Skip to main content

Quantum core · institution-dependent · Interactive lesson

Position and momentum representations

Position is not where quantum mechanics lives; it is one basis among several. Learn to resolve the same state on momentum eigenstates, read probabilities straight off the transform, and see why nothing ever has to be normalised twice.

UPIV-05.04 · Lesson 4 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Position and momentum representationsTwo panels, one state. Left: |ψ(x)|², a Gaussian of standard deviation 1.00 nm centred on x = 0.0 nm. Right: |Φ(p)|², its transform's density, of standard deviation 0.50 ħ/nm centred on p = 0.0 ħ/nm. Each curve is drawn to enclose the same area, so narrowing one makes it taller while the other flattens and spreads. The bars beneath the curves are ±σ.|ψ(x)|² position density|Φ(p)|² momentum density±σx = 1.00 nm±σp = 0.50 ħ/nmx / nmp / (ħ/nm)One state, two pictures: Φ(p) is the Fourier transform of ψ(x)shift a = 0.0 nm slides ψ only · boost p₀ = 0.0 ħ/nm slides Φ onlyboth areas = 1; σx σp = 0.50 ħ, always
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.

Quantum core · institution-dependent. Departments differ in how much quantum mechanics they include in Physics IV or teach in a dedicated course. Follow your university’s required mathematical depth and assessment; these numbered units are not automatically optional.

1

Build the model

One state, two component lists — and the transform that swaps them.

The key idea

The momentum representation of a state is the list of amplitudes Φ(p) got by projecting ψ onto the momentum eigenfunctions — the Fourier transform of ψ(x) with ħ setting the scale — whose squared modulus is the probability density per unit momentum.

Example. For an electron with ψ(x) = (2πσ²)(−1/4) e(−x²/4σ²) and σ = 1.0 nm, Φ(p) = (2σ²/πħ²)¹⁄⁴ e(−σ²p²/ħ²): a Gaussian of width σₚ = ħ/2σ = 5.3 × 10⁻²⁶ kg m s⁻¹, or about 99 eV/c.

The complete physical model and assumptions

A quantum state is a vector, and ψ(x) is only its component list on one particular basis — the eigenstates of position. The momentum operator has its own complete set, the plane waves uₚ(x) = e(ipx/ħ)/√(2πħ), and resolving the same vector on those gives a second component list Φ(p) = ⟨uₚ|ψ⟩, which works out to be the Fourier transform of ψ with ħ carrying the units. Nothing is lost in the change: the inverse integral rebuilds ψ from Φ, Parseval's theorem shows the two lists share a norm, and Born's rule applies to each in its own variable — |ψ|² per unit length, |Φ|² per unit momentum. What the change buys is that momentum questions become ordinary averages, ⟨p²⟩ = ∫p²|Φ|² dp instead of a derivative sandwiched inside an integral, and that the reciprocity of the two widths becomes a theorem about transforms rather than an extra postulate. What it costs is the pretence that sharp momentum is available: the momentum eigenfunctions are not square-integrable, so they are basis elements and not states. Every real preparation is a packet whose Φ has finite width, and the two pictures constrain each other precisely because they are two readings of one object, not two independent things a particle separately has.

1ψ and Φ are two component lists for one vector

In a finite-dimensional space you expand a vector on a basis and keep the list of coefficients; change the basis and the list changes while the vector does not. Quantum states work the same way. Project |ψ⟩ on the position eigenstates and you recover ψ(x) = ⟨x|ψ⟩, the function you have been drawing all along. Project the same ket on the eigenstates of p̂ = −iħ d/dx, which are uₚ(x) = e(ipx/ħ)/√(2πħ) with p̂ uₚ = p uₚ, and you get Φ(p) = ⟨uₚ|ψ⟩ = ∫ uₚ*(x) ψ(x) dx = (2πħ)(−1/2) ∫ ψ(x) e(−ipx/ħ) dx. The integral happens to be a Fourier transform, but it did not arrive as a technique borrowed from signal processing: it is an overlap, computed the way every overlap is. Because the inverse integral rebuilds ψ from Φ, neither list outranks the other. Which one you write down is a question about the problem in front of you, not about the electron: a well with walls is easiest in x, a beam through a monochromator is easiest in p.

