Skip to main content

Physics V course sequence · Interactive lesson

Radial Hamiltonian and effective potential

Every central potential ends in the same place: one operator on a half-line, one unknown u = rR, and a boundary condition at the origin you have to argue for rather than assume. This is where you learn to name the domain before you solve, because the differential equation on its own will not stop you inventing states.

UPV-11.03 · Lesson 3 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Radial Hamiltonian and effective potentialEffective radial potential for hydrogen, solid, against the bare Coulomb term, dashed: V_eff = −27.2114/r + 13.6057 l(l+1)/r² eV with r in a₀. The dashed level is E_n = -3.401 eV, filled dots are its classical turning points, and the open circle is the floor of the centrifugal well. The small panel plots s(s−1) − l(l+1), residual 0.00, whose zeros are s = l+1 and s = −l.energy / eVindicial s(s−1) − l(l+1)E₂ = −3.401 eVdashed: bare Coulombr / a₀ 0 to 200
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

Three dimensions collapse to a half-line, and the half-line needs a domain.

The key idea

The radial Hamiltonian is the operator −(ℏ²/2μ)d²/dr² + V(r) + ℏ²l(l+1)/(2μr²) acting on u = rR on the half-line r > 0, made self-adjoint by the domain condition u(0) = 0.

Example. For hydrogen with l = 1 it adds a +27.21 eV centrifugal term to the −27.21 eV Coulomb term at r = a₀, so Veff(a₀) = 0 exactly; the well bottoms out at −6.803 eV at 2a₀, and the 2p level at −3.401 eV floats halfway up it.

The complete physical model and assumptions

The model is one operator: hₗ = −(ℏ²/2μ)d²/dr² + V(r) + ℏ²l(l+1)/(2μr²), acting on u(r) = rR(r) in L²(0,∞). It comes from separation of variables, which is really the statement that (H, L², Lz) commute, so a shared eigenbasis exists and the angular factor Yₗₘ hands the radial problem one number, ℏ²l(l+1). The substitution u = rR then absorbs the r² of the volume element and cancels the first-derivative term exactly, leaving something that reads like a one-dimensional Schrödinger equation with the centrifugal term stacked on top of V. What it costs is the endpoint. The half-line is not the line: −d²/dr² on (0,∞) is symmetric on many domains and self-adjoint on almost none of them, and the eigenvalue problem is not defined until one is chosen. Frobenius analysis at r = 0 returns two exponents, l+1 and −l, and only for l ≥ 1 does normalisation kill the second; for l = 0 the singular solution R ~ 1/r is square-integrable and has to be excluded by a domain condition, u(0) = 0, whose warrant is that ∇²(1/r) = −4πδ³(r) would otherwise plant a point source at the nucleus. Impose it and the Coulomb spectrum follows; leave it out and the same differential equation cheerfully supplies states hydrogen does not have.

1u = rR flattens the measure

Write ψ = R(r)Yₗₘ(θ, φ). The radial part of the Laplacian is R″ + (2/r)R′, and the norm drags the Jacobian along: ∫|R|²r²dr. One substitution disposes of both. Put R = u/r, so R′ = u′/r − u/r² and R″ = u″/r − 2u′/r² + 2u/r³; adding (2/r)R′ = 2u′/r² − 2u/r³ cancels those two correction terms in pairs and leaves R″ + (2/r)R′ = u″/r exactly. The norm follows suit, ∫|R|²r²dr = ∫|u|²dr, so u lives in L²(0,∞) with the flat measure and obeys −(ℏ²/2μ)u″ + Veff u = Eu. The word to keep is lives. The line has been cut in half: r ∈ (0,∞) has an endpoint, the substitution has made that endpoint singular, and everything difficult about this topic is concentrated there.

2The centrifugal term is an eigenvalue, not a force

L² never acts as a differential operator on the radial factor: on Yₗₘ it returns the number ℏ²l(l+1), and that number is what enters the radial equation as ℏ²l(l+1)/(2μr²). Nothing is rotating; the barrier is bookkeeping for angular momentum the state already carries. It is also universal — the same term appears for a square well, a harmonic trap or a Yukawa potential, so it is not a Coulomb effect. Written in eV with r in Bohr radii, hydrogen's radial problem reads Veff = (−27.2114/r + 13.6057 l(l+1)/r²) eV. Put l = 1 and r = a₀: the centrifugal coefficient 2 × 13.6057 = 27.2114 exactly matches the Coulomb one, so Veff(a₀) = 0 identically, not approximately. The floor sits at r = l(l+1)a₀ = 2a₀ with depth −13.6057/[l(l+1)] = −6.803 eV, and the 2p level at −3.401 eV floats halfway between that floor and threshold.

