
Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson
Conserved operators in a central field: J and parity, not L
Before Dirac's hydrogen can be solved, its states need names. This topic finds which operators still commute with the Hamiltonian in a central field, proves that l, the label chemistry runs on, is not among them, and shows how parity, with the γ⁰ a Dirac spinor demands, takes its place.
UAQM-07.01 · Lesson 1 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Build the model
Dirac's electron in a central field keeps j and parity, and loses l.
The key idea
In a central electrostatic potential the Dirac Hamiltonian commutes with the total angular momentum J = L + (ħ/2)Σ and with the parity operator γ⁰P₀, but not with L² or S⋅L, so states are labelled by j, mⱼ and parity η instead of by l.
Example. Hydrogen's 2P₁/₂ has j = ½ and η = −1, so its upper component is a p wave, l = 1, and its lower an s wave, l′ = 0: a measurement of L² returns 2ħ² almost always, but 0 with probability about α²/16 = 3.3 × 10⁻⁶.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Quantum Mechanics II labelled hydrogen's states by l because its Hamiltonian commuted with L², and it added spin-orbit coupling as a perturbation that kept l. Dirac's central-field Hamiltonian, H = cα⋅p + βmc² + V(r), does not allow that. A central electrostatic V commutes with L and with every matrix, so rotational symmetry survives in exactly the form Unit 4 found for the free particle: L leaks at the rate cα × p, the spin matrix leaks back, and only J = L + (ħ/2)Σ is conserved. Squaring the leak shows that L² and S⋅L are both lost, S⋅L at minus half the rate of L², so the two leaks cancel in J² = L² + 2S⋅L + (3/4)ħ². The cause is the odd block cσ⋅p, which keeps j but moves l by one between the upper and lower components. What replaces l is parity, and parity for a Dirac spinor is γ⁰ times inversion, the γ⁰ giving the lower component an extra sign. Because the two orbital values that can make a given j, l = j ± ½, have opposite parities, the eigenvalue η decides which one the upper component carries and hands the other to the lower: l′ = 2j − l. So H, J², Jz and P label every state, with exactly the Pauli atom's count. The argument stops where its assumptions do: an axial field such as a uniform E along z keeps only Jz, a magnetic hyperfine coupling keeps parity and F = I + J but not J, and symmetry fixes no energies, leaving 2S₁/₂ and 2P₁/₂, same j and opposite η, for the radial equations to place.
1The potential is a rotational scalar, so J survives
SI units throughout, with the metric diag(1, −1, −1, −1) wherever γ⁰ is read as a four-vector component. Take H = cα⋅p + βmc² + V(r), with V(r) an electrostatic potential energy such as −Zαħc/r multiplying the 4 × 4 identity. Two facts decide everything. V commutes with L, because [Lᵢ, V] = −iħ(r × ∇V)ᵢ and ∇V points along r. And V commutes with Σ, α and β, because it is the identity in spinor space. So V commutes with J = L + (ħ/2)Σ, and Unit 4's free results carry over untouched: [H, L] = −iħc α × p, [H, Σ] = 2ic α × p, and the combination with weight ħ/2 vanishes. J², Jz and H share eigenstates, so j and mⱼ are good labels, derived. Dimensions: ħc α × p is J s × m s⁻¹ × kg m s⁻¹ = J × J s, as [H, L] must be. Limits: V → 0 returns the free particle, and a field that is not central, such as a uniform E along z, keeps only [H, Jz] = 0.
