Skip to main content

Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson

The divergence of the bound self-energy

This is where Bethe's calculation meets its crisis. Take the second-order energy apart at high photon energy and one piece grows in step with the cutoff, knows nothing of the atom but its mean kinetic energy, and outweighs the Lamb shift more than two-thousandfold. Isolating that piece cleanly is the first move of renormalisation.

UAQM-13.02 · Lesson 2 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: The divergence of the bound self-energyHydrogen's 2s self-energy integrand ÷ ⟨p²⟩, from photon energy 0 to the cutoff K = 510999 eV, in a two-group model: bound np states at 2.29 eV with share 0.31 of ⟨p²⟩, the continuum at 39 eV with the rest (defaults computed for 2s). Dashed: each group's term, levelling at minus its share. Solid: their sum, levelling at −⟨p²⟩ by closure. Faint line: E = αmc², shown when below K.2s integrand ÷ ⟨p²⟩ against photon energyE from 0 to K = 510999 eV0−1−⟨p²⟩, fixed by closurenp statescontinuumdashed: the two groups' termsfaint line: E = αmc² = ħc/a₀
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

Each term flattens at −|pₘₙ|², closure sums the plateaus, and the shift grows with K.

The key idea

The linear divergence of the bound self-energy is the part of a level's second-order energy in the vacuum field that grows in proportion to the photon cutoff K: −(4αK/(3πmc²)) times the level's mean kinetic energy, the same for every state with the same ⟨T⟩.

Example. Hydrogen's 2s has ⟨T⟩ = 3.40 eV, so with K = mc² = 511 keV the linear part is −(4α/(3π)) × 3.40 eV = −10.5 meV, a downward shift of 2.55 THz, about 2400 times the measured 1057.8 MHz Lamb shift.

The complete physical model and assumptions

Topic 13.01 left each level's second-order energy as an integral over photon energy E of E Σₘ |pₘₙ|²/(Eₙ − Eₘ − E), times 2α/(3πm²c²). Read one term at large E and the trouble is plain: the mode density and the 1/ω in each mode's squared amplitude together supply a factor E, the energy denominator supplies 1/E, and the term settles at −|pₘₙ|² instead of falling. A constant integrated up to a cutoff K grows like K. The identity E/(Eₙ − Eₘ − E) = −1 + Δₘₙ/(E + Δₘₙ) separates that plateau exactly from a tail that falls as 1/E, and closure sums the plateaus over every bound and continuum state to −⟨n|p²|n⟩. So each level is lowered by (4αK/(3πmc²))⟨T⟩ₙ, a term that knows the atom only through its mean kinetic energy: 2.55 THz for hydrogen's 2s at K = mc², some 2400 times the 1057.8 MHz that Lamb and Retherford measured, and the same for 2s and 2p. Beneath it the tail leaves a remainder that grows only as ln K and carries everything the spectrum knows. The model stops here twice over. With K = mc², over 99 per cent of the linear part comes from photons above αmc² = ħc/a₀, where the dipole approximation has already failed, and no interval, not 1S–2S and not even 2S–2P, comes out independent of an arbitrary K. Something must be done with the linear term before any number can be set against experiment.

1Where the integrand stops falling

SI units throughout, with energies in eV and shifts quoted as frequencies δE/h; the electron stays non-relativistic, so the course metric (+, −, −, −) never enters. Topic 13.01 derived δEₙ = (2α/(3πm²c²)) ∫₀K dE E Σₘ |pₘₙ|²/(Eₙ − Eₘ − E), quoted here, with E the photon energy. Follow one term. For E ≪ Δₘₙ = Eₘ − Eₙ it is −E|pₘₙ|²/Δₘₙ, vanishing with E: soft photons cost nothing. For E ≫ Δₘₙ it tends to −|pₘₙ|², a constant, derived. The reason is counting. The mode density grows as ω² and each mode's squared amplitude ħ/(2ε₀ωV) falls as 1/ω, so the numerator grows as E, while the energy denominator grows as E too. Each further keV of photon energy then adds the same amount, and a constant integrated to K grows like K. For 2s→3p, Δ = 1.890 eV, and the term is within 1 per cent of its plateau from E = 99Δ = 187 eV on, 1/2700 of the way to mc².

