
Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson
Identical spin-half fermions: ¼|f + f′|² + ¾|f − f′|²
Two protons that collide cannot be told apart, and a spin-independent force never looks at their spins, yet the spins decide what counters record. We carry the exclusion principle into a scattering experiment: which spin state takes which amplitude, how an unpolarised beam mixes them, and what polarising beam and target changes.
UAQM-02.06 · Lesson 6 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Build the model
At 90° the classical rate halves, and with parallel spins it vanishes.
The key idea
Two identical spin-half fermions under a spin-independent force scatter with f(θ) + f(π − θ) in the singlet and f(θ) − f(π − θ) in the triplet, and an unpolarised pair weights the two cross-sections 1/4 and 3/4.
Example. Two slow neutrons scatter only in the s-wave, f = −a, so the triplet's f − f′ vanishes and the unpolarised dσ/dΩ is (1/4)(2a)² = a². With the quoted a = −18.9 fm that is 3.57 b sr⁻¹, half the 7.14 b sr⁻¹ distinguishable particles would give.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Exchange two identical particles in the centre-of-mass frame and r becomes −r, so a particle scattered to θ cannot be told from its partner scattered to π − θ. For spinless bosons that simply adds f(θ) and f(π − θ). Spin-half fermions carry a second label, and the Pauli principle constrains only the product of the spin and space states. A spin-independent central force conserves the total spin S, so singlet and triplet scatter as two separate problems: the singlet's spin state is odd under exchange, which forces the even spatial amplitude f + f′, and the triplet's is even, which forces f − f′. A detector blind to spin adds the two cross-sections with the probabilities an unpolarised pair has of being in each, one state in four against three in four. Expanded, the result is the classical sum |f|² + |f′|² less Re(f f′*), an interference of opposite sign and half the size of the spinless boson's, and the same counting for spin s makes it fade as 1/(2s + 1), because only two particles in the same spin state can interfere. All of this is derived from symmetrisation and spin conservation alone, and it stops where they fail: tensor and spin-orbit forces mix the triplet substates, the Coulomb amplitude needs topic 2.07's exact treatment, and relativistic electrons let spin enter the dynamics, which waits for Unit 5.
1Exchange acts on space and spin together
Work in SI units in the centre-of-mass frame; nothing here is relativistic, so the course metric diag(1, −1, −1, −1) never enters. Two identical spin-half fermions interact through a central V(r) that ignores spin, so H commutes with S₁ and S₂ separately, the total spin S and its projection are conserved, and the singlet and the triplet scatter as separate problems. Exchange sends r = r₁ − r₂ to −r, that is (θ, φ) to (π − θ, φ + π), and multiplies the spin state by (−1)(S+1): −1 for the singlet, +1 for the triplet. The whole state must change sign, so the spatial wave carries (−1)S: incident e(ikz) + (−1)S e(−ikz), scattered [f(θ) + (−1)S f(π − θ)] e(ikr)/r. Call these F₀ = f + f′ for the singlet and F₁ = f − f′ for the triplet, with f′ = f(π − θ). Both are lengths, so each |FS|² is an area per steradian, counting either particle as in topic 2.05.
2An unpolarised pair is one part singlet, three parts triplet
Random beam and target spins give the pair the density matrix ρ = I/4, with I the 4 × 4 identity. It looks the same in every basis, so the singlet and each triplet state are occupied with probability 1/4. The detector does not resolve spin, so the cross-section is a trace over final spins, and singlet and triplet waves, whose spin states are orthogonal, add with no cross term: dσ/dΩ = (1/4)|f + f′|² + (3/4)|f − f′|². The trace gives it in one line. Write the amplitude as a spin operator M = f − f′Pσ, with Pσ = (1 + σ₁⋅σ₂)/2 the spin-exchange operator, +1 on the triplet and −1 on the singlet; Tr Pσ = 2, so (1/4)Tr(M†M) = |f|² + |f′|² − Re(f f′*). For f = (3.0 + 1.0i) fm and f′ = (1.0 + 2.0i) fm the channels give 25 and 5 fm² sr⁻¹ and the weighted sum is 10 fm² sr⁻¹, against 15 for distinguishable particles.
3Any spin: interference needs a shared spin state
For spin s a random pair sits in one of (2s + 1)² product states |m₁, m₂⟩. The force leaves each particle's spin alone, so a pair with m₁ ≠ m₂ is labelled: the particle reaching the detector with m₁ came by f(θ), the one with m₂ by f(π − θ), the two final spin states are orthogonal, and the rate is |f|² + |f′|² with no interference. A pair with m₁ = m₂ has a symmetric spin state and interferes fully, |f ± f′|², plus for bosons and minus for fermions. That happens with probability (2s + 1)/(2s + 1)² = 1/(2s + 1), so dσ/dΩ = |f|² + |f′|² + (−1)(2s) 2 Re(f f′*)/(2s + 1). The trace agrees, because the spin-exchange operator has trace (s + 1)(2s + 1) − s(2s + 1) = 2s + 1. Spin zero gives topic 2.05's +2 Re(f f′*), spin half −Re(f f′*), deuterons +(2/3) Re(f f′*). With many spin states shared ones are rare, and the classical sum returns.
