
Quantum core · institution-dependent · Interactive lesson
The potential step and probability current
Reflection and transmission are bookkeeping on a current, not on an amplitude. Here you build j from the wavefunction, match a plane wave across a sudden change in potential, and find out why a step turns back particles that carry more than enough energy to cross it.
UPIV-07.07 · Lesson 7 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Quantum core · institution-dependent. Departments differ in how much quantum mechanics they include in Physics IV or teach in a dedicated course. Follow your university’s required mathematical depth and assessment; these numbered units are not automatically optional.
Build the model
Flux crosses the step, not amplitude.
The key idea
The reflection and transmission coefficients of a potential step are the fractions of the incident probability current that flow back from it and onward past it, R = |r|² and T = (k₂/k₁)|t|², and they always sum to one.
Example. Electrons of 2.00 eV crossing a 1.00 eV step have k₂/k₁ = 0.7071, r = 0.1716 and t = 1.1716, so R = 0.0294 and T = 0.7071 × 1.3726 = 0.9706 — and 0.0294 + 0.9706 = 1.
The complete physical model and assumptions
A potential step is the simplest place a quantum particle meets a boundary, and it is where the gap between a probability amplitude and a probability flow first bites. Solve ψ″ = 2m(V − E)ψ/ħ² on each side and you get plane waves with two different wavenumbers, k₁ = √(2mE)/ħ before the step and k₂ = √(2m(E − V₀))/ħ beyond it; continuity of ψ and ψ′ at the edge then fixes the reflected and transmitted amplitudes in one line, r = (k₁ − k₂)/(k₁ + k₂) and t = 2k₁/(k₁ + k₂). What you may not do is call |t|² the transmitted fraction. The conserved quantity is the probability current j = (ħ/m) Im(ψ* ∂ψ/∂x), which for a plane wave is density times speed, so the transmitted flux carries an extra factor k₂/k₁: T = (k₂/k₁)|t|², and only then does R + T = 1 come out exactly. The model charges you two idealisations for that clarity. A genuinely abrupt step is fiction — real interfaces smooth over a few atomic spacings — and a plane wave is not normalisable, so R and T are ratios of steady currents standing in for the probabilities that a real, momentum-spread wave packet ends up moving backwards or forwards long after it has struck the edge.
1Where the current comes from
Multiply the time-dependent Schrödinger equation by ψ*, subtract its complex conjugate multiplied by ψ, and the potential term cancels because V is real. What survives is ∂|ψ|²/∂t = −∂j/∂x, with j = (ħ/m) Im(ψ* ∂ψ/∂x). That is a conservation law: probability is not created or destroyed, it flows, and j is the flow. For one plane wave Ae(ikx) it evaluates to j = (ħk/m)|A|², exactly density × speed, since ħk/m is the group velocity. A wavefunction that is real, or real up to a constant phase, gives j = 0 — nothing is going anywhere. Every statement about reflection and transmission below is a statement about j, because in this problem j, not the density, is what stays the same on both sides of the step.
2Solve each side, then match at the edge
Take V = 0 for x < 0 and V = V₀ > 0 for x > 0, and send particles in from the left with E > V₀. On the left ψ = e(ik₁x) + r e(−ik₁x) with k₁ = √(2mE)/ħ; on the right ψ = t e(ik₂x) with k₂ = √(2m(E − V₀))/ħ. There is no e(−ik₂x) term on the right, and that is a physical choice, not algebra: nothing is sending waves back from x = +∞. Because V is finite everywhere, both ψ and ψ′ are continuous at x = 0. Continuity of ψ gives 1 + r = t; continuity of ψ′ gives k₁(1 − r) = k₂t. Two equations, two unknowns: r = (k₁ − k₂)/(k₁ + k₂) and t = 2k₁/(k₁ + k₂). Notice t > 1 whenever k₂ < k₁ — the transmitted amplitude exceeds the incident one, and nothing has gone wrong.
3T is a ratio of currents, so it carries k₂/k₁
The incident current is (ħk₁/m)⋅1, the reflected current is (ħk₁/m)|r|², and the transmitted current is (ħk₂/m)|t|². Divide each by the incident current: R = |r|² and T = (k₂/k₁)|t|². That wavenumber factor is not decoration — it is the transmitted particles' lower speed. Take E = 1.25 eV onto a step of V₀ = 1.00 eV. Then k₂/k₁ = √(0.25/1.25) = 0.4472, r = 0.3820 and t = 1.3820, so |t|² = 1.910: the probability density beyond the step is nearly double the incident density. Yet T = 0.4472 × 1.910 = 0.854, and R = 0.146. Density piles up precisely because the flow has slowed; the current getting through is smaller than the current arriving.
