Skip to main content

Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson

Energy of a single determinant: direct and exchange terms

The total energy Hartree-Fock reports is the expectation value of H in one Slater determinant, so the rest of the unit stands on this calculation. We push annihilators through creators to the vacuum and watch the interaction split into a direct term, an exchange term only parallel spins share, and nothing for an electron with itself.

UAQM-10.05 · Lesson 5 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Energy of a single determinant: direct and exchange termsProbability density of electron 2 in a box of length L, given electron 1 at x₀ = 0.30 L, for the determinant of box orbitals 1 and 2. Solid: spins 0° apart, so the exchange term is weighted by |⟨χ₁|χ₂⟩|² = 1.00. Dashed: antiparallel spins, no exchange term. The contact interaction g δ(x₁ − x₂) costs 0.00 g/L.electron 2, given electron 1 at x₀solid: spins 0° apartdashed: antiparallel spins1/L2/L0Lx₀orbitals 1, 2position of electron 2
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

Antisymmetry, not a new force, puts the minus sign in front of the exchange term.

The key idea

The energy of one Slater determinant is the sum of every occupied orbital's one-body energy plus, for each pair of electrons, their direct Coulomb energy minus an exchange energy that exists only when the two spins are parallel.

Example. Neon's closed shell holds 10 electrons and so C(10, 2) = 45 pairs, each with a direct term, but only the 2 × C(5, 2) = 20 pairs of parallel spin carry an exchange term; the other 25 pairs, of opposite spin, have none.

The complete physical model and assumptions

A single Slater determinant |Φ⟩ = c₁† c₂† … cN† |0⟩ is the simplest state that obeys the Pauli principle, and its energy follows from the anticommutators alone: nothing about the interaction has to be approximated to compute it. An annihilator acting on |Φ⟩ either finds its orbital occupied and leaves a signed hole or kills the state, so the only surviving one-body contraction is ⟨cᵢ† cⱼ⟩ = δᵢⱼ nᵢ, and a four-operator expectation value is the overlap of two two-hole states: +1 when the holes match in order, −1 when they match crossed. That sign is the whole of exchange. Fed into the Hamiltonian of topic 10.04 it gives E = Σᵢ ⟨i|h|i⟩ + ½ Σᵢⱼ (⟨ij|v|ij⟩ − ⟨ij|v|ji⟩): the classical Coulomb energy of charge clouds, minus a term with no classical analogue that needs the two spinors to overlap and that cancels each electron's repulsion with itself exactly. In position space the same minus sign digs a hole around every electron from which parallel spins are excluded, which is why, for given orbitals, exchange lowers the energy of parallel spins: the seed of Hund's first rule. The model stops at correlation. Nothing in one determinant makes antiparallel electrons avoid each other, so with an interaction its energy is only an upper bound, 1.1 eV above helium's measured −79.00 eV even with the best orbitals, and it is exact only when v drops out.

1One annihilator leaves one signed hole

SI units throughout, with atomic integrals quoted in hartrees, Eₕ = 27.211 eV; nothing here is relativistic, so the course metric (+, −, −, −) never enters. Take orthonormal spin-orbitals and the determinant |Φ⟩ = c₁† c₂† … cN† |0⟩, with nᵢ = 1 for i ≤ N and 0 otherwise. All we use is cᵢ cⱼ† + cⱼ† cᵢ = δᵢⱼ, cᵢ cⱼ = −cⱼ cᵢ and cᵢ|0⟩ = 0. Move cₖ to the right: each creator with a different label it passes costs a factor −1; at cₖ† it leaves cₖ cₖ† = 1 − cₖ† cₖ, and the second piece runs on to the vacuum and dies. So cₖ|Φ⟩ is zero if k is empty, and otherwise ± the determinant with k removed, the sign set by how many occupied orbitals are listed before k. The one-body contraction follows: ⟨Φ|cᵢ† cⱼ|Φ⟩ is the overlap of the hole states cᵢ|Φ⟩ and cⱼ|Φ⟩, which vanishes unless the same orbital was removed. Hence ⟨cᵢ† cⱼ⟩ = δᵢⱼ nᵢ and the one-body energy is Σᵢ ⟨i|h|i⟩ over occupied orbitals, derived. For helium's 1s² with hydrogenic Z = 2 orbitals that is 2 × (−2 Eₕ) = −108.8 eV.

