Skip to main content

Physics V course sequence · Interactive lesson

The Stark effect, polarisability and level mixing

Switch on a uniform field and ask what the energy does. For an isolated level the answer is nothing at first order and −½αF² at second; for a hydrogen manifold carrying parity degeneracy it is a straight line. Knowing which case you are in is the whole skill, and what decides it is a ratio, not a formula.

UPV-13.08 · Lesson 8 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: The Stark effect, polarisability and level mixingTwo-level Stark model for hydrogen n = 2: |2s⟩ and |2p₀⟩ split by Δ = 1.05 GHz and coupled by V = μF. Solid: exact eigenvalues ±√((Δ/2)² + V²). Dashed: second-order −½αF² on the lower level. At F = 200 V cm⁻¹, V = 0.768 GHz, the lower level has moved -0.405 GHz, and −½αF² claims -0.561 GHz.hydrogen n = 2 in a static fieldΔ = 1.05 GHz · μ = 3.00 ea₀dashed: second-order −½αF²+5 GHz0−501200field F / V cm⁻¹
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

A static field has no first-order grip on a state of definite parity.

The key idea

The Stark effect is the shift and splitting of atomic levels caused by the odd-parity operator eFz, and the static polarisability α is the coefficient in the second-order shift ΔE = −½αF² it produces whenever no degeneracy blocks the sum.

Example. Hydrogen's ground state has α = 4.5 × 4πε₀a₀³ = 7.42 × 10⁻⁴¹ C m² V⁻¹, so at F = 1.0 × 10⁷ V m⁻¹ it drops by 3.7 × 10⁻²⁷ J, or 23 neV — one part in 4 × 10⁸ of the 10.2 eV gap up to n = 2.

The complete physical model and assumptions

Put an atom in a uniform static field F ẑ and the perturbation is HS = −d⋅F = eFz, a one-body operator odd under parity. Every |n l m⟩ eigenket of a central-field H₀ carries definite parity, so ⟨0|z|0⟩ = 0 identically and the first-order shift vanishes at any field strength: an isolated atomic level has no permanent electric dipole. The leading effect is second order, a sum over the states z can reach, ΔE = −½αF² with α = 2e²Σ|⟨k|z|0⟩|²/(Eₖ − E₀). Read that sum as level repulsion: the field mixes opposite-parity states into |0⟩, the mixture carries an induced dipole ⟨dz⟩ = αF, and a ground state always moves down because every denominator is positive. Hydrogen breaks the argument without breaking the parity rule. Its accidental l degeneracy puts 2s and 2p₀ at one energy, a denominator is zero, the sum is meaningless, and you must diagonalise eFz inside the manifold instead, where |⟨2s|z|2p₀⟩| = 3a₀ returns eigenvalues ±3ea₀F on equal mixtures of the two parities. What it all costs is boundedness: the added potential runs to −∞ downhill, so strictly no level is bound at all. Every one is a Siegert resonance with a tunnelling width — invisible to a finite-basis diagonalisation, utterly negligible for the ground state, and decisive for Rydberg states.

1Parity, not smallness, kills the first-order term

HS = eFz is odd under r → −r. Every eigenket |n l m⟩ of a central-field H₀ is a parity eigenket, |n l m⟩ → (−1)ˡ|n l m⟩, so |⟨r|n l m⟩|² is even while z is odd, and ⟨n l m|z|n l m⟩ = 0 exactly — for hydrogen 1s as for sodium 3s. That is a statement about the operator's symmetry, not about F being small: the diagonal element is a fixed number computed in the zero-field basis, and it does not grow when you turn the field up. Contrast the Zeeman case. HZ = (μB/ħ)(L + gₛ S)⋅B is built from axial vectors, even under parity, so its diagonal elements survive and the shift is linear in B from the weakest field. The whole asymmetry between a linear Zeeman effect and a quadratic Stark effect is a parity statement and nothing else.

