Skip to main content

Optional unit · institution-dependent · Interactive lesson

The jellium Hamiltonian in second quantisation

Every number this unit computes for the electron gas, the 2.21 and −0.916 included, comes from the Hamiltonian written here. Two steps need care: cancelling the infinite q = 0 Coulomb energy, which works only if the limits are taken in the right order, and rescaling lengths until rₛ is the only parameter left.

UAQM-15.01 · Lesson 1 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: The jellium Hamiltonian in second quantisationSodium jellium, n = 2.65 × 10²⁸ m⁻³, on log–log axes against the Coulomb cutoff length μ⁻¹. Upper line: one q = 0 term per electron, X = e²n/(2ε₀μ²), now 10^(8.4) eV. Lower line: the three summed, of size X/N, now 10^(-14.6) eV for N = 10^(23). Dashed: H's energy unit Ry/rₛ² = 0.88 eV; the open circle is where the sum reaches it.upper: one q = 0 term per electronlower: their sum; dashed: Ry/rₛ²10²⁰ eV10⁻²⁰ eV0.88 eV1 nm1 μm1 mm1 mμ⁻¹
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.

Optional unit · institution-dependent. Units 14 and 15 are the course’s optional extension into open systems and quantum gases. Unit 14 builds on radiation and decay; Unit 15 builds on second quantisation. Keep the fifteen-unit numbering and follow your institution’s required syllabus. Optional work is not a required completion gate.

1

Build the model

Smear out the ions, cancel an infinity, and one number is left: rₛ.

The key idea

Jellium is N electrons in a box whose ions are smeared into a uniform positive background; on plane waves its Hamiltonian is Σεₖc†c plus (1/2V)Σ′vq c†c†cc with vq = e²/(ε₀q²) and q = 0 left out, and its only parameter is rₛ, the radius per electron in Bohr radii.

Example. Sodium's measured bcc lattice constant, 4.225 Å at 5 K, holds two conduction electrons per cube, so n = 2/a³ = 2.65 × 10²⁸ m⁻³ and rₛ = 3.93. Jellium's energy unit is then Ry/rₛ² = 0.880 eV, and the Coulomb term enters H with relative weight 3.93.

The complete physical model and assumptions

Jellium keeps one feature of a simple metal, the Coulomb repulsion between its conduction electrons, and replaces the ions by a rigid, uniform positive charge that makes the whole neutral. On the plane waves of a periodic box, Unit 10's two-body operator becomes a sum over momentum transfers: a pair in k and k′ scatters to k + q and k′ − q with amplitude vq/V, vq = e²/(ε₀q²), because a translation-invariant force conserves momentum. The one troublesome term is q = 0, infinite for a 1/r law, and it is also the only term the uniform background touches. With the Coulomb law cut off as e(−μr), the background's self-energy, its attraction to the electrons and the q = 0 repulsion add to −e²/(2ε₀μ²V) per electron, which vanishes as V → ∞ at fixed μ, so q = 0 is dropped exactly, provided the limits come in that order. Measuring lengths in rₛa₀, the radius of the sphere per electron, then leaves a single parameter: kinetic energy scales as 1/rₛ², Coulomb energy as 1/rₛ, so the interaction's relative weight is rₛ and the dense gas is the nearly free one. All of this is derived. It stops where its omissions bite: the ions' periodic potential, harmless for sodium, whose measured Fermi surface is spherical to about one part in a thousand, but decisive for the d-band metals; the ions' motion; and relativity, which stops compression weakening the coupling once rₛ falls to about 0.014.

1Plane waves turn the Coulomb law into a momentum transfer

Units are SI and the gas is non-relativistic, so the course's metric (+, −, −, −) never enters; 1 Ry = ħ²/(2ma₀²) = 13.606 eV. In a cube of volume V = L³ with periodic boundaries the orbitals are φₖσ = V(−1/2)e(ik⋅r)χσ with k = 2πn/L for n a triple of integers, and the kinetic energy is Σεₖc†ₖσcₖσ, εₖ = ħ²k²/2m. Unit 10's ½Σ⟨ij|v|kl⟩c†ᵢc†ⱼcₗcₖ then needs ⟨k + q, k′ − q|v|k, k′⟩. Writing r₁ = r₂ + r, the r₂ integral returns V times a Kronecker δ on total momentum and leaves vq/V, with vq = ∫d³r e(−iq⋅r)v(r): a pair scatters by exchanging ħq, spin rides through each vertex unchanged, and only three of the four momenta are free. For v = e²e(−μr)/(4πε₀r) the angular integral leaves (e²/(ε₀q))∫₀^∞ sin(qr)e(−μr)dr = e²/(ε₀(q² + μ²)), derived. Dimensions check: vq is in J m³, so vq/V is an energy.