2Where 2πħ comes from, and what it does to the units

Fourier inversion fixes only the product of the two prefactors: substitute one transform into the other and ψ comes back only if the forward and inverse constants multiply to 1/2πħ. The symmetric convention splits that factor evenly, (2πħ)(−1/2) on each side, so the two transforms differ only in the sign of the exponent, and it is the one split that makes the transform unitary, as the next section shows. The same factor is what δ-normalises the plane waves themselves, ⟨uₚ′|uₚ⟩ = δ(p − p′); that continuous-spectrum bookkeeping is worked in Continuous spectra and the momentum-space wavefunction (UPIV-06.07), and nothing here needs more of it. Now count units. In one dimension [ψ] = m(−1/2), so ∫ψ dx carries m¹⁄²; and [ħ] = J s = (kg m s⁻¹)⋅m, so dividing by √(2πħ) leaves [Φ] = (kg m s⁻¹)(−1/2). |Φ(p)|² is therefore a probability per unit momentum while |ψ(x)|² is one per unit length: the two numbers are never comparable, and a peak height in one picture tells you nothing about a peak height in the other. Asymmetric conventions exist, with all of the 2πħ on one side; they are legal, but silently mixing two of them breaks Parseval, so declare yours once and keep it.

3Parseval: normalise once, and both pictures are normalised

Substitute the transform into ∫|Φ(p)|² dp and it becomes (2πħ)(−1) ∫dp ∫dx ∫dx′ ψ*(x′) ψ(x) e(ip(x′ − x)/ħ). Do the p integral first: it returns 2πħ δ(x − x′), which cancels the prefactor and collapses the double integral to ∫|ψ(x)|² dx. So a state normalised in position is already normalised in momentum, and there is no second constant to hunt for. Run the same argument on two different states and you get ∫φ*(x) ψ(x) dx = ∫Φφ*(p) Φψ(p) dp: the transform preserves every inner product, not merely norms. That is what unitary means, and it is the formal content of the claim that the two representations are equally valid rather than one being derived from the other. It also hands you a free check on any transform you compute by hand — if the two integrals of the squared modulus disagree, a factor of 2πħ has gone astray.

4The dictionary: a shift, a boost, and a squeeze

Three theorems handle most problems without a single new integral. Translate the packet, ψ(x) → ψ(x − a), and Φ(p) → Φ(p) e(−ipa/ħ): the momentum density is untouched, because moving a packet does not change what it is doing. Multiply by a position-dependent phase, ψ(x) → ψ(x) e(ip₀x/ħ), and Φ(p) → Φ(p − p₀): now the position density is untouched and the whole momentum distribution slides onto p₀. Rescale, ψ(x) → λ(−1/2) ψ(x/λ), and Φ(p) → λ¹⁄² Φ(λp), so widening in x narrows in p by exactly the same factor. Behind all three sits one fact worth memorising: writing ψ = |ψ| e(iθ), the mean momentum is ⟨p⟩ = ħ ∫ |ψ|² (dθ/dx) dx. Momentum lives in the gradient of the phase — precisely the part of ψ that squaring the modulus throws away. A real wavefunction, however elaborate its bumps, always has ⟨p⟩ = 0.

5Work the Gaussian, then put numbers on it

Take ψ(x) = (2πσ²)(−1/4) e(−x²/4σ²), so |ψ|² is a normalised Gaussian of standard deviation σ. In the transform integral, complete the square: −x²/4σ² − ipx/ħ = −(1/4σ²)(x + 2iσ²p/ħ)² − σ²p²/ħ². The bracket integrates to 2σ√π, and the prefactor tidies to give Φ(p) = (2σ²/πħ²)¹⁄⁴ e(−σ²p²/ħ²). Square it: |Φ|² is Gaussian with σₚ = ħ/2σ, so σₓ σₚ = ħ/2 exactly. Numbers make the reciprocity concrete. For an electron with σ = 1.0 nm, σₚ = ħ/2σ = 5.3 × 10⁻²⁶ kg m s⁻¹, and the kinetic energy that spread alone implies is σₚ²/2mₑ = 1.5 × 10⁻²¹ J = 9.5 meV. Squeeze the same electron to σ = 0.10 nm and σₚ grows tenfold while that energy grows a hundredfold, to 0.95 eV. That factor is why atomic energies come out in electron-volts, and why nothing confines an electron for free.

