
Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson
Coulomb scattering of a Dirac electron: the Mott factor
This is where the unit's γ-matrix algebra earns its keep: a measured process, fast electrons on nuclei, computed with spin sums and traces and not one written spinor. Spin adds a single overlap factor, and reading that factor by helicity explains a striking fact, that fast electrons almost never come straight back.
UAQM-05.09 · Lesson 9 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Build the model
Rutherford's law at relativistic p and v, times one spinor overlap.
The key idea
The Mott factor 1 − β² sin²(θ/2) is the ratio of the spin-averaged first-Born cross-section of a Dirac electron on a fixed point charge to Rutherford's cross-section evaluated with the same relativistic momentum and speed.
Example. An electron with kinetic energy 1.022 MeV, twice its rest energy, has γ = 3 and β² = 8/9, so the factor is 0.556 at 90° and 1/9 = 0.111 straight back: a spinless particle with the same p and v returns nine times as often.
The complete physical model and assumptions
A fast electron crossing a nucleus is Quantum Mechanics II's Born problem with one new ingredient, and this topic isolates it. The Coulomb potential is the time component of a four-vector, so it multiplies the spinor by the identity, and the golden rule with Unit 4's normalised plane waves gives Rutherford's cross-section, now with relativistic momentum and speed, times |u†(p′)u(p)|²/(2E/c)². Everything spin does lives in that ratio. For an unpolarised beam and a detector blind to spin, the spin sums close the overlap into a trace that the Clifford algebra evaluates without one explicit spinor, and the result is 1 − β² sin²(θ/2): the first-order form of Mott's 1929 result. Splitting by helicity says what it means. Helicity is kept with amplitude cos(θ/2) and flipped with (mc²/E) sin(θ/2); straight back, conservation of Jz kills the first and the chirality-preserving vector coupling suppresses the second, so the backward rate falls as 1/γ². The model is first order in Zα about a fixed point charge. It cannot tell electrons from positrons or give a polarised beam a left-right asymmetry, both order-Zα effects inside Mott's exact solution, and it fails once the momentum transfer resolves the nucleus or the electron can recoil it.
1One golden-rule step with spinor plane waves
Units are SI, with x⁰ = ct and metric diag(1, −1, −1, −1); four-vector products are written pμp′μ, and p⋅p′ always means the three-vector product. Treat the nucleus as a fixed point charge. Its potential V(r) = −Zαħc/r multiplies the 4 × 4 identity, because it is the time component of topic 5.08's vector coupling. Box-normalise the free solutions as ψ = u(p, s)e(ip⋅r/ħ)/√(2EL³/c), so Unit 4's u†u = 2E/c puts one electron in the box. Then ⟨p′s′|V|ps⟩ = Ṽ(q)u†(p′, s′)u(p, s)c/(2EL³), with q = p′ − p. Quantum Mechanics II's golden rule needs the final-state density per steradian, L³p²/((2πħ)³v), because dE/dp = v at any speed, and the incident flux v/L³. The box cancels and dσ/dΩ = (p/(2πħ²v))²|Ṽ(q)|²|u′†u|²/(2E/c)², derived. As v → 0, p/v → m and the overlap ratio becomes χ′†χ: the familiar Born formula, with the spin carried through untouched.
2The spinless baseline: Rutherford at relativistic p and v
For V = −Zαħc/r, Ṽ(q) = −4πZαħ³c/q², derived by screening with e(−r/a), transforming, and letting a grow without limit. A fixed source scatters elastically, so |p′| = |p| and q = 2p sin(θ/2), and the spin-free part of the cross-section is (Zαħc)²/(4p²v² sin⁴(θ/2)). That is the complete first-order answer for a spinless particle: to first order in V the Klein–Gordon equation reads p̂²φ/(2m) + (E/mc²)Vφ = [(E² − m²c⁴)/(2mc²)]φ, a Schrödinger problem with V scaled by γ, and (γm)² = (p/v)². Dimensions: (J m)² over J² is m², per steradian. As v → 0, pv → 2T and Geiger and Marsden's measured sin⁻⁴(θ/2) law returns. At 1.00 MeV, pv = 1.34 MeV against 2T = 2.00 MeV, so kinematics alone raise the cross-section 2.23-fold over the non-relativistic formula. Whatever spin does must come on top, through the overlap ratio.
