UQMII · Undergraduate, typically year 3–4 · A second dedicated quantum-mechanics course
Finish hydrogen. Then learn to approximate everything else.
A fifteen-unit, fifteen-week second course in quantum mechanics that begins where Quantum Mechanics I stopped. Units 1 and 2 finish hydrogen: the spherical harmonics are derived by series and by ladder operators, and the radial equation is solved by a power series whose termination gives n = n_r + l + 1, the Bohr energies and the associated Laguerre polynomials. Units 3 to 5 extend the formalism to spin and charge in electromagnetic fields, to composite systems with entanglement and density operators, and to angular momentum as the generator of rotations, added with Clebsch-Gordan coefficients. Units 6 to 9 build time-independent perturbation theory and apply it to identical particles and many-electron atoms, to hydrogen's fine structure and the Lamb shift in the midterm week, and to the Zeeman, Stark and hyperfine effects. Units 10 and 11 turn to problems without a small perturbation: the variational principle, then the semiclassical limit through the path integral and WKB. Units 12 and 13 derive transition rates and apply them to emission and absorption of radiation, and Units 14 and 15 treat the adiabatic approximation with Berry's phase and three-dimensional scattering.
Independent pathway notice. GioPhysics University & College Physics is an independent learning pathway. GioPhysics is not a university, does not award academic credit or degrees, and is not accredited by or affiliated with any university or professional body. This is not a universal programme specification. Course coverage and degree requirements vary by institution; confirm requirements with your university.
What this course is for
A sequel that derives what the first course quoted.
By the end, a student should be able to finish hydrogen from the Schrödinger equation, add angular momenta, choose and apply the right approximation to a problem with no exact solution, compute a transition rate and a lifetime, and say of every number whether it was derived or quoted.Units 1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 12 and 13 are the irreducible core: they finish hydrogen, add angular momenta, build time-independent and time-dependent perturbation theory, and complete every calculation Quantum Mechanics I deferred, with a midterm in week 8.
Units 3, 4, 7, 9, 10 and 11 may be compressed or reordered. Units 3, 4 and 9 feed the core, so they shorten rather than drop: Landau levels, CHSH and the Breit-Rabi solution can go, but the Heisenberg picture, magnetic resonance, minimal coupling, the tensor product, the 21 cm line and the linear Stark effect are used later. Unit 7 can shrink to exchange symmetry and helium, Unit 10 must precede Unit 14, and Unit 11, which needs only Units 2 and 3, can move earlier.
Units 14 and 15, the adiabatic approximation with Berry's phase and the Born-Oppenheimer separation, then three-dimensional scattering, are the tail a shorter term trims, Unit 15 first; when Unit 15 is cut short it keeps partial waves and the first Born approximation. Every deferral from Quantum Mechanics I lands before them.
Next come relativistic quantum mechanics, where the Dirac equation yields the Thomas factor, the Darwin term and the electron's g-factor of 2, all quoted in this course; quantum field theory and quantum optics, which quantise the field behind spontaneous emission and the Lamb shift and prove the spin-statistics connection; many-body theory in second quantisation; and scattering with spin and identical particles.
Before unit 01
Bring Quantum Mechanics I. None of it is taught again.
Dirac notation, ladder operators, spin-½ algebra and two-state systems are used from the first week without being re-derived; the first topic alone recalls the separated angular equation before the new work starts. What Quantum Mechanics I quoted — the spherical harmonics, the radial solution, fine structure, transition rates — this course derives.Readiness, not gatekeeping
What must already be fluent.
If a ket, a commutator and a spin-½ matrix are comfortable, this course is tractable. If they are not, Quantum Mechanics I is the place to make them so: this course will not slow down for them.
- University Quantum Mechanics I or equivalent: Dirac notation, ladder operators, spin-half algebra, two-state systems and the separated central-potential equations, all used here without being re-taught
- Classical mechanics including the Lagrangian, the action and Hamilton's principle, central-force orbits, and the reduced mass of a two-body problem
- Electromagnetism with the scalar and vector potentials and their gauge freedom, the Lorentz force, magnetic dipoles, and polarised plane waves
- Special relativity to the level of E^2 = p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4 and the magnetic field a moving charge sees, and the Planck spectrum from a modern-physics course
- Ordinary differential equations with series solutions, Fourier transforms in one and three dimensions, and vector calculus through Stokes' theorem
- Enough programming, for example Python with NumPy, to integrate coupled differential equations and diagonalise small matrices
Fifteen units · a recommended fifteen-week schedule
Finish the exact solution, then learn what to do without one.
