
Physics IV course sequence · Interactive lesson
Pauli principle and Slater determinants
Exclusion is usually handed to you as a rule to obey. Here you build the state that obeys it — one determinant whose rows are electrons and whose columns are spin-orbitals — expand it, read the Pauli principle straight off a determinant identity, and find out exactly what that single determinant still gets wrong.
UPIV-11.02 · Lesson 2 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Build the model
Exclusion is not a postulate. It is a determinant with two equal columns.
The key idea
A Slater determinant is the normalised, fully antisymmetric N-electron state built from N one-electron spin-orbitals: rows label the electrons, columns label the spin-orbitals, and the determinant supplies every sign that indistinguishability demands.
Example. For helium's 1s² ground state, Ψ = (1/√2)[1s(r₁)α(1)⋅1s(r₂)β(2) − 1s(r₁)β(1)⋅1s(r₂)α(2)] = 1s(r₁)1s(r₂)⋅(αβ − βα)/√2. Assign a third electron to 1s α and that column repeats, so the 3 × 3 determinant is zero everywhere.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Electrons are not merely alike: no measurement tells them apart, so their labels carry no physics. |Ψ|² must therefore survive the swap of any two labels, and because the swap operator squares to the identity its eigenvalues can only be +1 or −1. That sign is imported, not derived here: the spin-statistics theorem ties half-integer spin to the minus. Antisymmetrising a product of N one-electron spin-orbitals by hand then generates N! terms signed by the parity of each permutation — precisely the Leibniz expansion of a determinant. Put electron i in row i and spin-orbital j in column j, divide by √(N!), and the bookkeeping is done. Two facts now collapse into one. Swapping two electrons swaps two rows and flips the sign, which is antisymmetry; giving two electrons the same spin-orbital repeats a column, and a determinant with two equal columns is identically zero, which is exclusion — a corollary, and an exact one, since the amplitude vanishes everywhere rather than merely shrinking. The cost sits in that same object: one determinant is the best independent-particle state there is, so its minus sign keeps same-spin electrons apart, the Fermi hole, while leaving opposite-spin electrons statistically independent with no Coulomb hole at all. The energy lost is the correlation energy — 1.14 eV in helium, 1.4% of the atom's 79.01 eV binding, but a quarter of an H₂ bond.
1From one swap to every permutation
The previous topic settled the case of two electrons. The exchange operator P₁₂ swaps their full coordinates x = (r, σ), position and spin projection together; it squares to the identity, so its only eigenvalues are +1 and −1, and the spin-statistics theorem, imported from relativistic quantum field theory, gives half-integer spin the minus sign. An atom with N electrons owes that minus sign to every pair at once: PᵢⱼΨ = −Ψ for each of the N(N − 1)/2 choices of i and j. Any rearrangement P of the N labels can be assembled from such pairwise swaps. The assembly is not unique, but whether it takes an even or an odd number p of swaps is fixed by P alone, so the separate pair conditions merge into one rule: PΨ = (−1)ᵖΨ, unchanged by even permutations and reversed by odd ones. That is a demanding requirement, one function of N arguments locked to a definite sign across all N! orderings of those arguments. Every Pᵢⱼ commutes with the Hamiltonian of identical particles, so a state built to obey the rule keeps obeying it for all time, and the construction has to be done only once.
2Antisymmetrise by hand, then recognise the determinant
Start from the naive independent-particle guess χₐ(x₁)χb(x₂), which claims electron 1 is in χₐ. Swapping the labels changes it, so it is illegal. Repair it by subtracting the swapped copy and renormalising: Ψ = [χₐ(x₁)χb(x₂) − χb(x₁)χₐ(x₂)]/√2, which flips sign on exchange and is normalised whenever the spin-orbitals are orthonormal. Three electrons need all 3! = 6 orderings, each carrying the parity of the permutation that produced it — plus for even, minus for odd. That signed sum over permutations is exactly the Leibniz formula for a determinant, so write it as one: build the N × N matrix whose entry in row i, column j is χⱼ(xᵢ), take the determinant, divide by √(N!). Rows are electrons, columns are spin-orbitals. The compression is free and dramatic — neon's ground state is 10! = 3 628 800 signed products, and the determinant holds them all in one symbol whose algebra then does the physics for you.
