
Advanced Quantum Mechanics course sequence · Interactive lesson
Dirac's requirements and the algebra of α and β
Dirac did not guess his equation. He listed what a relativistic wave equation must do, wrote the most general Hamiltonian that could do it, and let the algebra choose its coefficients. Work through that once and the multi-component wavefunction stops looking arbitrary: it is what the arithmetic demands.
UAQM-04.01 · Lesson 1 of 9 in this unit. Position is not a completion score.Build the model
Ask a first-order Hamiltonian to square to Klein-Gordon, and numbers stop working.
The key idea
Dirac's requirements are that the Hamiltonian H = cα⋅p + βmc² be Hermitian and square to p²c² + m²c⁴; they hold exactly when α₁, α₂, α₃ and β are Hermitian, square to 1 and anticommute in pairs, which no ordinary numbers can do.
Example. For an electron with p = 1.00 MeV/c along the 3-axis, H² = (1.00² + 0.511²) MeV² = 1.261 MeV², so E = ±1.123 MeV. Had β equalled α₃, the cross term 2cp mc² = 1.022 MeV² would survive and E would be ±1.511 MeV instead.
The complete physical model and assumptions
Dirac's equation answers a list of demands; it is not a guess. Unit 3 found that the Klein-Gordon equation, second order in time, takes ψ and ∂ψ/∂t as independent initial data and so carries a conserved density that can go negative. Dirac kept the Schrödinger form iħ ∂ψ/∂t = Hψ, and because relativity treats time and space alike he made H first order in the space derivatives too: H = cα⋅p + βmc², with dimensionless coefficients that depend on neither position, time nor momentum. Two demands then fix those coefficients. H must be Hermitian, for real energies and a conserved norm, so each αᵢ and β is Hermitian. And H² must equal p²c² + m²c⁴, so that every component obeys the Klein-Gordon equation; squaring H without letting its coefficients commute shows this holds only if αᵢ² = β² = 1 and all six pairs anticommute. No numbers anticommute, so the coefficients are matrices and ψ is a column of components that nobody put in by hand. The argument stops in three places. It does not fix the size of the matrices, which is the next topic. It assumes Lorentz covariance, which Unit 5 proves. And it cannot remove negative energies: H only squares to a positive operator, and β must have the eigenvalue −1 as well as +1, a level at −mc² whose meaning waits for Unit 8.
1What Unit 3 left Dirac to repair
This lesson uses SI units with ħ and c written out, and the metric signature (+, −, −, −) with xμ = (ct, x). Unit 3's Klein-Gordon equation gives every plane wave the right E² = p²c² + m²c⁴, but its conserved density ρ = (iħ/2mc²)(ψ*∂ψ/∂t − ψ∂ψ*/∂t) is (E/mc²)|ψ|² on a plane wave, negative whenever E is negative (quoted from Unit 3). The cause is the second time derivative: ψ and ∂ψ/∂t are independent initial data, and the density has to involve both. That sinks the equation only as a one-particle wave equation: as a field theory, with ρ read as a charge density, the Klein-Gordon equation describes spin-0 particles such as the charged pions correctly, quoted here. Dirac wanted a one-particle equation for the electron, and kept the Schrödinger form iħ ∂ψ/∂t = Hψ, first order, so that ψ alone fixes the future and a density with no time derivative in it becomes possible. Relativity sets ct beside x, so one ∂/∂t calls for one ∇: H must be linear in p = −iħ∇. With coefficients independent of x and t, which is what a free particle in uniform space-time allows, the most general choice is H = cα⋅p + βmc². Dimensions check at once: cp and mc² are both energies, so α and β are dimensionless. For an electron with p = 1.00 MeV/c the two terms are 1.00 MeV and 0.511 MeV, comparable, so neither can be dropped.
