dx ∫dx′ ψ*(x′) ψ(x) e(ip(x′ − x)/ħ). Do the p integral first: it returns 2πħ δ(x − x′), which cancels the prefactor and collapses the double integral to ∫|ψ(x)|² dx. So a state normalised in position is already normalised in momentum, and there is no second constant to hunt for. Run the same argument on two different states and you get ∫φ*(x) ψ(x) dx = ∫Φφ*(p) Φψ(p) dp: the transform preserves every inner product, not merely norms. That is what unitary means, and it is the formal content of the claim that the two representations are equally valid rather than one being derived from the other. It also hands you a free check on any transform you compute by hand — if the two integrals of the squared modulus disagree, a factor of 2πħ has gone astray.
4The dictionary: a shift, a boost, and a squeeze
Three theorems handle most problems without a single new integral. Translate the packet, ψ(x) → ψ(x − a), and Φ(p) → Φ(p) e(−ipa/ħ): the momentum density is untouched, because moving a packet does not change what it is doing. Multiply by a position-dependent phase, ψ(x) → ψ(x) e(ip₀x/ħ), and Φ(p) → Φ(p − p₀): now the position density is untouched and the whole momentum distribution slides onto p₀. Rescale, ψ(x) → λ(−1/2) ψ(x/λ), and Φ(p) → λ¹⁄² Φ(λp), so widening in x narrows in p by exactly the same factor. Behind all three sits one fact worth memorising: writing ψ = |ψ| e(iθ), the mean momentum is ⟨p⟩ = ħ ∫ |ψ|² (dθ/dx) dx. Momentum lives in the gradient of the phase — precisely the part of ψ that squaring the modulus throws away. A real wavefunction, however elaborate its bumps, always has ⟨p⟩ = 0.
5Work the Gaussian, then put numbers on it
Take ψ(x) = (2πσ²)(−1/4) e(−x²/4σ²), so |ψ|² is a normalised Gaussian of standard deviation σ. In the transform integral, complete the square: −x²/4σ² − ipx/ħ = −(1/4σ²)(x + 2iσ²p/ħ)² − σ²p²/ħ². The bracket integrates to 2σ√π, and the prefactor tidies to give Φ(p) = (2σ²/πħ²)¹⁄⁴ e(−σ²p²/ħ²). Square it: |Φ|² is Gaussian with σₚ = ħ/2σ, so σₓ σₚ = ħ/2 exactly. Numbers make the reciprocity concrete. For an electron with σ = 1.0 nm, σₚ = ħ/2σ = 5.3 × 10⁻²⁶ kg m s⁻¹, and the kinetic energy that spread alone implies is σₚ²/2mₑ = 1.5 × 10⁻²¹ J = 9.5 meV. Squeeze the same electron to σ = 0.10 nm and σₚ grows tenfold while that energy grows a hundredfold, to 0.95 eV. That factor is why atomic energies come out in electron-volts, and why nothing confines an electron for free.
6Sharp momentum is a limit the pair never occupies
Push σ → ∞ in the Gaussian pair and |Φ|² collapses towards δ(p) while ψ flattens into a constant, the plane wave of zero momentum; boost the packet first and the same limit delivers δ(p − p₀) instead. Push σ → 0 and the roles swap. Neither endpoint is a state, because neither is square-integrable: ∫|e(ipx/ħ)|² dx diverges, so the plane wave has no norm and no Born probability. It is a basis element, exactly like the δ(x − x₀) it is dual to. How a basis of non-normalisable functions is handled, by delta normalisation or a large periodic box, is the business of Continuous spectra and the momentum-space wavefunction (UPIV-06.07); here only the limit matters, and no preparation reaches it. Real beams settle the argument anyway. Trim a 100 eV electron beam to Δp/p = 10⁻⁴; since pc = √(2mₑc²E) = √(2 × 511 keV × 100 eV) = 10.1 keV, the spread is Δp c ≈ 1.0 eV, and the coherence length is ħ/Δp = ħc/(Δp c) = 197 eV nm / 1.0 eV ≈ 0.2 μm. Long compared with a lattice spacing, which is why diffraction works — and finite, which is why the transform pair is the honest description.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
The transform pair
Φ(p) = (2πħ)(−1/2) ∫ψ e(−ipx/ħ) dx ⇄ ψ(x) = (2πħ)(−1/2) ∫Φ e(+ipx/ħ) dp
Φ(p) = ⟨uₚ|ψ⟩ — an overlap integral, a change of basis, not a change of variable.
