Skip to main content

Nuclear, particle & quantum-information sequence · Interactive lesson

The shell model and spin–orbit splitting

Fill a Woods–Saxon well and the closures come out 2, 8, 20, then 40, 58 and 92 — and experiment reports 28, 50, 82, 126. This is the lesson that adds the one operator which repairs that, l⋅s with the sign reversed from an atom's, and shows why its growth as 2l + 1 lets only the top orbital of each shell break away and open a new gap.

UPV-14.08 · Lesson 8 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: The shell model and spin–orbit splittingThe 1g and 2d doublets of the N = 4 oscillator shell, plotted as energy below the shell's unperturbed oscillator level, where its l = 0 member 3s1/2 sits, as the well's l² depression and the spin–orbit coefficient are raised. At |V_ls| = 1.40 MeV the 1g doublet splits by 6.30 MeV and 1g9/2 falls 9.60 MeV, against a gap of 9.08 MeV to the shell below, so the closure is 50.1g9/21g7/22d5/22d3/2N = 4 oscillator shellN = 4 levelN = 3 level0−10 MeVcloses at 50 nucleons
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.

Nuclear, particle & quantum-information sequence. These units continue into nuclear and particle physics and quantum information. Follow your university’s prerequisites, mathematical depth and assessment; this independent pathway is not a universal programme specification.

1

Build the model

Add one operator, with the opposite sign to an atom's, and the gaps move.

The key idea

The nuclear spin–orbit term is a one-body operator Vₗₛ(r) l⋅s with Vₗₛ negative, which splits every l > 0 orbital into j = l ± ½ and, because the splitting grows as 2l + 1, drives the largest-l j = l + ½ orbital out of its own oscillator shell.

Example. For 1g (l = 4) with |Vₗₛ| = 1.4 MeV the splitting is (2l+1)|Vₗₛ|/2 = 9 × 1.4/2 = 6.3 MeV, and the barycentre rule puts 1g9/2 four-ninths of that, 2.8 MeV, below the multiplet centre while 1g7/2 sits five-ninths, 3.5 MeV, above it.

The complete physical model and assumptions

The shell model is the claim that a nucleon moves in an average potential made by the other A − 1, so a hopeless A-body problem becomes one eigenvalue problem repeated A times. Take that potential to be Woods–Saxon — a flat-bottomed well about 50 MeV deep, of radius 1.25 A¹⁄³ fm and surface diffuseness 0.55 fm — and diagonalise p²/2mN + VWS(r) in a truncated harmonic-oscillator basis. You get 2, 8 and 20 exactly, and then nothing right: 40, 58 and, in heavy nuclei, 92, where experiment reports 28, 50, 82 and 126. Mayer and Jensen's repair in 1949 was one more one-body operator, Vₗₛ(r) l⋅s, with Vₗₛ negative and confined to the surface by the Thomas shape (1/r) dVWS/dr. In the coupled basis |n l j mⱼ⟩ that operator is just a number, (ħ²/2)[j(j+1) − l(l+1) − 3/4], so the Hamiltonian stays block diagonal in (l, j) and the gap between the two members of an l multiplet is (2l+1)|Vₗₛ|/2 — linear in l. That linearity is the physics: only the largest-l orbital of an oscillator shell splits enough for its j = l + ½ member to break away from the rest of its shell. 1f7/2 stands alone above 20, and 1g9/2, 1h11/2 and 1i13/2, pulled down by the flat bottom as well, settle onto the shell below; their 8, 10, 12 and 14 places land on 20, 40, 70 and 112 and give exactly the observed gaps. The cost is that this is still a mean field. It has no pairing, so even-even 0⁺ ground states must be put in by hand; it has no deformation, so ¹⁹F comes out 5/2⁺ against a measured 1/2⁺; and its level scheme gives energies and Jπ, not decay rates.

1Name the operator, the basis, and the boundary condition

The shell model trades the A-body Hamiltonian for a one-body one, Ĥ = p̂²/2mN + VWS(r) + Vₗₛ(r) l̂⋅ŝ/ħ², with VWS(r) = −V₀/[1 + exp((r − R)/a)], V₀ ≈ 50 MeV, R = 1.25 A¹⁄³ fm and a ≈ 0.55 fm. Because Ĥ is one-body its eigenkets are single-nucleon orbitals, and the nucleus is built by filling them. Work in the coupled basis |n l j mⱼ⟩ = |n l⟩ ⊗ [Yₗ ⊗ χ_½]j, and expand the radial factor in three-dimensional harmonic-oscillator functions Rₙₗ(r; b) with b = √(ħ/mN ω). That basis choice is also the boundary condition: every Rₙₗ vanishes as rl at the origin and dies as a Gaussian at infinity, so u(0) = 0 and u(r→∞) = 0 are imposed by construction rather than searched for by shooting. With ħ²/2mN = 20.7 MeV fm², about fifteen radial functions per block converge the bound spectrum to tens of keV — and the truncation, not the physics, is the first thing to check.