One unit a week. The first two weeks complete the exact solution Quantum Mechanics I left half done; every week after that is about problems with no exact solution — perturbation theory, variation, the semiclassical limit — and about how systems change in time, emit light and scatter.Recommended fifteen-week schedule
- Week 1 · Deriving the spherical harmonics
- Week 2 · The hydrogen radial equation, solved
- Week 3 · Spin and charge in electromagnetic fields
- Week 4 · Composite systems, entanglement and density operators
- Week 5 · Rotations and the addition of angular momentum
- Week 6 · Time-independent perturbation theory
- Week 7 · Identical particles and many-electron atoms
- Week 8 · Fine structure, the Lamb shift — and the midterm
- Week 9 · Hydrogen in external fields, and hyperfine structure
- Week 10 · The variational principle
- Week 11 · WKB and the path integral
- Week 12 · Time-dependent perturbation theory
- Week 13 · Emission and absorption of radiation
- Week 14 · The adiabatic approximation and Berry's phase
- Week 15 · Quantum scattering theory
Course scope: This GioPhysics course map is an adaptable learning sequence, not academic credit, accreditation, or a universal university syllabus. It is the sequel to Quantum Mechanics I, using its Dirac notation, ladder operators, spin-half algebra and separated central-potential equations without re-teaching them, and completing what it deferred: derivations of the spherical harmonics and hydrogen's radial solution, fine structure, the Lamb shift and transition rates. Unlike University Physics V, a survey of quantum, atomic, nuclear and particle physics, it stays inside non-relativistic quantum mechanics with classical fields, computes atomic shifts by perturbation theory, and gives each approximation method a full unit; relativistic and field-theory results are quoted. A midterm is assumed in week 8. Follow your institution's published scope, notation, laboratory programme, and assessment rules.
Complete interactive course map
All fifteen units, searchable by concept and evidence.
Search 135 numbered subsections, inspect outcomes and prerequisites, and expand the investigation and problem-practice plan for each unit.Mapped lesson links: this course sits above everything else written on this site, so no topic is mapped to an introductory page. Nothing here links to a page that does not teach the topic at this level.
Interactive course map
Choose one phase. Open one unit. Learn by doing.
Search includes unit titles, topics, skills, outcomes, prerequisites, and laboratory questions across all 15 units.
Private study checklist
0 of 15 units reviewedWeek 1 · UQMII-01 · Heavy
Deriving the Spherical Harmonics
Quantum Mechanics I presented the Yₗm(θ, φ) and checked them; this unit derives them, twice. By series: x = cos θ turns the polar equation into the associated Legendre equation, and regularity at both poles truncates the series, forcing λ = l(l + 1) with integer l and |m| at most l. By ladder operators written as differential operators on the sphere: L+ Yₗl = 0 is solved and every Yₗm lowered from it. Normalisation, the Condon-Shortley phase, parity, the cos θ recursion behind the dipole selection rules, and the addition theorem with the multipole expansion of 1/|r - r'| close the unit. Completeness on the sphere and the general addition theorem are quoted; Unit 10 uses the multipole expansion and Unit 15 the Legendre polynomials.
9 topics6 outcomes2 lab directions270 min practiceOpen Deriving the Spherical Harmonics: topics, evidence, and practice
Extra challenging questions
Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.
Topics and mapped lessons
- From the separated angular equation to the associated Legendre equation
The course's one review topic: ψ = R(r) Y(θ, φ) and Φ = exp(i m φ) with integer m are recalled from Quantum Mechanics I, not re-derived. The new step is x = cos θ, which turns the polar equation into (1 - x²) P'' - 2x P' + [λ - m²/(1 - x²)] P = 0, with λ not yet known to be l(l + 1). Frobenius exponents of plus and minus |m|/2 at each pole, with a logarithm when m = 0, give one regular and one singular solution there; the singular one is not normalisable for |m| of 1 or more and has infinite ⟨L²⟩ for m = 0, so regularity is a physical demand.
- Series solution of Legendre's equation, and why it must terminate
For m = 0 a power series gives the two-step recursion a(k+2) = [k(k + 1) - λ] aₖ / [(k + 1)(k + 2)]; left infinite, either branch has coefficients falling only as 1/k and diverges logarithmically at the poles. Re-expanding about x = 1 shows that no mixture of infinite branches is regular at both poles either. Regularity therefore forces λ = l(l + 1) with l a non-negative integer and the branch of the other parity set to zero: the l(l + 1) Quantum Mechanics I took from the ladder algebra now follows from the differential equation plus regularity, the equation alone admitting a solution for every λ.