2The background touches only q = 0

A uniform charge has no Fourier component except at q = 0, so the background enters only through two constants, which join the q = 0 part of the pair sum; all three are finite while μ ≠ 0 because ∫d³r e(−μr)/r = 4π/μ². Its energy with itself is ½(e²/4πε₀)n²V(4π/μ²) = e²N²/(2ε₀Vμ²), with n = N/V, and its attraction to the electrons is −e²N²/(ε₀Vμ²). The q = 0 part of the pair sum is (v₀/2V)Σc†ₖσc†ₖ′σ′cₖ′σ′cₖσ; anticommuting cₖσ two places to the left turns the operator into N̂² − N̂, so it equals (e²/(2ε₀Vμ²))N(N − 1). All three are derived, and they add to −e²N/(2ε₀Vμ²). The N² parts cancel exactly, which is neutrality, not an approximation. What survives is the −N̂: the background terms count all N² pairs, self-pairs included, while the normal-ordered electron sum counts only the N(N − 1) distinct ones. One-particle check: for N = 1 the pair term vanishes, and the two background terms give −e²/(2ε₀Vμ²), exactly the formula.

3Take the volume to infinity first

Per electron the leftover is −e²/(2ε₀μ²V), while each term is of order e²n/(2ε₀μ²). For sodium, n = 2.65 × 10²⁸ m⁻³, with μ⁻¹ = 1 μm in a 1 cm cube, the three are +2.40 × 10⁸, −4.80 × 10⁸ and +2.40 × 10⁸ eV per electron, and they sum to −9.05 × 10⁻¹⁵ eV. At fixed μ the leftover falls as 1/V and vanishes in the thermodynamic limit; send μ → 0 at fixed V instead and it diverges. So V → ∞ comes first and q = 0 is dropped exactly. Only then does μ → 0, in the q ≠ 0 terms, where it is harmless: as V → ∞ the sum over q becomes V/(2π)³ times ∫d³q, and because d³q/q² integrates over angles to 4πdq, which stays finite near q = 0, the cutoff alters a sliver of width about μ that vanishes with it. The result, derived, is H = Σεₖc†c + (1/2V)Σ′vq c†c†cc with vq = e²/(ε₀q²), the prime leaving out q = 0. Free-field check: e → 0 leaves the ideal Fermi gas.

4Measure lengths in units of rₛa₀

A uniform gas has one length, the radius rₛa₀ of the sphere that holds one electron: (4π/3)(rₛa₀)³ = 1/n, with a₀ = 4πε₀ħ²/(me²) = 0.529 Å. Measured densities put the simple metals at rₛ ≈ 2 to 6: 2.07 for aluminium, 3.93 for sodium and 5.69 for caesium. Rescale k = k̃/(rₛa₀), q = q̃/(rₛa₀) and V = Ṽ(rₛa₀)³, where Ṽ = 4πN/3. Then εₖ = (Ry/rₛ²)k̃², and since e²/(ε₀a₀) = 8π Ry, vq/2V = (Ry/rₛ²)(3rₛ/N)q̃⁻². So H = (Ry/rₛ²)[Σk̃²c†c + (3rₛ/N)Σ′q̃⁻²c†c†cc], derived, and the allowed k̃ = (2π/L̃)n, with L̃ = (4πN/3)¹⁄³, depend on N alone. Dimensions check: the bracket is a pure number and Ry/rₛ² carries the energy. Density enters only through the prefactor and the explicit rₛ before the interaction: kinetic energy per electron scales as 1/rₛ², interaction as 1/rₛ. Because rₛ ∝ me²n(−1/3)/(ε₀ħ²), the limit rₛ → 0 is at once the dense gas and the free-field limit e → 0, a check on any expansion in rₛ.

5Why the dense gas is the nearly free one

The kinetic energy here is Pauli's, not thermal: to hold N fermions the occupied plane waves reach a wavenumber of order 1/(rₛa₀), so kinetic energy per electron grows as n²⁄³, while the Coulomb energy at the mean spacing, 2/rₛ Ry, grows only as n¹⁄³. Rescaling a 1/rp interaction the same way gives it a relative weight rₛ(2−p): p = 1 is weak when dense, p = 2 never changes, and interactions falling faster than 1/r², like the short-range ones of topic 15.07's Bose gas, are weak when dilute. The next two topics turn the bracket into numbers, derived there and quoted here: one determinant gives E/N = 2.21/rₛ² − 0.916/rₛ Ry, an interaction-to-kinetic ratio of 0.414rₛ. That is 0.86 for aluminium, 1.63 for sodium and 2.36 for caesium, so metals sit where the small parameter is not small, and the series is not even a power series, correlation adding a ln rₛ term (Gell-Mann and Brueckner, quoted). At the dilute end, quantum Monte Carlo puts the Wigner crystal near rₛ ≈ 100 (quoted).