3Spin sums close the overlap into a trace
An unpolarised beam weights each initial spin by 1/2, and a detector blind to spin adds the final ones, so the factor to compute is (1/2)Σ|u′†u|²/(2E/c)², summed over s and s′. Write u′†u = ū′γ⁰u; since γ⁰ is Hermitian its complex conjugate is ūγ⁰u′. The product ū′γ⁰u ūγ⁰u′ is a closed chain, and Unit 4's spin sum Σₛ u ū = p̸ + mc, used twice, turns it into (1/2)Tr[γ⁰(p̸ + mc)γ⁰(p̸′ + mc)] without writing a spinor. Traces of an odd number of γ matrices vanish, Tr(γ⁰γ⁰) = 4, and the trace identity for four γ matrices gives Tr(γ⁰p̸γ⁰p̸′) = 4(2p⁰p′⁰ − pμp′μ) = 4(E²/c² + p⋅p′). The full trace is 4(E²/c² + p² cos θ + m²c²) = (8E²/c²)[1 − β² sin²(θ/2)], with β = pc/E. Halve it, divide by (2E/c)², and the Mott factor appears, derived: 0.595 at β = 0.90 and 90°. Only the Clifford algebra was used here; the Born approximation entered once, through the overlap.
4Helicity amplitudes: which spins actually scatter
The trace says how much scatters, not which spins. Explicit spinors say which. In the Dirac representation a helicity state is u(p, h) = √((E + mc²)/c) (χₕ, hrχₕ), with σ⋅p̂χₕ = hχₕ, h = ±1 and r = pc/(E + mc²). Put p along z and p′ at θ in the xz-plane; then u†(p′, h′)u(p, h) = [(E + mc²)/c](1 + hh′r²)χ′†χ. Because r² = (E − mc²)/(E + mc²), the bracket is 2E/c when helicity is kept and 2mc when it flips, while the two-component overlaps are cos(θ/2) and ±sin(θ/2). Relative to 2E/c the amplitudes are cos(θ/2) and (mc²/E) sin(θ/2), derived, the same for either starting helicity, and cos²(θ/2) + (1 − β²) sin²(θ/2) rebuilds the trace term by term, an independent check. As β → 0 the split is cos² against sin²: the spin stays put while p turns, so a flipped helicity only means the reference axis moved. As β → 1 the lower components lock spin to momentum, and flips die as 1/γ².
5Straight back: two separate reasons for zero
At θ = π each amplitude vanishes for its own reason. A point charge is symmetric under rotations about the beam, so Jz is conserved, and a plane wave along ±z has Lz = 0, so Jz is the spin projection on z. An h = +1 electron arriving along +z has Jz = +ħ/2; leaving along −z with h = +1 needs Jz = −ħ/2, which a potential symmetric about the beam cannot supply at any energy: that is the zero of cos(θ/2). A flip conserves Jz, but the coupling ψ̄γ⁰ψ, like any vector coupling, connects only like chiralities (topic 5.08), and chirality equals helicity up to terms of order mc²/E. So backward scattering is Rutherford's times 1/γ², 2.4 × 10⁻³ at 10 MeV. A contrast confirms the reason: a Lorentz-scalar potential would bring in ū′u, which flips chirality, and its spin average, 1 − β² cos²(θ/2) as the Medium example derives, is largest straight back. The zero is measured and exploited: electron scattering at 180° picks out a nucleus's magnetic response, because charge scattering is switched off there.
