Skip to main content

Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson

Field operators, change of basis and the wavefunction

Topic 10.01 built occupation numbers on one chosen set of orbitals. Here the choice stops mattering: the field operator is one object in every basis, a change of orbitals is a unitary change of variables, and Quantum Mechanics II's wavefunction comes back as a vacuum matrix element, antisymmetric without being told to be.

UAQM-10.02 · Lesson 2 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Field operators, change of basis and the wavefunctionTwo spin-up electrons in a box of width L. Top: occupied orbitals χ₁ and χ₂ after φ₂ is mixed with the empty φ₃ by β = 0° and the occupied pair is rotated by θ = 0°. Open circles mark χ₁ and χ₂ at x₂. Bottom: the recovered ⟨0|ψ(x₂)ψ(x₁)|Ψ⟩/√2, real here, against x₁ at x₂ = 0.30 L; it vanishes at x₁ = x₂. Overlap with c₁†c₂†|0⟩, det S = cos β: 1.000.orbitals χ₁ solid, χ₂ dasheddet S = 1.000Ψ × L against x₁; node at x₁ = x₂ = 0.30 L0L
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

Orbitals are coordinates; the field operator is the thing itself.

The key idea

The field operator ψ(x) = Σᵢ φᵢ(x)cᵢ removes a particle at position r with spin σ; it is the same operator whichever complete orthonormal orbitals expand it, and its matrix elements between the vacuum and an N-particle state are that state's wavefunction.

Example. Two spin-up electrons fill φ₁ and φ₂ of a 1.00 nm box, φₙ = √(2/L) sin(nπx/L). Then ⟨0|ψ(x₂)ψ(x₁)c₁†c₂†|0⟩/√2 at x₁ = L/4, x₂ = L/2 is −1.41 nm⁻¹, and swapping the two points gives +1.41 nm⁻¹.

The complete physical model and assumptions

Occupation-number states are written on one chosen set of orbitals, so the first question is what depends on that choice; nothing physical does. Assemble ψ(x) = Σᵢ φᵢ(x)cᵢ, x being position and spin. Its anticommutator with ψ†(y) is Σᵢ φᵢ(x)φᵢ*(y), which completeness turns into δ(x − y) for every complete orthonormal set, so ψ(x) is one operator written in many coordinate systems and ψ†(x)|0⟩ is a particle at a point. A second orbital set gets its creation operators from aₖ† = ∫dx χₖ(x)ψ†(x), the same unitary combination that takes the old kets to the new, and unitarity is exactly what keeps the anticommutators canonical. Mixing occupied orbitals among themselves multiplies a determinant by det U alone, so a determinant belongs to the subspace its orbitals span. The wavefunction is no longer postulated: it is the matrix element ⟨0|ψ(xN)⋯ψ(x₁)|Ψ⟩/√(N!), antisymmetric because the fields anticommute, and without interactions the field obeys the one-particle Schrödinger equation, so nothing is quantised twice. All of it is derived here. It stops in three places: a finite basis, which every calculation uses, turns δ(x − y) into the kernel of a projector; non-orthogonal orbitals do not anticommute canonically; and below the reduced Compton length ħ/mc = 3.86 × 10⁻¹³ m the Pauli field no longer stands in for Unit 9's Dirac field, and ψ†(x)|0⟩ stops being one localised electron.