3Turning points, and where l ≤ n − 1 comes from

Set Eₙ = Veff(r) and solve. In Bohr units the quadratic Eₙ r² + 27.2114r − 13.6057 l(l+1) = 0 has roots r± = n²[1 ± √(1 − l(l+1)/n²)] a₀. For 2p that is 1.17 a₀ and 6.83 a₀, a band 5.66 a₀ wide holding ⟨r⟩ = 5a₀; for 3d it runs from 3.80 a₀ to 14.20 a₀. The square root is real only if l(l+1) ≤ n², and for integers that is exactly l ≤ n − 1. Read it off the well: raise l at fixed n and the floor −13.6057/[l(l+1)] eV rises until the level has nowhere to sit. A 2d state would have to live at −3.401 eV in a well whose floor is −2.268 eV. Truncation of the Laguerre series proves the rule; the effective potential is what makes it obvious.

4Frobenius at the origin: two exponents

Near r = 0 the centrifugal term beats everything else in the equation: it is O(r⁻²) while the Coulomb term is O(r⁻¹) and E is O(1). The leading balance is therefore u″ = l(l+1)u/r². Substituting u = rs gives s(s−1)r(s−2) = l(l+1)r(s−2), so the indicial equation is s(s−1) = l(l+1), with roots s = l+1 and s = −l. The regular root gives R = u/r ~ rl, the familiar behaviour of a p or d orbital near the nucleus; the singular root gives R ~ r(−l−1). Carrying the series one term further fixes the first correction, u = r(l+1)[1 − Zr/((l+1)a₀) + …], and because it comes from the recursion — and because E first enters two orders later — it is the same for every state of that l: for l = 2 it is 1 − r/3a₀, whether the state is 3d, 4d or 5d.

5Two different reasons to drop the singular root

For l ≥ 1 the argument is normalisation: u ~ r(−l) makes ∫|u|²dr ~ ∫r(−2l)dr diverge at the origin, and nothing more need be said — in Weyl's language the operator is limit point at r = 0 and needs no boundary condition at all. The dividing line is sharp: the limit-point test on the half-line asks whether l(l+1) ≥ 3/4, which l ≥ 1 clears and l = 0 fails. For l = 0 the singular root is u → constant, R ~ 1/r, and ∫|R|²r²dr = ∫dr converges. Normalisation cannot reject it. What rejects it is ∇²(1/r) = −4πδ³(r), which means R ~ 1/r satisfies the eigenvalue equation only with an unadvertised point source at the nucleus. Formally the operator is limit circle at r = 0 and admits a one-parameter family of self-adjoint extensions, the Robin conditions cos α u(0) + sin α u′(0) = 0, each of which kills the boundary term of formula five. Dirichlet is the member a point Coulomb nucleus selects: give the nucleus a radius RN, solve inside and out, then let RN → 0, and u(0) = 0 is what survives.

6The domain, on a grid

Numerically the domain condition is free if the grid is built correctly. Take rᵢ = ih for i = 1…N in a box of radius R = (N+1)h and never create a node at i = 0: the missing row is Dirichlet. In atomic units the matrix is tridiagonal — diagonal 1/h² − Z/rᵢ + l(l+1)/(2rᵢ²), off-diagonal −1/(2h²) — and one symmetric tridiagonal eigensolver call returns the spectrum. Two errors then compete. The three-point second difference is O(h²): for l = 0 in a 40a₀ box the ground state comes out −0.498756 Ha at h = 0.1a₀ and −0.499688 Ha at h = 0.05a₀, and Richardson extrapolation [4E(h/2) − E(h)]/3 = −0.499998 Ha lands on −13.6057 eV. The box is the other error and it bites the top of the spectrum: shrink the box to 10a₀ and 1s is untouched at −0.499687 Ha while 2s reads −0.1128 Ha instead of −0.125 Ha and 3s is pushed above threshold as a pseudo-state.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Radial reduction, u = rR

−(ℏ²/2μ)u″ + Veff(r)u = Eu, with u = rR and ∫|u|²dr = 1

Cancels the first-derivative term exactly and flattens the measure, so the problem reads like a 1-D one on r > 0.

μ is the reduced mass in kg, r in m, u in m⁻¹⁄²; the r² of the volume element is now inside u

The effective potential

Veff(r) = −Ze²/(4πε₀r) + ℏ²l(l+1)/(2μr²)

Every l is a different one-dimensional problem, and the same centrifugal term appears for any central V(r).

l is the L² eigenvalue label, a number here and not an operator; Veff in J with r in m

Centrifugal well in eV, with r in Bohr radii

Veff = (−27.2114 Z/r + 13.6057 l(l+1)/r²) eV, r in a₀

For l = 1 the floor is −6.803 eV at 2a₀, so the 2p level at −3.401 eV sits halfway between floor and threshold.

a₀ = 0.052918 nm; minimum at r = l(l+1)a₀/Z, depth −13.6057 Z²/[l(l+1)] eV

Indicial equation at the origin

s(s−1) = l(l+1), so u ~ A r(l+1) + B r(−l)

