
Nuclear, particle & quantum-information sequence · Interactive lesson
Mass defect and separation energies
Weigh a nucleus, weigh its nucleons separately, and the gap is the energy holding it together. This lesson turns that one subtraction into a working instrument: total binding, binding per nucleon, and the first differences that say what it actually costs to pull one nucleon out — and what the mass table still refuses to tell you.
UPV-14.04 · Lesson 4 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Nuclear, particle & quantum-information sequence. These units continue into nuclear and particle physics and quantum information. Follow your university’s prerequisites, mathematical depth and assessment; this independent pathway is not a universal programme specification.
Build the model
The whole weighs less than its parts, and the deficit is the physics.
The key idea
The binding energy of a nucleus is the energy equivalent of its mass defect — how much less the bound nucleus weighs than the free protons and neutrons it contains — and a separation energy is the change in that binding when one nucleon is removed.
Example. ⁴He weighs 4.0026033 u while two ¹H atoms and two neutrons weigh 4.0329799 u; the 0.0303766 u defect is 28.30 MeV of binding, 7074 keV per nucleon.
The complete physical model and assumptions
A bound nucleus weighs less than the nucleons inside it, and E = mc² turns that missing mass into the energy needed to take it apart: B(Z, N) = [Z m(¹H) + N mₙ − Mₐₜ(Z, A)]c². Using neutral-atom masses rather than nuclear ones is deliberate — the Z electron rest masses cancel side to side, leaving only their binding, about 1 keV in carbon and 0.5 MeV in lead against 1636 MeV of nuclear binding. That single subtraction is the whole model, and it inherits the absolute precision of mass spectrometry: sub-keV on a 492 MeV number for ⁵⁶Fe. Everything else comes from differencing it. Divide by A for the intensive curve, which peaks at ⁶²Ni with 8794.5 keV per nucleon and falls to 7867 keV at ²⁰⁸Pb. Take first differences for the separation energies Sₙ = B(Z, N) − B(Z, N−1) and Sₚ = B(Z, N) − B(Z−1, N), which expose what the smooth B/A curve hides: a 3 MeV odd-even zigzag that is the pairing force read straight off measured masses, and multi-MeV cliffs wherever N or Z crosses a magic number. The cost is a hard boundary. Binding is a property of two ground states, so it says what is energetically allowed and never how fast it happens — ²³²Th (Qα = +4.08 MeV, 1.4 × 10¹⁰ yr) and ²¹²Po (Qα = 8.95 MeV, 0.29 µs) draw the same verdict from the mass table and differ by 24 orders of magnitude in rate.
1One subtraction, and why the electrons cancel
Take a neutral ⁵⁶Fe atom, Mₐₜ = 55.9349363 u. Take 26 hydrogen ATOMS and 30 free neutrons: 26(1.00782503) + 30(1.00866492) = 26.2034508 + 30.2599476 = 56.4633984 u. The parts outweigh the whole by Δm = 0.5284621 u, and at 931.494 MeV per u that defect is B = 492.26 MeV — the work needed to disassemble the nucleus into free nucleons at rest. Atomic rather than nuclear masses are used on purpose. Each m(¹H) carries one electron, so Z of them stand on the parts side against the Z electrons already inside Mₐₜ, and the rest masses cancel exactly. What does not cancel is the difference between the atom's total electron binding Bₑ(Z) and Z times hydrogen's 13.6 eV: roughly 1 keV for carbon, about 34 keV for iron, some 0.5 MeV for lead against 1636 MeV of nuclear binding. Standard tables ignore it. Say so, rather than pretending it is zero.
2Mass excess turns the calculation into a table lookup
Nobody types ten-digit masses. Tables list the mass excess Δ ≡ (Mₐₜ − A u)c² in keV, and because Z + N = A the A u terms cancel identically, leaving B = Z ΔH + N Δₙ − Δ(Z, A) with ΔH = 7.2890 MeV and Δₙ = 8.0713 MeV. For ¹⁴C, Δ = 3.0199 MeV, so B = 6(7.2890) + 8(8.0713) − 3.0199 = 43.734 + 64.570 − 3.020 = 105.284 MeV. In NumPy the table is one array and every binding energy is a dot product with the integer vector (Z, N, −1), so a whole isotope chain costs one line. The precision this preserves is worth naming: B is a small difference of large numbers — 0.53 u out of 56 u for ⁵⁶Fe — so it inherits the absolute, not the relative, uncertainty of the masses. A few tenths of a keV on Mₐₜ(⁵⁶Fe) lands as a few tenths of a keV on 492.26 MeV, better than one part in 10⁶. Every fit and every drip-line criterion later in this unit rests on that.