3Exclusion is a property of determinants
Two determinant identities now carry the whole content of the Pauli principle. Interchange two rows and a determinant changes sign: swap two electrons and Ψ flips sign, which is antisymmetry, for free. Give a determinant two identical columns and it is zero: assign two electrons the same spin-orbital and Ψ vanishes at every set of coordinates. Not small, not suppressed — identically zero, so the occupation number of each spin-orbital is 0 or 1, and exclusion is a corollary rather than a postulate. Read the statement carefully: what may not repeat is the whole spin-orbital, space part and spin part together. The 1s orbital holds two electrons because 1s α and 1s β are different columns, and a subshell of orbital quantum number l holds 2(2l + 1) electrons, six for a p subshell. One feature is easy to miss: the determinant assigns nothing to electron 1. Mixing the occupied spin-orbitals among themselves by any unitary transformation leaves Ψ unchanged up to a phase, so which electron occupies which orbital is not a question the state answers.
4The minus sign digs a Fermi hole
Set both arguments equal in Ψ(x₁, x₂) = −Ψ(x₂, x₁): you get Ψ(x, x) = −Ψ(x, x), so Ψ(x, x) = 0. Two electrons in the same spin state have zero amplitude to sit at the same point — a hole dug by a sign, with no term in the Hamiltonian doing the digging. Split the two-electron state into space and spin to see the consequence. The antisymmetric spin function is the singlet, one state with S = 0, and it must multiply a symmetric spatial function; the three symmetric spin functions form the triplet, S = 1, and they must multiply an antisymmetric spatial function that vanishes at r₁ = r₂. Parallel spins therefore keep further apart, their expectation of e²/4πε₀r₁₂ is smaller, and the triplet lies lower. Helium's 1s2s configuration shows it directly: 2³S sits 19.82 eV above the ground state while 2¹S sits 20.62 eV above it, a splitting of 0.80 eV = 2K, so the exchange integral for that pair is about 0.40 eV.
5Reading the energy off a single determinant
Take the expectation of the many-electron Hamiltonian in one determinant and the Slater–Condon rules return E = Σᵢ hᵢᵢ + ½ Σᵢⱼ (Jᵢⱼ − Kᵢⱼ), the sums running over occupied spin-orbitals. The one-electron term hᵢᵢ holds kinetic energy and nuclear attraction. Jᵢⱼ is the ordinary Coulomb repulsion between two charge clouds, exactly what a classical picture would give. Kᵢⱼ has no classical analogue at all: it exists only because of the determinant's minus sign, it enters with a minus, and it vanishes unless χᵢ and χⱼ share a spin projection. Two checks follow. The i = j terms give Jᵢᵢ − Kᵢᵢ = 0 exactly, so no electron repels itself — a result the older Hartree method reaches only by deleting the self term by hand. And the counting is concrete: neon's ten electrons make 45 pairs, of which the 20 same-spin pairs carry an exchange integral and the 25 opposite-spin pairs do not. Minimising E over the orbitals themselves gives the Hartree–Fock equations.
6What one determinant cannot know: correlation
A single determinant is an independent-particle state: each electron feels the average field of the rest, never their instantaneous positions. Same-spin electrons still avoid each other, because antisymmetry forces it, but opposite-spin electrons are left statistically independent, their pair density factorising with no Coulomb hole at all — in helium's ground state the two electrons are permitted to sit on top of one another. The missing energy has a name and a size. A hydrogenic trial with optimised effective charge Z′ = 27/16 gives −77.49 eV; relaxing the orbital shape while keeping one determinant reaches the Hartree–Fock limit, −77.87 eV; the exact non-relativistic value is −79.01 eV. The difference, Ecorr = −1.14 eV, is only 1.4% of the total binding, yet it is a quarter of the 4.48 eV bond in H₂, so it decides chemistry. No single determinant can recover it; the cure is a sum of determinants, configuration interaction and its descendants.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Antisymmetry under every permutation
PΨ(x₁, …, xN) = (−1)ᵖ Ψ(x₁, …, xN)
Even permutations keep Ψ and odd ones flip it; the two-electron rule P₁₂Ψ = −Ψ is the case p = 1.