The next order fixes u = r(l+1)[1 − Zr/((l+1)a₀) + …], the same coefficient for every state of that l.

from the leading balance u″ = l(l+1)u/r²; the Coulomb term is subleading at r = 0

Boundary term and the domain

⟨u|hv⟩ − ⟨hu|v⟩ = (ℏ²/2μ)[u*v′ − (u*)′v] at r = 0

Dirichlet u(0) = 0 is one self-adjoint extension; a point Coulomb nucleus is what picks it out of the Robin family.

must vanish for every u, v in the domain; normalisability handles the r → ∞ end

Grid Hamiltonian, Dirichlet built in

diagonal 1/h² − Z/rᵢ + l(l+1)/(2rᵢ²) · off-diagonal −1/(2h²), in a.u.

Tridiagonal and O(h²): at h = 0.05a₀ the 1s comes out −13.5972 eV, and Richardson lifts it to −13.6057 eV.

rᵢ = ih for i = 1…N in a box R = (N+1)h; the row never built at i = 0 is u(0) = 0
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

1
0 to 3; steps of 1.
2
1 to 3; steps of 1.
2.0
−3 to 4; steps of 0.5.

Try this. With n = 2, drag l from 0 to 1: the well floor lifts to −6.80 eV at 2 a₀ and the inner turning point leaves the origin for 1.17 a₀. Push l to 2 and the dots vanish, the level having dropped below the floor. Then set s = l + 1 to drive the indicial residual to zero.

Live results

BARRIER AT r = a₀
27.21 eV
LEVEL Eₙ
-3.401 eV
ALLOWED BAND r₊ − r₋
5.66 a₀
INDICIAL RESIDUAL
0.00

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Physics V modelEffective radial potential for hydrogen, solid, against the bare Coulomb term, dashed: V_eff = −27.2114/r + 13.6057 l(l+1)/r² eV with r in a₀. The dashed level is E_n = -3.401 eV, filled dots are its classical turning points, and the open circle is the floor of the centrifugal well. The small panel plots s(s−1) − l(l+1), residual 0.00, whose zeros are s = l+1 and s = −l.energy / eVindicial s(s−1) − l(l+1)E₂ = −3.401 eVdashed: bare Coulombr / a₀ 0 to 200
Effective radial potential for hydrogen, solid, against the bare Coulomb term, dashed: Veff = −27.2114/r + 13.6057 l(l+1)/r² eV with r in a₀. The dashed level is Eₙ = −3.401 eV, filled dots are its classical turning points, and the open circle is the floor of the centrifugal well. The small panel plots s(s−1) − l(l+1), residual 0.00, whose zeros are s = l+1 and s = −l.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Orbital quantum number l: 1; Principal quantum number n: 2; Trial exponent s in u ~ rs: 2.0

Baseline 1; choose 0 to 3, in steps of 1.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

Two answers get given for u(0) = 0, and both fail on the case that actually needs the rule. The first is normalisation — correct for l ≥ 1, false for l = 0, where R ~ 1/r gives ∫|R|²r²dr = ∫dr and is perfectly square-integrable near the origin. The second is the centrifugal barrier, 'the wavefunction is pushed out of the origin', which fails harder: at l = 0 that barrier is identically zero, and s states have their largest amplitude at the nucleus, which is precisely why s electrons dominate hyperfine structure and electron capture. The real point is that a differential equation is not an operator. The eigenvalue problem is undefined until a domain is named, u(0) = 0 is that choice rather than a deduction, and the point nucleus is what singles it out. Every other member of the Robin family cos α u(0) + sin α u′(0) = 0 is an equally self-adjoint operator with an equally respectable spectrum — and none of those spectra is hydrogen's.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

Hydrogen with l = 2. Write the effective potential in eV with r in Bohr radii, find the radius and the depth of its minimum, and use them to decide which of a 2d and a 3d level can exist.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

Take l = 2 in hydrogen and work at the origin. Find the two Frobenius exponents of the radial equation, say which survives and on what grounds, then carry the series one term further and check it against the exact 3d radial function.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

The l = 0 radial Hamiltonian is discretised in atomic units on a uniform grid rᵢ = ih, i = 1…N, inside a box of radius 40a₀, with u(0) = 0 imposed by omitting the i = 0 node. The lowest eigenvalue comes out −0.498756 Ha at h = 0.1a₀ and −0.499688 Ha at h = 0.05a₀. Confirm the order of the method, extrapolate, and explain why the same grid does far better for l = 1.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

For l = 0 the two Frobenius roots of the radial equation at r = 0 are u ~ r and u ~ constant. The second gives R = u/r ~ 1/r. On what grounds is it discarded?
7

Review & continue

The radial Hamiltonian is the operator −(ℏ²/2μ)d²/dr² + V(r) + ℏ²l(l+1)/(2μr²) acting on u = rR on the half-line r > 0, made self-adjoint by the domain condition u(0) = 0.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.