4R + T = 1 is conservation, not a coincidence
For a stationary state ∂|ψ|²/∂t = 0, so ∂j/∂x = 0 and the current is the same number everywhere, including across the step. On the left ψ is a sum of two counter-propagating waves, and their interference contributes nothing to the current: for ψ = Ae(ikx) + Be(−ikx) the current is exactly (ħk/m)(|A|² − |B|²), the cross terms cancelling identically. So the left current is (ħk₁/m)(1 − |r|²), the right current is (ħk₂/m)|t|², and equating them is R + T = 1. Algebraically (k₁ − k₂)² + 4k₁k₂ = (k₁ + k₂)², so it holds for every E and V₀. Use it as a check: if your R and T do not sum to one, you either dropped the k₂/k₁ factor or squared a complex amplitude without taking its modulus.
5Below the step: all of it returns, some of it enters
For E < V₀ the right-hand equation has real exponential solutions, and boundedness as x → ∞ kills the growing one, leaving ψ = t e(−κx) with κ = √(2m(V₀ − E))/ħ. Now r = (k₁ − iκ)/(k₁ + iκ) is a complex number over its own conjugate, so |r| = 1 exactly: R = 1, T = 0, everything comes back. That is not the same as nothing entering. The density just inside is |t|² = 4E/V₀ times the incident density and falls by 1/e over 1/2κ. For an electron at E = 0.60 eV against V₀ = 1.00 eV, κ = 3.24 nm⁻¹, so the density at the edge is 2.40 times the incident value and has fallen to 14% of that by 0.30 nm in. This evanescent wave carries no current — ψ there is real up to a constant phase — yet it is exactly what lets a thin barrier be tunnelled. Total reflection also costs a phase: r = e(−2i arctan(κ/k₁)), here −78.5°.
6Steps reflect downhill too, and plane waves are a fiction
Classically nothing reflects when E > V₀, and nothing reflects off a drop at all. Quantum mechanically the only thing that matters is that k changes: R = ((k₁ − k₂)/(k₁ + k₂))² is nonzero whenever k₂ ≠ k₁, in either direction. An electron of E = 1.00 eV running off a cliff where the potential falls by 3.00 eV has k₂/k₁ = √(4.00/1.00) = 2, so R = (1/3)² = 0.111 — one in nine bounces back off a step it is speeding down. That is quantum reflection, and it is the same effect that makes an abrupt change of refractive index reflect light. One last debt: these plane waves are not normalisable, since |ψ|² is constant over an infinite line. The honest object is a wave packet with a narrow spread in k, and R and T are then the probabilities of finding it moving left or right long after the collision — provided R(E) barely varies across that spread.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Probability current in one dimension
j = (ħ/m) Im(ψ* ∂ψ/∂x)
It is what ∂|ψ|²/∂t + ∂j/∂x = 0 conserves, so it is what R and T must be built from.
ψ in m(−1/2) and m the particle mass in kg, so j is a probability per secondPlane-wave current: density × speed
ψ = A e(ikx) → j = (ħk/m)|A|²
Two regions with equal |A|² but different k carry different current. That single fact is the whole lesson.
ħk/m is the group speed in m s⁻¹; |A|² is a density in m⁻¹Wavenumbers on the two sides
k₁ = √(2mE)/ħ, k₂ = √(2m(E − V₀))/ħ
One energy, two wavelengths: the particle moves slower past an up-step, so its wave is stretched.
For an electron k = 5.123 √(E/eV) nm⁻¹; k₂ turns imaginary once E < V₀Matching ψ and ψ′ at x = 0
r = (k₁ − k₂)/(k₁ + k₂), t = 2k₁/(k₁ + k₂)
Two continuity conditions, two unknowns — no integral and no normalisation anywhere.
Dimensionless amplitude ratios, with the incident amplitude set to 1Flux coefficients
R = |r|², T = (k₂/k₁)|t|² = 4k₁k₂/(k₁ + k₂)²
R + T = 1 identically, which is the arithmetic check on every step problem you will solve.
Both dimensionless; the factor k₂/k₁ is the speed ratio and is never optionalBelow the step: total reflection
κ = √(2m(V₀ − E))/ħ, |ψ|² ∝ e(−2κx), R = 1
The wave leaks in but carries no current, and the reflection costs a phase of −2 arctan(κ/k₁).
κ in m⁻¹; the density falls by 1/e over 1/2κ, about 0.15 nm when V₀ − E = 0.40 eVInteractive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Hold V₀ at 1.00 eV and slide E from 0.60 to 1.20 eV. The through arrow appears only once E passes V₀, yet the density just past the step is above 1 on both sides of that crossing: density is not flux, and the missing factor is k₂/k₁.