1One operator, written in any orbitals

Units are SI, and nothing here is relativistic, so the course's metric (+, −, −, −) never enters. Let x = (r, σ) and y = (r′, σ′), with ∫dx = Σσ ∫d³r and δ(x − y) = δ³(r − r′)δσσ′ in m⁻³. Topic 10.01 gave operators cᵢ for an orthonormal set φᵢ with [cᵢ, cⱼ†]₊ = δᵢⱼ, where [A, B]₊ ≡ AB + BA. Assemble ψ(x) = Σᵢ φᵢ(x)cᵢ. Then [ψ(x), ψ†(y)]₊ = Σᵢ φᵢ(x)φᵢ*(y), which completeness makes δ(x − y), and [ψ(x), ψ(y)]₊ = 0 likewise, both derived. Only completeness was used, so every complete orthonormal set gives the same algebra. Dimensions agree: cᵢ is a pure number and φᵢ carries m⁻³⁄², so both sides are in m⁻³. On the vacuum, ψ†(x)|0⟩ = Σᵢ φᵢ*(x)|φᵢ⟩ = |x⟩, a particle at r with spin σ, and in the one-particle limit ⟨0|ψ(x)cᵢ†|0⟩ = φᵢ(x): an orbital is the field's vacuum-to-one-particle amplitude. For hydrogen's 1s state at the nucleus that amplitude is (πa₀³)⁻¹⁄² = 1.47 × 10¹⁵ m⁻³⁄².

2Creation operators transform like kets

Any normalised orbital f gets a creation operator c†(f) = ∫dx f(x)ψ†(x), and for f = φᵢ orthonormality returns cᵢ†. Apply it to a second complete orthonormal set χₖ: aₖ† = ∫dx χₖ(x)Σᵢ φᵢ*(x)cᵢ† = Σᵢ cᵢ†⟨φᵢ|χₖ⟩. That is the matrix Uᵢₖ = ⟨φᵢ|χₖ⟩ that expands the kets, |χₖ⟩ = Σᵢ |φᵢ⟩Uᵢₖ, and the annihilators take its conjugate, aₖ = Σᵢ Uᵢₖ*cᵢ, derived. The algebra survives because U is unitary: [aₖ, aₗ†]₊ = Σᵢ Uᵢₖ*Uᵢₗ = (U†U)ₖₗ = δₖₗ, and Σₖ χₖ(x)aₖ = Σᵢ φᵢ(x)cᵢ, so ψ(x) itself never changed. A change of orbitals is a change of variables on Fock space, a canonical transformation. The orbitals must be orthonormal. Two hydrogen 1s spin-orbitals of the same spin, at H₂'s measured bond length, 0.741 Å = 1.40 a₀, overlap by the quoted S = e(−R/a₀)(1 + R/a₀ + R²/(3a₀²)) = 0.753, so their operators obey [aA, aB†]₊ = 0.753, not 0: they are not independent modes until orthogonalised.

3A determinant belongs to its occupied subspace

Now rotate only the N occupied orbitals among themselves, with an N × N unitary U. Expanding a₁†a₂†⋯aN† gives a sum over every way of choosing one cᵢ† from each factor. A term that picks an orbital twice vanishes, since (cᵢ†)² = 0, and every surviving term is a reordering of c₁†⋯cN†, which costs the sign of the permutation, so the coefficients assemble into a determinant: a₁†⋯aN†|0⟩ = det U c₁†⋯cN†|0⟩, derived. With |det U| = 1, the state changes by a phase at most: the orbitals were rearranged, the state was not. The same expansion gives the overlap of any two determinants, det S with Sᵢₖ = ⟨φᵢ|χₖ⟩ over the occupied orbitals. Mixing an occupied orbital with an empty one is different: replacing φ₂ by cos β φ₂ + sin β φ₃ gives det S = cos β, so at β = 20° the new determinant keeps 0.940 of the old amplitude and 0.883 of its probability. That is why Hartree-Fock in topic 10.06 can fix only the occupied subspace, and why canonical and localised orbitals are one state. For bosons the overlap is a permanent instead, with no signs, and the terms that pick an orbital twice survive, so even a rotation among occupied orbitals changes a boson state.

