
Physics IV course sequence · Interactive lesson
Spin-orbit coupling and the Zeeman effect
Put hydrogen's Bohr levels through first-order perturbation theory and three corrections of order α² appear: spin-orbit coupling, the relativistic kinetic term and the Darwin term. Each depends on l; their sum does not. Then switch on a magnet and read the spectrum: count the Zeeman components, place them, and decide from one ratio whether you will see the anomalous pattern or the Paschen-Back triplet.
UPIV-11.07 · Lesson 7 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Build the model
Three corrections disagree about l, agree about j, and then a magnet splits every line again.
The key idea
Fine structure is the splitting of a gross atomic level by the three corrections of order α² beyond the Coulomb problem, spin-orbit coupling, the relativistic kinetic correction and the Darwin term, whose sum in hydrogen depends only on n and the total angular momentum j.
Example. Hydrogen's n = 3 shell holds five (l, j) combinations but only three fine-structure energies: 3s₁⁄₂ and 3p₁⁄₂ both sit 20.1 µeV below the Bohr value, 3p₃⁄₂ and 3d₃⁄₂ both 6.7 µeV below it, and 3d₅⁄₂ 2.2 µeV below it.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Fine structure is what first-order perturbation theory finds when the Coulomb Hamiltonian is corrected at the next order in v/c, and three terms arrive at that order together. Spin-orbit coupling, whose Thomas factor of one half is derived in Spin-orbit coupling, fine structure, and the Landé g factor (UPIV-09.09), shifts each l > 0 level up or down according to whether j = l + ½ or l − ½. The relativistic kinetic correction −p⁴/8m³c² lowers every level, s states most, because even at v ≈ αc the kinetic energy is not exactly p²/2m. The Darwin term is a contact interaction that touches only l = 0, the one place spin-orbit is silent. Each of the three depends on l; their sum depends on n and j alone, so 2s₁⁄₂ and 2p₁⁄₂ come out degenerate until the QED Lamb shift separates them by 1058 MHz. In hydrogen all of it is of order α², about one part in 19 000 of the gross structure, but the doublet gap grows as Z⁴/n³: from hydrogen's 45 µeV 2p splitting to sodium's 2.13 meV D-line doublet and caesium's 554 cm⁻¹. A magnet then splits every line again. While μB B stays below the fine-structure gap each level moves by gJ μB B mJ, and a line breaks into the anomalous pattern, four components for sodium D₁ and six for D₂; push μB B past the gap and L and S decouple, the spin-flip components fade, and what remains is a normal Lorentz triplet whose outer members are doubled by the leftover spin-orbit energy.
1Three corrections at one order
The Coulomb Hamiltonian p²/2m − Ze²/4πε₀r is the first term of an expansion in v/c, and since v/c ≈ Zα/n for a bound electron the next terms are smaller by (Zα)². Three arrive together. Spin-orbit coupling is the spin moment in the magnetic field of the electron's own orbit, Thomas factor included; that operator is built in Spin-orbit coupling, fine structure, and the Landé g factor (UPIV-09.09), and this lesson takes one line from it: in a state of definite j, ⟨L⋅S⟩ = (ħ²/2)[j(j+1) − l(l+1) − s(s+1)]. The relativistic kinetic correction comes from expanding √(p²c² + m²c⁴). The Darwin term comes from the Dirac equation and acts only at the nucleus. All three perturb a degenerate n-shell, and degenerate perturbation theory is safe only in a basis that already diagonalises the perturbation. The coupled states |n l j mJ⟩ do that for all three at once: p⁴ and the Darwin term are spherically symmetric and ignore spin, so they commute with L², S², J² and Jz, and L⋅S is diagonal once j is fixed. First-order theory is then three expectation values, added.