6Where first order stops: Zα, nuclear size and recoil
First Born needs Zα ≪ 1, and Zα is 0.095 for aluminium but 0.58 for gold. Mott's 1929 exact partial-wave solution, quoted here, sums the Coulomb series to all orders; expanded for light nuclei it adds McKinley and Feshbach's πZαβ sin(θ/2)[1 − sin(θ/2)] to the factor, also quoted. That term changes sign with the projectile's charge, so electrons and positrons, identical in first Born, differ; for highly relativistic electrons the fractional difference is largest at backward angles, where the Mott factor is small, although the term itself vanishes at exactly 180°. A transversely polarised beam scatters left and right differently only beyond first Born, where the two spin amplitudes acquire a relative phase; Mott polarimeters use the tens-of-per-cent asymmetry on gold foils that first Born puts at zero. A point nucleus needs qR ≪ ħ: a charge cloud multiplies the cross-section by |F(q)|² ≈ 1 − q²⟨r²⟩/(3ħ²), and Hofstadter's Stanford experiments read nuclear radii off exactly this departure from the Mott cross-section. A fixed nucleus needs E ≪ Mc², 25 GeV for aluminium.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Born cross-section with Dirac spinors
dσ/dΩ = (p/(2πħ²v))² |Ṽ(q)|² |u†(p′, s′)u(p, s)|²/(2E/c)²
Derived from the golden rule with box-normalised spinor waves. Spin lives only in the overlap ratio; as v → 0, p/v → m and the familiar Born formula returns.
Ṽ(q) = ∫V(r)e(−iq⋅r/ħ)d³r in J m³; q = p′ − p in kg m s⁻¹; u†u = 2E/c; dσ/dΩ in m² sr⁻¹Rutherford at relativistic p and v
(dσ/dΩ)R = (Zαħc)²/(4p²v² sin⁴(θ/2))
Derived, and the whole first-order answer for a spinless particle. As v → 0, pv → 2T and the sin⁻⁴(θ/2) law that Geiger and Marsden measured returns.
Zαħc in J m (1.440 MeV fm per unit Z), pv in J; from Ṽ(q) = −4πZαħ³c/q² with q = 2p sin(θ/2)Spin average as a trace
(1/2)Σ|u′†u|² = (1/2)Tr[γ⁰(p̸ + mc)γ⁰(p̸′ + mc)]
Derived. The 1/2 averages the beam's spin, the unobserved final spin is summed, and from here on only Clifford trace identities are needed.
Σ over s and s′; p̸ = γμpμ in kg m s⁻¹; uses Unit 4's Σₛ u ū = p̸ + mc and u′†u = ū′γ⁰uMott factor in first Born approximation
dσ/dΩ = (dσ/dΩ)R [1 − β² sin²(θ/2)]
Derived. β → 0 gives Rutherford, θ → 0 gives 1, and θ = π gives 1 − β² = 1/γ², only 2.4 × 10⁻³ for a 10.0 MeV electron.
β = pc/E = v/c, dimensionless; fixed point nucleus with Zα ≪ 1; the first-order form of Mott's 1929 resultHelicity split of the Mott factor
1 − β² sin²(θ/2) = cos²(θ/2) + (mc²/E)² sin²(θ/2)
Derived from Dirac-representation spinors. Jz conservation kills the kept term at θ = π, and the flips die as 1/γ² because a vector coupling preserves chirality (topic 5.08).
Kept helicity: |u′†u| = (2E/c) cos(θ/2). Flipped: |u′†u| = 2mc sin(θ/2). The same for either initial helicity.Next order in Zα (quoted)
dσ/dΩ = (dσ/dΩ)R [1 − β² sin²(θ/2) + πZαβ sin(θ/2)(1 − sin(θ/2))]
Quoted, not derived: it sizes the first-Born error. For aluminium at 4.00 MeV it adds 0.0097 at 150°, 12% of the first-order 0.079, with the projectile's sign.
McKinley and Feshbach (1948), Mott's exact solution expanded for light nuclei; replace Z by −Z for positronsInteractive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Set β = 0: the solid curve sits on the line at 1, and past 90° the bar is mostly open, because a slow electron's spin ignores the turn. Push β to 0.99 and the open part collapses: straight back, only 1/γ² = 0.020 is left.
Live results
- MOTT FACTOR AT θ
- 0.393
- HELICITY KEPT
- 0.250
- HELICITY FLIPPED
- 0.142
- KINETIC ENERGY T
- 0.661 MeV
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Electron speed β = v/c: 0.90; Scattering angle θ: 120 °
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
It is tempting to file 1 − β² sin²(θ/2) as the relativistic correction any fast charge would show, like the γ that appears everywhere else in the unit. It is not kinematic. All the relativistic kinematics already sit in Rutherford's factor through p and v, and a spinless Klein–Gordon particle treated to the same order has an overlap of exactly 1 and no Mott factor at all. Nor does the suppression mean a fast electron is too stiff to be turned round: Rutherford's factor stays finite at 180°. What vanishes there is the spinor overlap. Conservation of Jz forbids keeping helicity on reversal, and the chirality-preserving vector coupling lets helicity flip only with probability (mc²/E)² = 1/γ².
