Skip to main content

Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson

Quantising the field: A, E and B as operators

Every photon calculation in the rest of this course, from spontaneous emission to the Lamb shift, starts from the three operator expansions derived here. The new work is not the ladder algebra, which you already own, but the normalisation, the commutator that ∇⋅A = 0 forces, and which fields respect the light cone.

UAQM-11.03 · Lesson 3 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Quantising the field: A, E and B as operatorsCommutators of the free Coulomb-gauge field between the origin at t = 0 and a point 1.2 m away at time t, in the xz plane at 0° to the x axis. Top: [Aₓ(r, t), Aₓ(0, 0)]/i, a straight ramp across the shaded spacelike band, |t| under r/c = 4.00 ns. Bottom: every E and B commutator, zero off the light cone. Singular terms on the cone edges are not drawn.Aₓ–Aₓ commutatorshaded: spacelikeE and B: zero off the cone−4.0 nst = 0+4.0 ns
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

One oscillator commutator per mode turns A, E and B into operators.

The key idea

Quantising the radiation field means promoting each transverse mode's amplitude to an oscillator ladder operator, so that the vector potential A and the fields E and B become operator-valued functions of position whose commutators all follow from [a, a†] = 1.

Example. In a periodic 1.0 cm cube the lowest mode has λ = 1.0 cm and ω = 1.88 × 10¹¹ s⁻¹, and its electric-field operator carries the amplitude ℰ = √(ħω/(2ε₀V)) = 1.06 × 10⁻³ V m⁻¹: the r.m.s. field of that mode's vacuum.

The complete physical model and assumptions

Topic 11.02 left the transverse field as independent oscillators, two per wave vector. Quantising it takes one postulate, Quantum Mechanics I's [aₖₛ, a†ₖ′ₛ′] = δₖₖ′δₛₛ′ imposed on every mode as Unit 9 imposed it on the scalar field, and everything else here is derived from it. The normalisation √(ħ/(2ε₀ωₖV)) is the one value that turns the field energy into Σħωₖ(a†a + 1/2). E and B become operators that change the photon number by one, so they average to zero in every number state. And the canonical commutator takes a form no scalar field has: A and its conjugate momentum −ε₀E⊥ fail to commute through the transverse delta function δ⊥ᵢⱼ, whose trace counts two polarisations and whose 1/r³ tail is the price of imposing ∇⋅A = 0 at every instant. The tail never reaches anything measurable. The commutators of E and B are derivatives of the massless Pauli-Jordan function and vanish outside the light cone, so measurements at spacelike separation cannot disturb one another; A's commutator keeps an instantaneous Coulomb integral and leaks across the cone, the mark of a gauge-dependent quantity, not an observable. The model stops at free fields in a box: charges enter in 11.08, the divergent zero-point sum is regulated in 11.05 and 11.06, and the manifest Lorentz covariance surrendered to the gauge choice returns only through covariant quantisation, named here and not pursued.

1One postulate per mode, and the normalisation it forces

Units are SI throughout, and where a four-vector appears the metric is (+, −, −, −). Topic 11.02 wrote the free transverse field in a periodic box of volume V as A = Σₖₛ Nₖ[εₖₛαₖₛe(i(k⋅r − ωₖt)) + c.c.], with two polarisations per k obeying k⋅εₖₛ = 0 and a classical energy 2ε₀Vωₖ²Nₖ²|αₖₛ|² in each mode. Quantisation replaces each amplitude αₖₛ by an operator aₖₛ with [aₖₛ, a†ₖ′ₛ′] = δₖₖ′δₛₛ′: quoted from Quantum Mechanics I and imposed, not derived. Nₖ is then no longer free. The classical |α|² becomes the symmetrised (aa† + a†a)/2 = a†a + 1/2, and the mode energy is ħωₖ(a†a + 1/2) only if Nₖ² = ħ/(2ε₀ωₖV), which is the same as demanding [q, p] = iħ for each of 11.02's canonical pairs. For a 1.0 cm cube and its lowest mode, λ = 1.0 cm, Nₖ = 5.6 × 10⁻¹⁵ T m. The time dependence is consistent, not assumed: with Hrad from the next section, [aₖₛ, Hrad] = ħωₖaₖₛ gives aₖₛ(t) = aₖₛe(−iωₖt) in the Heisenberg picture.