Live results
- REFLECTED FLUX R
- 0.177
- TRANSMITTED FLUX T
- 0.823
- DENSITY JUMP |t|²
- 2.02
- SPEED RATIO k₂/k₁
- 0.408
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Incident energy E: 1.20 eV; Step height V₀: 1.00 eV
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The standard error is writing T = |t|². It is tempting because R = |r|² really is right, but the two sides are not symmetric: the reflected wave shares its region, its wavenumber and its speed with the incident wave, while the transmitted wave lives beyond the step and travels at ħk₂/m instead of ħk₁/m. T compares currents, so it must carry that ratio of speeds: T = (k₂/k₁)|t|². Drop it and the numbers announce the mistake — for E = 1.0303 eV onto a 1.000 eV step, |t|² = 2.914, so |t|² alone claims 291% transmission and R + |t|² = 3.414, while the honest answer is T = 0.1716 × 2.914 = 0.500. A transmitted amplitude larger than the incident one is not a paradox: probability density piles up on the slow side exactly as a traffic queue does at a narrowing, and the flow through it is still smaller.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
Electrons of kinetic energy E = 2.00 eV travel along a flat region and meet an upward potential step of height V₀ = 1.00 eV. Find the reflection and transmission coefficients, and check them.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Both regions are classically allowed, so both wavenumbers are real and only their ratio is needed: k₂/k₁ = √((E − V₀)/E) = √(1.00/2.00) = 0.7071.
- Matching ψ and ψ′ at x = 0 gives r = (k₁ − k₂)/(k₁ + k₂). Dividing top and bottom by k₁: r = (1 − 0.7071)/(1 + 0.7071) = 0.2929/1.7071 = 0.1716.
- The reflected wave shares the incident wave's speed, so R needs no correction factor: R = |r|² = 0.1716² = 0.0294.
- T is a flux ratio and does need one. t = 2/(1 + 0.7071) = 1.1716, so |t|² = 1.3726, and T = (k₂/k₁)|t|² = 0.7071 × 1.3726 = 0.9706.
- Check the ledger: R + T = 0.0294 + 0.9706 = 1.0000.
Answer. R = 0.0294 and T = 0.9706 — about 2.9% of the electrons bounce off a step they carry twice the energy to cross, which no classical particle would do.
MediumExample 2
The same electrons are slowed to E = 0.60 eV before meeting the same V₀ = 1.00 eV step. Find R and T, the probability density just inside the step relative to the incident density, the distance over which that density falls by 1/e, and the phase of the reflected wave. Use k = 5.123 √(E/eV) nm⁻¹ for an electron.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Now E < V₀, so k₂ is imaginary; write k₂ = iκ with κ = √(2m(V₀ − E))/ħ = 5.123√0.40 = 3.240 nm⁻¹, while k₁ = 5.123√0.60 = 3.968 nm⁻¹.
- Then r = (k₁ − iκ)/(k₁ + iκ) is a complex number divided by its own conjugate, so |r| = 1 exactly. R = 1 and T = 0: every electron is reflected.
- Reflection is not the whole story. t = 2k₁/(k₁ + iκ), so |t|² = 4k₁²/(k₁² + κ²) = 4E/V₀ = 2.40 — the density just inside the step is 2.40 times the incident density.
- It dies fast. |ψ|² ∝ e(−2κx) falls by 1/e over 1/(2κ) = 1/6.480 = 0.154 nm, and at x = 0.30 nm it is e(−1.944) = 0.143 of its edge value.
- The reflected wave is phase-shifted, not simply turned round: r = e(−2i arctan(κ/k₁)), and arctan(3.240/3.968) = arctan(0.8165) = 39.2°, so the phase is −78.5°.
Answer. R = 1 and T = 0, yet |ψ|² at the edge is 2.40 times the incident density and falls by 1/e in 0.154 nm. The reflected wave returns with a phase of −78.5°.
HardExample 3
For an upward step of height V₀ = 1.000 eV, find the incident energy at which exactly half the incident probability current is transmitted. Then state the probability density just beyond the step, and explain how a density near 3 can accompany a transmitted flux of only 0.5.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Write u = k₂/k₁. Then T = 4k₁k₂/(k₁ + k₂)² = 4u/(1 + u)². Setting T = 1/2 gives (1 + u)² = 8u, that is u² − 6u + 1 = 0.
- The roots are u = 3 ± 2√2. Only u = 3 − 2√2 = 0.17157 lies below 1, as it must for an upward step where k₂ < k₁.
- u² = (E − V₀)/E = 0.029437, so V₀/E = 1 − 0.029437 = 0.970563 and E = 1.000/0.970563 = 1.0303 eV — barely 3% above the step, yet half the current still crosses.
- Amplitudes follow: r = (1 − u)/(1 + u) = 0.82843/1.17157 = 0.70711, so R = 0.5000; and t = 2/(1 + u) = 1.70711, so |t|² = 2.9142.
- Flux check: T = u|t|² = 0.17157 × 2.9142 = 0.5000, and R + T = 1.0000 exactly.
Answer. E = 1.0303 eV. The density beyond the step is 2.914 times the incident density while only half the current crosses, because the transmitted electrons crawl at 0.1716 of the incident speed: 2.9142 × 0.17157 = 0.5000.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
The reflection and transmission coefficients of a potential step are the fractions of the incident probability current that flow back from it and onward past it, R = |r|² and T = (k₂/k₁)|t|², and they always sum to one.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.