2Spin-orbit: the size lives in ⟨1/r³⟩
For a Coulomb potential (1/r)(dV/dr) = Ze²/4πε₀r³, so the first-order spin-orbit shift is (Ze²/8πε₀m²c²)⟨1/r³⟩⟨L⋅S⟩, and the hydrogenic integral ⟨1/r³⟩ = Z³/[a₀³n³ l(l+½)(l+1)] carries the dependence on the state. One Z from the potential and three from the shrinking orbit give Z⁴/n³, and the result is ESO = Z⁴α²Eₕ[j(j+1) − l(l+1) − ¾]/[4n³ l(l+½)(l+1)]. Writing the interaction as (ζ/ħ²)L⋅S, with ζ an energy, the doublet j = l ± ½ is split by (l + ½)ζ, which for a hydrogenic level is Z⁴α²Eₕ/[2n³ l(l+1)]: 45.3 µeV for hydrogen 2p, or 10.9 GHz. Sodium's 3p doublet, 2.13 meV, is 47 times larger, yet the formula with the bare Z = 11 overshoots it by a factor of 92; inverting it gives Zeff ≈ 3.6, because the 3p orbital penetrates the ten-electron core. The same fourth power is why caesium's 6p doublet reaches 554 cm⁻¹. At l = 0 the term gives nothing at all, since L⋅S = 0, and every s level is left to the other two corrections.
3The relativistic and Darwin terms
Expand the kinetic energy: √(p²c² + m²c⁴) − mc² = p²/2m − p⁴/8m³c² + …. The second term is the perturbation, and its expectation value needs no new integral. Since p²/2m = Eₙ − V, ⟨p⁴⟩ = 4m²[Eₙ² − 2Eₙ⟨V⟩ + ⟨V²⟩], and with ⟨1/r⟩ = Z/(n²a₀) and ⟨1/r²⟩ = Z²/[n³(l + ½)a₀²] the result is Eᵣₑₗ = −(Eₙ²/2mc²)[4n/(l + ½) − 3]. It is negative for every state and largest for s states, whose electrons spend the most time close to the nucleus, where they move fastest. The Darwin term is HD = (ħ²/8m²c²)∇²V. For the Coulomb potential ∇²(1/r) = −4πδ³(r), so HD = (πħ²/2m²c²)(Ze²/4πε₀)δ³(r), a contact interaction that samples only |ψ(0)|². Only s states have ψ(0) ≠ 0, and with |ψ(0)|² = Z³/(πn³a₀³) the shift is +2nEₙ²/mc². It is often pictured as the electron's position being smeared over its reduced Compton wavelength ħ/mc, so that it feels the Coulomb potential averaged over that distance; the operator itself is what the Dirac equation delivers at this order.
4Add the three and l drops out
Collect the pieces in units of Eₙ²/2mc². For j = l + ½, Eᵣₑₗ + ESO = 3 − 4n/(l + 1); for j = l − ½ it is 3 − 4n/l; and for an s state, where the Darwin term stands in for spin-orbit, Eᵣₑₗ + ED = 3 − 4n. Every case is 3 − 4n/(j + ½), so Eₙⱼ = −(13.6 eV/n²)[1 + (α²/n²)(n/(j + ½) − ¾)]: the energy remembers n and j and has forgotten l. Three checks close it. Dimensions: Eₙ²/mc² is an energy. Limits: α → 0, which is c → ∞, returns the Bohr levels, and the correction is always negative, largest for small j. Correspondence with the exact theory: the Dirac equation, solved for hydrogen, expands to this same expression at order α⁴mc², so the three first-order pieces are the whole of the α² physics. What survives is a degeneracy. 2s₁⁄₂ and 2p₁⁄₂ reach the same energy by different routes, the first lowered by the relativistic term and raised by Darwin, the second lowered by both the relativistic and spin-orbit terms. Only the 1058 MHz Lamb shift, vacuum polarisation and electron self-energy from QED, one order of α further on, separates them.
5The weak-field Zeeman spectrum
A field adds (μB/ħ)(L + 2S)⋅B. While μB B is well below the fine-structure gap, j survives, and the result to import from UPIV-09.09 is one line: each level shifts by gJ μB B mJ with gJ = 1 + [j(j+1) + s(s+1) − l(l+1)]/[2j(j+1)], which is 2 for ²S₁⁄₂, 2/3 for ²P₁⁄₂ and 4/3 for ²P₃⁄₂. A spectrometer sees differences. A line's components sit at (gJ′mJ′ − gJ mJ)μB B for ΔmJ = 0, ±1, primes marking the upper level. Sodium D₁, ²P₁⁄₂ → ²S₁⁄₂, gives four: π components (ΔmJ = 0) at ±2/3 and σ components (ΔmJ = ±1) at ±4/3, in units of μB B. D₂, ²P₃⁄₂ → ²S₁⁄₂, gives six: π at ±1/3 and σ at ±1 and ±5/3. Viewed across the field, π light is linearly polarised along B and σ light across it; viewed along B, the π components are missing and the two σ groups are circularly polarised in opposite senses. The shifts are small: at 1 T, μB B = 57.9 µeV, about three parts in 10⁵ of the 2.10 eV photon. The normal Lorentz triplet at 0 and ±μB B needs gJ = 1 in both levels, which singlet lines, S = 0, guarantee; the other pattern is called anomalous only because it was seen before spin was known.