2Second order is level repulsion, and it defines α

With first order gone, second order runs: ΔE = Σ(k≠0) |⟨k|eFz|0⟩|²/(E₀ − Eₖ). For a ground state every Eₖ > E₀, so every term is negative and the level always moves down; write it as −½αF² and α = 2e²Σ|⟨k|z|0⟩|²/(Eₖ − E₀) is positive by construction. The same first-order mixing |ψ⟩ = |0⟩ + Σₖ |k⟩⟨k|eFz|0⟩/(E₀ − Eₖ) supplies the induced dipole: ⟨ψ|dz|ψ⟩ = αF to first order in F, and only the cross term between |0⟩ and the admixture survives, precisely because ⟨0|z|0⟩ = 0. Shift and dipole are the same physics counted twice. For an excited state a term can flip sign — anything lying below |0⟩ contributes a negative denominator — so α need not be positive once you leave the ground state, and a level squeezed between two neighbours can barely move at all.

3Dalgarno–Lewis: solve one equation instead of summing

The sum over k is not a practical formula. For hydrogen 1s the discrete np states contribute 3.66 a₀³ and the continuum a further 0.84 a₀³, so truncating at 2p returns 2.96 a₀³ — only 66% of the exact 4.5 a₀³. Two escapes. Closure bounds it: α ≤ 2e²⟨0|z²|0⟩/ΔEₘᵢₙ, and with ⟨1s|z²|1s⟩ = ⟨r²⟩/3 = a₀² and ΔEₘᵢₙ = 0.375 Eₕ that gives 5.33 a₀³, 18% high, which at least brackets the answer. Or stop summing and solve. Dalgarno and Lewis replace the sum by one inhomogeneous equation, (H₀ − E₀)|ψ⁽¹⁾⟩ = −(HS − ⟨HS⟩)|0⟩, closed in atomic units by ψ⁽¹⁾ = −F(r + r²/2) cosθ ψ⁰; then ⟨ψ⁰|HS|ψ⁽¹⁾⟩ = −2.25 F² gives α = 4.5 exactly. Numerically it is a linear solve on the l = 1 radial grid, or a scipy.linalg.eigh diagonalisation of H₀ + eFz in a finite basis with the curvature read off at small F.

4Degeneracy changes the question: diagonalise first

Hydrogen's Coulomb degeneracy makes Eₖ − E₀ = 0 for a state that z connects, and the second-order sum divides by zero. Degenerate perturbation theory answers instead: diagonalise HS inside the degenerate subspace. For n = 2 the four states are |2s⟩ and |2p₀⟩, |2p(±1)⟩; z is an odd-parity, rank-one spherical tensor with q = 0, so it demands Δl = ±1 and Δm = 0 and the only non-zero element is ⟨2s|z|2p₀⟩ = −3a₀. The (|2s⟩, |2p₀⟩) block is eF times [[0, −3a₀], [−3a₀, 0]], with eigenvalues ∓3ea₀F on (|2s⟩ ± |2p₀⟩)/√2, while |2p(±1)⟩ stay put. So n = 2 splits into three components — up, unmoved and doubly degenerate, down — and the shifted eigenstates are not parity eigenstates: each carries a real permanent dipole of 3ea₀ = 2.54 × 10⁻²⁹ C m, or 7.62 D. At 10 kV cm⁻¹ that puts the outer components at ±0.159 meV.

5Which term is bigger? The crossover is a ratio

Real n = 2 hydrogen is not degenerate: fine structure lifts 2p₃/₂ by 10.97 GHz above 2p₁/₂, and the Lamb shift lifts 2s₁/₂ by 1.06 GHz above it. So the minimal model is two levels split by Δ and coupled by V = μF, with eigenvalues ±√((Δ/2)² + V²); ignoring spin, μ = 3ea₀. Expand for V ≪ Δ/2 and the quadratic regime reappears, with α = 2μ²/Δ for the lower level and −2μ²/Δ for the upper; take V ≫ Δ/2 and the eigenvalues are ±V, linear. The crossover is therefore a ratio, not a fixed field: with μ = 3ea₀, V = Δ at 275 V cm⁻¹ against the Lamb shift and at 2.9 kV cm⁻¹ against the fine-structure interval, and the spin-resolved 2s₁/₂–2p₁/₂ element, √3 ea₀, moves the Lamb-shift crossing up to 477 V cm⁻¹. Small denominators make enormous polarisabilities — the spinless two-level α for 2s against the Lamb shift is −1.85 × 10⁻³³ C m² V⁻¹, negative because its partner lies below it, and some 2.5 × 10⁷ times the ground state's in size — which is why a quadratic description of an excited level expires at fields a bench supply reaches with a few hundred volts.

