Skip to main content

Nuclear, particle & quantum-information sequence · Interactive lesson

The proton–proton chain and stellar fusion

One weak matrix element, one barrier integral and one atomic-mass ledger meet in a single number here: the ⟨σv⟩ near 10⁻⁴³ cm³ s⁻¹ that makes a proton wait ten billion years. Learn which of the three you can measure, which you must calculate, and why the same machinery gives T⁴ in the Sun but T¹⁷ a little higher up the main sequence.

UPV-16.07 · Lesson 7 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: The proton–proton chain and stellar fusionLog of the energy generation rate ε against core temperature T₆ at ρ = 150 g cm⁻³, solid for the pp chain and dashed for the CNO cycle. At T₆ = 15.7 MK, X = 0.35, X_CNO = 0.004: n_pp = 3.8, n_CNO = 19.6, CNO share 5.5 percent, crossover at T₆ = 18.9 MK.log ε [erg g⁻¹ s⁻¹]solid pp · dashed CNOat T₆ = 15.7: nₚₚ = 3.8 nCNO = 19.6CNO overtakes pp at T₆ = 18.9 MKT₆ = 42240 MK+80−4
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.

Nuclear, particle & quantum-information sequence. These units continue into nuclear and particle physics and quantum information. Follow your university’s prerequisites, mathematical depth and assessment; this independent pathway is not a universal programme specification.

1

Build the model

A solar proton waits billions of years because the first step is weak, not because the barrier is high.

The key idea

The proton–proton chain is the sequence p + p → d + e⁺ + ν, d + p → ³He + γ and ³He + ³He → ⁴He + 2p that turns four protons into one ⁴He nucleus, its overall rate fixed by the weak first step and its temperature dependence by that step's Gamow peak.

Example. At the solar centre, T = 15.7 MK, ρ = 150 g cm⁻³ and X = 0.35, the pp step runs at ⟨σv⟩ ≈ 1.4 × 10⁻⁴³ cm³ s⁻¹: a proton waits about 7 × 10⁹ years and the gas releases about 10 erg g⁻¹ s⁻¹, a thousand times less per kilogram than a resting human.

The complete physical model and assumptions

Hydrogen burning in the Sun is three reactions of three different kinds. p + p → d + e⁺ + ν is weak: two protons in the ¹S₀ continuum must flip a spin and turn one proton into a neutron while still inside the Coulomb barrier, and only the Gamow–Teller operator στ₊ connects that state to the ³S₁ deuteron. Its cross-section at the 6 keV Gamow peak is near 10⁻⁵⁰ cm², so S₁₁(0) has never been measured; it is computed from the deuteron wavefunction, gA and the superallowed ft value, to about 1%. d + p → ³He + γ is electromagnetic and takes a second; ³He + ³He → ⁴He + 2p is strong and closes the chain. The slowest link sets the pace, so the solar rate is a weak rate: ⟨σv⟩ ≈ 1.4 × 10⁻⁴³ cm³ s⁻¹ at 15.7 MK, a proton lifetime near 7 × 10⁹ yr, about 10 erg g⁻¹ s⁻¹ at the centre. Energetics come from atomic masses, but the positron costs 2mₑc², so Qₚₚ = 1.442 − 1.022 = 0.420 MeV even though the whole chain, positrons annihilated, gives 26.73 MeV per ⁴He. Averaging exp(−E/kT − √(EG/E)) over a Maxwellian puts the reacting pairs at E₀ = (EG(kT)²/4)¹⁄³, well above kT, with local exponent n = (τ − 2)/3 for τ = 3E₀/kT: near 4 for pp and near 20 for the ¹⁴N(p, γ) bottleneck of the CNO cycle, which is why CNO wins above about 19 MK. All of it assumes a non-degenerate Maxwellian in hydrostatic equilibrium, which is what makes a T²⁰ law a thermostat rather than a bomb.