3B/A is an average, and its peak is nickel, not iron
Divide by A and you get the only binding number comparable between different nuclides. B/A climbs steeply and unevenly through the light nuclei — ²H 1112, ⁴He 7074, ¹²C 7680 keV per nucleon — flattens across the iron–nickel region and falls slowly to 7867 keV at ²⁰⁸Pb. The maximum is ⁶²Ni at 8794.5 keV per nucleon, with ⁵⁸Fe at 8792.2 and ⁵⁶Fe at 8790.3: the top three lie within 4.2 keV per nucleon of one another, 0.05% of B/A, yet with sub-keV mass uncertainties that margin is hundreds of standard deviations. The ordering is measurement, not model. Never rank total B across different A: ⁶²Ni's 545.26 MeV beats ⁵⁶Fe's 492.26 MeV by 53 MeV solely because it has six more nucleons. And that ⁵⁶Fe still dominates the observed iron peak is a statement about nuclear statistical equilibrium and the neutron-to-proton ratio at freeze-out, not about which nuclide is most bound.
4A separation energy is a first difference, not an average
How much does it cost to pull one neutron off? Not B/A. The removal energy is the first difference Sₙ = B(Z, N) − B(Z, N−1), or Sₙ = Δ(Z, A−1) + Δₙ − Δ(Z, A) directly from the table; the proton version is Sₚ = B(Z, N) − B(Z−1, N). These are nuclear ionisation energies: the departing nucleon sits in the highest occupied level, not at the average depth. Doubly magic ¹⁶O has B/A = 7976 keV but Sₙ = 127.619 − 111.955 = 15.66 MeV and Sₚ = 127.619 − 115.492 = 12.13 MeV, both far above that average. Add one neutron and ¹⁷O's Sₙ collapses to 131.762 − 127.619 = 4.14 MeV, a factor of 3.8 down, while B/A barely moves, from 7976 to 7751 keV per nucleon. The average is smooth because it averages; the difference is where the level structure shows.
5The odd-even sawtooth is pairing, read before any fit
Plot Sₙ along an isotope chain and it zigzags. Carbon: 18.72 MeV at N = 6, 4.95 MeV at N = 7, 8.18 MeV at N = 8. Even N is always the expensive one, because removing a neutron from an even-N nucleus breaks a J = 0 coupled pair while removing the odd neutron from an odd-N nucleus does not. The amplitude of that zigzag is the pairing energy, and it comes off measured masses before any model is fitted — the semi-empirical mass formula's ±aP A(−1/2) term exists to reproduce this feature, not to explain it. The one-sided estimate ½[Sₙ(N+1) − Sₙ(N)] gives 1.62 MeV for carbon but is biased by whatever smooth slope Sₙ carries; the symmetric four-point Δ⁽⁴⁾(N) = ¼[Sₙ(N−1) + Sₙ(N+1) − 2 Sₙ(N)] at odd N cancels a linear trend exactly. When you want shell structure without the pairing noise, difference by two instead: S₂n = B(Z, N) − B(Z, N−2) = Sₙ(N) + Sₙ(N−1) removes a whole pair, runs smoothly with N, and drops sharply where N crosses 8, 20, 28, 50, 82 or 126.
6Binding fixes energetics and never a rate
Every number in this topic is a difference of two ground-state masses. That fixes what is energetically permitted and nothing else. Sₙ < 0 means the nucleus cannot hold that neutron and it leaves in about 10⁻²¹ s; Sₙ > 0 means neutron emission is closed, and the mass table stops there. Alpha decay makes the point sharply: ²³²Th has Qα = +4.08 MeV and a half-life of 1.4 × 10¹⁰ years, ²¹²Po has Qα = 8.95 MeV and 0.29 µs. Both are allowed by the same table, and their rates differ by 24 orders of magnitude, because a rate needs the Coulomb barrier and a tunnelling exponent that no mass difference contains. The same discipline applies in reverse: a large Sₙ does not make a nuclide long-lived against beta decay, which is governed by an entirely different mass difference and by a matrix element the masses know nothing about.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Binding energy from neutral-atom masses
B(Z, N) = [Z m(¹H) + N mₙ − Mₐₜ(Z, A)] c²
Atomic masses go in unchanged: the Z electron rest masses cancel side to side, so only their binding is left uncorrected.
m(¹H) = 1.0078250 u, mₙ = 1.0086649 u, 1 u = 931.494 MeV/c²; Mₐₜ in u for the neutral atomMass-excess form of the same subtraction
B = Z ΔH + N Δₙ − Δ(Z, A), with Δ ≡ (Mₐₜ − A u) c²
The A u terms cancel identically, so B is one integer dot product with the mass-excess column: (Z, N, −1)⋅(ΔH, Δₙ, Δ).