2Hermitian coefficients keep the norm
The first demand is the one every quantum Hamiltonian meets. From iħ ∂ψ/∂t = Hψ and its adjoint, d⟨ψ|ψ⟩/dt = (i/ħ)⟨ψ|(H† − H)|ψ⟩, which vanishes for every state only if H† = H; the same condition makes the energies real. Take the adjoint term by term. Each pᵢ = −iħ∂ᵢ is Hermitian, and constant matrices commute with derivatives, so (cαᵢpᵢ)† = c pᵢαᵢ† = cαᵢ†pᵢ. Then H† − H = c Σᵢ(αᵢ† − αᵢ)pᵢ + (β† − β)mc². On a plane wave this must vanish for every momentum: p = 0 kills the β bracket, and p along each axis in turn kills each α bracket. So αᵢ† = αᵢ and β† = β, derived. Two facts come free. Each coefficient has real eigenvalues and an orthonormal set of eigenvectors. And if one set αᵢ, β works, so does UαᵢU†, UβU† for any unitary U, because a change of basis among the components preserves both Hermiticity and every product: the demands fix an algebra, not one particular set of matrices.
3Squaring H without letting anything commute
The second demand is that every component of ψ obey the Klein-Gordon equation, so each free wave carries E² = p²c² + m²c⁴. H does not depend on t, so applying iħ ∂/∂t twice gives −ħ² ∂²ψ/∂t² = H²ψ, and the demand becomes H² = (p²c² + m²c⁴)1. Expand H² keeping every product in order: c²Σᵢⱼ αᵢαⱼpᵢpⱼ + mc³Σᵢ(αᵢβ + βαᵢ)pᵢ + β²m²c⁴. Since p₁p₂ = p₂p₁, the coefficient of p₁p₂ is α₁α₂ + α₂α₁, not 2α₁α₂. Now match powers of p, which is arbitrary: p₁² gives α₁² = 1, p₁p₂ gives α₁α₂ + α₂α₁ = 0, the linear term gives α₁β + βα₁ = 0, and the constant gives β² = 1. Over i = 1, 2, 3 that is ten conditions, all derived. The linear term is the one to watch. For an electron with cp = mc² = 0.511 MeV along the 3-axis the target is E² = 0.261 + 0.261 = 0.522 MeV², so E = ±0.723 MeV, √2 times the rest energy. Were β equal to α₃, the cross term would add 2 × 0.511 × 0.511 = 0.522 MeV², doubling E² and giving ±1.022 MeV = ±(cp + mc²), an energy linear in p.
4Why no numbers will do
For two ordinary numbers, real or complex, ab + ba = 2ab, which is zero only if a = 0 or b = 0, and α₁² = β² = 1 forbids both. So the coefficients are N × N matrices and ψ is a column (ψ₁, …, ψN) of functions: the Dirac equation is N coupled first-order equations. Because H² is the identity times p²c² + m²c⁴, each component separately obeys the Klein-Gordon equation, while H itself ties the components together. Nothing about spin was assumed; the components came from asking a first-order H to square correctly. The massless limit is a check. At m = 0, β drops out and only three anticommuting matrices are needed, which the Pauli matrices supply: σᵢσⱼ = δᵢⱼ + iεᵢⱼₖσₖ gives σᵢσⱼ + σⱼσᵢ = 2δᵢⱼ, so H = cσ⋅p, with two components, squares to p²c². That is Weyl's equation for a massless spin-half particle, quoted here. It is the mass, needing a fourth matrix that anticommutes with all three, that forces more components; the next topic proves N ≥ 4.
5What the algebra already fixes about the spectrum
Some results need no representation. If a Hermitian matrix squares to 1 and Mv = λv, then v = M²v = λ²v, so λ = ±1: every αᵢ and β has eigenvalues +1 and −1 only. Nor can β be +1 or −1 throughout, for then αᵢβ + βαᵢ = ±2αᵢ, which is not zero. So β has both eigenvalues, and at rest, where H = βmc², the free particle has levels at +mc² and −mc², 2mc² = 1.022 MeV apart for an electron. Compare with measurement: the positive level is the rest energy 0.511 MeV, the energy of each photon when an electron and a positron annihilate at rest, the 511 keV line every PET scanner detects. The negative level cannot be argued away, since the anticommutator that fixed the dispersion is what forces it; Unit 8 gives it a meaning. The same argument gives α₃ the eigenvalues ±1, so cα₃ has eigenvalues ±c, a puzzle that returns when cα turns out to be the velocity operator. And for p ≪ mc the positive branch, mc²√(1 + p²/m²c²) ≈ mc² + p²/2m, hands back Schrödinger's kinetic energy.