1Sort the chain by how long each link takes

Write the three links of pp-I with the interaction that drives each. p + p → d + e⁺ + ν is weak: a proton becomes a neutron while the pair sits inside the barrier. d + p → ³He + γ is electromagnetic. ³He + ³He → ⁴He + 2p is strong. The first two links face the same barrier, Z₁Z₂ = 1, so the barrier is not what separates them; the S-factors are. S₁₁ = 4.0 × 10⁻²² keV b, S₁₂ = 2.1 × 10⁻⁴ keV b, S₃₃ = 5.2 × 10³ keV b: eighteen and then seven more orders of magnitude. The third link gives much of its advantage back: Z₁Z₂ = 4 and three times the reduced mass make EG ≈ 24 MeV, so τ ≈ 49 at 15.7 MK against 13.5 for pp, and ³He is scarce. At the solar centre that makes a proton wait about 7 × 10⁹ yr for a partner, a deuteron about 2 s, and a ³He nucleus of order 10⁵ yr. The slowest link is the rate-limiting step, so the solar luminosity is a weak-interaction rate, and deuterium and ³He settle to steady-state abundances at which each is destroyed as fast as it is made. Everything downstream of the first step is fast bookkeeping; everything about the chain's pace is in S₁₁.

2Keep the electron ledger when you take Q from atomic masses

Mass tables list atomic masses, each carrying Z electrons. For p + p → d + e⁺ + ν the nuclear balance is 2mₚ − md − mₑ, while 2M(¹H) − M(²H) = 2mₚ + 2mₑ − md − mₑ = 2mₚ − md + mₑ. The difference is 2mₑc² = 1.022 MeV: one electron because the tables gave you one too many, one because the positron is new mass. So Qₚₚ = 1.442 − 1.022 = 0.420 MeV, shared by the positron and the neutrino, whose spectrum ends at 0.420 MeV and averages 0.265 MeV. The rare capture route p + e⁻ + p → d + ν has no positron and no spare electron, so its Q is the full 1.442 MeV, the monoenergetic pep line. Now do the whole chain: 4M(¹H) − M(⁴He) = 0.02870 u = 26.73 MeV, and here nothing is subtracted, because the two positrons annihilate with two of the four electrons and their 2 × 1.022 MeV comes back as photons. The only energy that leaves the star is neutrino energy: 0.53 MeV for pp-I, 1.08 for pp-II (mostly the 0.862 MeV ⁷Be line), 7.0 for pp-III (the ⁸B spectrum) and 1.70 for CNO.

3S₁₁(0) is a calculation, because no beam can reach it

At the Gamow peak, E₀ ≈ 6 keV, σₚₚ = (S/E₀) exp(−√(EG/E₀)) = (4.0 × 10⁻²² keV b / 6.1 keV) × e(−9.0) ≈ 8 × 10⁻²⁷ b ≈ 10⁻⁵⁰ cm². Even at 1 MeV, where the barrier factor has risen to 0.5, S(0) gives only 2 × 10⁻²⁵ b: a milliamp of protons stopping in a thick hydrogen target would make one deuteron per 10³ to 10⁴ years, far too few to count against any beam-induced background. So S₁₁(0) comes from theory. Two low-energy protons in a relative s-wave must be spin singlet, ¹S₀ with T = 1, by the Pauli principle; the deuteron is ³S₁ with T = 0. The Fermi operator Σ τ₊ changes neither S nor T, so the transition is pure Gamow–Teller, driven by Σ σ τ₊ with coupling gA = 1.27, and its matrix element is the overlap Λ of the pp scattering wavefunction with the deuteron wavefunction, Λ² ≈ 7.0. Normalising to the superallowed 0⁺ → 0⁺ ft value of 3071 s removes GF and the radiative corrections, and the phase-space integral fₚₚ = 0.144 fixes the lepton kinematics. The result, S₁₁(0) = 4.01 × 10⁻²² keV b to about 1%, is the best-known number in solar fusion precisely because it is the one nobody can measure.

