
Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson
Bethe against Welton, and the ground-state shift
Welton and Bethe reach the same α⁵ coefficient by different roads. Set side by side, they differ only at the bottom of the logarithm: Welton guessed it, Bethe's energy denominators compute it. Then spend the result on hydrogen's ground state, 8.19 GHz against 8.17 measured, and on heavier ions, where the logarithm runs out.
UAQM-13.08 · Lesson 8 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Build the model
One coefficient, a lower cutoff the spectrum computes, and the ground state as the test.
The key idea
Bethe's mean excitation energy K₀ is the lower cutoff of the self-energy logarithm: a geometric mean of a level's transition energies weighted by |pₘₙ|²(Eₘ − Eₙ), replacing the atomic frequency Welton had to choose by hand.
Example. For hydrogen 1s, ln(K₀/Ry) = 2.984 (quoted), so K₀ = 19.8 Ry = 269 eV, twenty times the 13.6 eV binding energy. With K = mc² the logarithm is ln(510 999/269.0) = 7.55, and 7.55 × 1085.2 MHz = 8.19 GHz.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Two arguments give the same coefficient. Welton shakes a free electron with the vacuum field and averages the Coulomb potential over the jiggle; Bethe takes the second-order energy in A⋅p, subtracts the free electron's electromagnetic mass and collapses the sum over intermediate states with the commutator sum rule. Both reach (α/(3π))(ħ/mc)²⟨∇²V⟩ times a logarithm, which for a hydrogen ns level is (4α⁵mc²/(3πn³)) ln(upper/lower). The difference lives inside the logarithm. Each intermediate state m brings the factor (Eₘ − Eₙ)/(E + Eₘ − Eₙ): for photons far above the interval it falls as (Eₘ − Eₙ)/E, the free response Welton assumed, and for softer photons it flattens, because a bound electron is not driven freely by fields slower than its own transitions. Its integral equals a hard cutoff at exactly Eₘ − Eₙ, so the lower limit Welton chose by hand is computed: K₀, a weighted geometric mean of hydrogen's transition energies. The weights grow as oscillator strength times interval squared, the continuum dominates, and K₀ = 19.8 Ry for 1s, twenty times the binding energy. With K = mc², 1s rises 8.19 GHz against a measured 8.17 GHz. The model stops twice: the upper cutoff is still chosen, worth 9% per factor of two, and in hydrogen-like ions the logarithm loses 2 ln Z and reaches zero near Z = 44, where only calculations to all orders in Zα, quoted, can answer.
1Two derivations, one coefficient
Units are SI, with energies also quoted as frequencies ΔE/h; this non-relativistic topic needs no four-vectors, but the course's metric (+, −, −, −) stands. Welton's route, quoted from Quantum Mechanics II: the zero-point field jiggles a free electron by ⟨(δr)²⟩ = (2α/π)(ħ/mc)² L, and averaging the Coulomb potential over the jiggle adds (1/6)⟨(δr)²⟩∇²V. Bethe's route, derived earlier in this unit: after the mass subtraction, ΔEₙ = (2α/(3πm²c²)) Σₘ |pₘₙ|²(Eₘ − Eₙ) ∫₀K dE/(E + Eₘ − Eₙ). If every state shared one logarithm L, the sum rule Σₘ |pₘₙ|²(Eₘ − Eₙ) = (ħ²/2)⟨∇²V⟩ would give (α/(3π))(ħ/mc)²⟨∇²V⟩ L, and Welton's (1/6)(2α/π) is the same α/(3π). Dimensions: (ħ/mc)² is m² and ∇²V is J m⁻². With ∇²V = 4παħc δ³(r) and |ψₙ₀₀(0)|² = 1/(πn³a³), an ns level shifts by (4α⁵mc²/(3πn³)) L. Limits: a free electron, ∇²V = 0, keeps no shift, its whole self-energy having gone into the mass; and α → 0 removes it as α⁵. The coefficient is settled; the dispute is what L is.