6Derived, assumed and deferred
Keep the ledger straight. Derived here: αᵢ and β are Hermitian, square to 1 and anticommute in pairs; they cannot be numbers; their eigenvalues are ±1, with β taking both. Imposed as requirements: the first-order form, linearity in p, Hermiticity and H² = p²c² + m²c⁴. Quoted: the relativistic E² = p²c² + m²c⁴ and Unit 3's indefinite density. Assumed, not yet proved: that the equation keeps its form under Lorentz transformations. Being first order in both ∂/∂t and ∇ is necessary for that but not sufficient, because the components of ψ must also mix among themselves under a boost, and Unit 5 builds the transformation that does it. Not settled by the algebra: the matrices themselves, fixed only up to a unitary change of basis, and their size, which topic 4.2 shows is at least 4 × 4. Still to come from these four matrices: a conserved density ψ†ψ that is never negative (topic 4.4), the spin of the particle (topic 4.7) and, once a field is added by minimal coupling (topic 4.9), g = 2 in Unit 6.
Key equations
Read the units, assumptions and limits before substituting.
Dirac's ansatz
iħ ∂ψ/∂t = Hψ, with H = cα⋅p + βmc² and p = −iħ∇
Assumed form. First order in t, so ψ at one instant fixes the future; first order in ∇ as well, because relativity treats time and space alike. Covariance is proved in Unit 5.
ψ is a column of components; α = (α₁, α₂, α₃) and β are dimensionless constants; cp and mc² are energies, in J.Hermitian coefficients
αᵢ† = αᵢ and β† = β, for i = 1, 2, 3
Derived. It gives real energies and a conserved norm, d⟨ψ|ψ⟩/dt = (i/ħ)⟨ψ|(H† − H)|ψ⟩ = 0, and gives each coefficient real eigenvalues.
† is the conjugate transpose; pᵢ is Hermitian and commutes with constant matrices, so H† = H for every p demands both.Klein-Gordon for every component
H² = (p²c² + m²c⁴) 1
Imposed, so plane waves in each component obey E² = p²c² + m²c⁴. With signature (+, −, −, −) it reads (∂μ∂μ + m²c²/ħ²)ψₐ = 0 for every component a.
1 is the identity on the components; then −ħ² ∂²ψ/∂t² = (−ħ²c²∇² + m²c⁴)ψ holds component by component, each side in J² times ψ.The square with the order kept
H² = c² Σᵢⱼ αᵢαⱼ pᵢpⱼ + mc³ Σᵢ (αᵢβ + βαᵢ) pᵢ + β² m²c⁴
Derived by expanding (cα⋅p + βmc²)². The middle term, linear in p, is the one that ordinary numbers can never cancel.
Nothing says αᵢ and β commute, so αᵢβ and βαᵢ stay distinct; pᵢpⱼ = pⱼpᵢ, so pᵢpⱼ with i ≠ j carries αᵢαⱼ + αⱼαᵢ.The algebra of α and β
αᵢαⱼ + αⱼαᵢ = 2δᵢⱼ 1, αᵢβ + βαᵢ = 0, β² = 1
Derived by matching H² to p²c² + m²c⁴ power by power in p. For numbers ab + ba = 2ab, so no numbers satisfy it, and ψ must have several components.
i, j = 1, 2, 3 and δᵢⱼ is the Kronecker δ: ten conditions on four dimensionless Hermitian matrices.The Hamiltonian at rest
H(p = 0) = βmc², with eigenvalues +mc² and −mc²
Derived. The +mc² level matches the 511 keV photons of electron-positron annihilation at rest; the −mc² level is forced by the same algebra, and Unit 8 says what it means.
mc² = 0.511 MeV for the electron. β² = 1 allows only ±1, and αᵢβ + βαᵢ = 0 rules out β = ±1, so both occur.Interactive lab
Predict first. Explore the model. Compare the result.
Explore the model
Try this. Drag s to 0 and the solid branches lock onto the dashed pair: anticommuting is what removes the cross term. At s = 1, β = α acts like a number and the branches become the gapless lines ±(cp + mc²). Then set m to 0: with no mass there is no cross term, and every s works.