Opposite signs in the exponents; both integrals run over the whole lineBorn's rule in the momentum picture
P(p₁ ≤ p ≤ p₂) = ∫ |Φ(p)|² dp over [p₁, p₂]
Momentum statistics come from Φ alone; the modulus of ψ cannot supply them.
[Φ] = (kg m s⁻¹)(−1/2), so |Φ|² is a probability per unit momentumParseval–Plancherel
∫|ψ(x)|² dx = ∫|Φ(p)|² dp = 1
Normalise once, in whichever picture is easier, and the other is normalised too.
True for any square-integrable ψ, with no extra constant anywhereOperators swap roles between the pictures
p-picture: p̂ → p ×, x̂ → +iħ ∂/∂p x-picture: x̂ → x ×, p̂ → −iħ ∂/∂x
⟨pⁿ⟩ = ∫pⁿ|Φ|² dp is an ordinary weighted average — no derivatives to integrate by parts.
Note the sign flip on the derivative when you change pictureShifts in one picture are phases in the other
ψ(x − a) ⇄ Φ(p) e(−ipa/ħ), ψ(x) e(ip₀x/ħ) ⇄ Φ(p − p₀)
Displacing a packet leaves |Φ|² alone and boosting it leaves |ψ|² alone: each move only rephases the other picture.
a in m, p₀ in kg m s⁻¹; pa/ħ and p₀x/ħ are dimensionless phasesThe Gaussian pair and reciprocal widths
ψ = (2πσ²)(−1/4) e(−x²/4σ²) ⇄ Φ = (2σ²/πħ²)¹⁄⁴ e(−σ²p²/ħ²)
Gaussian in, Gaussian out — and Gaussians are the only states that sit on the ħ/2 floor.
σₓ = σ and σₚ = ħ/2σ for every σ, so the two widths are reciprocal, not independentInteractive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Move the shift slider: only the left curve travels. Move the boost slider: only the right one does. The width slider is the one that touches both — and it drives the two ±σ bars in opposite directions, because there is one state and one ħ/2 to share.
Live results
- σx POSITION SPREAD
- 1.00 nm
- σp MOMENTUM SPREAD
- 0.50 ħ/nm
- σx σp PRODUCT
- 0.50 ħ
- σp IN BEAM UNITS
- 99 eV/c
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Packet width σ in x: 1.0 nm; Centre shift a in x: 0.0 nm; Boost phase p₀: 0.0 ħ/nm
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The commonest error is to think the momentum distribution can be read off the position distribution — that once you have |ψ(x)|², the spread in p follows from it. It does not, and two examples make the gap obvious. Multiply any ψ by e(ip₀x/ħ): the position density is unchanged to the last decimal while the entire momentum density slides onto p₀. Replace ψ by its complex conjugate ψ*: again |ψ|² does not move, yet Φ(p) is replaced by Φ(−p)*, so the momentum density is reflected and ⟨p⟩ changes sign. What separates such states is the phase, and the modulus discards it. The second version of the same mistake is treating Φ as a separate object needing its own normalisation constant. Parseval says it does not: normalise ψ once and Φ is normalised with it.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
An electron is prepared in the Gaussian state ψ(x) = (2πσ²)(−1/4) e(−x²/4σ²) with σ = 2.0 nm. Write down Φ(p), give the standard deviation σₚ of the momentum density, and find the kinetic energy σₚ²/2mₑ that this spread alone implies. Take ħ = 1.055 × 10⁻³⁴ J s and mₑ = 9.11 × 10⁻³¹ kg.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- The transform of this Gaussian is Φ(p) = (2σ²/πħ²)¹⁄⁴ e(−σ²p²/ħ²), so |Φ(p)|² ∝ e(−2σ²p²/ħ²). Match that to e(−p²/2σₚ²) and read the width off the exponent, never off the amplitude: 2σ²/ħ² = 1/2σₚ², so σₚ = ħ/2σ.