2l⋅s is a number in this basis, and that is the whole trick

Square ĵ = l̂ + ŝ: ĵ² = l̂² + ŝ² + 2 l̂⋅ŝ, so l̂⋅ŝ = ½(ĵ² − l̂² − ŝ²), and in |n l j mⱼ⟩ it is diagonal with eigenvalue (ħ²/2)[j(j+1) − l(l+1) − 3/4]. For j = l + ½ that is +lħ²/2; for j = l − ½ it is −(l+1)ħ²/2. Nothing else in Ĥ touches spin, so the matrix never connects different (l, j): it is block diagonal, one real symmetric radial block per (l, j), each perhaps 15 × 15, and numpy.linalg.eigh returns the lot in milliseconds. No Clebsch–Gordan coefficient is ever needed, because the coupled basis has already done the coupling, and the 2j + 1 values of mⱼ come out degenerate for free since Ĥ commutes with ĵ. Concretely 1f7/2 carries ⟨l⋅s⟩ = +1.5ħ² and 1f5/2 carries −2ħ²; those two numbers are the same in every nucleus, and only the coefficient Vₗₛ in front of them moves with A.

3Splitting grows as 2l + 1; the centre of gravity does not move

Subtract the two eigenvalues: ΔE = E(j = l − ½) − E(j = l + ½) = (2l+1)|Vₗₛ|/2. The gap is linear in l, so a p orbital splits by 3|Vₗₛ|/2 while an i orbital splits by 13|Vₗₛ|/2 — more than four times as much for the same coefficient. Where the two levels sit is then fixed by a sum rule: weight by 2j + 1 and note that (2l+2)(l) − (2l)(l+1) = 0, so l̂⋅ŝ leaves the multiplet's centre of gravity exactly where it was. The j = l + ½ level therefore falls by l/(2l+1) of ΔE and the j = l − ½ level rises by (l+1)/(2l+1) of it; the fatter level moves less. For 1g with |Vₗₛ| = 1.4 MeV, ΔE = 9 × 1.4/2 = 6.3 MeV, 1g9/2 drops 4/9 × 6.3 = 2.8 MeV, 1g7/2 climbs 5/9 × 6.3 = 3.5 MeV, and 10(−2.8) + 8(+3.5) = 0 as it must. Use that as an arithmetic check on every level scheme you draw.

4The force lives in the surface, and its sign is not the atom's

The radial shape is Thomas-like: Vₗₛ(r) = −κ (1/r) dVWS/dr. Woods–Saxon is flat inside, so its derivative is a bell of width a centred on r = R with peak V₀/4a = 50/(4 × 0.55) = 23 MeV fm⁻¹. At A = 90, R = 5.60 fm, and with κ ≈ 0.5 fm² the peak coefficient is 0.5 × 23/5.60 ≈ 2.0 MeV; averaging over a radial wavefunction that is not all in the skin brings it down to roughly 1.4 MeV. Two effects then point the same way — the 2l + 1 factor, and the centrifugal term l(l+1)ħ²/2mN r² pushing high-l orbitals out into exactly the shell where the force acts. The sign is the part to memorise. Atomic fine structure has a positive coefficient and puts j = l + ½ higher; the nuclear term is negative and puts it lower. It is also twenty to thirty times too strong to be the electron's Thomas precession scaled up: it comes from the nucleon–nucleon interaction, and in a non-relativistic mean field both κ and its sign are fitted, not derived.

5The intruder arithmetic that makes 28, 50, 82 and 126

Count the plain oscillator first. Shell N = 2(n − 1) + l holds (N + 1)(N + 2) nucleons once spin is included, so the closures are 2, 8, 20, 40, 70, 112: three right, the rest wrong. Flattening the well adds a depression roughly proportional to l(l+1), which spreads each N shell and, in heavy nuclei, sinks its largest-l multiplet toward the shell below, so the gaps drift toward 58, 92 and 138, still not the observed ones. Spin–orbit is what regroups them: it tears the j = l + ½ member of the largest l in shell N away from the rest of that shell and opens a new gap above it. For 1f7/2 that is all that happens, and it stands alone between 20 and the rest of N = 3; from 1g9/2 on, the depression and l⋅s together carry that member down toward shell N − 1, through most or all of the gap ħω ≈ 41 A(−1/3) MeV, until it sits on top of that shell or, for 1i13/2, among its levels. After that it is only addition. Shell N = 3 loses 1f7/2, which holds 8: 20 + 8 = 28. The remaining 12 of N = 3 take you to 40, and 1g9/2's 10 give 50. The remaining 20 of N = 4 reach 70, and 1h11/2's 12 give 82. The remaining 30 of N = 5 reach 112, and 1i13/2's 14 give 126. Every gap above 20 is made by one split-off orbital; 2, 8 and 20 need none, because the well alone makes them.