6What jellium leaves out

The ions. Point ions on a lattice have Fourier components at every reciprocal lattice vector G, and an electron–ion term ΣUG c†(k+G)σcₖσ would let the lattice absorb momentum ħG and open gaps at the Brillouin-zone faces; jellium keeps only G = 0, where the background sits. For the alkali metals the loss is small: de Haas–van Alphen measurements find sodium's Fermi surface spherical to about one part in a thousand, so its electrons barely see the lattice. In aluminium the lattice already reshapes the Fermi surface, and in the transition metals, with d bands, jellium fails outright. The ions are also frozen into a rigid background, so there are no phonons, and the only pressure is the electrons' own, whose zero topic 15.04 finds. Relativity is safe: with the free Fermi gas's kF = 1.92/(rₛa₀), quoted from statistical physics, vF/c = 1.92α/rₛ = 0.0036 for sodium, and the non-relativistic H holds until rₛ falls to about 0.014.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Jellium Hamiltonian on plane waves

H = Σ εₖ c†ₖσ cₖσ + (1/2V) Σ′ vq c†(k+q)σ c†(k′−q)σ′ cₖ′σ′ cₖσ

Derived from Unit 10's ½Σ⟨ij|v|kl⟩c†ᵢc†ⱼcₗcₖ: on plane waves each element is vq/V times a Kronecker delta that conserves total momentum.

εₖ = ħ²k²/2m in J; V = L³ in m³; c, c† dimensionless; k = (2π/L)n with n a triple of integers; Σ′ runs over k, k′, q, σ, σ′ with q = 0 left out

Cut-off Coulomb law in momentum space

vq = ∫d³r e(−iq⋅r) e²e(−μr)/(4πε₀r) = e²/(ε₀(q² + μ²))

Derived. For q ≠ 0, μ → 0 leaves the bare e²/(ε₀q²); at q = 0 it leaves e²/(ε₀μ²), finite only while the cutoff is in place.

vq in J m³; q and μ in m⁻¹; e = 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ C; ε₀ = 8.854 × 10⁻¹² F m⁻¹

The q = 0 ledger

Ebb + Eeb + Eₑₑ(q = 0) = (e²/(2ε₀Vμ²))[N² − 2N² + N(N − 1)] = −e²N/(2ε₀Vμ²)

Derived. Per electron it is −e²/(2ε₀μ²V), zero as V → ∞ at fixed μ: drop q = 0 first, then remove the cutoff from the q ≠ 0 terms.

Background–background, electron–background and q = 0 electron–electron energies, in J; N(N − 1) leaves out self-pairs

Radius per electron

(4π/3)(rₛa₀)³ = V/N = 1/n

Defines jellium's only parameter. Measured densities give rₛ = 2.07 for aluminium, 3.93 for sodium and 5.69 for caesium.

a₀ = 4πε₀ħ²/(me²) = 5.29 × 10⁻¹¹ m; n in m⁻³; rₛ is a pure number

The Hamiltonian in units of rₛ

H = (Ry/rₛ²)[Σ k̃² c†ₖσ cₖσ + (3rₛ/N) Σ′ q̃⁻² c†(k+q)σ c†(k′−q)σ′ cₖ′σ′ cₖσ]

Derived. Kinetic energy per electron scales as 1/rₛ² and interaction as 1/rₛ, so the interaction's weight is rₛ: dense jellium is nearly free.

k̃ = krₛa₀ and q̃ = qrₛa₀ are pure numbers on a grid set by N alone; Ry = ħ²/(2ma₀²) = 13.606 eV

Where the non-relativistic H stops

ħkF = mc at rₛ = (9π/4)¹⁄³ α = 0.0140

Derived. Below it εₖ → ħck and the interaction's coefficient freezes at α/2 instead of falling as rₛ: compression stops weakening the coupling.

kF = (9π/4)¹⁄³/(rₛa₀), the free Fermi gas's, quoted; α = 1/137.036; n = 5.87 × 10³⁵ m⁻³ there
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

−6.0
−9 to 2; steps of 0.5.
23
3 to 24; steps of 1.