4The wavefunction is a vacuum matrix element

Take |Ψ⟩ = c₁†c₂†|0⟩. The field ψ(x₁) = Σᵢ φᵢ(x₁)cᵢ removes a particle from either orbital, with a sign for moving c₂ past c₁†: ψ(x₁)|Ψ⟩ = φ₁(x₁)c₂†|0⟩ − φ₂(x₁)c₁†|0⟩. A second field reaches the vacuum, so ⟨0|ψ(x₂)ψ(x₁)|Ψ⟩ = φ₁(x₁)φ₂(x₂) − φ₂(x₁)φ₁(x₂), and dividing by √2 gives exactly Quantum Mechanics II's normalised Slater determinant. In general Ψ(x₁, …, xN) = ⟨0|ψ(xN)⋯ψ(x₁)|Ψ⟩/√(N!), derived, with inverse |Ψ⟩ = (N!)⁻¹⁄² ∫dx₁⋯dxN Ψ ψ†(x₁)⋯ψ†(xN)|0⟩. Antisymmetry is now a theorem: swapping two arguments reorders two anticommuting fields at the cost of −1, and ψ(x)² = 0 makes Ψ vanish when two arguments coincide. Dimensions check, Ψ carrying m(−3N/2), and so does measurement: the field gives c†(1s↑)c†(2s↑)|0⟩ a spatially antisymmetric wavefunction, which keeps the electrons apart, and helium's 1s2s triplet lies 0.796 eV below the singlet, at 19.820 against 20.616 eV above the ground state.

5The field moves by the one-particle Schrödinger equation

Without interactions, use the orbitals that diagonalise h = −ħ²∇²/2m + u(r), with u(r) the one-body potential energy, so hφᵢ = εᵢφᵢ and H = Σⱼ εⱼcⱼ†cⱼ, the non-relativistic form of Unit 9's mode sum. The identity [A, BC] = [A, B]₊C − B[A, C]₊ gives [cᵢ, cⱼ†cⱼ] = δᵢⱼcᵢ, so the Heisenberg equation iħ dcᵢ/dt = [cᵢ, H] = εᵢcᵢ has cᵢ(t) = cᵢe(−iεᵢt/ħ). Then ψ(x, t) = Σᵢ φᵢ(x)e(−iεᵢt/ħ)cᵢ and iħ∂ψ/∂t = hψ(x, t), derived: the field operator obeys exactly the equation a one-particle wavefunction obeys, and since ⟨0|ψ(x, t) = ⟨0|ψ(x)e(−iHt/ħ), every argument of the recovered Ψ evolves by its own h. Commutators give the same δᵢⱼcᵢ through [A, BC] = [A, B]C + B[A, C], so bosons and fermions share their dynamics and differ only in the algebra. The one-particle limit meets experiment in hydrogen, where εₙ = −13.6 eV/n² gives the 10.2 eV line measured at 121.6 nm. Topic 10.04's interaction adds ∫dy ψ†(y)V(x − y)ψ(y)ψ(x), quoted here, and the equation stops being linear in ψ.

6A finite basis turns δ into a projector

Every calculation keeps finitely many orbitals. With M of them, ψM(x) = Σᵢ₌₁ᴹ φᵢ(x)cᵢ still has [cᵢ, cⱼ†]₊ = δᵢⱼ exactly, but the field anticommutator becomes PM(x, y) = Σᵢ₌₁ᴹ φᵢ(x)φᵢ*(y), the kernel of the projector onto the span. It is idempotent, its trace ∫dx PM(x, x) is M, and it reproduces a function only if the function lies in the span. For sine orbitals in a box of width L, PM(L/2, L/2) is 2/L times the number of odd n ≤ M: a peak of height near M/L and width near L/M that becomes δ only as M → ∞. Inside the span, everything above is exact algebra; the error is what the span leaves out, and it differs from correlation. Helium shows the split: the best single hydrogen-like 1s function, e(−Z′r/a₀) with Z′ = 27/16, gives Quantum Mechanics II's −77.49 eV, the complete-basis Hartree-Fock limit of topic 10.08 is −77.87 eV, and the measured energy is −79.0 eV, so 0.38 eV is basis error and about 1.1 eV is correlation, which no basis removes from one determinant.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

The field operator and its anticommutator

[ψ(x), ψ†(y)]₊ = Σᵢ φᵢ(x) φᵢ*(y) = δ(x − y)

Derived from [cᵢ, cⱼ†]₊ = δᵢⱼ and completeness alone, so no complete orthonormal basis is singled out.

