Skip to main content

Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson

Series termination and the exact Dirac–Coulomb energies

This is where the Dirac energy Quantum Mechanics II quoted stops being a formula you trust and becomes one you produce. Factor the two limits off G and F, and what is left is a recursion that one number per order controls; demand radial functions you can normalise and that number must vanish, which hands you every bound level at once.

UAQM-07.06 · Lesson 6 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.
Starting model: Series termination and the exact Dirac–Coulomb energiesBinding energy in units of Z² × 13.606 eV against N = ZαE/(ħcλ) for Z = 80. Every point on the solid Dirac curve is a trial energy that already meets both limits; the series stops only at the dots N = nᵣ + γ, here with γ = 0.8119 for κ = -1. The ring is the nᵣ = 0 slot, filled only for negative κ. The dashed curve is Bohr's 1/N², the Zα → 0 limit.binding b, units of Z² RyN = ZαE/(ħcλ)123ring: nᵣ = 0 (κ ≤ −1 only)dots: N = nᵣ + γκ = −1, γ = 0.8119solid: Dirac, Z = 80dashed: Bohr, 1/N²
Start with a picture. Change the model in the lab below.
1

Build the model

Normalisability stops the series, and the stopping condition is the spectrum.

The key idea

The exact Dirac–Coulomb energies are the values of E at which the power series left in G and F, once rγ and e(−λr) are factored off, end at a finite degree nᵣ; at every other E the radial functions grow as e(λr) and cannot be normalised.

Example. In hydrogen-like iron, Z = 26, Zα = 0.18973 and γ = 0.98184 for κ = ±1. The 2S₁/₂ series ends after one extra term only if ZαE/(ħcλ) = 1 + γ = 1.98184, which fixes the binding at 2325.7 eV, 1.15% deeper than Bohr's 2299.4 eV.

The complete physical model and assumptions

Topic 7.05 fixed how G and F behave at the two ends of the radial line, as rγ near the nucleus with γ = √(κ² − (Zα)²) and as e(−λr) far away with λ = √(m²c⁴ − E²)/(ħc). Factor both off and power series remain. Substituting them into the coupled first-order equations gives a two-term recursion: each pair of coefficients (gₛ, fₛ) follows from the pair before by a 2 × 2 solve whose determinant, s(s + 2γ), vanishes only at s = 0, where it is the indicial equation. Every step is driven along one fixed direction, so the pair recursion collapses onto a single scalar dₛ = λgₛ + k₊fₛ obeying Kummer's recursion, with ratio 2λ(s + γ − N)/[s(s + 2γ)] and N = ZαE/(ħcλ). For large s that ratio is 2λ/s, so an unstopped series sums like e(2λr) and the radial functions grow as e(λr), as in Quantum Mechanics II's Schrödinger atom. A normalisable state therefore needs the series to stop at some degree nᵣ, which happens only when N = nᵣ + γ, and that single condition is the energy E = mc²[1 + (Zα)²/(nᵣ + γ)²](−1/2). Whether a series may stop at its first term is a question of sign: yes only for κ ≤ −1. The model is one electron, a point nucleus of infinite mass and a classical Coulomb field. It ends when Zα reaches |κ| and γ stops being real, and even in hydrogen, with the reduced mass restored, the measured ionisation energy falls 2.5 parts per million short of it: the Lamb shift it omits.

1Factor off both limits and collect powers of r

Units are SI with ħ and c kept. The course's metric, diag(1, −1, −1, −1), is not needed here, since everything happens in the rest frame of the nucleus. Topic 7.04's radial equations, for ψ = ((G/r)χκᵐ, i(F/r)χ(−κ)ᵐ) with σ⋅r̂ χκᵐ = −χ(−κ)ᵐ, read G′ = −(κ/r)G + (k₊ + Zα/r)F and F′ = (κ/r)F + (k₋ − Zα/r)G, with k± = (mc² ± E)/(ħc). Topic 7.05 supplied λ = √(k₊k₋) and γ = √(κ² − (Zα)²). Write G = e(−λr) rγ Σ gₛ rˢ and F = e(−λr) rγ Σ fₛ rˢ and substitute. Differentiation brings down (s + γ)gₛ rˢ⁻¹ − λgₛ rˢ, and matching the coefficient of rˢ⁻¹ on both sides gives (s + γ + κ)gₛ − Zα fₛ = λgₛ₋₁ + k₊fₛ₋₁ and (s + γ − κ)fₛ + Zα gₛ = λfₛ₋₁ + k₋gₛ₋₁, derived. Dimensions check order by order: λ and k± are inverse lengths, so λgₛ₋₁ carries the units of gₛ, and Zα is a pure number.