Try this. Hold N and drag μ⁻¹ right, which is μ → 0 first: the sum climbs two decades per decade and crosses the dashed line. Then raise N at fixed μ⁻¹, which is V → ∞ first: the upper line stays put, the sum drops a decade per decade of N, and the crossing moves out.

Live results

ONE TERM, LOG₁₀(X/eV)
8.4
|SUM|, LOG₁₀(eV)
-14.6
BOX VOLUME, LOG₁₀(V/m³)
-5.4
CROSSING, LOG₁₀(μ⁻¹/m)
1.28

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Advanced Quantum Mechanics modelSodium jellium, n = 2.65 × 10²⁸ m⁻³, on log–log axes against the Coulomb cutoff length μ⁻¹. Upper line: one q = 0 term per electron, X = e²n/(2ε₀μ²), now 10^(8.4) eV. Lower line: the three summed, of size X/N, now 10^(-14.6) eV for N = 10^(23). Dashed: H's energy unit Ry/rₛ² = 0.88 eV; the open circle is where the sum reaches it.upper: one q = 0 term per electronlower: their sum; dashed: Ry/rₛ²10²⁰ eV10⁻²⁰ eV0.88 eV1 nm1 μm1 mm1 mμ⁻¹
Sodium jellium, n = 2.65 × 10²⁸ m⁻³, on log–log axes against the Coulomb cutoff length μ⁻¹. Upper line: one q = 0 term per electron, X = e²n/(2ε₀μ²), now 10(8.4) eV. Lower line: the three summed, of size X/N, now 10(−14.6) eV for N = 10(23). Dashed: H's energy unit Ry/rₛ² = 0.88 eV; the open circle is where the sum reaches it.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Cutoff μ⁻¹ as log₁₀(μ⁻¹/m): −6.0; Electrons N as log₁₀ N: 23

Baseline −6.0; choose −9 to 2, in steps of 0.5.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

Pushing electrons closer together seems bound to make them interact more strongly, and the Coulomb energy at the mean spacing, 2/rₛ Ry, does grow with density, as n¹⁄³. The mistake is to hold the kinetic energy fixed, as in a classical gas where the temperature sets it. In a degenerate Fermi gas the Pauli principle sets it: holding N electrons forces the occupied plane waves out to a wavenumber of about 1.92/(rₛa₀), so the kinetic energy per electron grows faster, as 1/rₛ² ∝ n²⁄³. Their ratio falls as rₛ ∝ n(−1/3), and compressing sodium eightfold halves it. Dilution, not compression, makes jellium strongly correlated, ending in a Wigner crystal near rₛ ≈ 100 (quoted), and only relativity, below rₛ ≈ 0.014, stops compression from weakening the coupling further.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

Aluminium (2.70 g cm⁻³, 26.98 g mol⁻¹, three conduction electrons per atom) and caesium (1.93 g cm⁻³, 132.91 g mol⁻¹, one) sit near the two ends of the simple metals' range. Find each one's conduction-electron density n, its rₛ and jellium's energy unit Ry/rₛ², and say how much more heavily the Coulomb term weighs in caesium than in aluminium.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 4 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

Model a 1.00 μm cube of aluminium, n = 1.81 × 10²⁹ m⁻³, rₛ = 2.07 and Ry/rₛ² = 3.17 eV from the Easy example, as jellium with periodic boundaries and the Coulomb law cut off at μ⁻¹ = 10.0 nm. Find N, the three q = 0 energies per electron and their sum, and compare the sum with Ry/rₛ². Then find the cutoff at which the sum's magnitude would reach Ry/rₛ² in this cube, and what a 1.00 mm cube does to it at that cutoff.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

The scaling says jellium grows ever more nearly free as rₛ → 0. Find where the non-relativistic Hamiltonian itself fails: the rₛ and density at which ħkF reaches mc. Then take Sirius B, measured at 1.02 solar masses and 0.0081 solar radii, made of carbon and oxygen with two nucleons per electron: find its mean electron density, rₛ and ħkF/mc, and show what the interaction's coefficient becomes when εₖ → ħck.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

N electrons fill a periodic box of volume V on a uniform positive background, and the Coulomb law is cut off as e(−μr). The background–background, electron–background and q = 0 electron–electron energies then add to −e²N/(2ε₀Vμ²). What justifies dropping the q = 0 term from the jellium Hamiltonian?
7

Review & continue

Jellium is N electrons in a box whose ions are smeared into a uniform positive background; on plane waves its Hamiltonian is Σεₖc†c plus (1/2V)Σ′vq c†c†cc with vq = e²/(ε₀q²) and q = 0 left out, and its only parameter is rₛ, the radius per electron in Bohr radii.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.