Skip to main content

Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson

Partial waves with spin: phase shifts for j = l ± ½

Once the projectile has spin, every partial wave above l = 0 scatters in two channels, and the angular distribution records both. Here you project the incident wave onto j = l ± ½, write g and h in the two phase shifts, and read the ⁵He resonance as a p₃/₂ effect from unpolarised data.

UAQM-02.02 · Lesson 2 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Partial waves with spin: phase shifts for j = l ± ½Left: the unitarity circle holding every fₗ = e^(iδ) sin δ, with p₃/₂ (filled) at 90° and p₁/₂ (open) at 8°; their chord, |sin(δ₁⁺ − δ₁⁻)| = 0.99, is k|h| at 90°. Right, θ from 0° to 180°: dashed k²|h|² = sin²(δ₁⁺ − δ₁⁻) sin²θ, solid the flip share |h|²/(|g|² + |h|²), with δ₀ = -27°.Argand plane of fₗ● p₃/₂ ○ p₁/₂|f₁⁺ − f₁⁻| = 0.99solid: flip sharedashed: k²|h|²10°θ = 180°
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

Every l above zero splits in two, and h is the difference between the halves.

The key idea

For a spin-½ projectile on a spinless target, each orbital angular momentum l ≥ 1 scatters in two independent channels, j = l + ½ and j = l − ½, each with its own phase shift; g(θ) adds them with weights l + 1 and l, and h(θ) adds their differences.

Example. For n-⁴He at Eₙ = 1.15 MeV, δ(p₃/₂) ≈ 90° and δ(p₁/₂) ≈ 8°, so at θ = 90° the flip amplitude has k|h| = sin 82° = 0.99, as large as one partial wave allows, while k|g| = |sin δ₀| ≈ 0.45 comes from the s wave alone.

The complete physical model and assumptions

A spin-½ particle scattering from a spinless target through Vc(r) + Vₛₒ(r) L⋅S does not conserve its orbital and spin projections separately, but it does conserve j, and parity forbids the two values of l that share a j from mixing. So Quantum Mechanics II's partial-wave method survives with one change: each l above zero becomes two independent radial problems, j = l + ½ and j = l − ½, each with its own phase shift. Projecting plane wave times spinor onto those channels, then turning σ⋅L acting on Pₗ(cos θ) into iσ⋅n Pₗ¹, produces the whole amplitude. g sums the channels weighted by l + 1 and l, half the number of states in each; h sums their differences against Pₗ¹, so it exists only where the two phase shifts of some l ≥ 1 differ. Nothing in the derivation uses the L⋅S form beyond the conservation of j and l, so the result holds for any rotation- and parity-invariant interaction of this pair. Neutron-⁴He scattering shows it at work: a p₃/₂ resonance near 1 MeV with a far broader p₁/₂ above it, legible even in unpolarised data. The method stops where its premises do: a target with spin needs more than two amplitudes, a Coulomb tail defeats the free asymptotic forms, inelastic channels push |e(2iδ)| below 1, and the relativistic origin of Vₛₒ waits for the Dirac equation.

1Two channels for every l above zero

Units are SI, with nuclear numbers in MeV and fm (ħc = 197.327 MeV fm, 1 b = 10⁻²⁸ m²); everything here is non-relativistic, so no metric signature enters. Work in the centre-of-mass frame with reduced mass μ and ħk = √(2μE), and let V = Vc(r) + Vₛₒ(r) L⋅S act on a spin-½ projectile and a spinless target. L⋅S commutes with L², S² and J = L + S but not with Lz or Sz, so mₗ and mₛ are not conserved while l, j and mⱼ are. Parity finishes the job: the two candidates l = j ± ½ for a given j have opposite parity and cannot mix. The coupled states |l, ½, j, mⱼ⟩ therefore scatter independently, and on them L⋅S takes Quantum Mechanics II's values lħ²/2 for j = l + ½ and −(l + 1)ħ²/2 for j = l − ½ (quoted). Each l ≥ 1 carries two radial problems and two phase shifts, δₗ⁺ and δₗ⁻, found by QM-II's radial machinery unchanged. The s wave has only j = ½ and one phase shift.