4At 90° the triplet falls silent
At θ = 90° the angle π − θ is θ itself, so f′ = f exactly, for any spin-independent central force at any energy. The triplet amplitude vanishes and the singlet's is 2f, so the unpolarised rate is (1/4)|2f|² = |f(90°)|²: half the distinguishable sum 2|f(90°)|² and a quarter of the spinless bosons' 4|f(90°)|². Polarising beam and target changes the singlet probability. With ρ = (1 + P₁⋅σ₁)(1 + P₂⋅σ₂)/4 and the singlet projector (1 − σ₁⋅σ₂)/4, the trace, using Tr σᵢσⱼ = 2δᵢⱼ for each particle, is (1 − P₁⋅P₂)/4, so dσ/dΩ(90°) = (1 − P₁⋅P₂)|f(90°)|². Fully parallel spins are pure triplet and nothing reaches the 90° counter. Antiparallel spins double the unpolarised 90° rate, and the interference term −(1 + P₁⋅P₂)Re(f f′*) cancels at every angle, because up-down pairs are labelled by spin. A beam polarised to 0.80 on a parallel target at 0.70 cuts the 90° rate to 0.44 of its unpolarised value.
5Even waves in the singlet, odd waves in the triplet
Since Pₗ(−cos θ) = (−1)ˡ Pₗ(cos θ), f(π − θ) is f with every odd partial wave reversed. So f + f′ is twice the sum of the even waves and f − f′ twice the odd: l + S must be even, which allows ¹S₀, ³PJ and ¹D₂ for two like nucleons and forbids ³S₁. Every event puts one particle in each hemisphere, so integrating dσ/dΩ over 2π sr gives σ = (2π/k²) Σ (2l + 1) sin²δₗ over even l plus (6π/k²) Σ (2l + 1) sin²δₗ over odd l: even waves at half their distinguishable weight 4π/k², odd ones at 3/2 of it. At threshold sin δ₀/k → −a while σₗ falls as k(4l), so σ → 2πa²; for two neutrons with aₙₙ ≈ −18.9 fm, quoted from π⁻d → nnγ, that is 22.4 b. Fermions in one spin state have no s-wave at all: in 1999 the JILA group measured collisions of spin-polarised ⁴⁰K atoms dying away on cooling as the p-wave threshold law requires, and cooled the first degenerate Fermi gas as a two-state mixture.
6Spin-dependent forces and proton-proton scattering
A force Vc(r) + Vσ(r)σ₁⋅σ₂ still conserves S, so topic 2.04's singlet and triplet amplitudes replace f: dσ/dΩ = (1/4)|fₛ + fₛ′|² + (3/4)|fₜ − fₜ′|², derived exactly as before. Only the even waves of fₛ and the odd waves of fₜ survive, so the triplet s-wave that binds the deuteron, aₜ = 5.4 fm in neutron-proton scattering, has no place in proton-proton scattering. For protons at a few MeV the amplitude is the Coulomb one, present in both channels and built in topics 2.07 and 2.08, plus a nuclear term that is s-wave and therefore singlet only. Phase-shift analyses of the measured data, quoted, put the ¹S₀ phase near 55° at 10 MeV laboratory energy while every ³P phase stays within a few degrees. An unpolarised experiment sees the nuclear force with weight 1/4; one with spins parallel sees none of it. The model fails where tensor and spin-orbit forces, which split the ³P phases by J as no σ₁⋅σ₂ term can, make the triplet amplitude a matrix in MS.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Amplitude in each spin channel
FS(θ) = f(θ) + (−1)S f(π − θ)
Derived: exchange sends θ to π − θ and multiplies the spin state by (−1)(S+1), so space must supply (−1)S. Singlet f + f′, triplet f − f′.