2The factor a free electron lacks
Each intermediate state carries the factor (Eₘ − Eₙ)/(E + Eₘ − Eₙ). Far above the interval it becomes (Eₘ − Eₙ)/E, and summed with the sum rule the integrand is (α/(3π))(ħ/mc)²⟨∇²V⟩ dE/E, Welton's free-electron jiggle term for term: a photon well above the atom's frequencies drives the electron as if it were free. Below the interval the factor tends to 1 and stops growing. A field slower than the atom's own transitions meets the bound electron's stiff response, eE/(mωₘₙ²), not the free eE/(mω²) that rises without limit as ω falls. Integrating gives (Eₘ − Eₙ) ln(1 + K/(Eₘ − Eₙ)). For 1s → 2p, Eₘ − Eₙ = 10.20 eV and K/(Eₘ − Eₙ) = 50 077, so ln 50 078 and ln 50 077 differ by 2 × 10⁻⁵. Per unit ln E, and divided by Eₘ − Eₙ, the integrand is a step, E/(E + Eₘ − Eₙ): photons below the knee add ln 2, exactly what the step withholds above it, so the smooth knee integrates to a hard cutoff at Eₘ − Eₙ itself. Welton chose ωₘᵢₙ; the spectrum supplies it, state by state.
3Where the 1s weight lives
Summing the per-state logarithms with weights wₘ = |pₘₙ|²(Eₘ − Eₙ) turns L into ln(K/K₀), with ln K₀ the weighted mean of ln(Eₘ − Eₙ). Since |pₘₙ|² = m²ωₘₙ²|rₘₙ|², wₘ = (3/2)m fₘₙ(Eₘ − Eₙ)²: a state counts as its oscillator strength times its interval squared. For 1s, Σ fₘ(Eₘ − E₁)² = 16/3 Ry² by the sum rule. The 2p state, f = 0.4162 at 0.75 Ry, carries 0.234 Ry², only 4.4%; all bound p states together carry 6.8%, though they hold 56.5% of the oscillator strength. The continuum carries 93.2%, and its weight per unit energy falls only as E(−3/2), so half of all the weight lies above 164 eV and 22% above 1.36 keV. These shares are computed here from the closed-form 1s oscillator strengths, quoted, and the same sum returns ln(K₀/Ry) = 2.984, the quoted Bethe logarithm. So K₀ = 19.8 Ry = 269 eV, twenty times the binding energy. The weights measure ∇²V at the nucleus, and only high-momentum continuum states resolve so small a region.
4The ground state: 8.19 GHz against 8.17 GHz
With K = mc², assumed, and ln(K₀/Ry) = 2.984, the logarithm is ln(mc²/Ry) − 2.984 = 10.534 − 2.984 = 7.550. For n = 1 the coefficient is 4α⁵mc²/(3π) = 4.488 μeV, h × 1085.2 MHz, so ΔE₁ₛ = 33.9 μeV, or 8.19 GHz. The measured ground-state Lamb shift, extracted from Doppler-free two-photon 1S–2S spectroscopy, is 8.173 GHz (quoted), 0.24% lower. Welton's natural lower cutoffs fail here: the 1 Ry ionisation energy gives 11.43 GHz, the 10.2 eV Lyman-α energy 11.74 GHz, the atomic unit α²mc² = 2 Ry 10.68 GHz, all 31% to 44% high, because each sits an order of magnitude below the true K₀. The upper cutoff is the softer worry: halving or doubling K moves the answer by 1085.2 MHz × ln 2 = 752 MHz, 9%, to 7.44 or 8.94 GHz. So the 0.24% is better than the method can promise. The covariant corrections quoted in the next topic shift the pieces by hundreds of MHz and nearly cancel, netting about −65 MHz at this order; the near-coincidence is partly luck, and 9% is the honest error bar.
5A ratio in which the upper cutoff cancels
Welton's argument, with one lower cutoff for every level, predicts ΔE₁ₛ/ΔE₂ₛ = 8 exactly, the ratio of the densities at the nucleus. Bethe's predicts 8 × ln(mc²/K₀(1s))/ln(mc²/K₀(2s)) = 8 × 7.5495/7.7219 = 7.821, using ln(K₀/Ry) = 2.812 for 2s, quoted, which with K = mc² puts 2s at 1047 MHz. The 2s mean excitation energy, 16.6 Ry = 226 eV, is 67 times its own binding energy and close to the 1s value, because both are set by the cusp at r = 0, not by the size of the orbit. The measured ratio needs the 2S₁/₂ level's own shift: the measured 1057.8 MHz interval includes the 12.8 MHz by which QED, quoted, lowers 2P₁/₂, so 2S₁/₂ itself rises 1057.8 − 12.8 = 1045.0 MHz, and 8172.8/1045.0 = 7.821. The test is sharp because the upper cutoff nearly cancels: halving K gives 7.804 and doubling it 7.836, while the departure from 8 is 0.18. That 2% failure of the 1/n³ law is the lower cutoff's signature, the one feature of the ground-state shift that Welton's picture cannot produce.