- σₚ = ħ/(2σ) = (1.055 × 10⁻³⁴ J s)/(2 × 2.0 × 10⁻⁹ m) = 2.6 × 10⁻²⁶ kg m s⁻¹.
- Check the product: σₓ σₚ = (2.0 × 10⁻⁹ m)(2.64 × 10⁻²⁶ kg m s⁻¹) = 5.3 × 10⁻³⁵ J s, which is ħ/2. The Gaussian sits exactly on the floor, as it must.
- σₚ²/2mₑ = (2.6375 × 10⁻²⁶)² / (2 × 9.11 × 10⁻³¹) = (6.96 × 10⁻⁵²)/(1.822 × 10⁻³⁰) = 3.8 × 10⁻²² J = 2.4 meV.
- Beam units are quicker: with ħc = 197 eV nm, σₚ c = ħc/2σ = 197/(2 × 2.0) = 49 eV, so σₚ ≈ 49 eV/c — the same number, no powers of ten to lose.
Answer. Φ(p) = (2σ²/πħ²)¹⁄⁴ e(−σ²p²/ħ²); σₚ = 2.6 × 10⁻²⁶ kg m s⁻¹ (≈ 49 eV/c); σₚ²/2mₑ = 3.8 × 10⁻²² J = 2.4 meV.
MediumExample 2
An electron is prepared in the displaced Gaussian ψ(x) = g(x − a), where g(x) = (2πσ²)(−1/4) e(−x²/4σ²), σ = 1.0 nm and a = 3.0 nm. Show that x̂ acts on Φ as +iħ d/dp, write down Φ(p), and find ⟨x⟩ and the spread Δx working only in the momentum picture. What would the wrong sign, −iħ d/dp, have returned?
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Where the sign comes from: differentiate the transform under the integral, dΦ/dp = (2πħ)(−1/2) ∫ψ(x)(−ix/ħ) e(−ipx/ħ) dx, so iħ dΦ/dp = (2πħ)(−1/2) ∫xψ(x) e(−ipx/ħ) dx, the transform of xψ. Multiplying by x in the position picture is iħ d/dp in the momentum picture, with a plus sign.
- By the shift theorem, Φ(p) = G(p) e(−ipa/ħ), where G(p) = (2σ²/πħ²)¹⁄⁴ e(−σ²p²/ħ²) is real and even. The phase has modulus 1, so |Φ|² = G²: the momentum density cannot say where the packet sits, and a lives only in the phase of Φ.
- Apply the operator: iħ dΦ/dp = (iħG′ + aG) e(−ipa/ħ), so ⟨x⟩ = ∫Φ*(iħ dΦ/dp) dp = iħ∫GG′ dp + a∫G² dp. The first integral is [G²/2] taken between −∞ and +∞, which is zero; the second is 1 by Parseval. So ⟨x⟩ = a = 3.0 nm.
- For ⟨x²⟩, (iħ d/dp)² = −ħ² d²/dp², and one integration by parts turns ⟨x²⟩ into ħ²∫|dΦ/dp|² dp, with |dΦ/dp|² = G′² + (a/ħ)²G². Since G′ = −(2σ²p/ħ²)G and ∫p²G² dp = σₚ² = ħ²/4σ², the first piece is ħ²∫G′² dp = (4σ⁴/ħ²)(ħ²/4σ²) = σ², and the second is a². So ⟨x²⟩ = σ² + a² = (1.0 nm)² + (3.0 nm)² = 10 nm².