S = 0 singlet, S = 1 triplet; f, FS in m; θ the centre-of-mass angle; f′ ≡ f(π − θ)Unpolarised beam and target
dσ/dΩ = (1/4)|f + f′|² + (3/4)|f − f′|²
One singlet and three triplet states, each with probability 1/4. Their final spin states are orthogonal, so cross-sections add and amplitudes never mix.
dσ/dΩ in m² sr⁻¹, counting either particle; derived from ρ = I/4 on the four spin statesInterference for identical particles of spin s
dσ/dΩ = |f|² + |f′|² + (−1)(2s) 2 Re(f f′*)/(2s + 1)
Spin 0 gives +2 Re(f f′*), topic 2.05; spin 1/2 gives −Re(f f′*). The more spin states, the weaker the interference.
s the spin of each particle; unpolarised; derived, since only pairs with m₁ = m₂, probability 1/(2s + 1), interferePolarised beam and target
dσ/dΩ = [(1 − P₁⋅P₂)/4]|f + f′|² + [(3 + P₁⋅P₂)/4]|f − f′|²
P₁⋅P₂ = 1 is pure triplet, so nothing reaches 90°; P₁⋅P₂ = −1 cancels the interference; P₁⋅P₂ = 0 returns the unpolarised weights.
P₁, P₂ the dimensionless polarisation vectors, |P| ≤ 1; singlet probability derived as Tr[ρ(1 − σ₁⋅σ₂)/4], the trace of ρ with the singlet projectorWhich partial waves each channel keeps
l + S even: singlet l = 0, 2, 4, …triplet l = 1, 3, 5, …
Derived. At threshold only the singlet s-wave survives, so the unpolarised total, events counted once over 2π sr, tends to 2πa², half the distinguishable 4πa².
from Pₗ(−cos θ) = (−1)ˡ Pₗ(cos θ); f + f′ doubles the even waves, f − f′ the odd onesSpin-dependent central force
dσ/dΩ = (1/4)|fₛ + fₛ′|² + (3/4)|fₜ − fₜ′|²
For protons at a few MeV the nuclear term is s-wave, so it enters fₛ only: the nuclear force acts in the singlet alone.
fₛ, fₜ the singlet and triplet amplitudes of topic 2.04, in m; primes mean angle π − θ; derived, valid while S is conservedInteractive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Drag P₁⋅P₂ to −1 and the solid curve lands on the dashed one, because up-down pairs are labelled by spin; drag it to +1 and the flat singlet part vanishes, leaving pure triplet that is zero at 90°. The 90° ratio to the dashed curve is (1 − P₁⋅P₂)/2 whatever the phases.
Live results
- SINGLET WEIGHT
- 0.250
- k² dσ/dΩ AT 90°
- 0.587 sr⁻¹
- 90° RATIO TO DISTINGUISHABLE
- 0.50
- k²σ, EVENTS COUNTED ONCE
- 4.78
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Polarisation product P₁⋅P₂: 0.0; s-wave phase δ₀ (singlet only): 50 °; p-wave phase δ₁ (triplet only): 8 °
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The tempting shortcut is to antisymmetrise the spatial amplitude alone: fermions change sign, so write |f(θ) − f(π − θ)|² and predict that unpolarised protons never reach a 90° counter. That treats a spin-half particle as a spinless fermion, which the spin-statistics connection forbids. The Pauli principle constrains the product of spin and space, and a singlet pair, odd in spin, needs an even spatial state and scatters with f + f′, so the quarter of random pairs that are singlets reach 90° at (1/4)|2f|² = |f|². The opposite slip is to weight the amplitudes, (1/4)(f + f′) + (3/4)(f − f′), and then square: singlet and triplet leave in orthogonal spin states, so their cross-sections add and their amplitudes never interfere.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
Two identical spin-half fermions scatter through a spin-independent force. In the centre-of-mass frame f(60°) = (2.4 + 1.1i) fm and f(120°) = (0.8 + 0.6i) fm. Find dσ/dΩ at 60° for an unpolarised pair, compare it with distinguishable particles, and say what a counter at 120° reads.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- The exchange partner of 60° is 180° − 60° = 120°, so f′ = (0.8 + 0.6i) fm. Singlet: f + f′ = (3.2 + 1.7i) fm and |f + f′|² = 10.24 + 2.89 = 13.13 fm² sr⁻¹. Triplet: f − f′ = (1.6 + 0.5i) fm and |f − f′|² = 2.56 + 0.25 = 2.81 fm² sr⁻¹.
- Weight the cross-sections, not the amplitudes: dσ/dΩ = 13.13/4 + 3 × 2.81/4 = 3.28 + 2.11 = 5.39 fm² sr⁻¹.
- Check with the expanded form: |f|² = 6.97 fm², |f′|² = 1.00 fm² and Re(f f′*) = 2.4 × 0.8 + 1.1 × 0.6 = 2.58 fm², so |f|² + |f′|² − Re(f f′*) = 7.97 − 2.58 = 5.39 fm² sr⁻¹ ✓.
- Distinguishable particles, counted at the same detector, give |f|² + |f′|² = 7.97 fm² sr⁻¹. Exchange removes 2.58/7.97 = 32% of it here because Re(f f′*) is positive.