6Reading Jπ off the scheme, and the ways it fails

Even-even nuclei are 0⁺ in their ground state without exception, and the mean field does not explain that: it is the residual pairing interaction, left out of Ĥ by construction, coupling identical nucleons pairwise to J = 0. Grant it, and odd-A becomes a one-line prediction — Jπ is the j of the last odd nucleon with parity (−1)l for its orbital. ¹⁷O puts a neutron in 1d5/2 and is 5/2⁺; ⁴¹Ca puts one in 1f7/2 and is 7/2⁻; ⁹¹Zr's 51st neutron sits in 2d5/2 and gives 5/2⁺; ²⁰⁷Pb is a 3p1/2 hole in the N = 126 core and is 1/2⁻, a hole carrying the particle's j and parity. Then the failures. Odd-odd nuclei need Nordheim's rules to couple two odd nucleons. Deformed nuclei break spherical symmetry so j stops being a good quantum number: ¹⁹F should be 5/2⁺ and is 1/2⁺, ²³Na should be 5/2⁺ and is 3/2⁺, and both want Nilsson orbitals labelled Ω[N nz Λ]. And a level scheme fixes which states exist, never how fast anything decays.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Single-particle shell-model Hamiltonian

Ĥ = p̂²/2mN + VWS(r) + Vₗₛ(r) l̂⋅ŝ/ħ²

One body, so A nucleons become A copies of one eigenproblem; u(0) = 0 and u(r→∞) = 0 come free with a harmonic-oscillator basis.

VWS = −V₀/[1 + e((r−R)/a)], V₀ ≈ 50 MeV, R = 1.25 A¹⁄³ fm, a ≈ 0.55 fm; ħ²/2mN = 20.7 MeV fm²

l⋅s in the coupled basis

⟨l⋅s⟩ = (ħ²/2)[j(j+1) − l(l+1) − 3/4]

Diagonal in |n l j mⱼ⟩, so Ĥ is block diagonal in (l, j) — no Clebsch–Gordan coefficients, just one small radial matrix per block.

+lħ²/2 for j = l + ½ and −(l+1)ħ²/2 for j = l − ½; 1f7/2 gives +1.5ħ², 1f5/2 gives −2ħ²

Splitting and the barycentre rule

ΔE = (2l+1)|Vₗₛ|/2shifts −l/(2l+1) and +(l+1)/(2l+1) of ΔE

Growth linear in l is why only the top-l orbital of a shell splits far enough to open a new gap, and why the fatter level is the one that moves less.

ΔE and |Vₗₛ| in MeV, since Ĥ carries l̂⋅ŝ/ħ²; the (2j+1)-weighted mean is unmoved, since (2l+2)l − 2l(l+1) = 0

Thomas radial shape of the spin–orbit term

Vₗₛ(r) = −κ (1/r) dVWS/dr, peaked at r = R

Confines the force to a surface skin of width a, so the high-l orbitals that the centrifugal barrier pushes outward are the ones that feel it.

κ ≈ 0.5 fm²; |dVWS/dr| peaks at V₀/4a ≈ 23 MeV fm⁻¹ for V₀ = 50 MeV and a = 0.55 fm

The oscillator gap an intruder must cross

ħω ≈ 41 A(−1/3) MeVoscillator closures 2, 8, 20, 40, 70, 112

The benchmark for every intruder claim: an orbital only changes shells once l⋅s plus the l² depression carry it past this gap.

Shell N = 2(n−1) + l holds (N+1)(N+2) nucleons with spin; A = 90 gives ħω = 9.1 MeV

Odd-A ground-state assignment

Jπ = j of the last odd nucleon, π = (−1)l of that orbital

⁴¹Ca → 1f7/2 → 7/2⁻ and ⁹¹Zr → 2d5/2 → 5/2⁺, while ¹⁹F predicts 5/2⁺ and measures 1/2⁺ — deformation, not a bad orbital.