ΔH = 7.2890 MeV, Δₙ = 8.0713 MeV. Tables list Δ in keV, so no ten-digit masses are needed.Binding per nucleon, the intensive measure
B/A — maximal at ⁶²Ni, 8794.5 keV per nucleon
The only binding number comparable across different A. ⁶²Ni beats ⁵⁶Fe in total B by 53 MeV purely by having six more nucleons.
⁵⁸Fe 8792.2, ⁵⁶Fe 8790.3, ²⁰⁸Pb 7867, ¹²C 7680, ⁴He 7074, ²H 1112 keV per nucleonNeutron and proton separation energies
Sₙ = B(Z, N) − B(Z, N−1) · Sₚ = B(Z, N) − B(Z−1, N)
The cost of lifting one nucleon to infinity at rest — a nuclear ionisation energy, set by the topmost occupied level, not by the average.
In mass excess: Sₙ = Δ(Z, A−1) + Δₙ − Δ(Z, A) and Sₚ = Δ(Z−1, A−1) + ΔH − Δ(Z, A)Odd-even staggering, four-point estimator
Δ⁽⁴⁾(N) = ¼[Sₙ(N−1) + Sₙ(N+1) − 2 Sₙ(N)], N odd
The symmetric form cancels any linear trend in Sₙ, which biases the one-sided three-mass form Δ⁽³⁾ = ½[Sₙ(N+1) − Sₙ(N)] by half the slope.
Spans four masses, B(N−2) to B(N+1). Typically 1–2 MeV, trending down with mass number roughly as A(−1/2), and under 1 MeV in the heaviest nucleiTwo-neutron separation energy
S₂n(N) = B(Z, N) − B(Z, N−2) = Sₙ(N) + Sₙ(N−1)
Plot this against N when you want shell closures without pairing noise: it runs smoothly, then drops sharply past 50, 82 and 126.
Removes a full pair, so the odd-even zigzag cancels between the two termsInteractive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Drag the pairing gap to zero and the zigzag collapses onto the dashed trend, so the sawtooth is the entire pairing signal. Then raise the smooth slope: the one-sided half-step drifts below the true gap by half the slope, while the symmetric four-point readout stays exactly on it.
Live results
- Sₙ AT EVEN N
- 8.60 MeV
- Sₙ AT ODD N
- 4.90 MeV
- ONE-SIDED HALF-STEP
- 1.35 MeV
- SYMMETRIC 4-POINT
- 1.60 MeV
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Pairing gap Δ: 1.6 MeV; Smooth fall of Sₙ per neutron: 0.50 MeV
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The commonest error is to treat B/A as the price of removing a nucleon. It is not. B/A is an average over all A nucleons; Sₙ is a first difference at the top of the filled levels, and the two disagree badly. ¹³C has B/A = 7470 keV and Sₙ = 4946 keV; ¹⁴C has B/A = 7520 keV and Sₙ = 8176 keV. The averages differ by 0.7%, the separation energies by 65%, because the last neutron either has a partner to pair with or does not. The second error is reading binding as stability. B compares two ground states, so it fixes what is energetically allowed and nothing else: ²³²Th (Qα = +4.08 MeV, half-life 1.4 × 10¹⁰ years) and ²¹²Po (Qα = 8.95 MeV, half-life 0.29 µs) are both open to alpha decay, and nothing in the mass table turns those two Q values into rates 24 orders of magnitude apart.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
Neutral ⁴He has atomic mass 4.00260325 u. With m(¹H) = 1.00782503 u, mₙ = 1.00866492 u and 1 u = 931.494 MeV/c², find the mass defect, the total binding energy and the binding per nucleon.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 4 steps revealed.
- ⁴He has Z = 2 and N = 2, so the parts are two hydrogen ATOMS and two free neutrons: 2(1.00782503) + 2(1.00866492) = 2.01565006 + 2.01732984 = 4.03297990 u.
- Mass defect: Δm = 4.03297990 − 4.00260325 = 0.03037665 u. The whole is lighter than its parts, which is what bound means.
- Convert: B = 0.03037665 × 931.494 = 28.296 MeV. Hydrogen atoms rather than bare protons, so the two electrons on the parts side cancel the two already inside the neutral helium atom.
- Per nucleon: B/A = 28.296/4 = 7.074 MeV, or 7074 keV. That is why ⁴He is so tightly bound for its size — its neighbour ⁶Li manages only 31.994/6 = 5332 keV per nucleon.