4Read the two exponents off the Gamow peak

The previous topic's Laplace expansion of the Maxwell-averaged tunnelling factor supplies the tools: E₀ = (EG (kT)²/4)¹⁄³, τ = 3E₀/kT and d ln⟨σv⟩/d ln T = (τ − 2)/3, the −2/3 coming from Δ(kT)(−3/2) ∝ T(−2/3). The work here is to apply them to the two bottlenecks of hydrogen burning. At 15.7 MK, kT = 1.353 keV. For pp, EG = 493 keV, so E₀ = (493 × 1.830/4)¹⁄³ = 6.09 keV, four and a half times kT, τ = 13.5 and n = (13.5 − 2)/3 = 3.8. For p + ¹⁴N, with Z₁Z₂ = 7 and μc² = 875 MeV, EG = 45.1 MeV, E₀ = 27.4 keV, τ = 60.8 and n = 19.6. Because τ ∝ EG¹⁄³, a Gamow energy ninety times larger makes τ 4.5 times larger and n five times larger: the same thermal average, a far steeper law. The exponents are local: at 25 MK they have fallen to 3.2 and 16.7, which is why textbooks quote T⁴ against anything from T¹⁶ to T²⁰.

5Branches, the CNO cycle, and where it takes over

Once ³He exists it can meet another ³He, closing pp-I with Q = 12.86 MeV, or meet the ⁴He already present to make ⁷Be. ⁷Be captures an electron to ⁷Li, which takes a proton and splits into two ⁴He (pp-II), or, about once in a thousand times, captures a proton to make ⁸B, whose β⁺ decay gives the 6.7 MeV neutrinos (pp-III). In the Sun the terminations run near 85%, 15% and 0.02%, the split set by S₃₃ = 5.2 MeV b against S₃₄ = 0.56 keV b times the ⁴He abundance. Carbon and nitrogen catalyse the same net reaction: ¹²C(p, γ)¹³N(e⁺ν)¹³C(p, γ)¹⁴N(p, γ)¹⁵O(e⁺ν)¹⁵N(p, α)¹²C. Its slowest link is ¹⁴N(p, γ)¹⁵O with S(0) = 1.66 keV b, so in equilibrium nearly all the catalyst waits as ¹⁴N and εCNO ∝ X XCNO. With X = 0.35 and XCNO = 0.004 the two rates match near 19 MK. At the solar centre this model gives CNO about 5% of the local heat; averaged over the cooler burning core the share falls to about 1% of the luminosity, the value Borexino measured in 2020, while stars above roughly 1.3 M☉ sit on the CNO side. A T¹⁸ law packs the burning into a tiny central sphere, so the radiative gradient there exceeds the adiabatic one and those stars carry convective cores the Sun lacks.

6What hydrostatic and non-degenerate buy you

Two assumptions sit under every number here. The Maxwellian average needs a non-degenerate gas: at the solar centre nₑ ≈ 6 × 10²⁵ cm⁻³ gives an electron Fermi energy near 0.6 keV against kT = 1.35 keV, so the electrons are only mildly degenerate and the ions not at all. Hydrostatic equilibrium is what makes a T⁴ or T¹⁸ law safe. The virial theorem gives a self-gravitating ideal gas a negative heat capacity: if ε rises, the core expands, cools as it works against gravity, and the rate falls back. The exponent sets how tightly the temperature is pinned, not whether the star survives. Remove either assumption and the thermostat is gone: in a red giant's degenerate helium core the pressure ignores the temperature, so the onset of helium burning runs away as the helium flash until the degeneracy lifts. Same Gamow physics, no restoring force. The Sun's lifetime is the same energy budget seen from outside: L☉/M☉ = 1.9 erg g⁻¹ s⁻¹ against 26.2 MeV per four protons, with a tenth of the star's hydrogen (X = 0.7) available, gives about 7 × 10⁹ years. That number is not set by S₁₁: L☉ is fixed by how fast radiation diffuses out, and the thermostat lets the core settle at whatever temperature makes the weak rate supply it, so a larger S₁₁ would buy a cooler core, not a proportionally shorter life.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Q of the first step from atomic masses

Qₚₚ = [2M(¹H) − M(²H)]c² − 2mₑc² = 1.442 − 1.022 = 0.420 MeV

The e⁺ and ν share 0.420 MeV, the ν taking 0.265 MeV on average; the capture route p + e⁻ + p → d + ν escapes the penalty and gives the 1.442 MeV pep line.