2Two annihilators: Wick's theorem for four operators

Because ⟨Φ|cᵢ† cⱼ† is the bra of cⱼ cᵢ|Φ⟩, the expectation ⟨cᵢ† cⱼ† cₗ cₖ⟩ is the overlap of two states with two holes each. Determinants with different holes are orthogonal, so it vanishes unless k and l are i and j in some order, both occupied, with k ≠ l. If i = k and j = l the two hole states are identical and the overlap is +1; if i = l and j = k they differ only in the order of the annihilators, cₖ cₗ = −cₗ cₖ, and it is −1. So ⟨cᵢ† cⱼ† cₗ cₖ⟩ = ⟨cᵢ† cₖ⟩⟨cⱼ† cₗ⟩ − ⟨cᵢ† cₗ⟩⟨cⱼ† cₖ⟩, the product of contractions minus the exchanged product, derived. Check it on Φ = c₁† c₂† c₃† |0⟩: c₃ c₁|Φ⟩ = −c₂†|0⟩ while c₁ c₃|Φ⟩ = +c₂†|0⟩, so ⟨c₃† c₁† c₃ c₁⟩ = −1, exactly the formula's second term. The general statement, quoted and not proved here, is that p creators and p annihilators in a determinant give the p × p determinant of one-body contractions: every complete pairing, signed by its permutation.

3Direct minus exchange, and where the half comes from

Insert that result into the interaction quoted from topic 10.04, V = ½ Σ ⟨ij|v|kl⟩ cᵢ† cⱼ† cₗ cₖ, whose reversed order cₗ cₖ is what makes the first pairing the direct one. The Kronecker deltas collapse four sums to two: ⟨Φ|V|Φ⟩ = ½ Σᵢⱼ (⟨ij|v|ij⟩ − ⟨ij|v|ji⟩) over occupied i and j, derived. In coordinates x = (r, σ) the direct term Jᵢⱼ = ∫∫ |ψᵢ(x₁)|² v(r₁₂) |ψⱼ(x₂)|² is the classical Coulomb energy of two charge clouds. The exchange term ∫∫ ψᵢ*(x₁) ψⱼ*(x₂) v(r₁₂) ψⱼ(x₁) ψᵢ(x₂) has no classical reading: it is the Coulomb energy of the overlap density ψᵢ*ψⱼ with its own complex conjugate, never negative for a Coulomb v, and it exists only because of the previous section's minus sign. The ½ survives because Σᵢⱼ runs over ordered pairs and meets each pair of electrons twice. Dimensions check: v = e²/(4πε₀ r₁₂), and each |ψ|² carries m⁻³ that its own volume element cancels, so J and K are energies on the scale e²/(4πε₀ a₀) = 27.2 eV.

4Spin decides who exchanges

Write each spin-orbital as ψᵢ = φᵢ(r) χᵢ, a spatial orbital times a two-component spinor. H contains no spin operator, so the spin sums factor out of both integrals: the direct term carries ⟨χᵢ|χᵢ⟩⟨χⱼ|χⱼ⟩ = 1, while the exchange term carries |⟨χᵢ|χⱼ⟩|², which is 1 for parallel spins and 0 for antiparallel. So ⟨ij|v|ji⟩ = |⟨χᵢ|χⱼ⟩|² Kᵢⱼ with a purely spatial Kᵢⱼ ≥ 0, derived: only parallel spins exchange, and when they do the energy falls, the seed of Hund's first rule. The figure's model makes this vivid. For two atoms in a one-dimensional box of length L with a contact interaction v = g δ(x₁ − x₂), the direct and exchange integrands coincide on the line x₁ = x₂, so K₁₂ = J₁₂ = g/L for box orbitals 1 and 2. Parallel spins pay nothing for the interaction; antiparallel spins pay g/L. The same antisymmetry is why a spin-polarised gas of fermionic atoms hardly collides at low temperature, and why the first degenerate ⁴⁰K gas, in 1999, had to be evaporatively cooled as a mixture of two spin states.

5No electron repels itself

Set i = j in the double sum: ⟨ii|v|ii⟩ − ⟨ii|v|ii⟩ = 0 term by term, because an electron is always parallel to itself. The restriction to i ≠ j that Hartree imposed by hand in Quantum Mechanics II is therefore automatic, and the sum may run freely over all occupied pairs, which is what will let topic 10.06 give every orbital the same operator. Two checks. In the one-particle limit N = 1 the only term is i = j, which cancels, so hydrogen's determinant energy is just ⟨1s|h|1s⟩ = −13.606 eV, and the reduced-mass factor turns that into the measured −13.598 eV. For helium's 1s↑1s↓ the four ordered pairs give ½(0 + 0 + J + J) = J = (5/8)Z Eₕ = 34.0 eV at Z = 2, so the determinant energy is −108.8 + 34.0 = −74.8 eV, with no exchange from the antiparallel pair. Drop the exchange term but keep i = j, as the Hartree energy ½∫∫ ρ ρ v of the total density does, and the repulsion doubles to 68.0 eV: a 34 eV self-interaction error. In position space the same cancellation says the exchange hole around each electron holds exactly one electron's worth of charge.