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
An unpolarised beam of electrons with kinetic energy 1.50 MeV scatters through 90.0° from oxygen-16 nuclei, Z = 8, treated as fixed point charges. Find β, the Mott factor and the spin-averaged dσ/dΩ in mb sr⁻¹. Compare it with Rutherford's formula at the same p and v, and with the non-relativistic formula that uses 2T in place of pv.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- Kinematics: E = T + mc² = 2.011 MeV and pc = √(E² − m²c⁴) = √(4.0441 − 0.2611) MeV = 1.9450 MeV, so β = pc/E = 0.9672 and β² = 0.9354.
- Mott factor: sin²45° = 0.5000, so 1 − β² sin²(θ/2) = 1 − 0.9354 × 0.5000 = 0.5323.
- Rutherford at relativistic p and v: pv = (pc)²/E = 3.7830/2.011 MeV = 1.8812 MeV, Zαħc = 8 × 1.43996 MeV fm = 11.520 MeV fm and sin⁴45° = 0.2500, so (dσ/dΩ)R = 132.70/(4 × 3.5387 × 0.2500) fm² sr⁻¹ = 37.50 fm² sr⁻¹ = 375.0 mb sr⁻¹, since 1 fm² = 10 mb.
- Multiply: dσ/dΩ = 0.5323 × 375.0 mb sr⁻¹ = 199.6 mb sr⁻¹. Dimensions: (MeV fm)² over MeV² is fm², an area per steradian.
- The non-relativistic formula with 2T = 3.00 MeV gives 132.70/(4 × 9.00 × 0.2500) fm² sr⁻¹ = 14.74 fm² sr⁻¹ = 147.4 mb sr⁻¹. Kinematics raise this to 375.0 mb sr⁻¹; spin then removes 47% of it.
- Validity: Zα = 0.058 ≪ 1, and q = 2p sin45° = 2.751 MeV/c with ¹⁶O's measured rms charge radius 2.70 fm gives qR/ħ = 2.751 × 2.70/197.3 = 0.038, so |F|² ≈ 0.9995 and the point nucleus is safe.
Answer. β = 0.967, Mott factor 0.532, dσ/dΩ = 2.00 × 10² mb sr⁻¹ (2.00 × 10⁻²⁹ m² sr⁻¹), against 375 mb sr⁻¹ for Rutherford at the same p and v and 147 mb sr⁻¹ from the non-relativistic formula.
MediumExample 2
Suppose a nucleus acted on the electron through a hypothetical Lorentz-scalar potential S(r) of Coulomb shape, entering as mc² → mc² + S, so its Born amplitude carries ū(p′)u(p) in place of u†(p′)u(p). For electrons of kinetic energy 0.511 MeV, so γ = 2, find the spin-averaged overlap factor for both couplings by traces, evaluate both at 60° and 180°, and explain the difference at 180°.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- The scalar term in H is γ⁰S, so the overlap is u′†γ⁰u = ū′u. Spin sums give (1/2)Σ|ū′u|² = (1/2)Tr[(p̸ + mc)(p̸′ + mc)] = 2(pμp′μ + m²c²) = 2(E²/c² − p² cos θ + m²c²). Dimensions: ū′u carries the kg m s⁻¹ of u†u, so the ratio to (2E/c)² is a pure number.
- With m²c² = E²/c² − p² and 1 + cos θ = 2cos²(θ/2), this is (4E²/c²)[1 − β² cos²(θ/2)], so the scalar factor is 1 − β² cos²(θ/2), against the vector factor 1 − β² sin²(θ/2). Both tend to 1 as β → 0: slowly, the two couplings cannot be told apart.