6In a uniform field, no level is strictly bound

Add eFz to the Coulomb potential and the total runs to −∞ downhill, so the spectrum is continuous and every level is a Siegert resonance E − iΓ/2. The classical saddle vanishes at Fᵢₒₙ = 1/(16n⁴) in atomic units: 3.2 × 10¹⁰ V m⁻¹ at n = 1, but only 4.0 × 10⁴ V m⁻¹, that is 397 V cm⁻¹, at n = 30 — which is how Rydberg populations are counted by field ionisation. Below threshold the width is exponentially small: for hydrogen 1s at F = 0.01 a.u. = 5.1 × 10⁹ V m⁻¹, Γ = (4/F) exp(−2/(3F)) = 1.8 × 10⁻¹⁰ s⁻¹, a lifetime near 170 years, so calling the state bound costs nothing. A finite-basis diagonalisation cannot see any of this — it returns real eigenvalues by construction. Complex scaling r → r e(iθ) rotates the continuum away and turns the resonance into an ordinary complex eigenvalue, width included. Between manifolds, the Inglis–Teller field 1/(3n⁵) marks where n and n+1 overlap: 70 V cm⁻¹ at n = 30, comfortably below ionisation.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Stark operator and its parity

HS = −d⋅F = eFz, E⁽¹⁾ = eF⟨0|z|0⟩ = 0

Names the operator and settles the leading term in one line: z is odd, |0⟩ has definite parity, so the diagonal element dies.

F in V m⁻¹, z in m, e = 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ C; d = −er, so HS is an energy in J

Second order and the static polarisability

ΔE = −½αF², α = 2e² Σ(k≠0) |⟨k|z|0⟩|² / (Eₖ − E₀)

Compresses a whole spectrum into one response number, and shows a ground state must move down: every denominator is positive.

α in C² m² J⁻¹; α/4πε₀ is the polarisability volume in m³, 0.667 ų for H 1s

Induced dipole and the factor of one half

⟨dz⟩ = αF, ΔE = −∫₀F ⟨dz⟩ dF′ = −½αF²

The dipole grows with the field that pays for it, so the shift is half of −dF. A permanent dipole would deliver the full −dF.

⟨dz⟩ in C m: 7.4 × 10⁻³⁴ C m for H 1s at 1.0 × 10⁷ V m⁻¹, or 8.8 × 10⁻⁵ ea₀

Hydrogen 1s, exactly

α(1s) = (9/2) × 4πε₀a₀³ = 7.42 × 10⁻⁴¹ C m² V⁻¹

Fixes the benchmark and exposes the continuum's 0.84 a₀³, 19% of the total — a bound-state sum on its own always comes up short.

Dalgarno–Lewis, not a truncated sum: 2p alone gives 2.96 a₀³, all discrete np 3.66 a₀³

Degenerate manifold: a linear shift

⟨2s|z|2p₀⟩ = −3a₀ ⟹ E = E₂ ± 3ea₀FΔEₙ = (3/2) n (n₁ − n₂) ea₀F

Gives three components from four states, since z cannot reach |2p(±1)⟩, and a genuine permanent dipole in the field's own basis.

3ea₀ = 2.54 × 10⁻²⁹ C m = 7.62 D; linear only above ΔEfs/3ea₀ ≈ 2.9 kV cm⁻¹ at n = 2

Saddle point and field ionisation

Fᵢₒₙ = Eₕ/(16 n⁴ e a₀) = 1/(16n⁴) in atomic units

Sets the field above which no barrier is left, and reminds you that the eigenvalue below it is a resonance, not a bound state.

Atomic field unit Eₕ/ea₀ = 5.14 × 10¹¹ V m⁻¹; n = 30 gives 4.0 × 10⁴ V m⁻¹ = 397 V cm⁻¹
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

3.00 a₀
0.5 to 5 a₀; steps of 0.25.
1.05 GHz
0.5 to 12 GHz; steps of 0.05.
200 V cm⁻¹
0 to 1200 V cm⁻¹; steps of 10.