2E and B follow, and the energy sorts itself mode by mode

With A in hand the other fields are definitions. E⊥ = −∂A/∂t brings down iωₖ on each a term and −iωₖ on each a† term, and B = ∇ × A brings down ik × and −ik ×, giving amplitude ℰₖ = √(ħωₖ/(2ε₀V)) for E⊥ and ℰₖ/c for B. Substitute both into (ε₀/2)∫(E⊥² + c²B²)d³r. The volume integral pairs each k with k′ = ±k. The aa and a†a† pieces, which would change the photon number by two, arrive from E⊥² and c²B² with equal size and opposite sign, because B pairs k with −k and (k × ε)⋅(−k × ε′) = −k²ε⋅ε′ for transverse vectors, while c²k² = ωₖ²; they cancel. The a†a pieces arrive with the same sign: the electric and magnetic parts each give (ħωₖ/2)(a†a + 1/2), so Hrad = Σħωₖ(a†a + 1/2), derived. In a number state ⟨n|E⊥|n⟩ = 0, yet one running mode gives ⟨n|E⊥²|n⟩ = ℰₖ²(2n + 1): a field with no mean value and a sharp energy. The quanta are measured, not inferred: Gleyzes and colleagues (2007) watched a single 51 GHz cavity mode jump between n = 1 and n = 0, one ħω at a time.

3Why ∇⋅A = 0 makes the commutator transverse

The Lagrangian density (ε₀/2)(E² − c²B²) gives A the conjugate momentum Π = ∂ℒ/∂(∂A/∂t) = −ε₀E⊥. Their equal-time commutator, computed from the expansions, contains the polarisation sum Σₛεᵢε*ⱼ = δᵢⱼ − k̂ᵢk̂ⱼ, true because the two polarisations and k̂ form an orthonormal triad. So [Aᵢ(r), −ε₀E⊥ⱼ(r′)] = iħδ⊥ᵢⱼ(r − r′), derived. The scalar-field answer δᵢⱼδ³ is impossible here: ∂/∂rᵢ of the left side is zero because ∇⋅A = 0, and of δᵢⱼδ³ it is ∂ⱼδ³. The price is nonlocality. With the electrostatic identity ∂ᵢ∂ⱼ(1/r) = (3r̂ᵢr̂ⱼ − δᵢⱼ)/r³ − (4π/3)δᵢⱼδ³(r), quoted, δ⊥ᵢⱼ(r) = (2/3)δᵢⱼδ³(r) − (δᵢⱼ − 3r̂ᵢr̂ⱼ)/(4πr³): a contact term plus a dipole-shaped tail. At 1.0 m along the field component the tail is +0.159 m⁻³, and perpendicular to it −0.080 m⁻³. Its trace is 2δ³(r), one per polarisation: the field has two degrees of freedom at each point, not three.

4E and B clash at one instant, but only at one point

Write δ⊥ᵢⱼ = δᵢⱼδ³ + ∂ᵢ∂ⱼ(1/(4πr)). B = ∇ × A, and the curl annihilates the second, nonlocal piece because εⱼₗₘ∂ₗ∂ₘ = 0, so what survives is local: [Eᵢ(r, t), Bⱼ(r′, t)] = −(iħ/ε₀)εᵢⱼₗ∂ₗδ³(r − r′), derived, while [Eᵢ, Eⱼ] and [Bᵢ, Bⱼ] vanish at equal times. Parallel components commute; Eₓ and By do not, so no state makes both sharp. Values at a point are too singular to be operators, so ask about averages. Average Eₓ over a cube of side a and By over the same cube shifted by a/2 along z: only the shifted cube's lower face lies inside the first, and [Ēₓ, B̄y] = −iħ/(ε₀a⁴). For a = 1.0 mm, ΔĒₓΔB̄y ≥ ħ/(2ε₀a⁴) = 6.0 × 10⁻¹² V m⁻¹ T; for unshifted cubes the face terms cancel and the averages commute. The a⁻⁴ is the classical limit at work: averages over large regions commute ever more nearly. Bohr and Rosenfeld (1933) showed that ideal measurements with charged test bodies reach exactly these limits, a result quoted here.