2Splitting the incident wave with j projectors

The incident state is e(ikz)χ = Σ iˡ(2l + 1) jₗ(kr) Pₗ(cos θ)χ, Rayleigh's expansion times a fixed spinor χ. Each term Pₗ(cos θ)χ has definite l but not definite j: it mixes j = l + ½ and j = l − ½ at the same mⱼ. Separate them with σ⋅L = 2L⋅S/ħ, whose eigenvalues are lħ and −(l + 1)ħ. The operators P₊ = (l + 1 + σ⋅L/ħ)/(2l + 1) and P₋ = (l − σ⋅L/ħ)/(2l + 1) equal 1 on one eigenvalue and 0 on the other and sum to 1; since σ⋅L is traceless, their traces over the 2(2l + 1) states of given l are 2(l + 1) and 2l, the 2j + 1 states of each channel. Far out, channel ± differs from the free wave only by e(2iδₗ⁺) or e(2iδₗ⁻) on its outgoing part, so the scattering operator is (1/k) Σ (2l + 1)[fₗ⁺P₊ + fₗ⁻P₋]Pₗ(cos θ), with fₗ = e(iδₗ) sin δₗ. Substituting the projectors gives (1/k) Σ [(l + 1)fₗ⁺ + l fₗ⁻ + (fₗ⁺ − fₗ⁻)σ⋅L/ħ]Pₗ(cos θ), derived.

3Turning σ⋅L into σ⋅n

σ⋅L/ħ still acts on the angular function. For a function of θ alone, L = −iħ r × ∇ reduces to −iħ φ̂ ∂/∂θ, because r̂ × θ̂ = φ̂. Since dPₗ(cos θ)/dθ = −sin θ Pₗ′(cos θ) = −Pₗ¹(cos θ), this gives L Pₗ = iħ φ̂ Pₗ¹, so σ⋅L Pₗ/ħ = i(σ⋅φ̂)Pₗ¹. At the detector direction k′, φ̂ is exactly n = k × k′/|k × k′|, the normal to the scattering plane. Hence the amplitude is g(θ) + i h(θ)σ⋅n with g = (1/k) Σ [(l + 1)fₗ⁺ + l fₗ⁻]Pₗ and h = (1/k) Σ (fₗ⁺ − fₗ⁻)Pₗ¹, both derived: the form the previous topic built from rotation and parity, with its two functions now written in phase shifts. The sign of h rests on two conventions. With the Condon–Shortley Pₗ¹, which includes a factor −1, the same physics reads h = −(1/k) Σ (fₗ⁺ − fₗ⁻)Pₗ¹, and defining n as k′ × k flips it again. Mixing a formula from one source with a convention from another reverses every predicted polarisation while leaving |h|² and the cross-section untouched.

4Limits, dimensions and unitarity

Set δₗ⁺ = δₗ⁻: h vanishes term by term and g becomes (1/k) Σ (2l + 1)fₗPₗ, QM-II's spinless amplitude. The s wave has only j = ½, so its weight in g is l + 1 = 1 with no l fₗ⁻ partner, and P₀¹ = 0: h needs p waves at least. Near threshold δₗ grows as k(2l+1) (quoted from QM-II), so h ∝ k² while g → −a, and |h|²/|g|² falls as k⁴: spin effects on a spinless target die at low energy. Dimensions: fₗ is a number and 1/k a length, so g and h are lengths and |g|² + |h|², the unpolarised cross-section from the previous topic, is an area per steradian. Integrate it using ∫Pₗ² dΩ = 4π/(2l + 1) and ∫(Pₗ¹)² dΩ = 4πl(l + 1)/(2l + 1): the interference terms between fₗ⁺ and fₗ⁻ cancel exactly between |g|² and |h|², leaving σ = (4π/k²) Σ [(l + 1) sin²δₗ⁺ + l sin²δₗ⁻], derived. Because Pₗ(1) = 1, Pₗ¹(1) = 0 and Im fₗ = sin²δₗ, this equals (4π/k) Im g(0): the optical theorem survives the spin, and each channel is capped at (4π/k²)(j + ½).

5Neutron-⁴He: the measured peak picks out p₃/₂

⁴He has spin 0 and even parity, and below the ⁴He(n, d)³H threshold at 22 MeV n-⁴He scattering is purely elastic, so it is the clean case. Quoted data: the total cross-section peaks at 7.6 b at Eₙ = 1.15 MeV, and an R-matrix analysis places a p₃/₂ resonance, the unbound ⁵He ground state, at Ecm ≈ 0.77 MeV with width 0.64 MeV, and a p₁/₂ resonance near 2 MeV with width about 5 MeV. At 1.15 MeV, Ecm = 0.918 MeV; with μc² = 750.4 MeV this gives k = 0.188 fm⁻¹ and 4π/k² = 3.55 b. The s wave is repulsive, because the Pauli principle bars the neutron from the filled 0s shell, and acts like a hard sphere of radius near the scattering length a = 2.46 fm (quoted): δ₀ ≈ −ka ≈ −27°. If both p channels resonated together, as a spinless p wave would, σ would reach 3.55 b × (3 + 0.21) = 11.4 b. With only p₃/₂ at 90° and δ(p₁/₂) ≈ 8° (quoted), σ = 3.55 b × (2 + 0.21 + 0.02) = 7.9 b, 4% above the measurement. The weight j + ½ = 2 is what the experiment sees.