ψ(x) = Σᵢ φᵢ(x)cᵢ; x = (r, σ); φᵢ and ψ in m⁻³⁄², δ in m⁻³; [A, B]₊ ≡ AB + BA

Creation operators change basis like kets

aₖ† = Σᵢ cᵢ† Uᵢₖ, with Uᵢₖ = ⟨φᵢ|χₖ⟩

Derived from aₖ† = ∫dx χₖ(x)ψ†(x). Then [aₖ, aₗ†]₊ = (U†U)ₖₗ = δₖₗ: unitarity is exactly what keeps the algebra canonical.

U is dimensionless and unitary, the matrix in |χₖ⟩ = Σᵢ |φᵢ⟩Uᵢₖ; annihilators take U*: aₖ = Σᵢ Uᵢₖ* cᵢ

Overlap of two determinants

⟨0|cN⋯c₁ a₁†⋯aN†|0⟩ = det S, with Sᵢₖ = ⟨φᵢ|χₖ⟩

Derived by expanding every aₖ† and reordering. If the χₖ only rotate the occupied φᵢ, S = U and the state changes by the phase det U.

i and k run over the N occupied orbitals of each determinant; S is N × N and dimensionless

The wavefunction recovered

Ψ(x₁, …, xN) = ⟨0|ψ(xN)⋯ψ(x₁)|Ψ⟩ / √(N!)

Derived. Swapping two arguments reorders two anticommuting fields, so Ψ changes sign with no postulate added, and ψ(x)² = 0 makes Ψ vanish at coincident points.

Ψ in m(−3N/2), so that ∫|Ψ|² over all N coordinates is a pure number; the operator order fixes the sign convention

The free field obeys Schrödinger's equation

iħ ∂ψ(x, t)/∂t = [ψ(x, t), H] = h ψ(x, t)

Derived from [cᵢ, cⱼ†cⱼ] = δᵢⱼcᵢ, which bosons share. The equation is the old one; the statistics sit in the anticommutator.

H = Σᵢ εᵢ cᵢ†cᵢ with hφᵢ = εᵢφᵢ; h = −ħ²∇²/2m + u(r) in J; ħ = 1.055 × 10⁻³⁴ J s

Anticommutator in a finite basis

[ψM(x), ψM†(y)]₊ = Σᵢ₌₁ᴹ φᵢ(x) φᵢ*(y) ≡ PM(x, y)

Derived. It acts as δ(x − y) only on functions inside the span; whatever lies outside is basis error, which no algebra recovers.

ψM keeps M orbitals; PM, in m⁻³, is the kernel of the projector onto their span, and ∫dx PM(x, x) = M
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

0 °
0 to 180 °; steps of 5.
0 °
0 to 90 °; steps of 5.
0.30 L
0.1 to 0.9 L; steps of 0.05.

Try this. Sweep θ from 0° to 180°: the orbitals swing through each other and return negated, yet Ψ and det S never move. Then raise β: mixing in the empty φ₃ is the only change that alters the state, and at 90° the overlap reaches 0. Move x₂ and the node follows it.