- γ = 2 gives β² = 1 − 1/γ² = 0.750. At 60°: vector 1 − 0.750 × 0.250 = 0.8125, scalar 1 − 0.750 × 0.750 = 0.4375.
- At 180°: vector 1 − 0.750 = 0.250 = 1/γ², scalar 1 − 0 = 1.000. The scalar coupling reflects electrons γ² = 4 times as strongly.
- Helicity reading: γ⁰ reverses the sign of the lower-component product, giving [(E + mc²)/c](1 − hh′r²)χ′†χ, so relative to 2E/c the scalar keeps helicity with (mc²/E) cos(θ/2) and flips it with sin(θ/2). At 60°: 0.5 × 0.866 = 0.433, squared 0.1875, plus 0.500² = 0.2500, total 0.4375, as the trace said.
- At 180° Jz still forbids keeping helicity under both couplings. But γ⁰ anticommutes with γ⁵, so the scalar coupling flips chirality and its helicity flip is unsuppressed, while the vector coupling preserves chirality and pays (mc²/E)² for the flip.
Answer. Vector: 0.8125 at 60° and 0.250 at 180°. Scalar: 0.4375 at 60° and 1.000 at 180°. Straight back the chirality-flipping scalar coupling reflects γ² = 4 times as strongly; the 1/γ² of real Coulomb scattering is the mark of a vector coupling.
HardExample 3
Unpolarised 4.00 MeV electrons scatter singly from a thin aluminium foil, Z = 13. Detectors of equal solid angle sit at 30.0° and 150°. Predict N(150°)/N(30°) in first Born and the factor by which spin changes it. Then use the quoted McKinley–Feshbach term and ²⁷Al's measured rms charge radius, 3.06 fm, to say which correction a 2% measurement of the ratio would see first, and predict the ratio for positrons.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- Kinematics: E = 4.511 MeV, pc = √(4.511² − 0.511²) MeV = 4.4820 MeV, β = 0.99356, β² = 0.98717 and γ = 8.83. In the ratio, Z, p and v cancel, leaving the angular factors.
- Rutherford part: [sin²15°/sin²75°]² = (0.066987/0.933013)² = 5.155 × 10⁻³. Mott factors: 1 − 0.98717 × 0.066987 = 0.93387 at 30° and 1 − 0.98717 × 0.933013 = 0.07896 at 150°.
- First-Born ratio: 5.155 × 10⁻³ × 0.07896/0.93387 = 4.358 × 10⁻⁴. Spin multiplies the ratio by 0.07896/0.93387 = 0.0846, an 11.8-fold cut against a spinless particle.
- Quoted McKinley–Feshbach term: πZαβ = π × 0.09487 × 0.99356 = 0.29611, times sin(θ/2)[1 − sin(θ/2)], adds 0.29611 × 0.25882 × 0.74118 = 0.05680 at 30° and 0.29611 × 0.96593 × 0.03407 = 0.009746 at 150°. Electrons: 0.99068 and 0.08871, ratio 4.616 × 10⁻⁴, up 5.9%.
- Positrons, Z → −Z: 0.87707 and 0.06921, ratio 4.068 × 10⁻⁴, down 6.7%, so electrons and positrons differ by 13% where first Born sees no difference.
- Size: q = 2p sin(θ/2) = 8.658 MeV/c at 150°, so qR/ħ = 8.658 × 3.06/197.33 = 0.1343 and |F|² ≈ 1 − 0.1343²/3 = 0.9940; at 30°, q = 2.320 MeV/c gives 0.99957. The ratio falls 0.56%. Recoil: E/Mc² = 4.511 MeV/25.1 GeV = 1.8 × 10⁻⁴.
Answer. First Born: N(150°)/N(30°) = 4.36 × 10⁻⁴, 11.8 times below the spinless 5.15 × 10⁻³. The order-Zα term raises it to 4.62 × 10⁻⁴ for electrons and lowers it to 4.07 × 10⁻⁴ for positrons; nuclear size moves it 0.6%, so a 2% measurement sees the Zα term first.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
The Mott factor 1 − β² sin²(θ/2) is the ratio of the spin-averaged first-Born cross-section of a Dirac electron on a fixed point charge to Rutherford's cross-section evaluated with the same relativistic momentum and speed.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.