2Split each term exactly, then integrate

The algebra is one identity, derived: E/(Eₙ − Eₘ − E) = −1 + Δₘₙ/(E + Δₘₙ). It is not an expansion; it holds at every E. The first piece is blind to the spectrum. The second falls as Δₘₙ/E once E passes the atomic interval, and it carries everything the atom knows. Integrated from 0 to K they give −K and Δₘₙ ln((K + Δₘₙ)/Δₘₙ), so for K ≫ Δₘₙ each term is |pₘₙ|² (−K + Δₘₙ ln(K/Δₘₙ) + Δₘₙ²/K + …). For the 2s→3p term at K = mc² = 511.0 keV the second piece is 1.890 eV × 12.51 = 23.6 eV against 5.110 × 10⁵ eV, a ratio of 4.6 × 10⁻⁵. Double K and the first piece doubles, while the second gains only Δ ln 2 = 1.31 eV. Dimensions check term by term: K, Δ and Δ ln(K/Δ) are all energies, and |pₘₙ|²/(m²c²) is a pure number. Topic 13.04's subtraction will rest on this same split.

3Closure turns the plateaus into ⟨p²⟩

Summed over m, the −1 pieces give −K Σₘ |pₘₙ|², and closure, Σₘ |m⟩⟨m| = 1 over the complete set, turns that sum into ⟨n|p²|n⟩. So the leading part is −(2α/(3πm²c²)) K ⟨n|p²|n⟩ = −(4αK/(3πmc²)) ⟨T⟩ₙ, derived. Dimensions: α and K/mc² are pure numbers and ⟨T⟩ₙ is an energy. Limits: it vanishes as K → 0, and in the free-field limit α → 0, where it is first order: one emission, one reabsorption. Closure needs every state, continuum included. For 2s the bound np states supply only 31.4 per cent of ⟨p²⟩, computed from hydrogen's dipole matrix elements, and the ionisation continuum the other 68.6, so a sum over bound states alone would miss the coefficient by a factor of 3.2. The virial theorem, quoted from Quantum Mechanics I, gives ⟨T⟩ₙ = −Eₙ = 13.606 eV/n², so for hydrogen the linear part is −(2α³/(3πn²)) K: at K = mc², −42.1 meV (−10.19 THz) for 1s and −10.5 meV (−2.547 THz) for 2s. The A² term of topic 13.01 adds a constant common to all levels; this term is not common, because ⟨T⟩ₙ is not.

4What grows beneath it is a logarithm

The remainder is Rₙ(K) = (2α/(3πm²c²)) Σₘ |pₘₙ|² Δₘₙ ln((K + Δₘₙ)/|Δₘₙ|), derived. Once K lies far above the intervals that carry the weight, each logarithm becomes ln K − ln|Δₘₙ|, so Rₙ grows as ln K times one coefficient, Σₘ |pₘₙ|² Δₘₙ, plus a finite part. That coefficient is finite; topic 13.05 evaluates it with a commutator sum rule and finds it nonzero only for s states. Its sign is already visible for 2s. The 2p states are degenerate with it, so their pₘₙ = i m ωₘₙ rₘₙ vanishes, and 1s is not dipole-connected to it; every state with weight lies above 2s, every Δₘₙ is positive, and every term of R₂ₛ raises the level, the direction Lamb and Retherford found. A state below, as 1s is for 2p, puts a pole inside the integration range that topic 13.04 treats as a principal value. Now compare growth: raising K from mc² to 2mc² lowers 2s by another 2.547 THz through the linear part, while the logarithm adds ln 2 times its coefficient, 94 MHz with topic 13.05's value, quoted.

5A term that knows only the kinetic energy

The linear part depends on the state through ⟨T⟩ₙ alone, and that has consequences you can check. In non-relativistic hydrogen ⟨T⟩ = 3.401 eV for 2s and 2p alike, so both are lowered by the same 2.547 THz at K = mc², and the term cannot split them: Lamb's 2S₁/₂–2P₁/₂ interval does not see it. Between shells it does not cancel. It widens the 1S–2S interval by (2α³/(3π))(1 − ¼)K = (α³/(2π))K, which is 7.64 THz at K = mc², 0.31 per cent of the 2 466 061 413 187 kHz measured by two-photon spectroscopy to about 10 Hz, and about a thousand times the 7.1 GHz by which the measured 1s and 2s Lamb shifts change it. A correction proportional to ⟨p²/2m⟩ is also exactly what a small change in the electron's mass would make in its kinetic energy. That clue is followed in topic 13.03, which puts a free electron through the same integral.