6Reading the split at 90°

With s and p waves only, g = [f₀ + (2f₁⁺ + f₁⁻)cos θ]/k and h = (f₁⁺ − f₁⁻)sin θ/k. At 90° the p-wave part of g vanishes and h is at its largest, so k² dσ/dΩ(90°) = sin²δ₀ + sin²(δ₁⁺ − δ₁⁻), derived. Without a spin-orbit split the second term is zero and the unpolarised angular distribution dips deeply at 90°; with it, |h|² fills the dip. For n-⁴He at 1.15 MeV the bracket is 0.21 + 0.98 = 1.19 in units of 1/k² = 0.282 b, so dσ/dΩ(90°) ≈ 0.34 b sr⁻¹, nearly six times the s-wave floor of 0.058 b sr⁻¹. Wheeler and Barschall inferred a nuclear spin-orbit coupling from unpolarised neutron-helium angular distributions at 2.5 MeV in the 1940s, before the shell model needed one. The ordering, p₃/₂ below p₁/₂, says Vₛₒ is negative, attractive in j = l + ½, the reverse of atomic fine structure, and helium's large h is why it became the standard analyser of neutron polarisation, the subject of the next topic.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Channel potentials for j = l ± ½

V₊(r) = Vc(r) + (lħ²/2)Vₛₒ(r) and V₋(r) = Vc(r) − ((l + 1)ħ²/2)Vₛₒ(r)

Derived from the conservation of j and l. Each channel is its own radial problem with its own phase shift; the gap is (l + ½)ħ²Vₛₒ and the (2j + 1)-weighted mean is Vc.

V in J (MeV here); ħ²Vₛₒ is an energy; + and − label j = l + ½ and j = l − ½; the L⋅S values are quoted from QM-II

Projectors onto j = l ± ½

P₊ = (l + 1 + σ⋅L/ħ)/(2l + 1) and P₋ = (l − σ⋅L/ħ)/(2l + 1)

Derived. They split Pₗ(cos θ)χ into its j = l + ½ and j = l − ½ parts; their traces, 2l + 2 and 2l, count the 2j + 1 states of each channel.

σ the Pauli matrices, L in J s, so σ⋅L/ħ is dimensionless, with eigenvalues l and −(l + 1)

Non-flip amplitude g(θ)

g(θ) = (1/k) Σ [(l + 1)fₗ⁺ + l fₗ⁻] Pₗ(cos θ), with fₗ⁺ = e(iδₗ⁺) sin δₗ⁺ and likewise fₗ⁻

Derived. The weights l + 1 and l are (2j + 1)/2, each channel's share of the states; equal phase shifts return QM-II's (1/k) Σ (2l + 1)fₗPₗ.

g in m; k in m⁻¹ with ħk = √(2μE); δₗ⁺ and δₗ⁻ are the phase shifts of j = l + ½ and j = l − ½

Spin-flip amplitude h(θ)

h(θ) = (1/k) Σ (fₗ⁺ − fₗ⁻) Pₗ¹(cos θ), with Pₗ¹(cos θ) = sin θ dPₗ/d(cos θ)

Derived from L Pₗ = iħφ̂Pₗ¹. The Condon–Shortley Pₗ¹ carries an extra minus sign and flips this formula's sign; |h|² is unaffected.

h in m, multiplying iσ⋅n with n = k × k′/|k × k′|; P₀¹ = 0, so the sum starts at l = 1; P₁¹ = sin θ

Size of the flip term

fₗ⁺ − fₗ⁻ = e(i(δₗ⁺ + δₗ⁻)) sin(δₗ⁺ − δₗ⁻)

Derived. |h| depends only on the splitting δₗ⁺ − δₗ⁻: zero for equal phases and largest when they differ by 90°, however large each one is.

dimensionless; from fₗ = (e(2iδₗ) − 1)/2i written for each channel

Total cross-section with spin

σ = (4π/k²) Σ [(l + 1) sin²δₗ⁺ + l sin²δₗ⁻]

Derived by integrating |g|² + |h|²: the interference terms cancel. It equals (4π/k) Im g(0), and channel j can give at most (4π/k²)(j + ½).

σ in m² (1 b = 10⁻²⁸ m²), k in m⁻¹; at l = 0 only the first term exists
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

−27 °
−90 to 0 °; steps of 1.
90 °
0 to 180 °; steps of 1.
8 °
0 to 180 °; steps of 1.