- Legendre polynomials: Rodrigues' formula, orthogonality and norm
Pₗ(x) = (1/(2l l!)) dl/dxl (x² - 1)l is shown to solve Legendre's equation by differentiating (x² - 1) w' = 2l x w, with w = (x² - 1)l, l + 1 times; Pₗ(1) = 1 fixes its scale and P₀ to P₃ are checked against the terminated recursion. Orthogonality with norm 2/(2l + 1) is derived by repeated integration by parts, and orthogonality again from the Sturm-Liouville form, whose boundary terms vanish at x = plus or minus 1 because 1 - x² does. Orthogonality also forces all l zeros of Pₗ to lie inside (−1, 1).
- The generating function and the multipole expansion of 1/|r - r'|
Expanding (1 - 2xt + t²)⁻¹⁄² in powers of t, for |t| < 1, generates coefficients shown to be the Pₗ(x), and differentiating it in t gives the recursion (2l + 1) x Pₗ = (l + 1) P(l+1) + l P(l-1). Setting t = r_</r_> gives 1/|r - r'| as the sum over l of (r_<l / r_>(l + 1)) Pₗ(cos γ), gamma the angle between r and r'. The series converges geometrically for |r| not equal to |r'| and is the expansion that evaluates the helium repulsion integral in Unit 10.
- Associated Legendre functions, and why |m| cannot exceed l
Writing P = (1 - x²)(|m|/2) u leaves an equation for u whose series terminates only at degree l - |m|, and differentiating Legendre's equation |m| times identifies that polynomial as the |m|-th derivative of Pₗ, so Pₗ^|m|(x) = (1 - x²)(|m|/2) d^|m|/dx^|m| Pₗ(x), regular at both poles. A degree cannot be negative, so |m| at most l follows from the differential equation, matching what Quantum Mechanics I got from the ladder algebra. The l - |m| polar nodes it quoted are the zeros of that derivative, counted by Rolle's theorem from the l zeros of Pₗ.
- Normalising Yₗm, and the Condon-Shortley phase
Integrating over d Ω = sin θ d θ d φ, with the Legendre norm found from N(|m|+1) = (l + |m| + 1)(l - |m|) N_|m| by integration by parts, fixes the factor sqrt[(2l + 1)(l - |m|)! / (4 π (l + |m|)!)]. The sign (−1)m for positive m is a convention, placed here in Yₗm rather than in Pₗ^|m| as some texts do, that makes the matrix elements of L+ and L- real and positive, as Quantum Mechanics I assumed; Yₗ(−m) = (−1)m [Yₗm]* follows. Y₀⁰ through the five l = 2 functions are built and checked against the tables Quantum Mechanics I quoted.
- The ladder route: solving L+ Yₗl = 0 on the sphere
Transforming Lₓ plus or minus i Ly into angles gives Lₚₘ = plus or minus ℏ exp(plus or minus i φ)[d/d θ plus or minus i cot θ d/d φ], so L+ Yₗl = 0 is a first-order equation solved by sinl θ exp(i l φ). Lowering with the matrix elements of Quantum Mechanics I generates every Yₗm and reproduces Rodrigues' formula at m = 0; it fixes every sign within a multiplet but not the overall one, which the Condon-Shortley choice (−1)l for Yₗl supplies, and so agrees with the series route for l = 2. Trying l = 1/2 gives a top state double-valued in φ and a lowered function, cos θ over √(sin θ), singular at both poles: one reason orbital l is an integer.
- Parity, completeness, and the recursion for cos θ Yₗm
Under r → −r, θ → π - θ and φ → φ + π; Pₗ^|m| supplies (−1)(l + |m|) and exp(i m φ) supplies (−1)m, so Yₗm gains (−1)l, derived rather than quoted. Differentiating the Legendre recursion |m| times, and removing the term in the (|m| - 1)-th derivative with P'(l+1) - P'(l-1) = (2l + 1) Pₗ from the generating function, gives (2l + 1) x Pₗ^|m| = (l - |m| + 1) P(l+1)^|m| + (l + |m|) P(l-1)^|m|, so cos θ connects Yₗm only to Y(l+1)m and Y(l-1)m: the first sighting of the rule Unit 5 derives from commutators. Completeness on the sphere is quoted from Sturm-Liouville theory, and cos² theta is expanded on Y₀⁰ and Y₂⁰ by projection.