Try this. Leave Δ at the 1.05 GHz Lamb shift and walk the marker out: the dashed curve peels away once μF reaches Δ/2, near 140 V cm⁻¹, and by 1200 V cm⁻¹ the mixing angle is a few degrees short of 45°. Raise Δ to the 11 GHz fine-structure interval and the quadratic curve survives the whole axis.

Live results

COUPLING μF
0.768 GHz
EXACT SHIFT
-0.405 GHz
QUADRATIC −½αF²
-0.561 GHz
MIXING ANGLE θ
27.8 °

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Physics V modelTwo-level Stark model for hydrogen n = 2: |2s⟩ and |2p₀⟩ split by Δ = 1.05 GHz and coupled by V = μF. Solid: exact eigenvalues ±√((Δ/2)² + V²). Dashed: second-order −½αF² on the lower level. At F = 200 V cm⁻¹, V = 0.768 GHz, the lower level has moved -0.405 GHz, and −½αF² claims -0.561 GHz.hydrogen n = 2 in a static fieldΔ = 1.05 GHz · μ = 3.00 ea₀dashed: second-order −½αF²+5 GHz0−501200field F / V cm⁻¹
Two-level Stark model for hydrogen n = 2: |2s⟩ and |2p₀⟩ split by Δ = 1.05 GHz and coupled by V = μF. Solid: exact eigenvalues ±√((Δ/2)² + V²). Dashed: second-order −½αF² on the lower level. At F = 200 V cm⁻¹, V = 0.768 GHz, the lower level has moved −0.405 GHz, and −½αF² claims −0.561 GHz.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Matrix element ⟨2s|z|2p₀⟩: 3.00 a₀; Zero-field splitting Δ: 1.05 GHz; Field marker F: 200 V cm⁻¹

Baseline 3.00; choose 0.5 to 5, in steps of 0.25.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The error is reading the quadratic shift as the small-field face of a first-order term that switches on once the field is strong enough. No such term ever switches on. ⟨0|z|0⟩ is a number computed in the zero-field basis, and parity makes it zero whatever F is; raising F does not make that matrix element non-zero. What changes with F is whether perturbation theory converges at all. Hydrogen's linear Stark effect is not the first-order term switching on — it is degenerate perturbation theory answering a different question, because 2s and 2p₀ were already degenerate at F = 0. The mirror-image error is then to say hydrogen 2s has a permanent dipole. The bare |2s⟩ does not; the field's own eigenstates (|2s⟩ ± |2p₀⟩)/√2 do, and it was the field that selected that basis. And the ½ in −½αF² is not a convention: the dipole is induced by the very field it then interacts with, so half the energy goes into making it.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

Hydrogen's ground state has polarisability α = 4.5 in atomic units, where the atomic unit is 4πε₀a₀³ = 1.649 × 10⁻⁴¹ C² m² J⁻¹. Find the Stark shift and the induced dipole at F = 1.0 × 10⁷ V m⁻¹ (100 kV cm⁻¹), and compare the shift with the 10.2 eV gap to n = 2.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

Model hydrogen 2s and 2p₀ as two spinless levels, 2s lying above 2p₀ by the Lamb shift Δ = 1.058 GHz = 4.38 × 10⁻⁶ eV, coupled by V = μF with μ = 3ea₀. Find the two-level polarisability of 2s, the field at which V = Δ/2, and the error the quadratic formula makes there.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

For a hydrogen Rydberg state with n = 30, work in atomic units (Eₕ = 27.211 eV, field unit Eₕ/ea₀ = 5.142 × 10¹¹ V m⁻¹). Find the binding energy, the classical field-ionisation threshold Fᵢₒₙ = 1/(16n⁴), the Stark manifold width 3n²F at that threshold, and the Inglis–Teller field 1/(3n⁵) at which the n and n + 1 manifolds first overlap.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

Hydrogen's ground state shifts as −½αF² in a static field, but its n = 2 level splits linearly, into three components with the outer two at ±3ea₀F. Why does a term linear in F appear for n = 2 and not for n = 1?
7

Review & continue

The Stark effect is the shift and splitting of atomic levels caused by the odd-parity operator eFz, and the static polarisability α is the coefficient in the second-order shift ΔE = −½αF² it produces whenever no degeneracy blocks the sum.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.