2L² and S⋅L are lost, and they leak in step
Square the leak. Summing [H, Lᵢ]Lᵢ + Lᵢ[H, Lᵢ] over i gives [H, L²] = −iħc α⋅(p × L − L × p), and p × L = −L × p + 2iħp turns it into 2ħ²c α⋅p + 2iħc α⋅(L × p), derived. It is not zero. Take ψ = (φ(r)ξ, 0), an s wave in the upper slot with spinor ξ: L²ψ = 0, but Hψ has lower component cσ⋅p φξ, which is odd under inversion with j still ½, so it has l = 1 and [H, L²]ψ = −2ħ²(0, cσ⋅p φξ). Now S⋅L, with S = (ħ/2)Σ. Using [H, Σ] = 2ic α × p and the matrix identity Σ⋅(α × p) = 2iα⋅p, [H, S⋅L] = −ħ²c α⋅p − iħc α⋅(L × p), exactly −½[H, L²]. The check: J² = L² + 2S⋅L + (3/4)ħ² then commutes with H, as the first section demands. The culprit is the odd block cσ⋅p: σ⋅p is a scalar under rotations, so it keeps j, and a pseudoscalar under inversion, so it moves l by one.
3Parity needs γ⁰ as well as inversion
Spatial inversion P₀, ψ(r) → ψ(−r), sends p to −p and leaves the matrices alone, so P₀HP₀⁻¹ = −cα⋅p + βmc² + V(r): the kinetic term flips sign. Unit 5's Dirac parity repairs it with γ⁰ = β = diag(1, 1, −1, −1). Because βαβ = −α, the operator P = γ⁰P₀ gives PHP⁻¹ = cα⋅p + βmc² + V(r) = H whenever V(−r) = V(r), which a central potential always satisfies, derived. P² = β² = 1, so its eigenvalues are η = ±1. P also commutes with J: P₀ commutes with L = r × p because both factors flip, and β commutes with Σ = diag(σ, σ). So H, J², Jz and P can be diagonalised together, and they fix the whole angular dependence; what remains is two radial functions, one per component. A Lorentz-scalar potential U(r), entering as β(mc² + U(r)), also commutes with J and with P, so the same labels would survive; it is named here and not treated.
4Parity decides which l each component carries
Write ψ = (φ, χ). Each two-component piece with sharp j and mⱼ is built from Quantum Mechanics II's coupled states |l, ½, j, mⱼ⟩, and only l = j − ½ and l = j + ½ can make j; their parities (−1)l are opposite. Pψ = ηψ reads φ(−r) = ηφ(r) and −χ(−r) = ηχ(r). So φ carries a single l with (−1)l = η, and χ a single l′ with (−1)l′ = −η. Then l′ ≠ l, hence l′ = 2j − l, derived. The spectroscopic letter names the upper l. For j = ½, S₁/₂ has η = +1, l = 0, l′ = 1, and P₁/₂ has η = −1, l = 1, l′ = 0. For j = 3/2, P₃/₂ has l = 1, l′ = 2, η = −1, and 3D₃/₂ has l = 2, l′ = 1, η = +1. Count check: each j offers two parities, exactly the two orbital choices l = j ± ½ of the Pauli atom, so n = 2 still holds 2 + 2 + 4 = 8 = 2n² states. Trading l for η loses no state and gains none.
5How far from sharp is L²?
If the lower component carries a fraction w of the norm, a measurement of L² returns l(l + 1)ħ² with probability 1 − w and l′(l′ + 1)ħ² with probability w. The two values differ by (2j + 1)ħ², so ΔL² = (2j + 1)ħ²√(w(1 − w)), derived. Symmetry fixes which two values; dynamics fixes w. To order (v/c)², Unit 6 gives w ≈ ⟨T⟩/(2mc²), so hydrogen 1s, with ⟨T⟩ = 13.6 eV, has w = 1.33 × 10⁻⁵, ⟨L²⟩ = 2.7 × 10⁻⁵ ħ² and ΔL² = 7.3 × 10⁻³ ħ²: the spread grows as √w, not w. For hydrogen-like uranium the exact 1s weight w = 0.129, quoted here and derived in topic 7.08, gives ⟨L²⟩ = 0.26ħ² and ΔL² = 0.67ħ². Limit: w → 0 makes L² sharp, which is how Quantum Mechanics II could label states by l. Unit 6's Foldy-Wouthuysen Hamiltonian, built from powers of p², functions of r and S⋅L, commutes with L² to order (v/c)²: the l it conserves belongs to the transformed two-component state, not to the Dirac spinor.