5Across the light cone: E and B are causal, A is not

At unequal times the same polarisation sum gives [Aᵢ(r, t), Aⱼ(0, 0)] = −(iħ/ε₀)(δᵢⱼ − ∂ᵢ∂ⱼ∇⁻²)D(r, t), where (1/V)Σₖ sin(ωₖt)e(ik⋅r)/ωₖ is D = [δ(r − ct) − δ(r + ct)]/(4πcr), which is −1/c times Unit 9's real Pauli-Jordan function Δ at m = 0 and x⁰ = ct, quoted, and supported on the cone c²t² − r² = 0. In [Eᵢ, Eⱼ] two time derivatives meet ∇⁻², and since ∂²D/∂t² = c²∇²D the inverse Laplacian cancels, leaving (iħ/ε₀)(δᵢⱼ∂²/∂t² − c²∂ᵢ∂ⱼ)D: zero wherever r exceeds c|t|, derived, and the same holds for [Eᵢ, Bⱼ] and [Bᵢ, Bⱼ]. In A's commutator nothing cancels. ∇⁻²D is the Coulomb potential of a shell of radius c|t| carrying total charge ∫D d³r = t, so outside it equals −t/(4πr), and wherever r exceeds c|t| the commutator is (iħt/(4πε₀r³))(δᵢⱼ − 3r̂ᵢr̂ⱼ). At r = 1.5 m and t = 3.0 ns, perpendicular to the components, that is i × 8.4 × 10⁻³⁴ T² m². A in Coulomb gauge is fixed by an instantaneous, nonlocal condition and is not an observable; covariant quantisation keeps A local at the price of unphysical states, named only.

6Checks: dimensions, limits and two measurements

Dimensions first. A is in T m and ε₀E in C m⁻², so [A, ε₀E] carries T C m⁻¹ = J s m⁻³, ħ times the m⁻³ of δ⊥; [E, B] carries V m⁻¹ T, ħ/ε₀ times m⁻⁴. Limits next. As t → 0, D → 0 and ∂D/∂t → δ³(r), so the unequal-time [Eᵢ(r, t), Bⱼ(0, 0)] = −(iħ/ε₀)εᵢⱼₗ∂ₗ∂D/∂t becomes the equal-time card. One mode gives a commutator spread smoothly over the cavity (the Medium example); only the sum over every mode concentrates it at a point. In a standing mode holding n photons the bound is a fraction 1/(2n + 1) of ΔEₓΔBy, the classical limit. Then measurement. Two polarisations per k, the trace of δ⊥, enter Planck's law, quoted from statistical mechanics, and give σ = π²kB⁴/(60ħ³c²) = 5.670 × 10⁻⁸ W m⁻² K⁻⁴, the measured value; a longitudinal third state would make it 8.51 × 10⁻⁸. And Brune and colleagues (1996) saw atoms in a 51 GHz cavity Rabi-oscillate at frequencies in the ratios 1 : √2 : √3 : 2 for n = 0 to 3, the √(n + 1) that a† puts into ⟨n + 1|E|n⟩.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Vector-potential operator in a box of volume V

A(r, t) = Σₖₛ √(ħ/(2ε₀ωₖV)) [εₖₛ aₖₛ e(i(k⋅r − ωₖt)) + h.c.]

Derived: the only normalisation that makes the field energy Σħωₖ(a†a + 1/2). The h.c. term keeps A Hermitian; there is no s = 3 because k⋅εₖₛ = 0 enforces ∇⋅A = 0.