6Hydrogen-like ions: Z⁴ against a shrinking logarithm
Give the nucleus charge Ze. ∇²V gains one factor of Z and |ψ₁₀₀(0)|² = Z³/(πa³) three more, so the coefficient grows as Z⁴. Every momentum matrix element scales as Z and every interval as Z², so the weights scale together and the ion's mean excitation energy is Z² × 19.77 Ry. The upper cutoff does not move, so the logarithm is ln(mc²/(Z²K₀)) = ln(1/(Zα)²) − 2.291, down 2 ln Z; Z = 1 returns 7.550. The product Z⁴(7.550 − 2 ln Z) peaks near Z = 34, where the logarithm is 0.50, and vanishes at Z = √1899.8 = 43.6, where Zα = 0.32 and Z²K₀ has reached mc². Past it the formula turns negative: for hydrogen-like uranium it gives −480 eV, against a measured 1s Lamb shift of +460.2 ± 4.6 eV and an all-orders theory of 464.0 eV, about 265 eV of it QED and 199 eV the nucleus's finite size (quoted). The zero is not physics. Bethe's result keeps only the large logarithm of an expansion in Zα; once that logarithm is no larger than the constants beside it and the electron moves at Zαc, only calculations to all orders in Zα, quoted, describe heavy ions.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
One coefficient, two derivations
ΔEₙ = (α/(3π))(ħ/mc)²⟨∇²V⟩ L
Welton's (1/6)(2α/π)(ħ/mc)², from Quantum Mechanics II, and Bethe's (2α/(3πm²c²))(ħ²/2), derived here, are the same number, so the two pictures can differ only inside L.
ΔE in J; ħ/mc = 3.862 × 10⁻¹³ m; ⟨∇²V⟩ in J m⁻²; L is the logarithm of a ratio of two energies, a pure number.Bethe's factor for one intermediate state
∫₀K (Eₘ − Eₙ) dE/(E + Eₘ − Eₙ) = (Eₘ − Eₙ) ln(1 + K/(Eₘ − Eₙ))
Derived. For K ≫ Eₘ − Eₙ it is (Eₘ − Eₙ) ln(K/(Eₘ − Eₙ)): the smooth knee integrates to a hard cutoff at exactly the state's own interval.
E is the photon energy, K the cutoff, in J. Eₘ is above Eₙ for 1s and 2s, except 2s's degenerate 2p, which weighs zero.Bethe's mean excitation energy
ln(K₀/Ry) = Σₘ wₘ ln((Eₘ − Eₙ)/Ry) / Σₘ wₘ, with wₘ = |pₘₙ|²(Eₘ − Eₙ)
Derived as a definition; values quoted. Since wₘ ∝ fₘₙ(Eₘ − Eₙ)², the continuum carries 93% of the 1s weight and K₀ = 19.8 Ry, not 1 Ry.
wₘ in kg² m² s⁻² J; K₀ in J, quoted in Ry = 13.606 eV. Σₘ wₘ = (ħ²/2)⟨∇²V⟩ by the commutator sum rule.The ground-state shift
ΔE₁ₛ = (4α⁵mc²/(3π)) ln(mc²/K₀)
Derived in this unit: ln(37 558/19.77) = 7.550 gives 8.19 GHz against a measured 8.173 GHz, quoted. A factor of two in K moves it 752 MHz, 9%.
ΔE in J; 4α⁵mc²/(3π) = 4.488 μeV, or h × 1085.2 MHz. K = mc² is assumed; ln(K₀/Ry) = 2.984 is quoted.Ratio of the 1s and 2s shifts
ΔE₁ₛ/ΔE₂ₛ = 8 ln(K/K₀(1s)) / ln(K/K₀(2s))
Derived: Bethe gives 7.821, and experiment 8172.8/1045.0 = 7.821. Halving K only moves it to 7.804, so the ratio tests the lower cutoff alone.
A pure number. ln(K₀/Ry) = 2.984 for 1s and 2.812 for 2s, quoted. Welton's single lower cutoff gives exactly 8.Hydrogen-like ions
ΔE₁ₛ(Z) = (4Z⁴α⁵mc²/(3π)) ln(mc²/(Z²K₀))
Derived. Z⁴ comes from ∇²V and |ψ(0)|²; the logarithm loses 2 ln Z and vanishes at Z = √(mc²/K₀) = 43.6, where Zα = 0.32.