6What the labels predict, checked against hydrogen
Good labels give selection rules. An electric-dipole operator is odd under P, so η must change, and j can change by at most one. Lyman-α therefore links 1S₁/₂ (η = +1) to 2P₁/₂ and 2P₃/₂ (η = −1), and is a doublet split by the measured 10.97 GHz between the two j values, 0.0054 Å at 121.6 nm. 2S₁/₂ cannot reach 1S₁/₂ with one electric-dipole photon, since both have η = +1, so it decays mainly by emitting two photons and lives about 0.12 s against 1.6 ns for 2P, both quoted. Symmetry stops short of energies: 2S₁/₂ and 2P₁/₂ share j and differ in η, so nothing here forces or forbids their degeneracy. Topic 7.06 shows the Dirac-Coulomb energies depend on n and j alone, so the two coincide to all orders in Zα, and the measured 1057.8 MHz Lamb shift between them is what the Dirac atom omits. Lamb and Retherford measured it with microwaves that drove 2S₁/₂ atoms to 2P₃/₂, a 9.91 GHz interval in zero field that they tuned with a magnetic field, a transition allowed precisely because η flips.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Total angular momentum survives the potential
[H, J] = 0 for H = cα⋅p + βmc² + V(r)
Derived: [Lᵢ, V] = −iħ(r × ∇V)ᵢ = 0 because ∇V lies along r, and V commutes with Σ, so Unit 4's free cancellation is untouched. j and mⱼ are good labels.
J = L + (ħ/2)Σ in J s; V(r) in J, central and times the 4 × 4 identity; α, β, Σ dimensionless 4 × 4 matricesOrbital L² is not conserved
[H, L²] = −iħc α⋅(p × L − L × p)
Derived from [H, L] = −iħc α × p. Not zero: cα⋅p joins upper to lower components whose orbital labels differ by one, so no l survives on the whole spinor.
L in J s, p in kg m s⁻¹, c in m s⁻¹; equal to 2ħ²c α⋅p + 2iħc α⋅(L × p), in J (J s)²Spin-orbit coupling leaks back
[H, S⋅L] = −½[H, L²]
Derived. Neither L² nor S⋅L is conserved, but J² = L² + 2S⋅L + (3/4)ħ² is: the two leaks cancel, the check that [H, J] = 0 demands.
S = (ħ/2)Σ in J s; uses [H, Σ] = 2ic α × p and Σ⋅(α × p) = 2iα⋅pDirac parity commutes with H
[H, γ⁰P₀] = 0
Derived: P₀ flips p, β flips α back since βαβ = −α, and V(r) is even. P₀ alone fails. P commutes with J too, so H, J², Jz and P share eigenstates.
P₀ψ(r) = ψ(−r); γ⁰ = β = diag(1, 1, −1, −1), dimensionless; P² = 1, so η = ±1Parity read on both components
η = (−1)l = −(−1)l′
Derived from Pψ = ηψ. The minus from β forces l′ ≠ l, so l′ = 2j − l. The letter names the upper l: 2P₁/₂ has l = 1, l′ = 0.
l and l′, each j − ½ or j + ½, are the orbital labels of the upper and lower components; η the eigenvalue of γ⁰P₀How unsharp L² is
ΔL² = (2j + 1)ħ² √(w(1 − w))
Derived: L² takes two values with probabilities 1 − w and w. Hydrogen 1s, w = 1.33 × 10⁻⁵, gives ΔL² = 7.3 × 10⁻³ ħ²; w → 0, the Pauli limit, makes l good.
w the fraction of the norm in the lower component, dimensionless; ΔL² in J² s²; l(l + 1) and l′(l′ + 1) differ by 2j + 1Interactive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Flip η and the bars swap places, since parity alone decides which l sits on top. Raise j and the pair moves right while ΔL² grows as 2j + 1. Drag w to 0, the Pauli limit, and L² turns sharp. Realistic w: 0.0013% for hydrogen 1s, about 13% for the 1s of U⁹¹⁺.