6Why nothing can yet be compared with experiment

Two things stand between this result and a measured number. First, every interval still depends on K: 1S–2S linearly, and 2S–2P through the ln K in R₂ₛ, which 2p does not share. Nothing in the non-relativistic theory fixes K. Second, the photons that build the linear part lie outside the theory that computed it. Set the energies on a logarithmic ladder: 3.40 eV binds 2s; αmc² = ħc/a₀ = 3.73 keV is where a photon's reduced wavelength shrinks to the Bohr radius and e(ik⋅r) ≈ 1 fails; and near mc² = 511 keV the electron recoils relativistically and pairs appear. With K = mc², photons above αmc² supply 1 − α = 99.3 per cent of the linear part. The dominant term is set entirely by physics the dipole Hamiltonian cannot describe, so it must be interpreted before it can be evaluated. The comparison with 1057.8 MHz waits for topic 13.07.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Each term at high photon energy

E |pₘₙ|²/(Eₙ − Eₘ − E) → −|pₘₙ|² for E ≫ |Eₘ − Eₙ|

Derived. A term that settles at a constant instead of falling: integrated up to K, each one grows like K, with no atomic energy left to stop it.

E photon energy in J; pₘₙ = ⟨m|p|n⟩ in kg m s⁻¹; the integrand of topic 13.01, quoted, taken one state m at a time

Exact split of one term

E/(Eₙ − Eₘ − E) = −1 + Δₘₙ/(E + Δₘₙ), with Δₘₙ = Eₘ − Eₙ

Separates a piece blind to the spectrum from a tail that knows it. Integrated from 0 to K they give −K and Δₘₙ ln((K + Δₘₙ)/Δₘₙ).

an identity at every E, derived; Δₘₙ in J; the second piece falls as Δₘₙ/E once E ≫ |Δₘₙ|

Closure on the plateaus

Σₘ |⟨m|p|n⟩|² = ⟨n|p²|n⟩

Replaces an infinite sum over intermediate states by one expectation value, so the leading term needs no knowledge of the spectrum at all.

sum over every bound and continuum state m; p² in kg² m² s⁻²; for hydrogen 2s the continuum supplies 68.6 per cent, computed

The linearly divergent shift

δEₙ(K) = −(4αK/(3πmc²)) ⟨n|p²/2m|n⟩ + Rₙ(K)

Every level is lowered in proportion to its mean kinetic energy ⟨T⟩ₙ and to K, by photons far above any atomic interval.

K photon-energy cutoff in J; α = 1/137.036; mc² = 511.0 keV; derived; Rₙ(K) the remainder below

Hydrogen's linear part

−(4αK/(3πmc²)) ⟨T⟩ₙ = −(2α³/(3πn²)) K

At K = mc²: −42.1 meV (−10.19 THz) for 1s, and −10.5 meV (−2.547 THz) for 2s and 2p alike, so it cannot split 2s from 2p.

⟨T⟩ₙ = α²mc²/(2n²) = 13.606 eV/n² by the virial theorem, quoted; the same for every l at given n

The logarithmic remainder

Rₙ(K) = (2α/(3πm²c²)) Σₘ |pₘₙ|² Δₘₙ ln((K + Δₘₙ)/|Δₘₙ|)

Grows only as ln K: doubling the cutoff adds ln 2 times one fixed coefficient, while the linear part doubles.

derived; principal value where Δₘₙ is negative (topic 13.04); the coefficient Σₘ |pₘₙ|² Δₘₙ is finite, evaluated in topic 13.05
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

0.0
−5 to 0.5; steps of 0.1.
0.31
0.1 to 0.9; steps of 0.01.
39 eV
10 to 100 eV; steps of 1.