P permutes the N electron labels, each x = (r, σ) carrying space and spin together; p counts the pairwise swaps that build P, a number whose parity alone is fixed. Dimensionless.The Slater determinant
Ψ(x₁, …, xN) = (1/√(N!)) det[χⱼ(xᵢ)]
One symbol carries every permutation with its correct sign, for any N.
Row i is electron i, column j the orthonormal spin-orbital χⱼ. The 1/√(N!) normalises Ψ; N! signed terms.Two electrons, written out
Ψ = (1/√2)[χₐ(x₁)χb(x₂) − χb(x₁)χₐ(x₂)]
Exclusion appears as a determinant with two equal columns, never as an added rule.
Set χₐ = χb and the two terms cancel: Ψ ≡ 0 at all coordinates, not merely a small amplitude.The Fermi hole
Ψ(x, x) = 0 for every antisymmetric Ψ
Same-spin electrons avoid each other with no force acting — the origin of the exchange energy.
Immediate from Ψ(x₁, x₂) = −Ψ(x₂, x₁) at x₁ = x₂. Opposite spins are different x, so this identity digs them no hole.Energy of a single determinant
E = Σᵢ hᵢᵢ + ½ Σᵢⱼ (Jᵢⱼ − Kᵢⱼ)
The i = j terms cancel exactly, Jᵢᵢ = Kᵢᵢ, so no electron repels itself.
Sums over occupied spin-orbitals; h, J, K in eV. Kᵢⱼ = 0 unless χᵢ and χⱼ share a spin projection.Correlation energy
Ecorr = Eexact − EHF
Prices what a single determinant leaves behind; only more determinants recover it.
Helium: Eexact = −79.01 eV and EHF = −77.87 eV, so Ecorr = −1.14 eV. Negative by construction.Interactive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Leave s at −1 and drag x₁: the solid curve is pinned to exactly zero wherever electron 1 sits, for every orbital n. Now set s to 0 and the hole fills in to the faint line — that gap is the whole of what the determinant's minus sign removes.
Live results
- PLAIN PRODUCT AT x₂ = x₁
- 0.592 × 4/L²
- THIS STATE AT x₂ = x₁
- 0.000 × 4/L²
- HOLE DEPTH AT x₂ = x₁
- 0.592 × 4/L²
- DENSITY AT MIDPOINT
- 0.452 × 4/L²
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Electron 1 held at x₁/L: 0.30; Second orbital index n: 2; Exchange sign s: −1
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
Two errors travel together here. The first calls exclusion a force — a “Pauli repulsion” pushing electrons apart. Nothing has been added to the Hamiltonian; antisymmetry restricts which states exist, and the stiffness of matter is the kinetic-energy cost of promoting electrons into higher orbitals, not a new interaction. The second treats the determinant as a device you need only when two electrons might land in the same orbital, so a configuration like 1s2s looks safe without it. But the same minus sign that kills a repeated column also produces the exchange integral K, the Fermi hole, and the 0.80 eV by which helium's 2³S lies below its 2¹S — a splitting in a configuration where no two spin-orbitals are equal at all. Antisymmetry is compulsory everywhere; exclusion is only its most visible special case.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
Build the two-electron Slater determinant for helium's ground configuration from the spin-orbitals χₐ = 1s α and χb = 1s β. Expand it, factorise it into a space part and a spin part, and state the total spin. Then say what the determinant gives if a third electron is assigned 1s α.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Rows are electrons and columns are spin-orbitals, so Ψ = (1/√2!) × det of the 2 × 2 array with χₐ(x₁), χb(x₁) on the first row and χₐ(x₂), χb(x₂) on the second: Ψ = (1/√2)[χₐ(x₁)χb(x₂) − χb(x₁)χₐ(x₂)]. Two signed terms, because 2! = 2.
- Substitute the spin-orbitals: Ψ = (1/√2)[1s(r₁)α(1)⋅1s(r₂)β(2) − 1s(r₁)β(1)⋅1s(r₂)α(2)].
- The spatial factor 1s(r₁)1s(r₂) is common to both terms, so Ψ = 1s(r₁)1s(r₂) × (1/√2)[α(1)β(2) − β(1)α(2)] — a symmetric space part times an antisymmetric spin part, whose product is antisymmetric as required.