- The addition theorem for spherical harmonics
Pₗ(cos γ) = [4 π/(2l + 1)] times the sum over m of Yₗm*(θ', phi') Yₗm(θ, φ), gamma the angle between the two directions, is verified for l = 1, where it is the identity cos γ = cos θ cos θ' + sin θ sin θ' cos(φ - φ'). The general proof is outlined: the m-sum is unchanged by a common rotation of both directions, a property of rotation operators quoted here and justified in Unit 5, so it can be evaluated with one direction on the z axis, where only m = 0 survives. Substituted into the multipole expansion it writes 1/|r - r'| as a double sum over l and m that separates the directions of r and r' but not the radii, the form Unit 10 uses.
Learning outcomes
- Transform the separated polar equation into the associated Legendre equation in x = cos θ, and show from its Frobenius exponents and the Legendre recursion that regularity at both poles forces λ = l(l + 1) with l a non-negative integer.
- Derive |m| at most l from the degree of the polynomial factor in Pₗ^|m|, and predict the l - |m| polar nodes and the (−1)l parity of any Yₗm before plotting it.
- Construct and normalise any Yₗm with l at most 3 by both the series route and the ladder route, and reconcile the two results to the same Condon-Shortley phase.
- Use the associated Legendre recursion to state which Yₗ'm' the product cos θ Yₗm contains, and expand a given angular function on the Yₗm by projection.
- Expand 1/|r - r'| in Legendre polynomials and, through the addition theorem, in spherical harmonics, and use orthogonality to reduce an integral over two sets of angles to the few multipoles that survive, the l = 0 term alone when either distribution is spherically symmetric.
- Say for each property of the Yₗm whether this unit derives it, as for λ, the bound on m, normalisation and parity, or quotes it, as for completeness and the general addition theorem.
Prerequisite thread
- The separated central-potential equations of Quantum Mechanics I: ψ = R(r) Y(θ, φ), Φ = exp(i m φ) with integer m from single-valuedness, and the polar equation with its separation constant
- The angular-momentum ladder algebra: the L² and Lz eigenvalues, Lₚₘ, and the matrix elements ℏ √(l(l + 1) - m(m pm 1))
- Lz and L² as operators on the angles in spherical coordinates, and normalisation over d Ω = sin θ d θ d φ
- Power-series solution of an ordinary differential equation whose recursion must terminate, as done for the harmonic oscillator and the Hermite polynomials
- Orthogonality of eigenfunctions of a Hermitian operator, integration by parts with boundary terms, and the Leibniz rule for repeated derivatives of a product
- Binomial and Taylor expansions, and the law of cosines for the angle between two vectors
Laboratory directions
computationalShooting the polar equation for its eigenvalues If lambda is left free and the associated Legendre equation is integrated from a regular Frobenius start just inside x = 1, does the solution stay regular at x = −1 only when λ = l(l + 1), and is the lowest allowed l for each m equal to |m|?
Evidence: The coefficient of the singular branch at x = −1, estimated from the solution at several small distances from that pole and plotted against λ for m = 0, 1 and 2; its sign changes located by bisection to six figures and compared with l(l + 1); polar node counts checked against l - |m|; and the starting offset and step size varied to show the eigenvalues do not move.computationalTesting the addition theorem and the multipole series Does the sum over m of Yₗm*(n') Yₗm(n) depend only on the angle gamma between n and n' and equal (2l + 1)/(4 π) Pₗ(cos γ), and how many multipole terms does 1/|r - r'| need for a relative error of 10⁻⁶ as r_</r_> approaches 1?
Evidence: Residuals of the addition theorem for l up to 10 over a thousand random pairs of directions, with the software's normalisation and phase conventions identified first and the phase shown to cancel in the m-sum while the normalisation does not; truncation errors of the multipole series against direct evaluation for r_</r_> of 0.1, 0.5 and 0.9, compared with the geometric tail bound, with the worst-case angle stated.Problem practice
Deriving each property of the Yₗm from the polar equation or the ladder algebra rather than reading it off a table, and carrying one phase convention from the first line of a calculation to the last
Capstone: Take l = 3: derive the allowed λ from the Legendre recursion, build Y₃¹ once by differentiating P₃ and once by lowering Y₃³ twice, normalise both and reconcile their phases, confirm the parity and polar-node count, and use the cos θ recursion to name the two Yₗ¹ that cos θ Y₃¹ contains.
- Concept checks that require an explanation, not only a numerical answer
- Multi-step quantitative modelling with unit and limiting-case checks
- A calculus or data-interpretation challenge
Interactive concept map
Follow the model from claim to evidence.
01 · Physical claimDeriving the Spherical Harmonics 02 · RepresentationRecursion tables of series coefficients, showing which branch terminates and which diverges Power-series and Frobenius analysis near singular points
03 · TestPrediction before measurement If lambda is left free and the associated Legendre equation is integrated from a regular Frobenius start just inside x = 1, does the solution stay regular at x = −1 only when λ = l(l + 1), and is the lowest allowed l for each m equal to |m|?