6Crossing over to Paschen-Back
The Landé result is first-order perturbation theory in the field on top of fine structure, so it holds only while μB B ≪ ΔEfs. The crossing field ΔEfs/μB is 37 T for sodium's 2.13 meV doublet, beyond any bench magnet, but 0.78 T for hydrogen's 45.3 µeV 2p doublet. Past it the field outweighs spin-orbit coupling, mₗ and mₛ become the good labels, and a p level has energies μB B(mₗ + 2mₛ) + ζmₗ mₛ. The electric-dipole operator acts on position and not on spin, so Δmₛ = 0, and a p → s line then has components at μB B Δmₗ with Δmₗ = 0, ±1: the normal Lorentz triplet, each outer member split into a pair ζ apart by the leftover spin-orbit term. The ten weak-field components do not simply slide into three. Only mJ stays good at every field, so upper states of equal mJ are mixed by the field and repel, and line strength drains out of the four components that would need a spin flip until they vanish, while the six survivors gather into the triplet. The figure draws exactly that: every component at its exact position, as tall as its emission strength.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Spin-orbit shift, Thomas ½ included
ESO = Z⁴α²Eₕ[j(j+1) − l(l+1) − ¾] / [4n³ l(l+½)(l+1)], l ≥ 1
The Z⁴/[n³ l(l+½)(l+1)] is ⟨1/r³⟩ times the Z in the potential; the j = l ± ½ gap is Z⁴α²Eₕ/[2n³ l(l+1)], 45.3 µeV for hydrogen 2p.
Eₕ = 27.211 eV, α² = 5.325 × 10⁻⁵; n, l and j are pure numbers, so ESO is in eV. The bracket is 2⟨L⋅S⟩/ħ², quoted from UPIV-09.09.Relativistic kinetic correction
Eᵣₑₗ = −(Eₙ²/2mc²)[4n/(l + ½) − 3]
First order in H′ = −p⁴/8m³c²: it lowers every level, s states most, and depends on l but not on j.
Eₙ = −13.6 eV × Z²/n² is the Bohr energy and mc² = 0.511 MeV, so Eₙ²/2mc² is in eV; the bracket is positive for every l ≤ n − 1.Darwin term, s states only
ED = (πħ²/2m²c²)(Ze²/4πε₀)|ψ(0)|² = 2nEₙ²/mc², l = 0 only
A contact term, because ∇²(1/r) = −4πδ³(r): it raises s levels and leaves every l ≥ 1 level alone, exactly where spin-orbit gives nothing.
|ψ(0)|² = Z³/(πn³a₀³), in m⁻³, for an s state and zero for l ≥ 1; ħ/mc is a length, the reduced Compton wavelength, so ED is an energy.Fine-structure energy of hydrogen
Eₙⱼ = −(13.6 eV/n²)[1 + (α²/n²)(n/(j+½) − ¾)]
Sums the spin-orbit, relativistic and Darwin terms; the 1058 MHz Lamb shift that separates 2s₁⁄₂ from 2p₁⁄₂ is QED beyond it.
Depends on n and j only, so 2s₁⁄₂ and 2p₁⁄₂ come out degenerate.Weak-field Zeeman components of a line
Δ(hν) = (gJ′mJ′ − gJ mJ) μB B, ΔmJ = 0, ±1
Valid while μB B ≪ ΔEfs. Count the distinct values to count the components; the normal triplet at 0 and ±μB B needs gJ′ = gJ = 1.
Primes mark the upper level; gJ = 2, 2/3 and 4/3 for ²S₁⁄₂, ²P₁⁄₂ and ²P₃⁄₂ (UPIV-09.09); μB = 5.788 × 10⁻⁵ eV T⁻¹, B in tesla.Paschen-Back components
Δ(hν) = μB B Δmₗ, Δmₗ = 0, ±1, Δmₛ = 0
A dipole photon cannot flip the spin, so the anomalous pattern collapses back to the normal Lorentz triplet.