A in T m, V in m³, ωₖ = c|k| in s⁻¹; εₖₛ (s = 1, 2) are unit vectors with k⋅εₖₛ = 0; [aₖₛ, a†ₖ′ₛ′] = δₖₖ′δₛₛ′.

Electric-field operator and the field per photon

E⊥(r, t) = Σₖₛ iℰₖ [εₖₛ aₖₛ e(i(k⋅r − ωₖt)) − h.c.], with ℰₖ = √(ħωₖ/(2ε₀V))

Derived. a lowers the photon number and a† raises it, so ⟨n|E⊥|n⟩ = 0 in every number state; only ⟨n − 1|E⊥|n⟩ and ⟨n + 1|E⊥|n⟩ survive, weighted √n and √(n + 1).

E⊥ = −∂A/∂t in V m⁻¹; ℰₖ is the vacuum r.m.s. field of one mode. B = ∇ × A: the same sum with εₖₛ → k̂ × εₖₛ and ℰₖ → ℰₖ/c.

Radiation Hamiltonian

Hrad = (ε₀/2)∫(E⊥² + c²B²) d³r = Σₖₛ ħωₖ (a†ₖₛaₖₛ + 1/2)

Derived: the aa and a†a† terms of E⊥² and c²B² have opposite signs, since B pairs k with −k, and cancel; the a†a terms add. Normal ordering drops Σħωₖ/2, as Unit 9 did.

Hrad in J; ħωₖ is the quantum of mode (k, s). The Coulomb energy of charges is separate (11.01) and absent for free fields.

Equal-time commutator: the transverse delta

[Aᵢ(r, t), −ε₀E⊥ⱼ(r′, t)] = iħ δ⊥ᵢⱼ(r − r′)

Derived from the polarisation sum Σₛεᵢε*ⱼ = δᵢⱼ − k̂ᵢk̂ⱼ. Divergence-free in each index, as ∇⋅A = 0 demands; its trace 2δ³(r) counts two polarisations.

δ⊥ᵢⱼ(r) = (1/V)Σₖ(δᵢⱼ − k̂ᵢk̂ⱼ)e(ik⋅r) in m⁻³; for r ≠ 0 it equals −(δᵢⱼ − 3r̂ᵢr̂ⱼ)/(4πr³).

Equal-time commutator of E with B

[Eᵢ(r, t), Bⱼ(r′, t)] = −(iħ/ε₀) εᵢⱼₗ ∂ₗδ³(r − r′)

Derived: the curl in B kills δ⊥'s 1/r³ tail and leaves a local derivative of δ³. Parallel components commute; Eₓ and By at one point cannot both be sharp.

∂ₗ = ∂/∂xₗ acts on r; εᵢⱼₗ is the Levi-Civita symbol; both sides in V m⁻¹ T. E here is the free field E⊥.

Unequal-time commutator: the light cone

[Eᵢ(r, t), Eⱼ(0, 0)] = (iħ/ε₀)(δᵢⱼ ∂²/∂t² − c²∂ᵢ∂ⱼ) D(r, t)

Derived. D vanishes off the cone r = c|t|, so E commutes with itself, and with B, at spacelike separation. A's commutator keeps a 1/∇² of D and does not.

D(r, t) = [δ(r − ct) − δ(r + ct)]/(4πcr) in s m⁻³: −1/c times Unit 9's real m = 0 Pauli-Jordan function Δ, at x⁰ = ct.
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

1.2 m
1 to 2 m; steps of 0.1.
0 °
0 to 90 °; steps of 5.
2.0 ns
−8 to 8 ns; steps of 0.5.

Try this. Turn θ from 90° to 0° and the ramp flips and doubles; near 55° the xx leak vanishes, though Aₓ against Az still leaks. Move t₀ out of the band and both probes read zero. Where the ramp crosses zero its slope is −ħ/ε₀ times the transverse delta's 1/r³ tail, read out below.