04 · Evidence & boundaryDecide, then qualify Interactive diagram for Deriving the Spherical Harmonics: follow the physical claim through its representation, proposed test, evidence, and model boundary. modelPower-series and Frobenius analysis near singular points turns the stated idea into a representation that can make a prediction.
Example questions
Try the reasoning before revealing the structure.
Concept Using Deriving the Spherical Harmonics, explain how a physicist can: Transform the separated polar equation into the associated Legendre equation in x = cos θ, and show from its Frobenius exponents and the Legendre recursion that regularity at both poles forces λ = l(l + 1) with l a non-negative integer.
- From the separated angular equation to the associated Legendre equation
Week 2 · UQMII-02 · Very heavy
The Hydrogen Radial Equation Solved
The derivation Quantum Mechanics I quoted, carried out in full. The two-body problem is reduced to one particle of reduced mass, the Coulomb radial equation is made dimensionless, its behaviour at the origin and at infinity is factored off, and the remainder, a form of Kummer's equation, is solved by power series. The series solves the equation at every energy but, unless it terminates, grows like exp(2 ρ) and cannot be normalised; termination gives n = nᵣ + l + 1, l at most n - 1 and the Bohr energies, reduced mass and Z-scaling included. The terminated polynomials are identified as associated Laguerre polynomials, and normalised Rₙₗ up to n = 3 are built and checked. Radial expectation values follow from the virial theorem and Kramers' relation, and the quantum Runge-Lenz vector accounts for the l-degeneracy. All energies are non-relativistic, spinless and for a point nucleus.
9 topics6 outcomes2 lab directions300 min practiceOpen The Hydrogen Radial Equation Solved: topics, evidence, and practice
Extra challenging questions
Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.
Topics and mapped lessons
- Centre of mass, relative coordinates, and the reduced mass
Changing variables in the two-body Schrodinger equation separates two particles interacting through V(|r₁ - r₂|) into free motion of the centre of mass and one particle of reduced mass μ = mₑ mₚ/(mₑ + mₚ) in V(r). The separation is exact for any central interaction. Replacing mₑ by mu raises every hydrogen level by about 1 part in 1836, and the resulting 0.18 nm hydrogen-deuterium splitting of Balmer-α is computed. Positronium, with μ = mₑ/2 and levels at minus 6.8 eV over n-squared, is where the correction is largest; both particles are still treated as non-relativistic point charges.
- The dimensionless radial equation for the Coulomb potential
With κ = √(−2 μ E)/ℏ, ρ = κ r and ρ₀ = μ e²/(2 π ε₀ ℏ² κ), the radial equation for u = rR, taken from Quantum Mechanics I, becomes d²u/d ρ² = [1 - ρ₀/ρ + l(l + 1)/ρ²] u. Bound states need E < 0 so that kappa is real, and the unknown energy now hides entirely in the single number ρ₀, so finding the spectrum means finding which ρ₀ are allowed. Replacing e² by Z e² covers any one-electron ion. States with E > 0 form the continuum and are not treated here.
- Behaviour at infinity and at the origin, and the equation for v(ρ)
At large ρ, u ~ exp(−ρ); the growing exp(ρ) is discarded because it cannot be normalised. Near the origin, u ~ ρ(l + 1); the ρ(−l) branch is discarded as non-normalisable for l at least 1, and for l = 0 because R ~ 1/r would put a δ function into the Laplacian. Writing u = ρ(l + 1) exp(−ρ) v(ρ) defines v and assumes nothing, and gives ρ v'' + 2(l + 1 - ρ) v' + [ρ₀ - 2(l + 1)] v = 0. In the variable 2 rho this is Kummer's confluent hypergeometric equation, whose solution regular at the origin, M(l + 1 - ρ₀/2, 2l + 2, 2 ρ), is quoted, so the condition at infinity is the only one left to impose.
- The power series for v(ρ) and its recursion
Substituting v = sum of cⱼ ρj gives the one-step recursion c(j+1) = [2(j + l + 1) - ρ₀] cⱼ / [(j + 1)(j + 2l + 2)], fixed up to normalisation by c₀. It yields a solution for every ρ₀, so the equation alone quantises nothing. For large j the ratio approaches 2/j, so an unterminated series grows like exp(2 ρ) times some power of ρ, and u like exp(ρ), which cannot be normalised. The crude ratio argument cannot fix that power; the quoted large-ρ form of Kummer's function gives u ~ ρ(−ρ₀/2) exp(ρ), not the ρ(l + 1) exp(ρ) often written, and confirms that exponential growth sets in whenever the series fails to end.