Answer. Δm = 0.0303766 u; B = 28.30 MeV; B/A = 7074 keV per nucleon.
MediumExample 2
Mass excesses: Δ(¹²C) = 0 by definition, Δ(¹³C) = 3.1250 MeV, Δ(¹⁴C) = 3.0199 MeV, with Δₙ = 8.0713 MeV. Find the neutron separation energies of ¹³C and ¹⁴C, and use them to estimate the neutron pairing gap in this chain.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Work in mass excess and the A u terms cancel: Sₙ(Z, A) = B(Z, A) − B(Z, A−1) = Δ(Z, A−1) + Δₙ − Δ(Z, A). No ten-digit masses are needed.
- ¹³C has N = 7, odd: Sₙ = Δ(¹²C) + Δₙ − Δ(¹³C) = 0 + 8.0713 − 3.1250 = 4.9463 MeV.
- ¹⁴C has N = 8, even: Sₙ = Δ(¹³C) + Δₙ − Δ(¹⁴C) = 3.1250 + 8.0713 − 3.0199 = 8.1764 MeV.
- The even-N neutron is 8.1764 − 4.9463 = 3.2301 MeV dearer to remove, because it is one of a coupled J = 0 pair while ¹³C's seventh neutron is unpaired. Half that step estimates the gap: Δ ≈ ½(3.2301) = 1.62 MeV.
- Sanity check against the averages: B/A is 7470 keV for ¹³C and 7520 keV for ¹⁴C, 0.7% apart. The averages hide entirely what the first differences show — a 65% change in what the last neutron costs.
Answer. Sₙ(¹³C) = 4.946 MeV and Sₙ(¹⁴C) = 8.176 MeV; the 3.230 MeV odd-even step gives a neutron pairing gap of about 1.6 MeV.
HardExample 3
Atomic masses: M(⁵⁶Fe) = 55.9349363 u, M(⁵⁸Fe) = 57.9332744 u, M(⁶²Ni) = 61.9283451 u. Using m(¹H) = 1.00782503 u, mₙ = 1.00866492 u and 1 u = 931.494 MeV/c², decide which is the most tightly bound nuclide per nucleon, quantify the margin, and say whether mass uncertainties of a few tenths of a keV could overturn the ordering.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- ⁵⁶Fe (Z = 26, N = 30): parts = 26.2034508 + 30.2599476 = 56.4633984 u, so Δm = 0.5284621 u, B = 492.259 MeV and B/A = 492259/56 = 8790.3 keV.
- ⁵⁸Fe (Z = 26, N = 32): parts = 26.2034508 + 32.2772774 = 58.4807282 u, so Δm = 0.5474538 u, B = 509.950 MeV and B/A = 509950/58 = 8792.2 keV.
- ⁶²Ni (Z = 28, N = 34): parts = 28.2191008 + 34.2946073 = 62.5137081 u, so Δm = 0.5853630 u, B = 545.262 MeV and B/A = 545262/62 = 8794.5 keV.
- Rank on B/A, never on B. ⁶²Ni's total binding beats ⁵⁶Fe's by 545.262 − 492.259 = 53.0 MeV only because it has six more nucleons. Per nucleon the order is ⁶²Ni 8794.5 > ⁵⁸Fe 8792.2 > ⁵⁶Fe 8790.3 keV, margins of 2.3 and 4.2 keV per nucleon.
- Uncertainty: 0.4 keV on a total binding energy becomes 0.4/62 ≈ 0.006 keV per nucleon, so even the narrowest gap in the ranking, 1.9 keV per nucleon between ⁵⁸Fe and ⁵⁶Fe, is well over a hundred standard deviations. The ordering is a measurement, and no fitted mass formula is entitled to overturn it.
- Do not over-read it. That 4.2 keV per nucleon is 0.05% of B/A, and abundances are not set by B/A alone: silicon burning reaches nuclear statistical equilibrium at N ≈ Z, which favours ⁵⁶Ni, and ⁵⁶Ni decays through ⁵⁶Co to ⁵⁶Fe — which is why the observed iron peak is ⁵⁶Fe and not ⁶²Ni.
Answer. ⁶²Ni, at 8794.5 keV per nucleon, ahead of ⁵⁸Fe (8792.2) and ⁵⁶Fe (8790.3). Even the narrowest margin, 1.9 keV per nucleon, is well over a hundred σ, so the ordering is safe.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
The binding energy of a nucleus is the energy equivalent of its mass defect — how much less the bound nucleus weighs than the free protons and neutrons it contains — and a separation energy is the change in that binding when one nucleon is removed.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.