2Each order is a 2 × 2 solve driven by one scalar

Read the pair as a matrix acting on (gₛ, fₛ). Its determinant is (s + γ)² − κ² + (Zα)² = s(s + 2γ), using γ² = κ² − (Zα)². At s = 0 nothing drives the step, so the determinant must vanish: that is topic 7.05's indicial equation, and it leaves f₀/g₀ = (γ + κ)/(Zα). For s ≥ 1 the determinant is non-zero, so g₀ fixes everything. Now the right-hand sides. Because λ² = k₊k₋, the second, λfₛ₋₁ + k₋gₛ₋₁, is exactly λ/k₊ times the first, λgₛ₋₁ + k₊fₛ₋₁. Every step is pushed along the fixed direction (1, λ/k₊) with one amplitude dₛ₋₁ = λgₛ₋₁ + k₊fₛ₋₁. Inverting the matrix and forming dₛ gives dₛ = dₛ₋₁ × 2[λ(s + γ) − ZαE/(ħc)]/[s(s + 2γ)], derived, the energy entering through k₊ − k₋ = 2E/(ħc). With N = ZαE/(ħcλ) the bracket is λ(s + γ − N). For hydrogen's 2S₁/₂ the recursion gives f₀/g₀ = −0.00365 and g₁/g₀ = −0.50001 Z/a₀, and d₁ comes out zero.

3An unstopped series sums to e(2λr)

The ratio dₛ/dₛ₋₁ = 2λ(s + γ − N)/[s(s + 2γ)] tends to 2λ/s as s grows, the ratio of successive terms of e(2λr). So Σ dₛ rˢ converges at every radius and nothing goes wrong at finite r; the failure is at infinity. Matching the recursion to Kummer's series identifies the sum as d₀ M(1 + γ − N, 2γ + 1, 2λr), the confluent hypergeometric function of Quantum Mechanics II's Schrödinger atom, now with the non-integer parameter 2γ + 1. Its large-argument form, quoted, is Γ(2γ + 1)/Γ(1 + γ − N) times e(2λr)(2λr)(−γ−N). Multiplied by the e(−λr) factored off, G and F grow as e(λr) r(−N), and ∫(G² + F²) dr diverges. The prefactor 1/Γ(1 + γ − N) vanishes only when 1 + γ − N is zero or a negative integer, so the growing piece can be switched off only at N = γ + 1, γ + 2, …, or by making d₀ itself zero, the nᵣ = 0 case met two sections on. The next section reaches the same condition from the recursion alone.

4Stopping the series fixes the energy

To stop at degree nᵣ, the amplitude dₙᵣ must vanish while gₙᵣ and fₙᵣ do not; every later step then has nothing to drive it. For nᵣ ≥ 1 the scalar recursion allows this only through its factor (s + γ − N) at s = nᵣ, so ZαE/(ħcλ) = nᵣ + γ, derived; the nᵣ = 0 case, taken up below, gives the same condition with nᵣ = 0. Square it and use (ħcλ)² = m²c⁴ − E²: (Zα)²E² = (nᵣ + γ)²(m²c⁴ − E²), so E = mc²[1 + (Zα)²/(nᵣ + γ)²](−1/2), the positive root because N is positive. Dimensions: the bracket is a pure number and E carries mc². Limit: as Zα → 0, γ → |κ| and E → mc² − mc²(Zα)²/(2n²) with n = nᵣ + |κ|, Bohr's levels. Measurement: for hydrogen's 1S₁/₂, with α = 1/137.035999, mc² − E = 13.6058742 eV for an infinitely heavy point proton; the reduced-mass factor 0.99945568 brings it to 13.5984683 eV against the measured ionisation energy, 13.5984346 eV. The 33.7 μeV left over, 2.5 parts per million, is the 1S Lamb shift, which no Dirac–Coulomb level contains.