Live results
- UPPER COMPONENT l
- 1
- LOWER COMPONENT l′
- 2
- MEAN ⟨L²⟩
- 2.400 ħ²
- SPREAD ΔL²
- 1.200 ħ²
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Total angular momentum j: 1.5; Parity η: −1; Lower-component weight w: 10 %
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The tempting reading of 2P₁/₂ is an electron with sharp orbital angular momentum, l = 1 and L² = 2ħ², whose lower component is the same p wave, as a Pauli spinor's two spin components share one orbital. Both steps fail. L² does not commute with H, and the lower component of 2P₁/₂ is an s wave, l′ = 0, because γ⁰ puts an extra minus sign on it under parity. That is not bookkeeping: topic 7.05 shows the s-wave lower part leaves 2P₁/₂ with density at the nucleus, which no non-relativistic p state has. The opposite error is as common: concluding that, since L² is not conserved, the components have no definite l at all. Each component has a sharp l; it is the four-spinor that mixes two values, in proportions 1 − w and w. The letter names the upper l, and together with j it encodes the conserved parity, η = (−1)l.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
An electron in hydrogen occupies a state with j = 3/2 and Dirac parity η = −1. Find the orbital labels of its upper and lower components, check Pψ = ηψ on each, and give J² and the L² eigenvalue of each component in J² s², with ħ = 1.0546 × 10⁻³⁴ J s.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 4 steps revealed.
- Only l = 1 or l = 2 can combine with spin ½ to make j = 3/2. On the upper component P acts as plain inversion, so η = (−1)l = −1 needs l odd: l = 1, a P₃/₂ state.
- The lower component takes the other value, l′ = 2j − l = 2. Check it: inversion gives (−1)² = +1 and β supplies −1, so P returns −1 = η. The upper gives (−1)¹ = −1 = η as well.
- J² = j(j + 1)ħ² = (15/4)ħ² = 3.75 × (1.0546 × 10⁻³⁴ J s)² = 4.17 × 10⁻⁶⁸ J² s², sharp on the whole four-spinor.
- L² gives l(l + 1)ħ² = 2ħ² = 2.22 × 10⁻⁶⁸ J² s² on the upper component and 6ħ² = 6.67 × 10⁻⁶⁸ J² s² on the lower, so the four-spinor is not an eigenstate of L². Dimensions: (J s)² for each, as for J².
Answer. Upper l = 1, lower l′ = 2 (a P₃/₂ state); J² = 4.17 × 10⁻⁶⁸ J² s², sharp; L² is 2.22 × 10⁻⁶⁸ J² s² on the upper and 6.67 × 10⁻⁶⁸ J² s² on the lower component.
MediumExample 2
Hydrogen-like krypton, Kr³⁵⁺ (Z = 36), is in its 2P₁/₂ state. Using Unit 6's order-(v/c)² estimate w ≈ ⟨T⟩/(2mc²) for the lower-component weight, with ⟨T⟩ from the virial theorem, find the probability that a measurement of L² returns zero, then ⟨L²⟩ and ΔL², and compare that probability with hydrogen's 2P₁/₂.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Labels: j = ½ and η = −1 give l = 1 above and l′ = 0 below, so L² returns 2ħ² with probability 1 − w and 0 with probability w.
- Virial theorem for a Coulomb potential: ⟨T⟩ = −E = (Zα)²mc²/(2n²). Zα = 36/137.036 = 0.2627 and (Zα)² = 0.06901, so ⟨T⟩ = 0.06901 × 511.0 keV/8 = 4.41 keV.