6An upper bound, exact only when v drops out

With v = 0, H = Σ h is a one-body operator; if the occupied orbitals are eigenfunctions of h with eigenvalues εᵢ, then H|Φ⟩ = (Σᵢ εᵢ)|Φ⟩ and the determinant is an exact eigenstate, the non-interacting limit of this calculation. With v present, |Φ⟩ is only a normalised trial state, so Quantum Mechanics II's variational theorem gives E[Φ] ≥ E₀ for every choice of orbitals. Helium shows the size of the gap. Hydrogenic Z = 2 orbitals give −74.8 eV; varying the orbitals to self-consistency, as topic 10.08 will, gives −77.87 eV (quoted); minus the sum of the two measured ionisation energies is −79.00 eV. The last 1.1 eV is correlation, out of reach of any single determinant because it holds no term that makes antiparallel electrons avoid each other: its opposite-spin pair density is the plain product ρ↑(r₁) ρ↓(r₂). The bound also has a label: a determinant with MS = 1 has no overlap with any singlet, so it bounds the lowest triplet rather than the ground state.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

One-body contraction in a determinant

⟨Φ|cᵢ† cⱼ|Φ⟩ = δᵢⱼ nᵢ

Only diagonal, occupied terms survive, so the one-body energy is Σᵢ ⟨i|h|i⟩ over occupied orbitals: each electron's kinetic and nuclear energy counted once.

nᵢ = 1 for an occupied spin-orbital and 0 for an empty one; dimensionless; derived by moving cⱼ to the vacuum

Wick's theorem for four operators

⟨cᵢ† cⱼ† cₗ cₖ⟩ = ⟨cᵢ† cₖ⟩⟨cⱼ† cₗ⟩ − ⟨cᵢ† cₗ⟩⟨cⱼ† cₖ⟩

The exchanged pairing carries the sign of cₖ cₗ = −cₗ cₖ. For p creators and p annihilators the result is the p × p determinant of one-body contractions.

expectation in |Φ⟩, equal to nᵢ nⱼ (δᵢₖ δⱼₗ − δᵢₗ δⱼₖ); derived here, the p-body version quoted

Energy of a single determinant

E[Φ] = Σᵢ ⟨i|h|i⟩ + ½ Σᵢⱼ (⟨ij|v|ij⟩ − ⟨ij|v|ji⟩)

Derived. The ½ undoes counting each ordered pair twice, and the i = j terms cancel, so no electron repels itself and the sums may run freely.

sums over occupied spin-orbitals; ⟨ij|v|ij⟩ = Jᵢⱼ, the Coulomb energy of two charge clouds; in joules, or Eₕ = 27.211 eV

Exchange needs overlapping spinors

⟨ij|v|ji⟩ = |⟨χᵢ|χⱼ⟩|² Kᵢⱼ

Derived, because H contains no spin operator. Parallel spins give 1 and antiparallel 0, so only parallel pairs exchange, and the minus sign lowers their energy.

χ the spinors, φ the spatial orbitals; Kᵢⱼ = ∫∫ φᵢ*(r₁) φⱼ*(r₂) v φⱼ(r₁) φᵢ(r₂) d³r₁ d³r₂ ≥ 0, in joules

Pair density of a determinant

ρ₂(x₁, x₂) = ρ(x₁) ρ(x₂) − |ρ(x₁, x₂)|²

The subtracted term is the exchange hole: it empties x₂ = x₁ of parallel spins, and around each electron it integrates to exactly −1 electron.

ρ(x₁, x₂) = Σᵢ ψᵢ(x₁) ψᵢ*(x₂) over occupied orbitals, x = (r, σ); ρ₂ in m⁻⁶; derived by Wick with field operators

Variational bound and its exact limit

E₀ ≤ ⟨Φ|H|Φ⟩, with equality when v = 0

Helium: −74.8 eV with hydrogenic Z = 2 orbitals and −77.87 eV with the best ones, both above the measured −79.00 eV. That last gap is correlation.