Try this. Start at log₁₀(K/mc²) = −5, where the frame holds only atomic energies and the curve is still bending. Raise it to 0: the curve becomes a rectangle of depth ⟨p²⟩, and the remainder falls to 0.05 per cent of the linear part. Then drag w: the dashed terms trade height, the solid plateau never moves.

Live results

CUTOFF K
510999 eV
LINEAR PART, 2s (EXACT)
-2547.24 GHz
REMAINDER ÷ |LINEAR| (MODEL)
0.052 %
LINEAR PART ABOVE αmc²
99.3 %

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Advanced Quantum Mechanics modelHydrogen's 2s self-energy integrand ÷ ⟨p²⟩, from photon energy 0 to the cutoff K = 510999 eV, in a two-group model: bound np states at 2.29 eV with share 0.31 of ⟨p²⟩, the continuum at 39 eV with the rest (defaults computed for 2s). Dashed: each group's term, levelling at minus its share. Solid: their sum, levelling at −⟨p²⟩ by closure. Faint line: E = αmc², shown when below K.2s integrand ÷ ⟨p²⟩ against photon energyE from 0 to K = 510999 eV0−1−⟨p²⟩, fixed by closurenp statescontinuumdashed: the two groups' termsfaint line: E = αmc² = ħc/a₀
Hydrogen's 2s self-energy integrand ÷ ⟨p²⟩, from photon energy 0 to the cutoff K = 510999 eV, in a two-group model: bound np states at 2.29 eV with share 0.31 of ⟨p²⟩, the continuum at 39 eV with the rest (defaults computed for 2s). Dashed: each group's term, levelling at minus its share. Solid: their sum, levelling at −⟨p²⟩ by closure. Faint line: E = αmc², shown when below K.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Cutoff log₁₀(K/mc²): 0.0; Bound-state share of ⟨p²⟩, w: 0.31; Continuum group's energy: 39 eV

Baseline 0.0; choose −5 to 0.5, in steps of 0.1.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The tempting reading is that the linear term is the Lamb shift itself, waiting only for a sensible cutoff. Three checks rule it out. It depends on the level only through ⟨T⟩ₙ, and the virial theorem gives 3.40 eV for 2s and 2p alike, so it shifts both by the same amount and cannot open the 2S₁/₂–2P₁/₂ interval at all. It lowers every level, while Lamb and Retherford found 2s pushed up. And at K = mc² it is 2.55 THz, about 2400 times the measured 1057.8 MHz. The Lamb shift lives in the remainder beneath it, the part that depends on where the intermediate states lie and is positive for 2s. The linear term has to be removed by an argument, not tuned by choosing K.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

Give hydrogen's 1s and 2s levels the linearly divergent self-energy −(4αK/(3πmc²))⟨T⟩ₙ with the cutoff at K = mc² = 511.0 keV. Find each shift in meV and as a frequency, set them beside the measured Lamb shifts, +8.17 GHz for 1s and the 2S₁/₂–2P₁/₂ interval of +1057.8 MHz, and say what the same term does to 2p.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

In the 2s self-energy, the 3p term has Δ = E(3p) − E(2s) = 1.890 eV and |⟨3p|p|2s⟩|², summed over the three 3p sublevels, equal to 0.04530 (ħ/a₀)². With K = mc², split this one term into its linear and logarithmic pieces, express each as a frequency, and find how each changes when K is halved.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

Closure says the 2s linear part needs ⟨2s|p²|2s⟩ = (ħ/(2a₀))², but which states supply it? Using the quoted radial integrals R²(np, 2s) = 2¹⁷ n⁷ (n² − 1)(n − 2)(2n−6)/(n + 2)(2n+6) a₀², find the shares from the bound np states and from the εp continuum, and give each share of the 2s linear part at K = mc².

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

Hydrogen's 2s self-energy is evaluated with the photon cutoff first at K = mc² and then at K = 2mc², with no mass subtraction made. How does the computed 2s level move?
7

Review & continue

The linear divergence of the bound self-energy is the part of a level's second-order energy in the vacuum field that grows in proportion to the photon cutoff K: −(4αK/(3πmc²)) times the level's mean kinetic energy, the same for every state with the same ⟨T⟩.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.