M in u, 1 u = 931.494 MeV; 2M(¹H) carries two electrons, M(²H) one, and the e⁺ is new mass

Net energy per helium-4

Q = [4M(¹H) − M(⁴He)]c² = 0.02870 u × 931.494 MeV/u = 26.73 MeV

Only neutrino energy escapes: 26.20 MeV is thermal for pp-I, 25.65 for pp-II, 19.7 for pp-III and 25.03 for the CNO cycle.

Four atomic electrons in, two kept by ⁴He, two annihilated with the two e⁺: no 2mₑc² subtraction

S-factor and Gamow energy

σ(E) = S(E) E⁻¹ exp(−√(EG/E)), EG = 2μc² (παZ₁Z₂)²

S(E) is what is left once Coulomb tunnelling has been divided out, so it varies slowly and can be extrapolated; for pp it is 4.01 × 10⁻²² keV b.

EG = 493 keV for p + p, 658 keV for p + d, 45.1 MeV for p + ¹⁴N; μ the reduced mass, α = 1/137

S₁₁(0) from the weak interaction

S₁₁(0) = 6π² mₚc² α ln2 gA² Λ² fₚₚ / (c γ³ ft) = 4.01 × 10⁻²² keV b

No beam measurement enters: σₚₚ at the Gamow peak is about 10⁻⁵⁰ cm², so the number rests on the Gamow–Teller matrix element and deuteron properties, good to about 1%.

Λ² ≈ 7.0 is the ¹S₀ pp to ³S₁ deuteron overlap, γ = √(mₚEB)/ℏ = 0.232 fm⁻¹, ft = 3071 s, fₚₚ = 0.144; the c turns fm³ s⁻¹ into fm²

Gamow peak and the local exponent

E₀ = (EG (kT)²/4)¹⁄³, τ = 3E₀/kT, ε ∝ Tn with n = (τ − 2)/3

τ = 33.8 T₆(−1/3) for pp and 152.3 T₆(−1/3) for ¹⁴N + p; n falls slowly as T rises, which is why T⁴ and anything from T¹⁶ to T²⁰ are both quoted.

At T₆ = 15.7 (kT = 1.353 keV): pp gives E₀ = 6.1 keV, τ = 13.5, n = 3.8; ¹⁴N + p gives 27.4 keV, 60.8, 19.6

Energy generation rate

ε = ρ X₁X₂ Qeff ⟨σv⟩ / ((1 + δ₁₂) m₁m₂), ⟨σv⟩ = √(2/μ) Δ (kT)(−3/2) S(E₀) e(−τ)

pp goes as X², CNO as X⋅XCNO: as a core burns down its hydrogen the balance tilts toward CNO and the crossover temperature falls.

Δ = 4√(E₀kT/3) is the peak width; ε in erg g⁻¹ s⁻¹ (10⁻⁴ W kg⁻¹); δ₁₂ = 1 for identical particles
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

15.7 MK
4 to 40 MK; steps of 0.1.
0.35
0.1 to 0.75; steps of 0.05.
0.004
0.001 to 0.03; steps of 0.001.

Try this. Drag T₆ from 15.7 up past 19 and watch the dashed CNO curve climb through the solid pp curve while nCNO stays near 19 and nₚₚ near 4; then lower X towards 0.2, as an ageing core does, and the crossover slides to a cooler T₆ because pp pays X² while CNO pays only X.