E₀ the lowest energy with the determinant's MS; bound quoted from QM-II; equality derived for eigenorbitals of h
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

0.30 L
0.1 to 0.9 L; steps of 0.05.
0 °
0 to 180 °; steps of 15.
2
2 to 4; steps of 1.

Try this. Start at θ = 0: wherever you drag x₀, the solid curve falls to zero there, the Fermi hole. Open θ towards 180° and the hole fills while the contact energy climbs to g/L. Then set n = 2 and x₀ = 0.50: electron 1 sits on a node of orbital 2, and the curves coincide.

Live results

SPIN OVERLAP |⟨χ₁|χ₂⟩|²
1.00
DENSITY AT x₀
0.00 L⁻¹
CONTACT ENERGY
0.00 g/L
ONE-BODY ENERGY
5 E₁

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Advanced Quantum Mechanics modelProbability density of electron 2 in a box of length L, given electron 1 at x₀ = 0.30 L, for the determinant of box orbitals 1 and 2. Solid: spins 0° apart, so the exchange term is weighted by |⟨χ₁|χ₂⟩|² = 1.00. Dashed: antiparallel spins, no exchange term. The contact interaction g δ(x₁ − x₂) costs 0.00 g/L.electron 2, given electron 1 at x₀solid: spins 0° apartdashed: antiparallel spins1/L2/L0Lx₀orbitals 1, 2position of electron 2
Probability density of electron 2 in a box of length L, given electron 1 at x₀ = 0.30 L, for the determinant of box orbitals 1 and 2. Solid: spins 0° apart, so the exchange term is weighted by |⟨χ₁|χ₂⟩|² = 1.00. Dashed: antiparallel spins, no exchange term. The contact interaction g δ(x₁ − x₂) costs 0.00 g/L.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Position of electron 1, x₀: 0.30 L; Angle between the spins, θ: 0 °; Second occupied orbital, n: 2

Baseline 0.30; choose 0.1 to 0.9, in steps of 0.05.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

Because the exchange energy depends on how the spins point, it is tempting to read it as a magnetic interaction between the electrons' spin moments, a force that favours parallel spins. It is not. The Hamiltonian here contains no spin operator: h and v = e²/(4πε₀ r₁₂) are purely electrostatic, and spin enters only through the antisymmetry of the state, which keeps parallel electrons apart and so lowers their Coulomb energy. The numbers rule the magnetic reading out. Two Bohr magnetons 0.1 nm apart interact with at most 2μ₀μB²/(4πr³) = 1.1 × 10⁻⁴ eV, while helium's measured 0.796 eV 1s2s singlet-triplet gap needs K = 0.40 eV, more than three thousand times larger. The same confusion flips the sign: exchange is not an extra repulsion between parallel spins but a reduction of the Coulomb repulsion they would otherwise feel.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

Helium in the 1s2s configuration is modelled with unscreened hydrogenic orbitals, Z = 2, for which J = 17Z/81 Eₕ and K = 16Z/729 Eₕ, with Eₕ = 27.211 eV. Find the energies of the determinants 1s↑2s↑ and 1s↑2s↓, and the singlet-triplet splitting they imply. Compare with the measured 2¹S − 2³S gap of 0.796 eV.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

Lithium's ground state is modelled by the determinant 1s↑ 1s↓ 2s↑ of unscreened hydrogenic orbitals with Z = 3, for which J₁₁ = 5Z/8, J₁₂ = 17Z/81 and K₁₂ = 16Z/729, all in Eₕ = 27.211 eV. Find the determinant's energy, say how much of it is exchange, and test it against the measured total energy, −203.49 eV.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

Two fermionic ⁶Li atoms (m = 9.988 × 10⁻²⁷ kg, pseudo-spin ½) share a one-dimensional box of length L = 2.00 μm and interact through v = g δ(x₁ − x₂) with g = 1.099 × 10⁻³⁵ J m. Using box orbitals φₙ = √(2/L) sin(nπx/L), compare the determinants 1↑1↓, 1↑2↑ and 1↑2↓, say which the single-determinant picture makes the ground state, and decide whether that can be right.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

Beryllium's ground-state determinant occupies 1s↑, 1s↓, 2s↑ and 2s↓. Writing J₁₁, J₂₂, J₁₂ and K₁₂ for the spatial direct and exchange integrals of the 1s and 2s orbitals, which expression is its electron-electron energy ⟨Φ|V|Φ⟩?
7

Review & continue

The energy of one Slater determinant is the sum of every occupied orbital's one-body energy plus, for each pair of electrons, their direct Coulomb energy minus an exchange energy that exists only when the two spins are parallel.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.