- Truncation: n = nᵣ + l + 1 and the Bohr energies derived
The series must stop at some j = nᵣ, which requires ρ₀ = 2(nᵣ + l + 1) = 2n, so n is a positive integer and l runs from 0 to n - 1. Solving for E gives κ = 1/(na), Eₙ = -[μ/(2 ℏ²)](e²/(4 π ε₀))²/n² and a = 4 π ε₀ ℏ²/(μ e²): Quantum Mechanics I's minus 13.6 eV over n-squared, now derived from normalisability, with its Z-squared scaling and radii a/Z following from Z e2. Counting l and m gives n-squared states per level, an l-degeneracy the derivation leaves unexplained and topic 02.09 explains. These non-relativistic, spinless, point-nucleus energies are corrected for relativity and spin in Units 8 and 9 and for nuclear size in Unit 6.
- The associated Laguerre polynomials as the terminated series
The terminated v is proportional to L(n-l-1)(2l+1)(2 ρ), with 2 ρ = 2r/(na). It is built from the Rodrigues formula Lq(x) = (ex/q!) dq/dxq (e(−x) xq) and from Lqp(x) = (−1)p dp/dxp L(q+p)(x), then checked against the recursion for n up to 3. Texts differ by factorials, signs and index labelling: the older physics convention writes the same polynomial as L(n+l)(2l+1), which is minus (n + l)! times the one used here. Every formula in this unit names its convention, and every tabulated Rₙₗ is checked by direct normalisation rather than trusted.
- Normalised radial functions Rₙₗ for n up to 3
R₁₀ = 2 a⁻³⁄² exp(−r/a), R₂₀, R₂₁ and the three n = 3 functions are built from the recursion and normalised so that the integral of R² r² dr is 1; the general constant is quoted. Each is checked for n - l - 1 radial nodes and rl behaviour at the origin, and functions of different n at equal l are shown orthogonal; radial functions of different l need not be, since the Yₗm already are. States with l = n - 1 are nodeless, with radial density peaking at r = n² a, the circular-orbit limit. The contact density |ψₙ₀₀(0)|² = 1/(π n³ a³), checked to n = 3, is recorded for Units 6, 8 and 9.
- Radial expectation values: the virial theorem and Kramers' relation
In a stationary state <[H, r . p]> = 0, which gives the three-dimensional virial theorem 2⟨T⟩ = <r . grad V>; for the Coulomb potential that means ⟨V⟩ = 2Eₙ and <1/r> = 1/(n² a), with no integral done. Kramers' relation, derived from the radial equation by integrating by parts, links ⟨rs⟩, ⟨r(s-1)⟩ and ⟨r(s-2)⟩ for s above -(2l + 1). It gives ⟨r⟩ = (a/2)[3n² - l(l + 1)], returning Quantum Mechanics I's 1.5a for 1s, and ⟨r²⟩ = (n² a²/2)[5n² + 1 - 3l(l + 1)]. It cannot close on <1/r²>, which waits for the Feynman-Hellmann theorem in Unit 6; its s = −1 case then gives the <1/r³>, finite only for l above zero, that fine structure needs in Unit 8.
- The l-degeneracy explained: the quantum Runge-Lenz vector
The classical Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector, conserved only for an inverse-square force, is symmetrised into the Hermitian A = (p x L - L x p)/(2 μ) - k r-hat with k = e²/(4 π ε₀), and [H, A] = 0 and A . L = 0 are checked by commutator algebra. A commutes with H but not with L², so it connects states of equal n whose l differ by one: within n = 2, Az carries 2s into 2p₀ and Aₓ and Ay carry it into 2p(plus or minus 1), and the combinations (2s plus or minus 2p₀)/√(2) that Az selects are the states of Unit 9's linear Stark effect. Pauli's so(4) solution, which recovers Eₙ and the n-squared count from A² = k² + (2H/μ)(L² + ℏ²), is outlined with its algebra quoted.
Learning outcomes
- Separate a two-body problem with a central interaction into centre-of-mass and relative motion, and compute the reduced-mass shift of a hydrogen, deuterium or positronium line.
- Reduce the Coulomb radial equation to dimensionless form, justify each asymptotic factor removed at the origin and at infinity, and derive the recursion for the remaining power series.
- Show that an unterminated series cannot be normalised, and derive from its termination n = nᵣ + l + 1, the bound l at most n - 1, Eₙ and the Bohr radius with the reduced mass and nuclear charge Z included.