- Δx = √(⟨x²⟩ − ⟨x⟩²) = √(10 − 9.0) nm = 1.0 nm = σ, the width |g(x − a)|² shows directly, so the two pictures agree. With −iħ d/dp the linear term flips and ⟨x⟩ comes out as −3.0 nm, on the wrong side of the origin; ⟨x²⟩ cannot catch the slip, because the sign squares away.
Answer. iħ dΦ/dp is the transform of xψ, so x̂ acts on Φ as +iħ d/dp. Φ(p) = G(p) e(−ipa/ħ), whose density G² ignores the shift; ⟨x⟩ = a = 3.0 nm, ⟨x²⟩ = 10 nm² and Δx = σ = 1.0 nm, all from the momentum picture. The wrong sign returns ⟨x⟩ = −3.0 nm.
HardExample 3
An electron is prepared in ψ(x) = N[g(x − a) + g(x + a)], with g(x) = (2πσ²)(−1/4) e(−x²/4σ²), σ = 1.0 nm and a = 5.0 nm. Find Φ(p) and the momentum density, give the fringe spacing in p and the width of the envelope, and say what a 50:50 incoherent mixture of the same two lumps would give instead.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- Normalise. The overlap is ∫g(x − a) g(x + a) dx = e(−a²/2σ²); with a/σ = 5 that is e(−12.5) = 3.7 × 10⁻⁶, so N = [2(1 + 3.7 × 10⁻⁶)](−1/2) ≈ 1/√2.
- Apply the shift theorem to each lump: g(x ∓ a) ⇄ G(p) e(∓ipa/ħ), with G(p) = (2σ²/πħ²)¹⁄⁴ e(−σ²p²/ħ²). Adding them, Φ(p) = N G(p)[e(−ipa/ħ) + e(+ipa/ħ)] = 2N G(p) cos(pa/ħ) ≈ √2 G(p) cos(pa/ħ).
- So |Φ(p)|² = 2|G(p)|² cos²(pa/ħ): a Gaussian envelope of width σₚ = ħ/2σ = 5.3 × 10⁻²⁶ kg m s⁻¹ (99 eV/c), ruled by interference fringes. Two lumps in x have become fringes in p — the double slit, read in the momentum picture.
- Fringe maxima at cos² = 1, i.e. pa/ħ = nπ, so pₙ = nh/2a and the spacing is Δp = h/2a. With 2a = 10 nm, Δp c = hc/2a = 1240/10 = 124 eV, i.e. Δp = 6.6 × 10⁻²⁶ kg m s⁻¹.
- Count what survives: Δp/σₚ = (h/2a)/(ħ/2σ) = 2πσ/a = 2π/5 = 1.26, so only about three fringes, the central one and its two neighbours, stand clear under the envelope; the next pair is down to 4% of the central height. Separating the lumps further packs in finer fringes; narrowing each lump widens the envelope and reveals more of them.
- The mixture has no cross term, so its momentum density is just |G(p)|² — the same envelope, no fringes at all — while its position density departs from the superposition's only at the level of the overlap, a few parts in 10⁶ of the peak height. The position picture cannot tell the two preparations apart; the momentum picture does it at a glance.
Answer. Φ(p) = √2 G(p) cos(pa/ħ), G(p) = (2σ²/πħ²)¹⁄⁴ e(−σ²p²/ħ²); fringes spaced Δp = h/2a = 6.6 × 10⁻²⁶ kg m s⁻¹ (124 eV/c) under an envelope of width ħ/2σ = 5.3 × 10⁻²⁶ kg m s⁻¹. The mixture gives the same |ψ|² to a few parts in 10⁶ but a smooth |G(p)|², with no fringes.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
The momentum representation of a state is the list of amplitudes Φ(p) got by projecting ψ onto the momentum eigenfunctions — the Fourier transform of ψ(x) with ħ setting the scale — whose squared modulus is the probability density per unit momentum.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.