Live results

LOCAL EXPONENT n (pp)
3.83
LOCAL EXPONENT n (CNO)
19.6
CNO SHARE OF ε
5.5 %
CROSSOVER T₆
18.9 MK

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Physics V modelLog of the energy generation rate ε against core temperature T₆ at ρ = 150 g cm⁻³, solid for the pp chain and dashed for the CNO cycle. At T₆ = 15.7 MK, X = 0.35, X_CNO = 0.004: n_pp = 3.8, n_CNO = 19.6, CNO share 5.5 percent, crossover at T₆ = 18.9 MK.log ε [erg g⁻¹ s⁻¹]solid pp · dashed CNOat T₆ = 15.7: nₚₚ = 3.8 nCNO = 19.6CNO overtakes pp at T₆ = 18.9 MKT₆ = 42240 MK+80−4
Log of the energy generation rate ε against core temperature T₆ at ρ = 150 g cm⁻³, solid for the pp chain and dashed for the CNO cycle. At T₆ = 15.7 MK, X = 0.35, XCNO = 0.004: nₚₚ = 3.8, nCNO = 19.6, CNO share 5.5 percent, crossover at T₆ = 18.9 MK.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Core temperature T₆: 15.7 MK; Hydrogen mass fraction X: 0.35; CNO mass fraction XCNO: 0.004

Baseline 15.7; choose 4 to 40, in steps of 0.1.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The Sun burns slowly because the Coulomb barrier is hard to tunnel through. The deuteron proves otherwise: d + p → ³He + γ faces a barrier of the same height, Z₁Z₂ = 1 with EG = 658 keV against 493 keV, yet a deuteron in the solar core survives about 2 s while a proton survives 7 × 10⁹ yr. The penetration factor at the pp Gamow peak is exp(−9.0) ≈ 10⁻⁴, a modest price; the seventeen missing orders of magnitude sit in S₁₁ = 4 × 10⁻²² keV b against S₁₂ = 2 × 10⁻⁴ keV b, the ratio of a weak vertex, GF² gA² |MGT|², to an electromagnetic one. The barrier sets the temperature dependence, the Gamow peak and the exponent n; the weak interaction sets the absolute rate at a given temperature and so, through the thermostat, the 15.7 MK at which the core must run to supply the luminosity that radiative diffusion carries away.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

Using M(¹H) = 1.007825 u, M(²H) = 2.014102 u, M(⁴He) = 4.002603 u, mₑc² = 0.511 MeV and 1 u = 931.494 MeV, find Q for p + p → d + e⁺ + ν and for the net reaction 4p → ⁴He + 2e⁺ + 2ν, and say where the electron masses cancel.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

At the solar centre T = 15.7 MK. Find the Gamow peak energy, its width and the local temperature exponent for p + p (EG = 493 keV) and for p + ¹⁴N (EG = 45.1 MeV). Take k = 8.617 × 10⁻² keV per MK.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

Take the solar centre as ρ = 150 g cm⁻³, X = 0.35, XCNO = 0.004 with the catalyst waiting as ¹⁴N, and T = 15.7 MK, where the Laplace estimate about the Gamow peak gives ⟨σv⟩ = 1.43 × 10⁻⁴³ cm³ s⁻¹ for p + p and 2.6 × 10⁻⁴² cm³ s⁻¹ for p + ¹⁴N. Find the pp rate per cm³, the mean life of a proton against fusion, εₚₚ taking 13.1 MeV of heat per pp reaction, εCNO taking 25.03 MeV per cycle, and, with nₚₚ = 3.8 and nCNO = 19.6, the temperature at which CNO takes over.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

Atomic masses give 2M(¹H) − M(²H) = 1.442 MeV. What is Q for p + p → d + e⁺ + ν, and why?
7

Review & continue

The proton–proton chain is the sequence p + p → d + e⁺ + ν, d + p → ³He + γ and ³He + ³He → ⁴He + 2p that turns four protons into one ⁴He nucleus, its overall rate fixed by the weak first step and its temperature dependence by that step's Gamow peak.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.