- At 120° the roles of f and f′ swap and every expression above is unchanged, so that counter also reads 5.39 fm² sr⁻¹: the cross-section is symmetric about 90°.
Answer. dσ/dΩ = 5.39 fm² sr⁻¹ (0.0539 b sr⁻¹) at both 60° and 120°, against 7.97 fm² sr⁻¹ for distinguishable particles.
MediumExample 2
A proton beam of polarisation 0.75 strikes a polarised hydrogen target of polarisation 0.60, both along the same axis. In a model with only spin-independent central forces, a 90° centre-of-mass counter records 2400 counts per hour when both are unpolarised. Predict the rates with the spins parallel and antiparallel, and the asymmetry between them.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- At 90°, f′ = f, so the triplet amplitude vanishes and only singlet pairs scatter, at |2f|². The count rate is therefore proportional to the singlet probability alone.
- From ρ = (1 + P₁⋅σ₁)(1 + P₂⋅σ₂)/4 and the singlet projector (1 − σ₁⋅σ₂)/4, the singlet probability is (1 − P₁⋅P₂)/4, which is 1/4 for the unpolarised calibration run.
- Parallel: P₁⋅P₂ = 0.75 × 0.60 = 0.45, singlet probability 0.55/4 = 0.1375, so the rate is 2400 × 0.1375/0.25 = 1320 counts per hour.
- Antiparallel: P₁⋅P₂ = −0.45, singlet probability 1.45/4 = 0.3625, so the rate is 2400 × 1.45 = 3480 counts per hour.
- Asymmetry: (3480 − 1320)/(3480 + 1320) = 2160/4800 = 0.45, exactly P₁P₂. Limit check: full parallel polarisation would give zero counts, the pure triplet.
Answer. 1320 counts per hour parallel, 3480 antiparallel; the asymmetry 0.45 equals P₁P₂, independent of |f(90°)|.
HardExample 3
Two identical spin-half fermions scatter through a spin-independent central force at k = 0.40 fm⁻¹, where only the model phase shifts δ₀ = 50° and δ₁ = 8.0° matter. Find the unpolarised dσ/dΩ at 0° and 90°, the total cross-section counting events once, unpolarised and with beam and target fully polarised parallel, and compare with distinguishable particles under the same force.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- f = (1/k)[e(iδ₀) sin δ₀ + 3e(iδ₁) sin δ₁ cos θ], and f′ reverses the p-wave, so f + f′ = (2/k)e(iδ₀) sin δ₀ and f − f′ = (6/k)e(iδ₁) sin δ₁ cos θ. The s-wave lives in the singlet and the p-wave in the triplet, so the phase difference δ₀ − δ₁ never enters.
- Unpolarised: dσ/dΩ = (1/k²)(sin²δ₀ + 27 sin²δ₁ cos²θ). With 1/k² = 6.25 fm², sin²50° = 0.5868 and sin²8.0° = 0.01937, it is 6.25 × 0.5868 = 3.67 fm² sr⁻¹ at 90° and 6.25 × (0.5868 + 0.5230) = 6.94 fm² sr⁻¹ at 0°.
- Each event sends one fermion into each hemisphere, so integrate over 2π sr, where ∫cos²θ dΩ = 2π/3: σ = (2π/k²)(sin²δ₀ + 9 sin²δ₁) = 6.25 × 2π × 0.7611 = 29.9 fm².
- Parallel spins are pure triplet: σ = (1/2)∫|f − f′|² dΩ = (24π/k²) sin²δ₁ = 9.13 fm². The s-wave, 77% of the unpolarised total, is switched off.
- Distinguishable particles: σ = (4π/k²)(sin²δ₀ + 3 sin²δ₁) = 6.25 × 4π × 0.6449 = 50.7 fm². Identity halves the s-wave (2π against 4π) and multiplies the p-wave by 3/2 (18π against 12π), a ratio of 0.590 overall.
- Checks: every σ is 1/k² times a pure number, an area; and as δ₁ → 0 and k → 0, with sin δ₀/k → −a, the unpolarised result tends to 2πa², half the distinguishable 4πa².
Answer. Unpolarised dσ/dΩ = 6.94 fm² sr⁻¹ at 0° and 3.67 fm² sr⁻¹ at 90°; σ = 29.9 fm² unpolarised and 9.13 fm² for parallel spins, against 50.7 fm² for distinguishable particles.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
Two identical spin-half fermions under a spin-independent force scatter with f(θ) + f(π − θ) in the singlet and f(θ) − f(π − θ) in the triplet, and an unpolarised pair weights the two cross-sections 1/4 and 3/4.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.