Live results

LIGHT CROSSING TIME
4.00 ns
SQUARED INTERVAL AT PROBE
-1.08 m²
A–A COMMUTATOR / i AT PROBE
-21.94 10⁻³⁴ T² m²
TRANSVERSE DELTA TAIL, xx
0.092 m⁻³

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Advanced Quantum Mechanics modelCommutators of the free Coulomb-gauge field between the origin at t = 0 and a point 1.2 m away at time t, in the xz plane at 0° to the x axis. Top: [Aₓ(r, t), Aₓ(0, 0)]/i, a straight ramp across the shaded spacelike band, |t| under r/c = 4.00 ns. Bottom: every E and B commutator, zero off the light cone. Singular terms on the cone edges are not drawn.Aₓ–Aₓ commutatorshaded: spacelikeE and B: zero off the cone−4.0 nst = 0+4.0 ns
Commutators of the free Coulomb-gauge field between the origin at t = 0 and a point 1.2 m away at time t, in the xz plane at 0° to the x axis. Top: [Aₓ(r, t), Aₓ(0, 0)]/i, a straight ramp across the shaded spacelike band, |t| under r/c = 4.00 ns. Bottom: every E and B commutator, zero off the light cone. Singular terms on the cone edges are not drawn.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Separation r: 1.2 m; Angle θ between r and the x axis: 0 °; Probe time t₀: 2.0 ns

Baseline 1.2; choose 1 to 2, in steps of 0.1.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The tempting move is to quantise each Cartesian component of A as an independent scalar field and write [Aᵢ(r), −ε₀Eⱼ(r′)] = iħδᵢⱼδ³(r − r′). It is inconsistent. Take ∂/∂rᵢ of both sides: the left vanishes, because ∇⋅A = 0 holds as an operator identity in Coulomb gauge, while the right gives iħ∂ⱼδ³(r − r′), which does not. The naive rule also counts three field degrees of freedom per point, a longitudinal photon among them, and would raise every black body's emission by half, to σ = 8.51 × 10⁻⁸ W m⁻² K⁻⁴ against the measured 5.67 × 10⁻⁸. The consistent commutator carries the projector δᵢⱼ − k̂ᵢk̂ⱼ: its trace is 2, not 3, and in position space it has a 1/r³ tail. That tail is why A, unlike E and B, fails to commute with itself outside the light cone, and why nothing measurable suffers: A in Coulomb gauge is not an observable.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

A periodic cubic box of side 2.0 cm holds the running mode k = (2π/L)ẑ with polarisation x̂. Find ωₖ, the vector-potential amplitude √(ħ/(2ε₀ωₖV)), and the electric and magnetic amplitudes per unit of a, then show that this normalisation gives the mode's vacuum the energy ħωₖ/2.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

A cavity mode is the standing wave Aₓ = N(a + a†) sin kz at t = 0, with N = √(ħ/(ε₀ωV)), λ = 6.0 mm and cavity volume V = 0.80 cm³. Find [Eₓ(z), By(z′)], the smallest ΔEₓΔBy allowed at z = z′ = λ/8, and whether the vacuum reaches it. Then explain why this commutator is nonzero for z ≠ z′.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

Two field points are 2.4 m apart along z, and the time separation is 4.0 ns. Starting from [Aᵢ(r, t), Aⱼ(0, 0)] = −(iħ/ε₀)(δᵢⱼD − ∂ᵢ∂ⱼ∇⁻²D), evaluate the Coulomb-gauge commutators [Aₓ, Aₓ], [Az, Az] and [Aₓ, Az], then show that every E and B commutator vanishes there.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

Two points lie 2.0 m apart along a line perpendicular to the x axis. In Coulomb gauge, [Aₓ(r, t), Aₓ(0, 0)] = iħt/(4πε₀r³), which is nonzero at t = 3.0 ns although ct = 0.90 m is less than r. What follows?
7

Review & continue

Quantising the radiation field means promoting each transverse mode's amplitude to an oscillator ladder operator, so that the vector potential A and the fields E and B become operator-valued functions of position whose commutators all follow from [a, a†] = 1.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.