Live results
- E FROM H AT p₀
- 1.369 MeV
- KLEIN-GORDON E AT p₀
- 1.123 MeV
- CROSS TERM 2s mc³p₀
- 0.613 MeV²
- SOLID GAP AT ITS MINIMUM
- 0.818 MeV
Results follow this lesson’s model and assumptions. Displayed values are rounded.
Predict → change one variable → check
Plan a change before running it. Every other input stays at the saved baseline.
Saved baseline. Overlap s, where αβ + βα = 2s: 0.60; Mass m in electron masses: 1.00 mₑ; Probe momentum p₀: 1.00 MeV/c
This experiment is kept only while this page is open. It does not change saved course progress.
Catch the common trap
The tempting belief is that a first-order equation is the positive square root of the Klein-Gordon operator, so the Dirac equation keeps only E = +√(p²c² + m²c⁴) and Unit 3's negative energies are gone. They are not. The positive root exists as an operator, but it is not linear in p: expanded, it is mc² + p²/2m − p⁴/8m³c² + …, an endless series of ever higher derivatives that is non-local over the reduced Compton wavelength, ħ/mc = 3.86 × 10⁻¹³ m for an electron, and treats space and time unequally. Dirac's H is linear only because its coefficients are matrices, and the price is that H, unlike H², is not a positive operator: β must have the eigenvalue −1, so H = βmc² already gives −mc² at rest. Going first order bought a density that is never negative, which topic 4.4 derives, not an energy that is never negative.
Practice & worked examples
3 authored examples. Make an attempt, then reveal the reasoning one step at a time.
EasyExample 1
In one space dimension Dirac's Hamiltonian needs only two coefficients, H = cpα + βmc². Show that α = σ₁ and β = σ₃ meet every requirement, then find the energies of an electron (mc² = 0.511 MeV) with p = 1.50 MeV/c.
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Hermitian: σ₁ and σ₃ are Hermitian, as every Pauli matrix is, so H is Hermitian.
- Squares: σᵢσⱼ = δᵢⱼ + iεᵢⱼₖσₖ gives σ₁² = σ₃² = 1, so α² = β² = 1.
- Anticommutator: σ₁σ₃ = iε₁₃₂σ₂ = −iσ₂ and σ₃σ₁ = iε₃₁₂σ₂ = +iσ₂, so σ₁σ₃ + σ₃σ₁ = 0. Every condition holds, and in one dimension there is no second α to check.
- On a plane wave of momentum p, H is the 2 × 2 matrix with rows (mc², cp) and (cp, −mc²). Its eigenvalues λ satisfy (mc² − λ)(−mc² − λ) − (cp)² = 0, which is λ² = (cp)² + (mc²)²: the cross term is absent, exactly as the anticommutator promised.
- Numbers: λ² = 1.50² + 0.511² = 2.250 + 0.261 = 2.511 MeV², so λ = ±1.585 MeV. Checks: every term is an energy squared; at p = 0 the levels are ±0.511 MeV, the rest energies; for cp ≫ mc² they approach ±cp.
Answer. E = ±1.585 MeV: one level at +1.585 MeV and one at −1.585 MeV, both on E² = p²c² + m²c⁴.
MediumExample 2
Expand the positive root E = √(p²c² + m²c⁴) for p ≪ mc, then evaluate each term for a free electron with p = mₑαfs c, the root-mean-square momentum of hydrogen's ground state (fine-structure constant αfs = 1/137.036, not a Dirac matrix; mₑc² = 0.511 MeV). How large is the first relativistic correction compared with the kinetic energy?
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 5 steps revealed.
- Write E = mc²(1 + x)¹⁄² with x = p²/m²c² and use (1 + x)¹⁄² = 1 + x/2 − x²/8 + …, giving E = mc² + p²/2m − p⁴/8m³c² + … .
- Dimensions: p²/2m and p⁴/(m³c²) are both energies, in J. The second term is Schrödinger's kinetic energy, so the requirement H² = p²c² + m²c⁴ contains non-relativistic mechanics as its p ≪ mc limit.
- At p = mₑαfs c, x = αfs² = 5.325 × 10⁻⁵. The kinetic term is p²/2m = αfs²mₑc²/2 = (0.511 × 10⁶ eV)(5.325 × 10⁻⁵)/2 = 13.6 eV, hydrogen's binding energy, as the virial theorem requires.