K₀ = 19.77 Ry is hydrogen's. Every pₘₙ scales as Z and every interval as Z², so the ion's mean excitation energy is Z²K₀.Interactive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. At Z = 1 raise Welton's cutoff from 1 Ry: his band shrinks to Bethe's 8.19 GHz only near 20 Ry, twenty times the binding energy. Halve K and both fall 0.75 GHz. Then raise Z: K₀ climbs as Z², the step slides into the cutoff, and near Z = 44 Bethe's logarithm reaches zero.
Live results
- BETHE ln(K/K₀)
- 7.55
- BETHE 1s SHIFT ÷ Z⁴
- 8.19 GHz
- WELTON 1s SHIFT ÷ Z⁴
- 11.43 GHz
- Zα
- 0.007
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Nuclear charge Z: 1; Welton's lower cutoff ħωₘᵢₙ: 1.0 Z² Ry; Upper cutoff K: 1.00 mc²
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The tempting picture is that the electron stops responding freely once photons drop below its binding energy, so the lower cutoff should be the 13.6 eV ionisation energy of 1s, or the 10.2 eV Lyman-α energy. That gives 11.4 to 11.7 GHz, about 40% too high. Bethe's factor does end each logarithm at a transition energy, but at every transition energy at once, weighted by fₘₙ(Eₘ − Eₙ)², and that weighting favours the continuum so strongly that 93% of the 1s weight lies there, and half of all the weight above 164 eV. The weights measure ∇²V at the nucleus, which only short-wavelength, high-energy intermediate states can resolve. So K₀ = 19.8 Ry = 269 eV, twenty times the binding energy: the lower cutoff is a property of the cusp at r = 0, not of the size of the orbit.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
For hydrogen 1s with the upper cutoff K = mc² = 511.0 keV, evaluate the shift (a) with Bethe's quoted ln(K₀/Ry) = 2.984 and (b) with Welton's lower cutoff set at the 13.6 eV ionisation energy. Compare both with the measured 8.173 GHz, then find how far halving K moves result (a).
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 4 steps revealed.
- Coefficient for n = 1: 4α⁵mc²/(3π) = 4 × (7.2974 × 10⁻³)⁵ × 510 999 eV ÷ 3π = 4.488 × 10⁻⁶ eV. Dividing by h = 4.1357 × 10⁻¹⁵ eV s gives 1085.2 MHz per unit of logarithm.
- Bethe: ln(mc²/Ry) = ln(510 999/13.606) = ln 37 558 = 10.534, so ln(mc²/K₀) = 10.534 − 2.984 = 7.550 and ΔE = 1085.2 MHz × 7.550 = 8.19 GHz, or 33.9 μeV, 0.24% above experiment.
- Welton with ħωₘᵢₙ = 1 Ry keeps the full logarithm, 10.534: ΔE = 1085.2 MHz × 10.534 = 11.43 GHz, 40% above experiment. Both logarithms are of energy ratios, so each result is an energy times a pure number.
- Halving K subtracts ln 2 = 0.693 from Bethe's logarithm: 1085.2 MHz × 0.693 = 752 MHz, leaving 7.44 GHz, 9.2% lower. Raising the lower cutoff from 1 Ry to Bethe's 19.77 Ry removed ln 19.77 = 2.984, four times as much.
Answer. Bethe: 8.19 GHz (33.9 μeV), 0.24% above the measured 8.173 GHz. Welton with a 13.6 eV cutoff: 11.43 GHz, 40% high. Halving K lowers Bethe's value by 752 MHz, to 7.44 GHz.
MediumExample 2
Hydrogen 1s has oscillator strengths 0.4162, 0.0791 and 0.0290 to 2p, 3p and 4p (quoted), and the sum rule fixes Σ fₘ(Eₘ − E₁)² = 16/3 Ry². Find these three states' share of Bethe's weight and their weighted mean of ln((Eₘ − E₁)/Ry). Then, given that all bound p states carry 0.3608 Ry² with mean logarithm −0.214 (computed), use the quoted ln(K₀/Ry) = 2.984 to find the continuum's own mean excitation energy.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Intervals: Eₘ − E₁ = (1 − 1/n²) Ry = 0.7500, 0.8889 and 0.9375 Ry. Weights fₘ(Eₘ − E₁)²: 0.4162 × 0.5625 = 0.2341, 0.0791 × 0.7901 = 0.0625 and 0.0290 × 0.8789 = 0.0255 Ry².