- Construct and normalise Rₙₗ for n up to 3 from the recursion, identify each with an associated Laguerre polynomial in a stated convention, and check its nodes, its rl behaviour near the origin and its orthogonality.
- Evaluate <1/r>, ⟨r⟩ and ⟨r²⟩ for any n and l from the virial theorem and Kramers' relation without doing an integral, and confirm one of them by direct integration.
- Verify that the quantum Runge-Lenz vector commutes with H and is perpendicular to L, and explain from it why states of equal n and different l share an energy, saying which part of the so(4) argument is quoted.
Prerequisite thread
- The power-series solution of the harmonic oscillator: an asymptotic factor peeled off, a recursion for the remainder, and termination forced by normalisability rather than by a wall
- The separated central-potential problem: ψ = R(r) Yₗm(θ, φ), the radial equation for u = rR with its centrifugal term and u(0) = 0, and the hydrogen results Quantum Mechanics I quoted from it
- The spherical harmonics as derived in Unit 1, with the separation constant l(l + 1) and the bound |m| at most l established rather than assumed
- Integrals of rk exp(−br) from 0 to infinity as k!/b(k + 1), and normalisation with the volume element r² dr d Omega
- Commutators among xᵢ, pⱼ and Lₖ, and cross products of vector operators whose components do not commute
- Centre-of-mass and relative coordinates, and the reduced mass, from classical two-body mechanics
Laboratory directions
hands-onHydrogen and deuterium Balmer-α: measuring the reduced-mass shift Is the Balmer-α line of deuterium shorter than that of hydrogen by the 0.18 nm the reduced-mass correction predicts, and what value of mₑ/mₚ does the measured splitting imply?
Evidence: Wavelengths of H-α and D-α from a lamp containing both isotopes, recorded with a spectrometer whose resolving power exceeds about 10⁴ (a 1 m monochromator or a grating used in high order), the instrumental line width measured on a single isolated line to show the pair is resolved, the splitting with its uncertainty, and mₑ/mₚ inferred from it and compared with 1/1836.computationalThe series that will not stop When ρ₀ is set slightly away from 2n, at what rho does the power-series solution peel away from the bound state, and does u then grow like ρ(−ρ₀/2) exp(ρ), as the large-ρ form of Kummer's function predicts, or like the ρ(l + 1) exp(ρ) that the crude ratio argument suggests?
Evidence: Partial sums of the recursion taken to convergence at each rho for l = 0 and l = 1, with ρ₀ = 2n and offsets of plus or minus 0.1 and 0.01; plots of ln|u| against rho showing the exp(ρ) branch taking over; the large-ρ slope of ln|u| - ρ against ln ρ, set beside −ρ₀/2 and l + 1; the crossover radius plotted against the size of the offset; and the number of terms and working precision recorded, since the sum needs more than 2 rho terms and grows like exp(2 ρ), overflowing double precision beyond rho of about 350.Problem practice
Carrying one derivation from the two-body equation to normalised radial functions without skipping a step, and saying at each step which condition is being imposed and which result is being quoted
Capstone: Take a Coulomb-bound pair other than hydrogen, such as positronium, muonic hydrogen or the He+ ion. Carry it from the two-body equation to its normalised 1s and 2p radial functions, derive its energies and length scale with the correct reduced mass and charge, and evaluate ⟨r⟩ and <1/r> by Kramers' relation, confirming one of them by direct integration. Finally, for each assumption of the derivation, non-relativistic motion, spinless particles and a point nucleus, estimate by scaling whether the correction it neglects is larger or smaller, relative to the binding energy, than in hydrogen.
- Concept checks that require an explanation, not only a numerical answer
- Multi-step quantitative modelling with unit and limiting-case checks
- A calculus or data-interpretation challenge
Interactive concept map
Follow the model from claim to evidence.
01 · Physical claimThe Hydrogen Radial Equation Solved 02 · RepresentationEffective-potential curves with the small-r and large-r regions marked Asymptotic analysis: factoring off a solution's behaviour at a singular point and at infinity
03 · TestPrediction before measurement Is the Balmer-α line of deuterium shorter than that of hydrogen by the 0.18 nm the reduced-mass correction predicts, and what value of mₑ/mₚ does the measured splitting imply?
04 · Evidence & boundaryDecide, then qualify Interactive diagram for The Hydrogen Radial Equation Solved: follow the physical claim through its representation, proposed test, evidence, and model boundary. modelAsymptotic analysis: factoring off a solution's behaviour at a singular point and at infinity turns the stated idea into a representation that can make a prediction.
Example questions
Try the reasoning before revealing the structure.