- The correction is −p⁴/8m³c² = −αfs⁴mₑc²/8 = −(0.511 × 10⁶ eV)(2.836 × 10⁻⁹)/8 = −1.81 × 10⁻⁴ eV, smaller in size than the kinetic term by x/4 = αfs²/4 = 1.33 × 10⁻⁵. The exact root, mₑc²(√(1 + αfs²) − 1), agrees with the two-term sum to better than 10⁻⁸ eV.
- In the atom ⟨p⁴⟩ is not ⟨p²⟩², and Quantum Mechanics II's ground-state result −(5/8)αfs⁴mₑc² = −9.06 × 10⁻⁴ eV, quoted here, is five times this free-particle number. Its scale αfs⁴mₑc² = 1.45 × 10⁻³ eV is the fine-structure scale that Unit 6 derives from the Dirac equation itself.
Answer. E ≈ mc² + p²/2m − p⁴/8m³c²; at p = mₑαfs c the kinetic term is 13.6 eV and the correction −1.81 × 10⁻⁴ eV, a fraction αfs²/4 = 1.33 × 10⁻⁵ of it.
HardExample 3
Using only Hermiticity and the algebra αᵢαⱼ + αⱼαᵢ = 2δᵢⱼ, αᵢβ + βαᵢ = 0, β² = 1, show that Ω = α₁α₂α₃β is Hermitian, squares to 1 and anticommutes with H = cα⋅p + βmc². Deduce how the eigenvalues of H at fixed p are arranged, and give them for an electron with p = 1.20 MeV/c (mc² = 0.511 MeV).
Sketch your answer or reasoning, then compare it with the authored solution. Your writing is not automatically graded or saved.
0 of 6 steps revealed.
- Hermitian: Ω† = βα₃α₂α₁. Restoring the order α₁α₂α₃β takes 3 + 2 + 1 = 6 swaps of anticommuting neighbours, each a factor −1, so Ω† = (−1)⁶Ω = Ω.
- Square: in ΩΩ, move the second α₁ left past β, α₃ and α₂ (three swaps, −1) onto α₁² = 1; then the second α₂ past two (+1); then α₃ past one (−1). So Ω² = (−1)(+1)(−1)β² = +1.
- Anticommutation: α₁Ω = α₁α₁α₂α₃β = α₂α₃β, while Ωα₁ needs α₁ moved left past β, α₃ and α₂, three swaps, giving −α₂α₃β. So α₁Ω + Ωα₁ = 0, and likewise for α₂, α₃ and β, each of which must pass the other three. Hence ΩH = −HΩ at every p.
- Pairing: if Hw = Ew, then H(Ωw) = −ΩHw = −E(Ωw), and Ωw ≠ 0 because Ω² = 1. So Ω maps the +E eigenvectors one-to-one onto −E eigenvectors: at every momentum there are exactly as many negative-energy states as positive ones.
- Values: H² = (p²c² + m²c⁴)1 restricts every eigenvalue to ±√(1.20² + 0.511²) MeV = ±√1.701 MeV = ±1.304 MeV. With m ≠ 0 no eigenvalue is zero, so the N components split evenly and N is even; topic 4.2 reaches that by traces and also rules out N = 2.
- Checks: the eigenvalues cancel in pairs, so the trace of H is zero; at p = 0 the pairs become ±0.511 MeV, the rest levels of βmc²; with dimensions, Ω is a product of dimensionless matrices and E is an energy.
Answer. Ω is Hermitian, Ω² = 1 and ΩH = −HΩ, so eigenvalues come in pairs ±E with equal multiplicity; at p = 1.20 MeV/c, E = ±1.304 MeV, half the states at each sign.
Quick check
Select an answer and explain it before checking.
Review & continue
Dirac's requirements are that the Hamiltonian H = cα⋅p + βmc² be Hermitian and square to p²c² + m²c⁴; they hold exactly when α₁, α₂, α₃ and β are Hermitian, square to 1 and anticommute in pairs, which no ordinary numbers can do.
- Explain the relationship without looking at the equation.
- Check a sign, a unit and a model assumption in your working.
- Return to the lab or worked example if a step is still unclear.