- Together 0.3221 Ry², which is 0.3221/5.333 = 6.0% of the total, although the three hold f = 0.524, over half of the Thomas-Reiche-Kuhn total of 1. Weighting by the interval squared favours high intervals.
- Their mean logarithm: (0.2341 ln 0.75 + 0.0625 ln 0.8889 + 0.0255 ln 0.9375)/0.3221 = (−0.06735 − 0.00736 − 0.00165)/0.3221 = −0.237, a mean interval of e(−0.237) = 0.79 Ry.
- Split the total: 2.984 × 16/3 = 0.3608 × (−0.214) + 4.973 × ℓ, where 16/3 − 0.3608 = 4.973 Ry² is the continuum's weight and ℓ its mean logarithm. So ℓ = (15.915 + 0.077)/4.973 = 3.216.
- The continuum's weighted mean excitation energy is e(3.216) Ry = 24.9 Ry = 339 eV. Check: it exceeds K₀ = 19.8 Ry, as it must when the bound states, all below 1 Ry, pull the overall mean down.
Answer. 2p, 3p and 4p carry 6.0% of the weight, mean interval 0.79 Ry; the continuum carries 93.2% with a mean excitation energy of about 24.9 Ry, 339 eV, which is why K₀ = 19.8 Ry sits far above the 1 Ry binding energy.
HardExample 3
Show how each factor in Bethe's 1s formula scales with the nuclear charge Z, find the Z at which the predicted shift is largest and the Z at which it vanishes, and evaluate it for hydrogen-like uranium, Z = 92. Compare with the measured 1s Lamb shift of U⁹¹⁺, 460.2 ± 4.6 eV (quoted), and say what has failed.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- V = −Zαħc/r gives ∇²V = 4πZαħc δ³(r), and |ψ₁₀₀(0)|² = Z³/(πa³). Momenta scale as Z and intervals as Z², so every weight |pₘₙ|²(Eₘ − Eₙ) scales by the same Z⁴ and ln(K₀/(Z²Ry)) stays 2.984. Hence ΔE = Z⁴ × 4.488 μeV × (7.550 − 2 ln Z); Z = 1 returns 33.9 μeV.
- Maximum: d/dZ [Z⁴(7.550 − 2 ln Z)] = Z³[4(7.550 − 2 ln Z) − 2] = 0, so 7.550 − 2 ln Z = 0.5, ln Z = 3.525 and Z ≈ 34. At Z = 34: 34⁴ × 4.488 μeV × 0.497 = 1.336 × 10⁶ × 4.488 μeV × 0.497 = 2.98 eV.
- Zero: 2 ln Z = 7.550 gives Z = e(3.775) = 43.6, where Zα = 0.318, the binding energy Z² Ry is 25.9 keV, and the mean excitation energy Z²K₀ has reached mc² = 511 keV: the gap the logarithm measured has closed.
- Uranium: Z⁴ = 7.164 × 10⁷, and 7.164 × 10⁷ × 4.488 μeV = 321.5 eV; the logarithm is 7.550 − 2 ln 92 = 7.550 − 9.044 = −1.494, so ΔE = 321.5 eV × (−1.494) = −480 eV.
- Experiment gives +460.2 ± 4.6 eV, and all-orders theory, quoted, gives 464.0 eV, of which QED supplies about 265 eV and finite nuclear size 199 eV. Even the QED part is positive, against −480 eV. At Zα = 0.67 the electron moves near 0.67c and Z² Ry = 115 keV is 0.23 mc²: the constants and higher powers of Zα beside the logarithm are no longer small, and only all-orders calculations apply.
Answer. ΔE = Z⁴ × 4.488 μeV × (7.550 − 2 ln Z): largest near Z = 34, at about 3.0 eV, zero at Z = 43.6 (Zα = 0.32), and −480 eV for uranium against a measured +460.2 ± 4.6 eV, so heavy ions need QED to all orders in Zα.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
Bethe's mean excitation energy K₀ is the lower cutoff of the self-energy logarithm: a geometric mean of a level's transition energies weighted by |pₘₙ|²(Eₘ − Eₙ), replacing the atomic frequency Welton had to choose by hand.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.