5Which κ may stop at once, and how the shells fill

For nᵣ = 0 the series is a single term, so d₀ itself must vanish: f₀/g₀ = −λ/k₊ = −√((mc² − E)/(mc² + E)), the negative ratio the large-r equations demand. The origin has already fixed f₀/g₀ = (γ + κ)/(Zα). Since γ is less than |κ|, γ + κ has the sign of κ, so the two ratios can agree only for κ ≤ −1, where they agree at exactly one energy, E = mc²γ/|κ|, the nᵣ = 0 energy. For κ ≥ 1 the lowest degree is nᵣ = 1. Define n = nᵣ + |κ|. A shell then holds |κ| = 1 to n, with |κ| = n reached only through κ = −n: j = n − ½ appears once and every lower j twice, each with 2j + 1 = 2|κ| states, 2n² in all. For n = 2 that is 2S₁/₂ (κ = −1, nᵣ = 1), 2P₁/₂ (κ = +1, nᵣ = 1) and 2P₃/₂ (κ = −2, nᵣ = 0), 2 + 2 + 4 = 8 states. Because nᵣ + γ = n − |κ| + √(κ² − (Zα)²), E depends on n and |κ| = j + ½ alone, so 2S₁/₂ and 2P₁/₂ coincide to all orders in Zα. Fixing g₀ by ∫(G² + F²) dr = 1 normalises the state; its general closed form, a product of Γ functions, is not derived here, and no energy depends on it.

2

Key equations

Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.

Both limits factored off

G = e(−λr) rγ Σ gₛ rˢ, F = e(−λr) rγ Σ fₛ rˢ, s = 0, 1, 2, …

An exact rewrite, not an approximation. Once g₀ is chosen the recursion fixes every other coefficient, so all the physics lies in whether the sums stop.

λ = √(m²c⁴ − E²)/(ħc) in m⁻¹; γ = √(κ² − (Zα)²), a pure number (topic 7.05); G and F in m(−1/2)

Two-term recursion, derived

(s + γ + κ)gₛ − Zα fₛ = dₛ₋₁, (s + γ − κ)fₛ + Zα gₛ = (λ/k₊)dₛ₋₁

The 2 × 2 step has determinant s(s + 2γ): zero at s = 0, which is the indicial equation for γ, and non-zero after, so each order follows from the one before.

dₛ = λgₛ + k₊fₛ with d₋₁ = 0; k± = (mc² ± E)/(ħc) in m⁻¹ and λ = √(k₊k₋)

One scalar carries the series, derived

dₛ = dₛ₋₁ × 2λ(s + γ − N)/[s(s + 2γ)], N = ZαE/(ħcλ)

For large s the ratio tends to 2λ/s, so an unstopped series sums like e(2λr) and G and F grow as e(λr), as in Quantum Mechanics II's radial problem.

N is a pure number, E/(ħc) and λ both being in m⁻¹. Summed, Σ dₛ rˢ = d₀ M(1 + γ − N, 2γ + 1, 2λr), Kummer's function

Termination condition, derived

ZαE/(ħcλ) = nᵣ + γ, nᵣ = 0, 1, 2, …

The only way to make dₙᵣ vanish and every later coefficient with it. Normalisability, not a new postulate, is what quantises the energy.

nᵣ is the common degree of the polynomials in G and F; ħc = 197.327 MeV fm and α = 1/137.036

Exact Dirac–Coulomb energy, derived

E = mc² [1 + (Zα)²/(nᵣ + γ)²](−1/2)

As Zα → 0 it gives mc² − mc²(Zα)²/(2n²) with n = nᵣ + |κ|, and with |κ| = j + ½ it is the energy Quantum Mechanics II quoted. Hydrogen 1S₁/₂: 13.6059 eV bound.

E in J or eV with the rest energy included, mc² = 0.511 MeV; binding is mc² − E; real only while Zα is below |κ|

Which states may stop at the first term, derived

nᵣ = 0 needs f₀/g₀ = (γ + κ)/(Zα) to equal −λ/k₊, so κ ≤ −1

γ is below |κ|, so γ + κ has κ's sign. Then n = nᵣ + |κ| holds j = n − ½ once and each lower j twice: 2n² states, Bohr's count.

(γ + κ)/(Zα) is fixed at the origin; −λ/k₊ = −√((mc² − E)/(mc² + E)), always negative, is fixed at infinity
3

Interactive lab

Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.

Explore the model

80
1 to 100; steps of 1.
1
1 to 3; steps of 1.
−1
−1 to 1; steps of 2.