6Sharp momentum is a limit the pair never occupies

Push σ → ∞ in the Gaussian pair and |Φ|² collapses towards δ(p) while ψ flattens into a constant, the plane wave of zero momentum; boost the packet first and the same limit delivers δ(p − p₀) instead. Push σ → 0 and the roles swap. Neither endpoint is a state, because neither is square-integrable: ∫|e(ipx/ħ)|² dx diverges, so the plane wave has no norm and no Born probability. It is a basis element, exactly like the δ(x − x₀) it is dual to. How a basis of non-normalisable functions is handled, by delta normalisation or a large periodic box, is the business of Continuous spectra and the momentum-space wavefunction (UPIV-06.07); here only the limit matters, and no preparation reaches it. Real beams settle the argument anyway. Trim a 100 eV electron beam to Δp/p = 10⁻⁴; since pc = √(2mₑc²E) = √(2 × 511 keV × 100 eV) = 10.1 keV, the spread is Δp c ≈ 1.0 eV, and the coherence length is ħ/Δp = ħc/(Δp c) = 197 eV nm / 1.0 eV ≈ 0.2 μm. Long compared with a lattice spacing, which is why diffraction works — and finite, which is why the transform pair is the honest description.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

The transform pair

Φ(p) = (2πħ)(−1/2) ∫ψ e(−ipx/ħ) dx ⇄ ψ(x) = (2πħ)(−1/2) ∫Φ e(+ipx/ħ) dp

Φ(p) = ⟨uₚ|ψ⟩ — an overlap integral, a change of basis, not a change of variable.

Opposite signs in the exponents; both integrals run over the whole line

Born's rule in the momentum picture

P(p₁ ≤ p ≤ p₂) = ∫ |Φ(p)|² dp over [p₁, p₂]

Momentum statistics come from Φ alone; the modulus of ψ cannot supply them.

[Φ] = (kg m s⁻¹)(−1/2), so |Φ|² is a probability per unit momentum

Parseval–Plancherel

∫|ψ(x)|² dx = ∫|Φ(p)|² dp = 1

Normalise once, in whichever picture is easier, and the other is normalised too.

True for any square-integrable ψ, with no extra constant anywhere

Operators swap roles between the pictures

p-picture: p̂ → p ×, x̂ → +iħ ∂/∂p x-picture: x̂ → x ×, p̂ → −iħ ∂/∂x

⟨pⁿ⟩ = ∫pⁿ|Φ|² dp is an ordinary weighted average — no derivatives to integrate by parts.

Note the sign flip on the derivative when you change picture

Shifts in one picture are phases in the other

ψ(x − a) ⇄ Φ(p) e(−ipa/ħ), ψ(x) e(ip₀x/ħ) ⇄ Φ(p − p₀)

Displacing a packet leaves |Φ|² alone and boosting it leaves |ψ|² alone: each move only rephases the other picture.

a in m, p₀ in kg m s⁻¹; pa/ħ and p₀x/ħ are dimensionless phases

The Gaussian pair and reciprocal widths

ψ = (2πσ²)(−1/4) e(−x²/4σ²) ⇄ Φ = (2σ²/πħ²)¹⁄⁴ e(−σ²p²/ħ²)

Gaussian in, Gaussian out — and Gaussians are the only states that sit on the ħ/2 floor.

σₓ = σ and σₚ = ħ/2σ for every σ, so the two widths are reciprocal, not independent
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

1.0 nm
0.4 to 1.6 nm; steps of 0.1.
0.0 nm
−1 to 1 nm; steps of 0.1.
0.0 ħ/nm
−0.8 to 0.8 ħ/nm; steps of 0.1.

Try this. Move the shift slider: only the left curve travels. Move the boost slider: only the right one does. The width slider is the one that touches both — and it drives the two ±σ bars in opposite directions, because there is one state and one ħ/2 to share.