- w ≈ ⟨T⟩/(2mc²) = 4.41 keV/1022 keV = 4.31 × 10⁻³, dimensionless as a probability must be. So P(L² = 0) = 0.43%.
- ⟨L²⟩ = (1 − w) × 2ħ² = 1.991ħ², and ΔL² = (2j + 1)ħ²√(w(1 − w)) = 2ħ² × √(4.31 × 10⁻³ × 0.9957) = 0.131ħ².
- Hydrogen, Z = 1: w ≈ α²/16 = 3.33 × 10⁻⁶. The ratio is Z² = 1296, the (Zα)² scaling of every leading relativistic effect; the neglected terms are of relative order (Zα)², about 7% here.
Answer. P(L² = 0) ≈ 4.3 × 10⁻³, ⟨L²⟩ ≈ 1.991ħ² and ΔL² ≈ 0.131ħ²; hydrogen's 2P₁/₂ gives 3.3 × 10⁻⁶, smaller by Z² = 1296.
HardExample 3
A field E along z acts on hydrogen in 2S₁/₂, mⱼ = ½, adding eEz to H. Which of J², Jz and P = γ⁰P₀ survive? Given the measured 2S₁/₂–2P₁/₂ splitting 1057.8 MHz, the Pauli-limit matrix element |⟨2P₁/₂, ½|z|2S₁/₂, ½⟩| = √3 a₀ and the 2P lifetime 1.596 ns, find the field that makes the 2P₁/₂ admixture amplitude 0.10, and the 2S lifetime it then has.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Symmetry first. z commutes with β and with Lz and Sz, so Jz survives and mⱼ = ½ stays good. Under P = γ⁰P₀, z → −z, so eEz is odd and parity is lost; [Jₓ, z] = −iħy ≠ 0, so J² is lost too.
- Within n = 2, an odd perturbation joins 2S₁/₂ (η = +1) only to η = −1 states of the same mⱼ: 2P₁/₂, 1057.8 MHz below, and 2P₃/₂, 9911 MHz above. The Dirac-Coulomb energies make 2S₁/₂ and 2P₁/₂ exactly degenerate (quoted from topic 7.06), so the measured Lamb shift alone sets the nearer denominator.
- First-order mixing: ε = √3 e a₀E/(hΔν), with hΔν = 6.626 × 10⁻³⁴ J s × 1.0578 × 10⁹ s⁻¹ = 7.009 × 10⁻²⁵ J. For ε = 0.10, E = 0.10 × 7.009 × 10⁻²⁵ J/(√3 × 1.602 × 10⁻¹⁹ C × 5.292 × 10⁻¹¹ m) = 4.77 × 10³ V m⁻¹. Units: J C⁻¹ m⁻¹ = V m⁻¹.
- The mixed state decays through its 2P part: Γ ≈ ε²/τ₂P = 0.010/(1.596 × 10⁻⁹ s) = 6.27 × 10⁶ s⁻¹, so τ ≈ 0.16 μs.
- Checks: 2P₃/₂ has matrix element √6 a₀ and 9.37 times the denominator, so its amplitude is √2 × 1057.8/9911 = 0.15 of the 2P₁/₂ one and adds 2% to Γ; the exact two-level mixing, sin²θ = 0.0097, lowers it 3%. τ stays 0.16 μs to two figures.
Answer. Only Jz survives; J² and parity are broken. E ≈ 4.8 × 10³ V m⁻¹ (48 V cm⁻¹) gives an admixture amplitude of 0.10, and the 2S lifetime falls to about 0.16 μs, from about 0.12 s in zero field.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
In a central electrostatic potential the Dirac Hamiltonian commutes with the total angular momentum J = L + (ħ/2)Σ and with the parity operator γ⁰P₀, but not with L² or S⋅L, so states are labelled by j, mⱼ and parity η instead of by l.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.