Try this. Keep κ = −1 and slide Z from 1 to 100: the dots slip left of the whole-number ticks by 1 − γ and bind more deeply than Bohr's levels above those ticks. Then flip the sign to +1: the ring empties but no other dot moves, because κ = +1 repeats every rung of κ = −1 except the first.

Live results

γ = √(κ² − (Zα)²)
0.8119
LOWEST N = nᵣ + γ
0.8119
LOWEST LEVEL BINDING
96115.8 eV
BINDING ÷ BOHR, SAME n
1.1038

Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.

Interactive Advanced Quantum Mechanics modelBinding energy in units of Z² × 13.606 eV against N = ZαE/(ħcλ) for Z = 80. Every point on the solid Dirac curve is a trial energy that already meets both limits; the series stops only at the dots N = nᵣ + γ, here with γ = 0.8119 for κ = -1. The ring is the nᵣ = 0 slot, filled only for negative κ. The dashed curve is Bohr's 1/N², the Zα → 0 limit.binding b, units of Z² RyN = ZαE/(ħcλ)123ring: nᵣ = 0 (κ ≤ −1 only)dots: N = nᵣ + γκ = −1, γ = 0.8119solid: Dirac, Z = 80dashed: Bohr, 1/N²
Binding energy in units of Z² × 13.606 eV against N = ZαE/(ħcλ) for Z = 80. Every point on the solid Dirac curve is a trial energy that already meets both limits; the series stops only at the dots N = nᵣ + γ, here with γ = 0.8119 for κ = −1. The ring is the nᵣ = 0 slot, filled only for negative κ. The dashed curve is Bohr's 1/N², the Zα → 0 limit.

Predict → change one variable → check

Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.

Saved baseline. Nuclear charge Z: 80; |κ| = j + ½: 1; Sign of κ: −1

Baseline 80; choose 1 to 100, in steps of 1.
4. Compared with the saved baseline, this result will…

This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.

4

Catch the common trap

The tempting shortcut is to reuse the Schrödinger count nᵣ = n − l − 1 with l the upper component's orbital label. It works for κ ≤ −1, where l = |κ| − 1, but fails for every j = l − ½ state: there κ = +l, so nᵣ = n − |κ| = n − l, one more. Put nᵣ = 0 into 2P₁/₂ and the energy formula returns mc²γ, the 1S₁/₂ energy, for a level no spectrum shows; and an nᵣ = 0 series does not exist for κ = +1 at all, because its component ratios at the origin and at infinity have opposite signs. The Dirac nᵣ is the degree of the polynomial shared by G and F, set by |κ| = j + ½, not by l. Hydrogen's 2P₁/₂ shows where the extra degree goes: its G has no node, but its F, an l′ = 0 wave, crosses zero at 6.0 a₀.

5

Practice & worked examples

3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.

EasyExample 1

Singly ionised helium is hydrogen-like with Z = 2. Use the termination condition to find the exact 1S₁/₂ energy for a point nucleus, then compare its binding with Bohr's value and, after the reduced-mass factor μ/m = 0.999863, with the measured ionisation energy of 54.417765 eV.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

MediumExample 2

For hydrogen-like zirconium, Z = 40, list every n = 3 state by κ and nᵣ, check that the count of states is 2n², and use the termination condition to find the exact binding energy of each distinct level. Compare with Bohr's value.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 5 steps revealed.

HardExample 3

For the 2S₁/₂ state of hydrogen-like mercury, Z = 80, run the series by hand: find f₀/g₀, the s = 1 coefficients and the radii, in units of a₀/Z, at which G and F vanish. Compare with the non-relativistic nodes at 2 and 4 a₀/Z, the second from F ≈ (ħ/2mc)(G′ − G/r), and say whether the density (G² + F²)/r² has a node.

Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.

0 of 6 steps revealed.

6

Quick check

Select an answer and explain it before checking.

Solving the Coulomb radial equations by series, a student lets the κ = +1 series stop at its first term, nᵣ = 0, hoping to find a level below 2P₁/₂. What actually goes wrong?
7

Review & continue

The exact Dirac–Coulomb energies are the values of E at which the power series left in G and F, once rγ and e(−λr) are factored off, end at a finite degree nᵣ; at every other E the radial functions grow as e(λr) and cannot be normalised.

  • Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
  • Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
  • Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.

Extra challenging questions

Connect several ideas, explore supplied data, and compare your reasoning with a worked solution.