Try this. Drag δ₁⁻ onto δ₁⁺: the chord shrinks to a point and both curves go flat, because equal phases leave no h. At the n-⁴He values the flip share near 90° tops 0.8 yet is zero at 0° and 180°; set δ₀ to 0 and it reaches 1 at 90°, where g's p-wave term vanishes.

Live results

k²|h|² AT 90°
0.981 sr⁻¹
k² dσ/dΩ AT 90°
1.187 sr⁻¹
FLIP SHARE AT 90°
0.83
k²σ/4π
2.225

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Advanced Quantum Mechanics modelLeft: the unitarity circle holding every fₗ = e^(iδ) sin δ, with p₃/₂ (filled) at 90° and p₁/₂ (open) at 8°; their chord, |sin(δ₁⁺ − δ₁⁻)| = 0.99, is k|h| at 90°. Right, θ from 0° to 180°: dashed k²|h|² = sin²(δ₁⁺ − δ₁⁻) sin²θ, solid the flip share |h|²/(|g|² + |h|²), with δ₀ = -27°.Argand plane of fₗ● p₃/₂ ○ p₁/₂|f₁⁺ − f₁⁻| = 0.99solid: flip sharedashed: k²|h|²10°θ = 180°
Left: the unitarity circle holding every fₗ = e(iδ) sin δ, with p₃/₂ (filled) at 90° and p₁/₂ (open) at 8°; their chord, |sin(δ₁⁺ − δ₁⁻)| = 0.99, is k|h| at 90°. Right, θ from 0° to 180°: dashed k²|h|² = sin²(δ₁⁺ − δ₁⁻) sin²θ, solid the flip share |h|²/(|g|² + |h|²), with δ₀ = −27°.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. s₁/₂ phase shift δ₀: −27 °; p₃/₂ phase shift δ₁⁺: 90 °; p₁/₂ phase shift δ₁⁻: 8 °

Baseline −27; choose −90 to 0, in steps of 1.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

It is tempting to think a spin-orbit splitting matters only to polarisation experiments, so that an unpolarised beam on a spinless target sees one effective phase shift per l and the spinless formula with its (2l + 1) per wave still applies. It does not. The unpolarised cross-section is |g|² + |h|², and both pieces carry the split: g weights the two channels by l + 1 and l, not equally, and |h|² adds a term in (Pₗ¹)², sin²θ for p waves, that no single phase per l can produce. A pure p-wave term in g vanishes at 90° with P₁ = cos θ, so a spinless fit predicts a deep dip there; for n-⁴He at 1.15 MeV, |h|² fills it to nearly six times the s-wave value. The total cross-section carries the split too, through the weights l + 1 and l. What polarisation adds is the interference of g with h, their relative phase, which unpolarised data see only through magnitudes.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

A model n-⁴He interaction has, at r = 2.0 fm, Vc = −40 MeV and ħ²Vₛₒ = −4.0 MeV. Find the total radial potential, centrifugal term included, felt there by a p₃/₂ and a p₁/₂ neutron, using μc² = 750.4 MeV and ħc = 197.3 MeV fm, and say which channel resonates at lower energy.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

For n-⁴He at Eₙ = 1.15 MeV, take the quoted phase shifts δ₀ = −27°, δ₁⁺ = 90° and δ₁⁻ = 8°, with 1/k² = 0.282 b. Find k g and k h at θ = 60° (centre of mass), the unpolarised dσ/dΩ there, and the fraction of it that comes from spin flip.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

The measured n-⁴He total cross-section peaks at 7.6 b at Eₙ = 1.15 MeV. Using σ = (4π/k²) Σ [(l + 1) sin²δₗ⁺ + l sin²δₗ⁻], an s wave with δ₀ = −ka for a = 2.46 fm, and μc² = 750.4 MeV, test three pictures: a spinless p resonance, a p₃/₂ resonance with δ(p₁/₂) = 8°, and a p₁/₂ resonance with p₃/₂ negligible. Then verify the optical theorem for the one that survives.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

A spin-½ projectile scatters from a spinless target at an energy where only s and p waves matter, with δ(s₁/₂) = −40°, δ(p₃/₂) = 120° and δ(p₁/₂) = 40°. What is k²|h|² at θ = 90° in the centre-of-mass frame?
7

Review & continue

For a spin-½ projectile on a spinless target, each orbital angular momentum l ≥ 1 scatters in two independent channels, j = l + ½ and j = l − ½, each with its own phase shift; g(θ) adds them with weights l + 1 and l, and h(θ) adds their differences.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.