Valid once μB B ≫ ΔEfs; mₗ and mₛ replace j and mJ. For a p → s line the leftover ζmₗ mₛ, with ζ = (2/3)ΔEfs, splits each Δmₗ = ±1 component into a pair ζ apart.Interactive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Step B up from zero with ζ at 1.4 meV: D₁ opens into four components and D₂ into six, at the Landé offsets (gJ′mJ′ − gJ mJ)μB B, the anomalous pattern. Then drop ζ to 0.2 meV and push B to 30 T: four sticks shrink towards nothing and the other six gather into a triplet at 0 and ±μB B, each outer member a pair split by ζ, the Paschen-Back limit.
Live results
- ZERO-FIELD GAP 1.5ζ
- 2.10 meV
- ZEEMAN ENERGY μB B
- 0.347 meV
- RATIO μB B / ΔEfs
- 0.17
- D₂ +5/3 σ LINE STRENGTH
- 0.266
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Spin-orbit constant ζ: 1.4 meV; Applied magnetic field B: 6 T
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The commonest slip is to call fine structure 'the spin-orbit splitting' and compute it from the spin-orbit term alone. Spin-orbit is one of three corrections of the same order, and on its own it gets hydrogen badly wrong: it leaves 2s untouched, because L⋅S = 0 there, and puts 2p₁⁄₂ at −30.2 µeV and 2p₃⁄₂ at +15.1 µeV, where the full answer puts 2s₁⁄₂ and 2p₁⁄₂ together at −56.6 µeV and 2p₃⁄₂ at −11.3 µeV. It does get the 2p doublet gap right, because the relativistic term depends on l and not on j and so moves both 2p levels equally, and that coincidence is what hides the error. The opposite slip overcorrects: having learned that the total depends on j alone, a student applies the Darwin term to every level. It is proportional to |ψ(0)|², so it vanishes for every l ≥ 1, and the l-independence belongs only to the sum of the three terms, never to any one of them.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
Hydrogen, n = 2. Taking E₂ = −3.401 eV and mc² = 0.511 MeV, evaluate the relativistic, spin-orbit and Darwin shifts of 2s₁⁄₂, 2p₁⁄₂ and 2p₃⁄₂ in units of u = E₂²/2mc², add them, and check the totals against Eₙⱼ.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- u = (3.401 eV)²/(2 × 0.511 × 10⁶ eV) = 11.57/(1.022 × 10⁶) = 1.132 × 10⁻⁵ eV = 11.3 µeV.
- Relativistic, −u[4n/(l + ½) − 3] with n = 2: l = 0 gives −(16 − 3)u = −13u, and l = 1 gives −(16/3 − 3)u = −(7/3)u for both 2p levels, because this term knows l but not j.
- Spin-orbit: with Z⁴α²Eₕ/4n³ = nEₙ²/mc² = 2ν, ESO = 2nu[j(j+1) − l(l+1) − ¾]/[l(l+½)(l+1)] = (4/3)u × bracket for 2p. The bracket is +1 for j = 3/2 and −2 for j = 1/2, giving +(4/3)u and −(8/3)u; for 2s it is zero.
- Darwin, 2nEₙ²/mc² = 4ν = 8u, for 2s only.
- Totals: 2s₁⁄₂, −13u + 8u = −5u; 2p₁⁄₂, −(7/3)u − (8/3)u = −5u; 2p₃⁄₂, −(7/3)u + (4/3)u = −u. So 2s₁⁄₂ and 2p₁⁄₂ sit at −56.6 µeV and 2p₃⁄₂ at −11.3 µeV.
- Check with Eₙⱼ: E₂(α²/n²)(n/(j + ½) − ¾) = −3.401 × (5.325 × 10⁻⁵/4) × 1.25 = −5.66 × 10⁻⁵ eV for j = 1/2, and −3.401 × (5.325 × 10⁻⁵/4) × 0.25 = −1.13 × 10⁻⁵ eV for j = 3/2. ✓
Answer. 2s₁⁄₂ (−13u + 8u) and 2p₁⁄₂ (−(7/3)u − (8/3)u) both land at −5u = −56.6 µeV, and 2p₃⁄₂ at −u = −11.3 µeV: a 2p doublet 4u = 45.3 µeV wide, with 2s₁⁄₂ and 2p₁⁄₂ degenerate.