Live results

OVERLAP det S
1.000
OCCUPATION OF φ₃
0.000
WEIGHT OF φ₁ IN χ₁
1.000
Ψ(L/4, x₂) × L
-0.193

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Advanced Quantum Mechanics modelTwo spin-up electrons in a box of width L. Top: occupied orbitals χ₁ and χ₂ after φ₂ is mixed with the empty φ₃ by β = 0° and the occupied pair is rotated by θ = 0°. Open circles mark χ₁ and χ₂ at x₂. Bottom: the recovered ⟨0|ψ(x₂)ψ(x₁)|Ψ⟩/√2, real here, against x₁ at x₂ = 0.30 L; it vanishes at x₁ = x₂. Overlap with c₁†c₂†|0⟩, det S = cos β: 1.000.orbitals χ₁ solid, χ₂ dasheddet S = 1.000Ψ × L against x₁; node at x₁ = x₂ = 0.30 L0L
Two spin-up electrons in a box of width L. Top: occupied orbitals χ₁ and χ₂ after φ₂ is mixed with the empty φ₃ by β = 0° and the occupied pair is rotated by θ = 0°. Open circles mark χ₁ and χ₂ at x₂. Bottom: the recovered ⟨0|ψ(x₂)ψ(x₁)|Ψ⟩/√2, real here, against x₁ at x₂ = 0.30 L; it vanishes at x₁ = x₂. Overlap with c₁†c₂†|0⟩, det S = cos β: 1.000.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Occupied rotation θ: 0 °; Mixing with empty φ₃, β: 0 °; Second electron x₂: 0.30 L

Baseline 0; choose 0 to 180, in steps of 5.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

Reading ψ(x) as the wavefunction promoted to an operator leads to two wrong expectations: that ⟨Ψ|ψ(x)|Ψ⟩ should return the wavefunction, and that iħ∂ψ/∂t = hψ is a new, second-quantised law. For any state with a definite number of particles ⟨Ψ|ψ(x)|Ψ⟩ = 0, because ψ(x) removes one particle and leaves a state orthogonal to |Ψ⟩. The wavefunction is the amplitude between the N-particle state and the vacuum, ⟨0|ψ(xN)⋯ψ(x₁)|Ψ⟩/√(N!), and it has N arguments, not one. Nothing is quantised twice: the field obeys the same Schrödinger equation as a single particle, and what is new is the anticommutator, which carries the statistics, and the Fock space, which lets the number of particles change. At fixed N the formalism is a change of notation that reproduces every first-quantised result and adds none.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

Helium's closed shell c↑†c↓†|0⟩ puts both electrons in one 1s orbital, spin quantised along z. Requantise along an axis at 60° to z in the xz-plane, whose spin-up and spin-down spinors are (cos 30°, sin 30°) and (−sin 30°, cos 30°). Write the new operators b↑† and b↓†, check their anticommutators, and express b↑†b↓†|0⟩ in the old basis.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

Two spin-up electrons in a one-dimensional box of width L = 1.00 nm, with orbitals φₙ = √(2/L) sin(nπx/L) and εₙ = n² × 0.376 eV, start at t = 0 in |Ψ⟩ = (c₁†c₂† + c₁†c₃†)|0⟩/√2. Use the field's Heisenberg equation to find Ψ(x₁, x₂, t), and evaluate |Ψ|² at x₁ = L/4, x₂ = L/2 at t = 0 and half a beat period later.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

Spin-up electrons in a box of width L = 1.00 nm are described with only the lowest M orbitals φₙ = √(2/L) sin(nπx/L). For M = 3, evaluate the field anticommutator at x = y = L/2 and at x = L/2, y = 0.3L, and its trace. Then for the normalised orbital f(x) = √(30/L⁵) x(L − x), find [c(f), c†(f)]₊ with c†(f) = ∫dx f(x)ψM†(x), and the smallest M that brings it within 10⁻⁵ of 1.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

Spin-orbitals φ₁ and φ₂ are occupied in Φ = c₁†c₂†|0⟩. New orbitals χ₁ and χ₂ rotate them through θ = 60°: a₁† = cos θ c₁† + sin θ c₂† and a₂† = −sin θ c₁† + cos θ c₂†. What is the overlap of Φ with Φ′ = a₁†a₂†|0⟩?
7

Review & continue

The field operator ψ(x) = Σᵢ φᵢ(x)cᵢ removes a particle at position r with spin σ; it is the same operator whichever complete orthonormal orbitals expand it, and its matrix elements between the vacuum and an N-particle state are that state's wavefunction.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.