Live results

σx POSITION SPREAD
1.00 nm
σp MOMENTUM SPREAD
0.50 ħ/nm
σx σp PRODUCT
0.50 ħ
σp IN BEAM UNITS
99 eV/c

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Physics IV modelTwo panels, one state. Left: |ψ(x)|², a Gaussian of standard deviation 1.00 nm centred on x = 0.0 nm. Right: |Φ(p)|², its transform's density, of standard deviation 0.50 ħ/nm centred on p = 0.0 ħ/nm. Each curve is drawn to enclose the same area, so narrowing one makes it taller while the other flattens and spreads. The bars beneath the curves are ±σ.|ψ(x)|² position density|Φ(p)|² momentum density±σx = 1.00 nm±σp = 0.50 ħ/nmx / nmp / (ħ/nm)One state, two pictures: Φ(p) is the Fourier transform of ψ(x)shift a = 0.0 nm slides ψ only · boost p₀ = 0.0 ħ/nm slides Φ onlyboth areas = 1; σx σp = 0.50 ħ, always
Two panels, one state. Left: |ψ(x)|², a Gaussian of standard deviation 1.00 nm centred on x = 0.0 nm. Right: |Φ(p)|², its transform's density, of standard deviation 0.50 ħ/nm centred on p = 0.0 ħ/nm. Each curve is drawn to enclose the same area, so narrowing one makes it taller while the other flattens and spreads. The bars beneath the curves are ±σ.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Packet width σ in x: 1.0 nm; Centre shift a in x: 0.0 nm; Boost phase p₀: 0.0 ħ/nm

Baseline 1.0; choose 0.4 to 1.6, in steps of 0.1.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The commonest error is to think the momentum distribution can be read off the position distribution — that once you have |ψ(x)|², the spread in p follows from it. It does not, and two examples make the gap obvious. Multiply any ψ by e(ip₀x/ħ): the position density is unchanged to the last decimal while the entire momentum density slides onto p₀. Replace ψ by its complex conjugate ψ*: again |ψ|² does not move, yet Φ(p) is replaced by Φ(−p)*, so the momentum density is reflected and ⟨p⟩ changes sign. What separates such states is the phase, and the modulus discards it. The second version of the same mistake is treating Φ as a separate object needing its own normalisation constant. Parseval says it does not: normalise ψ once and Φ is normalised with it.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

An electron is prepared in the Gaussian state ψ(x) = (2πσ²)(−1/4) e(−x²/4σ²) with σ = 2.0 nm. Write down Φ(p), give the standard deviation σₚ of the momentum density, and find the kinetic energy σₚ²/2mₑ that this spread alone implies. Take ħ = 1.055 × 10⁻³⁴ J s and mₑ = 9.11 × 10⁻³¹ kg.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

An electron is prepared in the displaced Gaussian ψ(x) = g(x − a), where g(x) = (2πσ²)(−1/4) e(−x²/4σ²), σ = 1.0 nm and a = 3.0 nm. Show that x̂ acts on Φ as +iħ d/dp, write down Φ(p), and find ⟨x⟩ and the spread Δx working only in the momentum picture. What would the wrong sign, −iħ d/dp, have returned?

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

An electron is prepared in ψ(x) = N[g(x − a) + g(x + a)], with g(x) = (2πσ²)(−1/4) e(−x²/4σ²), σ = 1.0 nm and a = 5.0 nm. Find Φ(p) and the momentum density, give the fringe spacing in p and the width of the envelope, and say what a 50:50 incoherent mixture of the same two lumps would give instead.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

An electron is prepared twice: first in ψ₁(x) = (2πσ²)(−1/4) e(−x²/4σ²), then in ψ₂(x) = ψ₁(x) e(ip₀x/ħ) with p₀ > 0. Which statement about the two preparations is correct?
7

Review & continue

The momentum representation of a state is the list of amplitudes Φ(p) got by projecting ψ onto the momentum eigenfunctions — the Fourier transform of ψ(x) with ħ setting the scale — whose squared modulus is the probability density per unit momentum.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.