Concept Using The Hydrogen Radial Equation Solved, explain how a physicist can: Separate a two-body problem with a central interaction into centre-of-mass and relative motion, and compute the reduced-mass shift of a hydrogen, deuterium or positronium line.
- Centre of mass, relative coordinates, and the reduced mass
Mathematics embedded throughout
Special functions, derived where the physics needs them.
These are used actively in the course, not listed as background. The special functions arrive as solutions the course derives — Legendre in week 1, Laguerre in week 2, Airy in week 11, spherical Bessel in week 15 — rather than as tables to look up.Used actively, week to week
- Frobenius series, and the termination conditions that quantise l and n
- Legendre, associated Laguerre, Airy and spherical Bessel functions
- Tensor products, traces and partial traces
- Exponentials of operators, and commutator algebra
- Perturbation series in a small parameter
- Diagonalisation inside a degenerate subspace
- Gaussian, Fresnel and stationary-phase integrals
- Green's functions and the Born series
- Fourier integrals as delta functions, and densities of states
- Numerical diagonalisation and integration of coupled equations
How the course uses them
- Power-series and Frobenius solutions of ordinary differential equations, with the termination conditions that quantise l in Unit 1 and n in Unit 2
- Special functions: Legendre and associated Legendre functions, spherical harmonics, associated Laguerre polynomials, Airy functions, and spherical Bessel and Neumann functions
- Tensor-product spaces, partial traces and density matrices
- Rotation operators as exponentials of generators, commutator algebra, and Clebsch-Gordan coefficients built by lowering and orthogonality
- Perturbation series in a small parameter, and diagonalisation inside a degenerate subspace, including block-diagonalisation by a conserved quantum number
- Trial-function minimisation with exponential and Gaussian integrals in three dimensions, and the Rayleigh-Ritz reduction of an eigenvalue problem to a finite matrix
- Asymptotic methods: stationary-phase and Gaussian integrals, expansion in powers of hbar, and matching across a turning point
- Integral equations iterated into the Dyson and Born series, Green's functions, and long-time limits of Fourier integrals turned into delta functions and densities of states
- Numerical diagonalisation and integration of coupled amplitude equations, used to check the golden rule, the Landau-Zener formula and WKB spectra
How each problem is worked
One loop, from an estimate to a checked measurement.
Size it first
Estimate the correction in powers of α, or against the level spacing, before calculating anything. The estimate decides which terms matter and which basis is good.
Choose the basis
Find the operators that commute with both the unperturbed Hamiltonian and the perturbation. Inside a degenerate level the good states come from them, not from the labels you started with.
Calculate
Evaluate the matrix elements — by symmetry, selection rules and radial integrals — and only then the shift, the rate or the amplitude.
Say what was derived
Mark each result as derived here or quoted from relativistic theory, quantum electrodynamics or a table. A quoted number is not a derivation.
Check against a measurement
Compare with a measured splitting, lifetime or cross-section, and with the exact result where one exists, before believing the answer.
Course-level outcomes
What successful study should make possible.
These are learning capabilities, not promises of a grade, academic credit, transfer approval, professional status, or course completion.- Derive the spherical harmonics and the hydrogen radial functions, showing how regularity and normalisability force integer l and n = n_r + l + 1.
- Write Hamiltonians for spin and charge in electromagnetic fields and solve the dynamics they generate, from magnetic resonance to Landau levels.
- Describe composite systems with tensor products and density operators, impose exchange symmetry on identical particles, and state what a violation of the CHSH inequality excludes.
- Add angular momenta, build coupled states with Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, and derive selection rules from commutators and parity.
- Apply perturbation theory, choosing the good basis for each degenerate level, to helium, fine structure, the Zeeman and Stark effects and hyperfine structure.
- Choose among perturbation theory, the variational principle and WKB for a problem without an exact solution, and state what each result certifies and to what order.
- Derive transition rates from time-dependent perturbation theory and Fermi's golden rule, and compute a radiative lifetime from the hydrogen wavefunctions.
- Apply the adiabatic theorem and Berry's phase to slowly changing Hamiltonians, and compute scattering cross-sections by partial waves and by the Born approximation.
- Say of each result whether it was derived here or quoted from relativistic or field theory, as the Darwin term, the spin-statistics connection and the Lamb shift's value are.
Choose the right starting point
Finished Quantum Mechanics I? Unit 01 starts with what it quoted.
Quantum Mechanics I wrote down the spherical harmonics and checked them. Unit 01 derives them — once by a series that must terminate, once by ladder operators on the sphere — and the same termination argument is the one that quantises n in unit 02.