MediumExample 2
The sodium D lines lie at 588.995 nm and 589.592 nm. Find the 3p spin-orbit splitting in meV, then use ΔEfs = Zeff⁴α²Eₕ/[2n³l(l+1)], with α² = 5.325 × 10⁻⁵ and Eₕ = 27.211 eV, to find the effective nuclear charge the 3p electron feels. Compare it with the bare Z = 11.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 4 steps revealed.
- Work in wavenumbers: 10⁷/588.995 = 16978.07 cm⁻¹ and 10⁷/589.592 = 16960.88 cm⁻¹, a difference of 17.19 cm⁻¹.
- With 1 cm⁻¹ = 1.2398 × 10⁻⁴ eV, ΔEfs = 17.19 × 1.2398 × 10⁻⁴ = 2.131 × 10⁻³ eV = 2.13 meV.
- Rearrange: Zeff⁴ = 2 ΔEfs n³ l(l+1)/(α²Eₕ) = 2 × 2.131 × 10⁻³ × 27 × 2 / (1.449 × 10⁻³) = 0.2301 / 1.449 × 10⁻³ = 159.
- So Zeff = 159¹⁄⁴ = 3.55, roughly a third of the bare charge. Putting Z = 11 in instead would give 11⁴α²Eₕ/108 = 0.196 eV, which is 92 times the observed splitting.
Answer. ΔEfs = 2.13 meV (17.19 cm⁻¹) and Zeff ≈ 3.6. Because the splitting goes as Z⁴, a threefold error in the effective charge becomes a factor-of-92 error in the energy.
HardExample 3
Sodium vapour emitting the D₂ line (²P₃⁄₂ → ²S₁⁄₂, 589.0 nm) sits in a 0.80 T field. Show that the weak-field treatment applies, list the six components in units of μB B, then find the wavelength gap between adjacent components and the resolving power needed to see it. Take μB = 5.788 × 10⁻⁵ eV T⁻¹, the 3p splitting as 2.13 meV, and hc = 1239.84 eV nm.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- Regime check: μB B = 5.788 × 10⁻⁵ × 0.80 = 4.63 × 10⁻⁵ eV = 0.0463 meV, which is 2.13/0.0463 = 46 times below the spin-orbit splitting. J is a good quantum number, so use gJ μB B mJ.
- Landé factors: ²P₃⁄₂ gives g = 1 + (3.75 + 0.75 − 2)/(2 × 3.75) = 4/3, so its mJ = ±3/2, ±1/2 levels shift by ±2 and ±2/3. ²S₁⁄₂ gives g = 1 + (0.75 + 0.75 − 0)/(2 × 0.75) = 2, so its levels shift by ±1. Units of μB B throughout.
- Apply ΔmJ = 0, ±1 and subtract lower from upper: +2 − 1 = +1; +2/3 − 1 = −1/3; +2/3 + 1 = +5/3; −2/3 − 1 = −5/3; −2/3 + 1 = +1/3; −2 + 1 = −1. Six components at ±1/3, ±1, ±5/3.
- Adjacent components are all 2/3 apart, so ΔE = (2/3)(4.63 × 10⁻⁵) = 3.09 × 10⁻⁵ eV.
- Convert to wavelength: Δλ = λ²ΔE/hc = (589.0)² × 3.09 × 10⁻⁵ / 1239.84 = 10.72/1239.84 = 8.6 × 10⁻³ nm.
- Resolving power R = λ/Δλ = 589.0/0.0086 = 6.8 × 10⁴ — a good grating, not a hand spectroscope.
Answer. μB B is 46 times below the fine-structure gap, so the weak-field pattern holds: six lines at ±1/3, ±1 and ±5/3 of μB B, adjacent pairs 8.6 pm apart at 589 nm, needing R ≈ 6.8 × 10⁴.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
Fine structure is the splitting of a gross atomic level by the three corrections of order α² beyond the Coulomb problem, spin-orbit coupling, the relativistic kinetic correction and the Darwin term, whose sum in hydrogen depends only on n and the total angular momentum j.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.