Even-even is 0⁺ from pairing; odd-odd needs Nordheim's rules; a hole carries the particle's j and π
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

1.40 MeV
0.6 to 2 MeV; steps of 0.05.
0.34 MeV
0.1 to 0.36 MeV; steps of 0.02.
92
40 to 208; steps of 4.

Try this. Push the spin–orbit slider to its top with the l² depression at its lowest: the closure still reads 40, so l⋅s alone cannot do it. Raise the depression as well and only 1g9/2 dives past the N = 3 level while 1g7/2 stays far above it; the moment it crosses, the count flips to 50.

Live results

1g SPLITTING ΔE
6.30 MeV
1g9/2 BELOW N = 4 LEVEL
9.60 MeV
OSCILLATOR GAP
9.08 MeV
SHELL CLOSES AT
50 nucleons

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Physics V modelThe 1g and 2d doublets of the N = 4 oscillator shell, plotted as energy below the shell's unperturbed oscillator level, where its l = 0 member 3s1/2 sits, as the well's l² depression and the spin–orbit coefficient are raised. At |V_ls| = 1.40 MeV the 1g doublet splits by 6.30 MeV and 1g9/2 falls 9.60 MeV, against a gap of 9.08 MeV to the shell below, so the closure is 50.1g9/21g7/22d5/22d3/2N = 4 oscillator shellN = 4 levelN = 3 level0−10 MeVcloses at 50 nucleons
The 1g and 2d doublets of the N = 4 oscillator shell, plotted as energy below the shell's unperturbed oscillator level, where its l = 0 member 3s1/2 sits, as the well's l² depression and the spin–orbit coefficient are raised. At |Vₗₛ| = 1.40 MeV the 1g doublet splits by 6.30 MeV and 1g9/2 falls 9.60 MeV, against a gap of 9.08 MeV to the shell below, so the closure is 50.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Spin-orbit coefficient |Vₗₛ|: 1.40 MeV; l² depression coefficient D: 0.34 MeV; Mass number A: 92

Baseline 1.40; choose 0.6 to 2, in steps of 0.05.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The trap is importing atomic fine structure. In an atom the coefficient is positive, so j = l + ½ lies above j = l − ½; in a nucleus Vₗₛ is negative and j = l + ½ lies below, and the whole shell scheme hangs on that sign. Flip it and the intruders become 1f5/2, 1g7/2, 1h9/2 and 1i11/2, each holding two fewer nucleons, so the closures come out 26, 48, 80 and 124 — every one wrong — and ⁴¹Ca is predicted 5/2⁻ against a measured 7/2⁻. The second half of the error is taking the term to be the atom's electromagnetic spin–orbit coupling scaled up. Scale the electron's Thomas precession up to nuclear fields and the splitting is twenty to thirty times too small, still with the atomic sign. The nuclear l⋅s is not electromagnetic: it belongs to the nucleon–nucleon interaction, and in relativistic mean-field language it comes from scalar and vector potentials of a few hundred MeV that cancel in the central well and add in the spin–orbit one.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

A neutron occupies the 1g orbital of a nucleus near A = 90, where the radially averaged spin–orbit coefficient is |Vₗₛ| = 1.4 MeV. Evaluate ⟨l⋅s⟩ for both members of the doublet, find the splitting, and place each level relative to the multiplet's centre of gravity.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 4 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

Starting from the closure at 28, fill the orbitals in the standard order 2p3/2, 1f5/2, 2p1/2, 1g9/2 and show that the next gap falls at 50 rather than 40. Then assign Jπ to ⁹¹Zr (Z = 40, N = 51) and to ⁸⁹Y (Z = 39, N = 50), saying in each case which nucleon does the work.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

In the lead region take ħω = 41 A(−1/3) MeV, a radially averaged spin–orbit coefficient |Vₗₛ| = 0.80 MeV, and model the flat-bottomed well by an extra depression D l(l+1) with D = 0.16 MeV. For A = 208, find ħω, find the 1i splitting and how far 1i13/2 and 1i11/2 each sit below the l = 0 member of the N = 6 shell, decide which of them clears the gap, and assign Jπ to ²⁰⁷Pb.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

A student writing a Woods–Saxon shell-model code enters the spin–orbit coefficient with the atomic sign, so Vₗₛ comes out positive. The well, the harmonic-oscillator basis and the l² depression are all unchanged. What does the level scheme now predict for the magic numbers?
7

Review & continue

The nuclear spin–orbit term is a one-body operator Vₗₛ(r) l⋅s with Vₗₛ negative, which splits every l > 0 orbital into j = l ± ½ and, because the splitting grows as 2l + 1, drives the largest-l j = l + ½ orbital out of its own oscillator shell.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.