- That spin function is the singlet, S = 0 with MS = 0: one state, so the closed 1s² shell gives the single term ¹S₀.
- A third electron in 1s α makes the third column a copy of the first, so the 3 × 3 determinant is identically zero and the K shell closes at two. (For scale, a six-electron determinant carries 6! = 720 signed terms.)
Answer. Ψ = 1s(r₁)1s(r₂)⋅[α(1)β(2) − β(1)α(2)]/√2 — symmetric in space, singlet in spin, S = 0, term ¹S₀. A third 1s α electron gives a determinant that is zero everywhere.
MediumExample 2
Neon's ground configuration 1s²2s²2p⁶ is a single Slater determinant. Find (a) how many signed terms its Leibniz expansion carries, (b) how many electron pairs appear in the two-electron part of the energy, (c) how many of those pairs contribute a non-zero exchange integral Kᵢⱼ, and (d) how many contribute a Coulomb integral only.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- N = 10 electrons fill 10 spin-orbitals, so the determinant expands into N! = 10! = 3 628 800 signed products — all held in one symbol.
- The two-electron part of E = Σᵢ hᵢᵢ + ½ Σᵢⱼ (Jᵢⱼ − Kᵢⱼ) runs over unordered pairs, so there are C(10, 2) = (10 × 9)/2 = 45 of them.
- Neon is closed-shell: each of the five spatial orbitals 1s, 2s, 2p₋₁, 2p₀, 2p₊₁ is doubly occupied, giving 5 spin-up and 5 spin-down spin-orbitals.
- Kᵢⱼ vanishes unless the two spin-orbitals share a spin projection, so the exchange-carrying pairs number C(5, 2) + C(5, 2) = 10 + 10 = 20.
- The remaining 45 − 20 = 25 pairs are opposite-spin: they keep Jᵢⱼ but contribute no exchange, so nothing in this state keeps those electrons apart.
Answer. (a) 10! = 3 628 800 terms; (b) 45 pairs; (c) 20 pairs carry a non-zero K; (d) 25 opposite-spin pairs carry J alone — and those 25 are where most of the correlation energy hides.
HardExample 3
A variational trial for helium puts two 1s orbitals of effective charge Z′ into one Slater determinant, giving E(Z′) = (Z′² − 3.375 Z′) hartree, with 1 hartree = 27.211 eV. (a) Minimise E and interpret Z′. (b) Convert to eV and compare with the Hartree–Fock limit, −77.87 eV. (c) Helium ionises at 24.59 eV and He⁺ at 54.42 eV: find the exact total, then the correlation energy — absolutely, as a fraction of the total, and against the 4.48 eV bond of H₂.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- Minimise: dE/dZ′ = 2Z′ − 3.375 = 0, so Z′ = 1.6875 = 27/16. It sits below Z = 2 because each electron screens 0.3125 of the nuclear charge from the other.
- E = (1.6875)² − 3.375 × 1.6875 = 2.8477 − 5.6953 = −2.8477 hartree = −2.8477 × 27.211 = −77.49 eV.
- That is 0.38 eV above the Hartree–Fock limit of −77.87 eV, because the trial froze the orbital shape as hydrogenic; letting the shape relax, still within one determinant, recovers the rest.
- Exact total: stripping both electrons costs 24.59 + 54.42 = 79.01 eV, so Eexact = −79.01 eV.
- Correlation energy: Ecorr = −79.01 − (−77.87) = −1.14 eV, which is 1.14/79.01 = 1.44% of the total binding.
- But 1.14/4.48 = 0.25, so what one determinant misses is a quarter of an H₂ bond. A 1.4% error in the total is a 25% error in anything chemical, which is why the fix is more determinants, not a better orbital.
Answer. Z′ = 1.6875 and E = −77.49 eV; the Hartree–Fock limit is −77.87 eV and the exact value −79.01 eV, so Ecorr = −1.14 eV: 1.44% of the total binding, but 25% of an H₂ bond.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
A Slater determinant is the normalised, fully antisymmetric N-electron state built from N one-electron spin-orbitals: rows label the electrons, columns label the spin-orbitals, and the determinant supplies every sign that indistinguishability demands.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.